[
Alemanno A., Simony A-L. (eds.) (2015).Nudge and the Law. A European Perspective, Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baran B., Ożóg M. (eds.) (2021). Ochrona sygnalistów. Regulacje dotyczące osób zgłaszających nieprawidłowości, Wolters Kluwer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown et al. (2014). The relationship between transparency, whistleblowing, and public trust, in: Research Handbook on Transparency, Edward Elgar.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brożek B. (2021). The Legal Mind. A New Introduction to Legal Epistemology, Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brożek B. et al. (eds.) (2019). Prawo i nauki kognitywne. Wolters Kluwer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bystranowski et al. (2021). Anchoring effect in legal decision-making: A meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior 45(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cassematis P.G., Wortley R. (2012). Prediction of Whistleblowing or Non-reporting Observation: The Role of Personal and Situational Factors, Journal of Business Ethics 117.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng X. et al. (2015). A cross-cultural comparison of whistleblowing perceptions, Int. J. Management and Decision Making 14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cserne P. (2015). Making Sense of Nudge-Scepticism: Three Challenges to EU Law’s Learning from Behavioural Sciences, in: Nudge and the Law. A European Perspective, Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dungan et al. (2015). The psychology of whistleblowing, Current Opinion in Psychology 2015, 6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Engelman S. (2017). Nudging Bentham: indirect legislation and (neo-)liberal politics, History of European Ideas 43 (1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Englich et al. (2006). Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 32(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Franco et al. (2021). Nudging as a tool – The case of the transposition of EU directives, e-Pública – Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público 8 (2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gigerenzer G., Engel C. (Eds.) (2006). Heuristics and the law. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Graaf de G. (2019). What Works: The Role of Confidential Integrity Advisors and Effective Whistleblowing, International Public Management Journal 22(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guthrie et al. (2001). Inside the Judicial Mind, Cornell Law Review 86 (4).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haidt J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Howley P., Ocean N. (2022). Can nudging only get you so far? Testing for nudge combination effects, European Review of Agricultural Economics 49 (5).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hüttl T., Léderer S. (2013) Whistleblowing in Central Europe, Public Integrity 15:3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ivanković V., Engelen B. (2019). Nudging, Transparency, and Watchfulness, Social Theory and Practice 45(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson R.A. (2003). Whistleblowing: When it Works – and why, Lynne Rienner Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelsen H. (1945). General Theory of Law and State. Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kemmerer A. et al. (2015). The Dark Side of Nudging: The Ethics, Political Economy, and Law of Libertarian Paternalism, in: Choice Architecture in Democracies, Exploring the Legitimacy of Nudging (Oxford/Baden-Baden: Hart and Nomos.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuyer P., Gordijn B. (2023). Nudge in perspective: A systematic literature review on the ethical issues with nudging, Rationality and Society 35(2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis D. (2011). Whistleblowing in a changing legal climate: is it time to revisit our approach to trust and loyalty at the workplace? Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maier, M., et al. (2022). No evidence for nudging after adjusting for publication bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(31).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mertens et al. (2022). The effectiveness of nudging: A meta-analysis of choice architecture interventions across behavioral domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 119(1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Onyango G. (2021). Whistleblower protection in developing countries: a review of challenges and prospects, SN Business & Economics vol. 1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rachagan S., Kalaithasan K. (2013). Encouraging Whistle Blowing to Improve Corporate Governance? A Malaysian Initiative, Journal of Business Ethics 115.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rookhuijzen M. et al. (2021). The Effects of Nudges: One-Shot Only? Exploring the Temporal Spillover Effects of a Default Nudge, Frontiers in Psychology 12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosa P.M. (2022). Nudging is the Architecture of Choice in the World of Banking. Online: https://www.redalyc.org/journal/840/84070847004/html/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santos Silva M. (2022). Nudging and Other Behaviourally Based Policies as Enablers for Environmental Sustainability, Laws 2022, 11(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/laws11010009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sasaki S. et al. (2021). Effective but fragile? Responses to repeated nudge-based messages for preventing the spread of COVID-19 infection, The Japanese Economic Review 72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith V.L. (2003). Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics, American Economic Review 93.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sustein C.R. 2015, Nudging and Choice Architecture: Ethical Considerations, Yale Journal on Regulation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sustein K. (2015). The Ethics of Nudging, in: Nudge and the Law. A European Perspective, Bloomsbury.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szaszi, B., et al. (2022). No reason to expect large and consistent effects of nudge interventions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(31).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teichmann M.F., Falker M-C. (2020). Whistlebowing Incentives, Journal of Financial Crime.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thaler, R. H., Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Todd P.M., Gigerenzer G. (eds.) (2012). Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, New Series 185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vera-Munoz S.C. (2005). Corporate Governance Reforms: Redefined Expectations of Audit Committee Responsibilities and Effectiveness, Journal of Business Ethics 62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weiyi Cai C. (2019). Nudging the financial market? A review of the nudge theory. Accounting and finance 60 (4).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilkinson T.M. (2012). Nudging and Manipulation, Political Studies 61.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yeung et al. (2017). ‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a mode of regulation by design. Information, Communication and Society, 20(1), 118–136.
]Search in Google Scholar
