Reasoning with Expectations About Causal Relations

Casati, R. and Varzi, A. (2008). “Event concepts”. In: Shipley, T.F. and Zacks, J. (eds.), Understanding Events: From Perception to Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 31–54.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188370.003.0002 Search in Google Scholar

Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1969). The individuation of events. In: Rescher, N. (ed.), Essays in the Honor of Carl Hempel. Dordrecht: Springer, 216–234.10.1007/978-94-017-1466-2_11 Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. (1994). “The role of expectations in reasoning”. In: Masuch, M. and Polos, L. (eds.), Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Under Uncertainty, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1–16.10.1007/3-540-58095-6_1 Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors P. (2007). “Evolutionary and developmental aspects of intersubjectivity”. In: Liljenström, H. and Århem, P. (eds.), Consciousness Transitions: Phylogenetic, Ontogenetic and Physiological Aspects. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 281–305.10.1016/B978-044452977-0/50013-9 Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. (2014). The Geometry of Meaning: Semantics Based on Conceptual Spaces, Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. (2021). “Causal reasoning and event cognition as evolutionary determinants of language structure”. Entropy 23(7), 843.10.3390/e23070843 Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. (to appear). “Conceptual engineering for engineers (and for philosophers): The role of conceptual spaces”. In: Isaac, M.G., Koch, S. and Sharp, K. (eds.), New Perspectives on Conceptual Engineering. Vol. 1: Foundational Issues in Conceptual Engineering. Berlin: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. and Makinson, D. (1994). “Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations”. Artificial Intelligence 65, 197–245.10.1016/0004-3702(94)90017-5 Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. and Stephens, A. (2017). “Induction and knowledge-what”. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8, 471–491, DOI 10.1007/s13194-017-0196-y. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. and Warglien, M. (2012). “Using conceptual spaces to model actions and events”. Journal of Semantics 29, 487–519.10.1093/jos/ffs007 Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P., Jost, J. and Warglien, M. (2018). “From actions to events: Three constraints on event mappings”. Frontiers in Psychology, 14 August 2018, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01391. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Giese, M. A. and Lappe, M. (2002). “Measurement of generalization fields for the recognition of biological motion”. Vision Research 42, 1847–1858.10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00093-7 Search in Google Scholar

Gulz, A. (1991). The Planning of Action as a Cognitive and Biological Phenomenon, Lund University Cognitive Studies, 2. Lund: Lund University. Search in Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1748/2000). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00032980 Search in Google Scholar

Leslie, A. M. (1994). “ToMM, ToBy, and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity”. In: Hirschfeld, L.A. and Gelman, S.A. (eds), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press, 139–148.10.1017/CBO9780511752902.006 Search in Google Scholar

Marr, D. and Vaina, L. (1982). “Representation and recognition of the movements of shapes”, Proceedings of the Royal Society in London, B214, 501–524. Search in Google Scholar

Michotte, A. (1963). The Perception of Causality. New York: Methuen. Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic. London: John W. Parker. Search in Google Scholar

Osta Velez, M. and Gärdenfors, P. (2020). “Category-based induction in conceptual spaces”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 96, DOI 10.1016/j.jmp.2020.1s 02357. Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pearl, J. (2018). “Theoretical impediments to machine learning: With seven sparks from the causal revolution”. arXiv:1801.04016vi10.1145/3159652.3176182 Search in Google Scholar

Rips, L. J. (1975). “Inductive judgments about natural categories”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14, 665–681.10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80055-7 Search in Google Scholar

Shiriaev, A. S., Freidovich, L. B., Robertsson, A., Johansson, R., and Sand-berg, A. (2007). “Virtual-holonomic-constraints-based design of stable oscillations of Furuta pendulum: Theory and experiments”. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23(4), 827–832.10.1109/TRO.2007.900597 Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, L. (1988). “Force dynamics in language and cognition”. Cognitive Science 12, 49–100.10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 Search in Google Scholar

Warglien, M., Gärdenfors, P. and Westera, M. (2012). “Event structure, conceptual spaces and the semantics of verbs”. Theoretical Linguistics 38, 159–193.10.1515/tl-2012-0010 Search in Google Scholar

White, P. A. (2012). “Visual impressions of causality: Effects of manipulating the direction of the target object’s motion in a collision event”. Visual Cognition 20(2), 121–142.10.1080/13506285.2011.653418 Search in Google Scholar

Wolff P. (2007). “Representing causation”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 13, 82–111.10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.82 Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, P. (2008). “Dynamics and the perception of causal events”. In: Thomas, S. and Zacks, J. (eds.), Understanding Events: How Humans See, Represent, and Act on Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 555–587.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188370.003.0023 Search in Google Scholar

Wolff, P. (2012). “Representing verbs with force vectors”. Theoretical Linguistics 38, 237–248.10.1515/tl-2012-0015 Search in Google Scholar

Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., and Kawato, M. (2003). “A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 358(1431), 593–602. Search in Google Scholar

Woodward J. (2011). “A philosopher looks at tool use and causal understanding”. In: McCormack, T., Hoerl, C. and Butterfill, S. (eds.), Tool Use and Causal Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 18–50.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571154.003.0002 Search in Google Scholar

Zacks, J. M. and Tversky, B. (2001). “Event structures in perception and conception”. Psychological Bulletin 127(1), 3–21.10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.3 Search in Google Scholar