[
Arora-Jonsson, Stefan, Nils Brunsson, and Raimund Hasse. 2020. Where Does Competition Come From? The Role of Organization. Organization Theory 1(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787719889977.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baier, Christian. 2017. Reformen in Wissenschaft und Universität aus feldtheoretischer Perspektive: Universitäten als Akteure zwischen Drittmittelwettbewerb, Exzellenzinitiative und akademischem Kapitalismus. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baier, Christian, and Andreas Schmitz. 2012. Organisationen als Akteure in sozialen Feldern – Eine Modellierungsstrategie am Beispiel deutscher Hochschulen. Pp. 191–220 in Feldanalyse als Forschungsprogramm 1: Der programmatische Kern, edited by Stefan Bernhard and Christian Schmidt-Wellenburg. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barton, Thomas, Christian Müller, and Christian Seel (eds). 2019. Hochschulen in Zeiten Der Digitalisierung. Lehre, Forschung und Organisation. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benavides, Lina María Castro, Johnny Alexander Tamayo Arias, Martín Darío Arango Serna, John William Branch Bedoya, and Daniel Burgos. 2020. Digital Transformation in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors 20(11): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Böckelmann, Christine, and Erik Nagel. 2018. Increasingly Identical: Convergence Factors in the Tertiary Sector of Switzerland’s Education System. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung 13(3): 29–50. https://doi.org/10.3217/ZFHE-13-03/03.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Boer, Harry F., Jürgen Enders, and Uwe Schimank. 2007. Comparing Higher Education Governance Systems in Four European Countries. Pp. 35–54 in Governance and Performance of Education Systems, edited by Nils C. Soguel and Pierre Jaccard. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc J. D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bowen, William G. 2015. Higher Education in the Digital Age: Updated Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brunsson, Nils, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson. 2000. Constructing Organizations: The Example of Public Sector Reform. Organization Studies 21(4): 721–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600214003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bughin, Jacques, Eric Hazan, Sree Ramaswamy, Michael Chui, Tera Allas, Peter Dahlstrom, Nicolaus Henke, and Monica Trench. 2017. Artificial Intelligence: The Next Digital Frontier? Discussion Paper. McKinsey Global Institute.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christensen, Lars Thøger, Mette Morsing, and Ole Thyssen. 2013. CSR as Aspirational Talk. Organization 20(3): 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413478310.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clark, Burton R. 1983. The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Czarniawska, Barbara, and Guje Sevón. 2011. Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Enders, Jürgen, Barbara M. Kehm, and Uwe Schimank. 2015. Turning Universities into Actors on Quasi-Markets: How New Public Management Reforms Affect Academic Research. Pp. 89–103 in The Changing Governance of Higher Education and Research: Multilevel Perspectives, Higher Education Dynamics, edited by Dorothea Jansen and Insa Pruisken. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EPFL. 2019. Annual Report 2019. https://rapport-annuel.epfl.ch/en/ (03.06.2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ETH Board. 2014. Strategische Planung 2017–2020 des ETH-Rats für den ETH-Bereich. Zürich: ETH-Rat.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fligstein, Neil. 2013. Understanding Stability and Change in Fields. Research in Organizational Behavior 33: 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2013.10.005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fligstein, Neil, and Doug McAdam. 2011. Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory 29(1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Frank, David John, and John W. Meyer. 2020. The University and the Global Knowledge Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furnari, Santi. 2018. When Does an Issue Trigger Change in a Field? A Comparative Approach to Issue Frames, Field Structures and Types of Field Change. Human Relations 71(3): 321–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717726861.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gächter, Thomas. 2011. Das Doktorat gehört zum Profil der Universität. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, April 12, https://www.nzz.ch/das_doktorat_gehoert_zum_profil_der_universitaet-ld.576062 (14.01.2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Getto, Barbara, and Michael Kerres. 2017. Akteurinnen/Akteure der Digitalisierung im Hochschul-system: Modernisierung oder Profilierung? Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung 12(1): 123–142.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasse, Raimund, and Georg Krücken. 2013. Competition and Actorhood: A Further Expansion of the Neo-Institutional Agenda. Sociologia Internationalis 51(2):181–205. https://doi.org/10.3790/sint.51.2.181.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henke, Justus, and Peer Pasternack (eds). 2020. Wie die Hochschulen durch das Zeitalter des Frühdigitalismus kommen: Basiswissen für die avancierte Organisationsgestaltung in 94 Fragen und Antworten. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hertler, Roman. 2017. IT-Offensive wird teurer. St.Galler Tagblatt, https://www.tagblatt.ch/ostschweiz/kanton-stgallen-it-offensive-wird-teurer-ld.1012026 (03.06.2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hjellbrekke, Johs. 2018. Multiple Correspondence Analysis for the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffman, Andrew J. 1999. Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U. S. Chemical Industry. Academy of Management Journal 42(4): 351–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/257008.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Husson, Francois, Sebastien Le, and Jérôme Pagès. 2017. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hüther, Otto, and Georg Krücken. 2016. Nested Organizational Fields: Isomorphism and Differentiation Among European Universities. Pp. 53–83 in The University Under Pressure. Vol. 46, Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karstein, Uta. 2012. Auseinandersetzungen in und zwischen Feldern. Vorschläge zur Spezifizierung des Bourdieu’schen Begriffs sozialer Kämpfe am Beispiel des Staat-Kirche-Konfliktes in der DDR. Pp. 257–279 in Feldanalyse als Forschungsprogramm 2: Gegenstandsbezogene Theoriebildung, edited by Stefan Bernhard and Christian Schmidt-Wellenburg. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kindel, Alexander T., and Mitchell L. Stevens. 2021. What Is Educational Entrepreneurship? Strategic Action, Temporality, and the Expansion of US Higher Education. Theory and Society 50(4): 577–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09443-3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kodeih, Farah, and Royston Greenwood. 2014. Responding to Institutional Complexity: The Role of Identity. Organization Studies 35(1): 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613495333.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krücken, Georg. 2021. Multiple Competitions in Higher Education: A Conceptual Approach. Innovation 23(2): 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1684652.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lepori, Benedetto, and Tatiana Fumasoli. 2010. Reshaping the Swiss Higher Education System: Governance Reforms and Fields Reconfigurations. Swiss Political Science Review 16(4): 811–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2010.tb00452.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lepori, Benedetto, Jeroen Huisman, and Marco Seeber. 2014. Convergence and Differentiation Processes in Swiss Higher Education: An Empirical Analysis. Studies in Higher Education 39(2): 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.647765.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Litrico, Jean-Baptiste, and Robert J. David. 2017. The Evolution of Issue Interpretation within Organizational Fields: Actor Positions, Framing Trajectories, and Field Settlement. Academy of Management Journal 60(3): 986–1015. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0156.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liu, Yi, Wei Wang, and Zuopeng (Justin) Zhang. 2020. The Dual Drivetrain Model of Digital Transformation: Role of Industrial Big-Data-Based Affordance. Management Decision 60(2): 344–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2019-1664.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, John Levi. 2003. What Is Field Theory? American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/375201.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meyer, Alan D., Vibha Gaba, and Kenneth A. Colwell. 2005. Organizing Far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational Fields. Organization Science 16(5): 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0135.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–363.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Musselin, Christine. 2021. University Governance in Meso and Macro Perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology 47(1): 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-012708.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Porcaro, Giuseppe. 2017. Policy and Politics in the Era of the Industrial Internet: How the Digital Transformation Will Change the Political Arena. Pp 49–63 in Out-thinking Organizational Communications, edited by Joachim Klewes, Dirk Popp, and Manuela Rost-Hein. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41845-2_4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reay, Trish, and C. R. (Bob) Hinings. 2005. The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta. Organization Studies 26(3): 351–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050872.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roux, Brigitte Le, and Henry Rouanet. 2010. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santos, Tiago, Jorge Louçã, and Helder Coelho. 2019. The Digital Transformation of the Public Sphere. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 36(6): 778–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2644.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schrape, Jan-Felix. 2021. Digitale Transformation. Stuttgart: UTB.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schwab, Klaus. 2017. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
sda/tif. 2019. 300 Millionen für einen «Sondereffort». Tages-Anzeiger, March 8, https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/300-millionen-fuer-einen-sondereffort-794099716437 (14.01.2023).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simmel, Georg. 1992. Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
State Secretariat for Research, Education and Innovation (SERI). 2017. Herausforderungen der Digitalisierung für Bildung und Forschung in der Schweiz. Bern: Swiss Confederation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI). 2017. Aktionsplan Digitalisierung im BFI-Bereich in den Jahren 2019 und 2020. Bern: Swiss Confederation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stichweh, Rudolf. 2014. Die Form der Universität. Pp. 215–244 in Wissenschaft, Universität, Professionen. Soziologische Analysen, edited by Rudolf Stichweh. Bielefeld: transcript.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strang, David, and John W. Meyer. 1993. Institutional Conditions for Diffusion. Theory and Society 22: 487–511.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strauss, Anselm L. 1987. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swiss Confederation. 2018. Aktionsplan Digitale Schweiz. Bern: Swiss Confederation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swiss Confederation. 2020. Strategie Digitale Schweiz. Bern: Swiss Confederation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swiss National Science Foundation SNSF. 2020. SNF fördert 1000 Projekte zur Digitalisierung. Schweizerischer Nationalfonds (SNF), https://www.snf.ch/de/lpMUvQXnwRKWh1jJ/news/undefined/de/lpMUvQXnwRKWh1jJ/news/ (03.06.2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swiss Science Council (SSC). 2019. Empfehlungen des Schweizerischen Wissenschaftsrates SWR für die BFI-Botschaft 2021–2024. Bern: Swiss Confederation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, Barrett J. 2016. Strategic Action Fields in US Higher Education: The 1939 Mercer University Heresy Trial. Journal of Historical Sociology 29(3): 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12084.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thornton, Patricia H., and William Ocasio. 1999. Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology 105(3): 801–843.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tratschin, Luca. 2022. Post-NPM-Governance und Grenzobjekte. Zur organisationalen Funktion des Digitalisierungsdiskurses an Universitäten. Soziale Systeme 26(1-2): 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosys-2021-0011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
University of Basel. 2015. Jahresbericht 2015. Basel: Universität Basel.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
University of Geneva. 2016. Rapport de Gestion 2016. Geneva: University of Geneva.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
University of Lucerne. 2017. Jahresbericht 2017. Luzern: Universität Luzern
]Search in Google Scholar
[
University of Zurich. 2015. Jahresbericht 2015. Zürich: Universität Zürich.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
University of Zurich. 2016. Jahresbericht 2016. Zürich: Universität Zürich.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
University of Zurich. 2019. Jahresbericht 2019. Zürich: Universität Zürich.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Werron, Tobias. 2010. Direct Conflict, Indirect Competition: Differentiation and Comparison of Two Forms of Struggle. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 39(4): 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2010-0403.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wooten, Melissa, and Andrew J. Hoffman. 2017. Organizational Fields: Past, Present and Future. Pp. 55–74 in The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Thomas B. Lawrence, and Renate E. Meyer. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wruk, Dominika, Tino Schöllhorn, and Achim Oberg. 2020. Is the Sharing Economy a Field? How a Disruptive Field Nurtures Sharing Economy Organizations. Pp. 131–162 in Theorizing the Sharing Economy: Variety and Trajectories of New Forms of Organizing. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 66, edited by Indre Maurer, Johanna Mair, and Achim Oberg. Emerald Publishing Limited.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ziyadin, Sayabek, Saltanat Suieubayeva, and A. Utegenova. 2020. Digital Transformation in Business. Pp. 408–415 in Digital Age: Chances, Challenges and Future, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, edited by Svetlana I. Ashmarina, Marek Vochozka, and Valentina V. Mantulenko. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
