1. bookVolume 63 (2020): Issue 1 (September 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2199-6059
ISSN
0860-150X
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Data-Driven Dialogue Models: Applying Formal and Computational Tools to the Study of Financial And Moral Dialogues

Published Online: 04 Nov 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 63 (2020) - Issue 1 (September 2020)
Page range: 185 - 208
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2199-6059
ISSN
0860-150X
First Published
08 Aug 2013
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English

Ametller, J., Robles, S., & Borrell, J. (2003). Agent Migration over FIPA ACL Messages. In International Workshop on Mobile Agents for Telecommunication Applications (pp. 210–219). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Bench-Capon, T.J. (1998). Specification and Implementation of Toulmin Dialogue Game. In Proceedings of JURIX 98 (pp. 5–20). Jurix – The Foundation for Legal Knowledge Based Systems. Retreived March 20, 2020 from: http://jurix.nl/proceedings/.Search in Google Scholar

Bex, F., Lawrence, J., & Reed, C. (2014). Generalising Argument Dialogue with the Dialogue Game Execution Platform. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2014) (pp. 141–152). Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, DC: IOS Press,.Search in Google Scholar

Black, E., & Hunter, A. (2012). Executable Logic for Dialogical Argumentation. In ECAI 2012: 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 27–31 August 2012, Montpellier, France (pp. 15–20). Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, DC: IOS Press.Search in Google Scholar

Budzynska, K., Rocci, A., & Yaskorska, O. (2014a). Financial Dialogue Games: A Protocol for Earnings Conference Calls. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed, & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument COMMA 2014 (pp. 19–30). Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, DC: IOS Press.Search in Google Scholar

Budzynska, K., Janier, M., Kang, J., Reed, C., Saint-Dizier, P., Stede, M., & Yaskorska, O., (2014b). Towards Argument Mining from Dialogue. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed & F. Cerutti (eds.), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument COMMA 2014 (pp. 185–196). Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, DC: IOS Press.Search in Google Scholar

Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2007). The Language of Business Studies Lectures: A Corpus Assisted Analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.157Search in Google Scholar

O’Donnell, M. (2008). The UAM CorpusTool: Software for Corpus Annotation and Exploration. In Proceedings of the XXVI Congreso de AESLA (pp. 3–5), Almeria, Spain.Search in Google Scholar

Finin, T., Fritzson, R., McKay, D., & McEntire, R. (1994). KQML as an agent communication language. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 456–463). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.Search in Google Scholar

Hamblin, C. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.Search in Google Scholar

Kacprzak, M., & Yaskorska, O. (2014). Dialogue Protocols for Formal Fallacies. Argumentation 28(3), 349–369.10.1007/s10503-014-9324-4Search in Google Scholar

Lawrence, J., Janier, M., & Reed, C.A. (2015). Working with Open Argument Corpora. In M. Lewiński & D. Mohammed (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation (ECA 2015). London: College Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Lawrence, J., Bex, F., & Reed, C. (2012). Dialogues on the Argument Web: Mixed Initiative Argumentation with Arvina, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2012). Vienna: IOS Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lorenzen, D. N. (1972). The Kāpālikas and Kālāmukhas: Two Lost Śaivite Sects. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520324947Search in Google Scholar

Łupkowski, P. (2017). IEL-based Formal Dialogue System for Tutorials. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 2017, 26(3), 287–320.10.12775/LLP.2017.013Search in Google Scholar

Maudet, N. & Chaib-Draa, B. (2002). Commitment-Based and Dialogue-Game-Based Protocols: New Trends in Agent Communication Languages. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 17(2), 157–179.10.1017/S0269888902000486Search in Google Scholar

Palmieri, R., Rocci, A., & Kudrautsava, N. (2015). Argumentation in Earnings Conference Calls. Corporate Standpoints and Analysts’ Challenges. Studies in Communication Sciences, 15(1), 120–132.Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, S., & Jennings, N. R. (1996). Negotiation through Argumentation – A Preliminary Report. InProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 267–274). Kyoto: ICMAS.Search in Google Scholar

Parsons, S., McBurney, P., & Wooldridge, M. (2003). The Mechanics of Some Formal Inter-Agent Dialogues In Workshop on Agent Communication Languages (pp. 329–348). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Pease, A., Budzynska, K., Lawrence, J., & Reed C. (2014). Lakatos Games for Mathematical Argument. S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed, & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2014) (pp. 59–66). Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, DC: IOS Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reed, C., & Budzynska, K. (2011). How dialogues create arguments In: F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell (Eds) Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation – ISSA 2010 (pp. 1633–1645). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Search in Google Scholar

Reed, C., & Walton, D. (2007). Argumentation Schemes in Dialogue. In H.V. Hansen, et. al. (Eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground, CD-ROM (pp. 1–11). Windsor, ON: OSSA.Search in Google Scholar

Reed, C., & Wells S. (2007). Dialogical Argument as an Interface to Complex Debates. IEEE Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 22, 60–65.10.1109/MIS.2007.106Search in Google Scholar

Schroeder, M., Plewe, D. A., & Raab, A. (1998). Ultima Ratio: Should Hamlet kill Claudius? In AGENTS ’98: Proceedings of the second international conference on autonomous agents, May 1998 (pp. 467–468).Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Snaith, M., Lawrence, J., & Reed, C. (2010). Mixed Initiative Argument in Public Deliberation. In F. De Cindio, Macintosh, A. & Peraboni, C. (Eds), From e-Participation to Online Deliberation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Online Deliberation (OD2010). University of Leeds & Università degli Studi di Milano: Leeds, UK.Search in Google Scholar

Walton, D., & Krabbe, E. (1995). Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. Albany: S.U.N.Y. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wells, S., & Reed, C. (2012). A Domain Specific Language for Describing Diverse Systems of Dialogue. Journal of Applied Logic, 10(4), 309–329.10.1016/j.jal.2012.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Wiśniewski, A. (2013). Questions, Inferences, and Scenarios. London: College Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Woods, J., & Walton, D. (1978). Arresting Circles in Formal Dialogues. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 7, 73–90.10.1007/BF00245921Search in Google Scholar

Yaskorska, O. (2014). Recognising Argumentation in Dialogical Context. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1–11), Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo