[European Commission. Information Society and Media Directorate General. (2007). Benchmarking ICT use among General Practitioners in Europe 2007, Country Profile: Poland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., & Wu, S. (2006). Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144(10), 742-752.10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125]Search in Google Scholar
[Cotea, C. (2010). Electronic Health Record Adoption: Perceived Barriers and Facilitators. Research Coordination Unit, CMVH.]Search in Google Scholar
[DesRoches, C. M., Painter, M. W., & Jha, A. K. (2013). Health Information Technology in the United States: Better Information Systems for Better Care. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s annual report.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dobrev, A., Haesner, M., & Husing, T. (2008). Benchmarking ICT use among General Practitioners in Europe final report. Bonn: European Commision, 53-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gans, D., Kralewski, J., Hammons, T., & Dowd, B. (2005). Medical groups’ adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Affairs, 24(5), 1323-1333.10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1323]Search in Google Scholar
[Georgiou, A., Ampt, A., Creswick, N., Westbrook, J. I., & Braithwaite, J. (2009). Computerized Provider Order Entry What are health professionals concerned about? A qualitative study in an Australian hospital. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(1), 60-70.10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.09.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Hackl, W., Hoerbst, A., & Ammenwerth, E. (2009). The electronic health record in Austria: physicians’ acceptance is influenced by negative emotions. Studies in Health Technology & Informatics, 150, 140-144.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hier, D. B., Rothschild, A., LeMaistre, A., & Keeler, J. (2005). Differing faculty and house staff acceptance of an electronic health record. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74(7-8), 657-662.10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Hillestad, R., Bigelow, J., & Bower, A. (2005). Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Affairs (Millwood), 24(5), 1103-1117.10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1103]Search in Google Scholar
[Jha, A. K., Bates, D. W., Jenter, C., Orav, E. J., Zheng, J., Cleary, P., & Simon, R. (2009). Electronic Health Records: Use, Barriers and Satisfaction Among PhysiciansWho Care For Black and Hispanic Patients. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 15(1), 158-163. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00975.x.10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00975.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Jha, A. K., DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Donelan, K., Sowmya, R. R., Ferris, T. G., Shields, A, Rosenbaum, S., & Blumenthal, D. (2009). Use of electronic health records in US hospitals. The New England Journal of Medicine, 360(16), 1628-1638.10.1056/NEJMsa0900592]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahn, N. B. (2004). The Future of Family Medicine: A Collaborative Project of the Family Medicine Community. Annals of Family Medicine, 2 (suppl 1), s3-s32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kossman, S. P., & Scheidenhelm, S. L. (2008). Nurses’ perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 26(2), 69-77.10.1097/01.NCN.0000304775.40531.67]Search in Google Scholar
[Leung, G. M., Yu, P. L., Wong, I. O., Johnston, J. M., & Tin, K. Y. (2003). Incentives and barriers that influence clinical computerization in Hong Kong: a population-based physician survey. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10, 201-212.10.1197/jamia.M1202]Search in Google Scholar
[Linder, J. A., Ma, J., Bates, D. W., Middleton, B., & Stafford, R. S. (2007). Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Archivos de Medicina Interna, 167(13), 1400-1405. 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1400]Search in Google Scholar
[Lockhart, P. (2008). Two nations achieve a high level of primary care information technology (IT) interoperability: an introduction to a series comparing Denmark and New Zealand’s IT and health care. Informatics in Primary Care, 16(3), 179-181.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loomis, G. A., Ries, J. S., Saywell Jr., R. M., & Thakker, N. R. (2002). If electronic medical records are so great, why aren’t family physicians using them? Journal of Family Practice, 51(7), 636-641.]Search in Google Scholar
[Menachemi, N. & Collum, T. H. (2011). Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 4, 47-55.10.2147/RMHP.S12985]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, R. H., & Sim, I. (2004). Physicians’ Use Of Electronic Medical Records: Barriers And Solutions. Health Affairs, 23(2), 116-126.10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116]Search in Google Scholar
[Morin, D., Tourigny, A., Pelletier, D., Robichaud, L., Mathieu, L., Vezina, A., Bonin, L., Buteau, M. (2005). Seniors’ views on the use of electronic health records. Informatics in Primary Care, 13, 125-133.]Search in Google Scholar
[Najwyzsza Izba Kontroli. (2013). Informatyzacja szpitali informacja o wynikach kontroli, Raport NIK 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pedzinski, B., Sowa, P., Kolpak, M., Pedzinski, W., & Szpak, A. (2013). The use of electronic medical records in primary healthcare in the podlaskie voivodeship. Polish Journal of Public Health, 123(2), 107-111.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peterson, K. A. (2012). Essential requirements of information technology for primary care. Family Practice, 29(2), 119-120.10.1093/fampra/cms028]Search in Google Scholar
[Pike, Ch. (2010). An Empirical Analysis of the effects of GP competition. Cooperation & Competition Panel Working Paper Series, vol. 1(2).10.2139/ssrn.2948258]Search in Google Scholar
[Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., & Kawasumi, Y. (2005). The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Time Efficiency of Physicians and Nurses: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(5), 505-516.10.1197/jamia.M1700]Search in Google Scholar
[Police, R. L., Foster, T. & Wong, K. S. (2010). Adoption and use of health information technology in physician practice organisations: systematic review. Informatics in Primary Care, 18(4), 245-258.]Search in Google Scholar
[Protti, D., & Johansen, I. (2010).Widespread Adoption of Information Technology in Primary Care Physician Offices in Denmark: A Case Study. The Commonwealth Fund: ‘Issues in international health policy’, 1379(80).]Search in Google Scholar
[Romano, M. J., & Stafford, R. S. (2011). Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Archivos de Medicina Interna, 171(10), 897-903.10.1001/archinternmed.2010.527]Search in Google Scholar
[Saleem, J. J., Patterson, E. S., Militello, L., Render, M. L., Orshansky, G., & Asch, S. M. (2005). Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(4), 438-447. 10.1197/jamia.M1777]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Squires, D., Doty, M., Rasmussen, P., Pierson, R., & Applebaum, S. (2012). A Survey of Primary Care Doctors in Ten Countries Shows Progress in Use of Health Information Technology, Less in Other Areas. Health Affairs (Millwood), 31(12), 2805-2816.10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0884]Search in Google Scholar
[Sequist, T. D., Cullen, T., Hays, H., Taualii, M. M., Simon, S. R., & Bates, D. W. (2007). Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(2), 191-197.10.1197/jamia.M2234]Search in Google Scholar
[Ustawa z dnia 28 kwietnia 2011 o systemie informacji w ochronie zdrowia. (2011). Dz.U. 2011 vol. 113 item 657.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, S. J., Middleton, B., & Prosser, L. A. (2003). A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. The American Journal of Medicine, 114(5), 397-403.10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00057-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Zakaria, N., Mohd Affendi, S. Y., & Zakaria, N. (2010). Managing ICT in healthcare organization: culture, challenges, and issues of technology adoption and implementation. In Y. K. Dwivedi, K. Khoumbati, B. Lal, & A. Srivastava (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Advances in Health Informatics and Electronic Healthcare Applications: Global Adoption and Impact of Information Communication Technologies (pp. 153-168). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. ]Search in Google Scholar