[Angrist, Joshua D., and Jörn-Steffen Pischke. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400829828]Search in Google Scholar
[Auspurg, Katrin, and Thomas Hinz. 2015. Factorial Survey Experiments. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483398075]Search in Google Scholar
[Auspurg, Katrin, and Ulf Liebe. 2011. Choice-Experimente und die Messung von Handlungsentscheidungen in der Soziologie. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 63: 301–314.10.1007/s11577-011-0136-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldassari, Deliam, and Maria Abascal. 2017. Field Experiments Across the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 43: 41–73.10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112445]Search in Google Scholar
[Barone, Carlo, and Heike Solga. 2020. Introduction: Experimental Methods in Social Stratification Research. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 65: 1–2.10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100478]Search in Google Scholar
[Becker, Rolf. 2019. Key Challenges for the Sociology of Education – Theoretical, Methodological, and Empirical Issues. Pp. 12–16 in Research Handbook on the Sociology of Education, edited by Rolf Becker. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781788110426.00007]Search in Google Scholar
[Becker, Rolf, and Christoph Zangger. 2015. Experimentelle Bildungsforschung. Beiträge experimenteller Forschung zur Bildungssoziologie und -ökonomie. Pp. 100–126 in Experimente in den Sozialwissenschaften (Soziale Welt – Special Issue 22), edited by Tobias Wolbring, and Marc Keuschnigg. Baden-Baden: Nomos.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berger, Joël, and Benita Combet. 2017. Late School Tracking, Less Class Bias in Educational Decision- Making? The Uncertainty Reduction Mechanism and Its Experimental Test. European Sociological Review 33(1): 124–136.10.1093/esr/jcw054]Search in Google Scholar
[Bietenbeck, Jan, Jan Marcus, and Felix Weinhardt. 2020. Tuition Fees and Educational Attainment. IZA Discussion Paper No. 13709. Bonn: IZA.10.2139/ssrn.3696407]Search in Google Scholar
[Blossfeld, Hans-Peter. 1996. Macro-Sociology, Rational Choice Theory and Time. A Theoretical Perspective on the Empirical Analysis of Social Processes. European Sociological Review 12: 181–206.10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018185]Search in Google Scholar
[Blossfeld, Gwendolin Josephine, Pia Nicoletta Blossfeld, and Hans-Peter Blossfeld. 2019. A Sociological Perspective on Education as a Lifelong Process. Pp. 18–34 in Research Handbook on the Sociology of Education, edited by Rolf Becker. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781788110426.00009]Search in Google Scholar
[Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, Götz Rohwer, and Thorsten Schneider. 2019. Event History Analysis with Stata. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780429260407]Search in Google Scholar
[Boudon, Raymond. 1974. Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Breen, Richard, and John H. Goldthorpe. 1997. Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory. Rationality and Society 9(3): 275–305.10.1177/104346397009003002]Search in Google Scholar
[Chakrabarti, Rajashri. 2013. Do Vouchers Lead to Sorting under Random Private School Selection? Evidence from the Milwaukee Voucher Program. Economics of Education Review 34: 191–218.10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.01.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang-Tai, Hsieh, and Miguel Urquiola. 2006. The Effects of Generalized School Choice on Achievement and Stratification: Evidence from Chile’s Voucher Program. Journal of Public Economics 90(8–9): 1477–1503.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.11.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Clampet-Lundquist, Susan, and Douglas S. Massey. 2008. Neighborhood Effects on Economic Self-Sufficiency: A Reconsideration of the Moving to Opportunity Experiment. American Journal of Sociology 114(1): 107–143.10.1086/588740]Search in Google Scholar
[Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook, Thomas D. 2001. Sciencephobia. Why Education Researchers Reject Randomized Experiments. Education Next 1(3): 63–68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook, Thomas D. 2002. Randomized Experiments in Educational Policy Research: A Critical Examination of the Reasons the Educational Evaluation Community Has Offered for Not Doing Them. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24(3): 175–199.10.3102/01623737024003175]Search in Google Scholar
[de Souza Leão, Luciana, and Gil Eyal. 2019. The Rise of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in International Development in Historical Perspective. Theory and Society 48: 383–418.10.1007/s11186-019-09352-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Diekmann, Andreas. 2008. Soziologie und Ökonomie: Der Beitrag experimenteller Wirtschaftsforschung zur Sozialtheorie. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 60(4): 528–550.10.1007/s11577-008-0026-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Dollmann, Jörg. 2011. Verbindliche und unverbindliche Grundschulempfehlungen und soziale Ungleichheiten am ersten Bildungsübergang. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 63(4): 595–621.10.1007/s11577-011-0148-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Dunning, Thad. 2008. Improving Causal Inference Strengths and Limitations of Natural Experiments. Political Research Quarterly 61(2): 282–293.10.1177/1065912907306470]Search in Google Scholar
[Erikson, Robert, and Jan O. Jonsson. 1996. Explaining Class Inequality in Education: The Swedish Test Case. Pp. 1–63, in Can Education Be Equalized? edited by Robert Erikson, and Jan O. Jonsson. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Esser, Hartmut. 1999. Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen (Vol. 1: Situationslogik und Handeln). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Falk, Armin, and James J. Heckman. 2009. Lab Experiments are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences. Science 326(5952): 535–538.10.1126/science.1168244]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedman, Milton. 2004. Kapitalismus und Freiheit. München: Piper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guala, Francesco. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614651]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanushek, Eric A. 1999. Some Findings from an Independent Investigation of the Tennessee STAR Experiment and From Other Investigations of Class Size Effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21(2): 143–163.10.3102/01623737021002143]Search in Google Scholar
[Heckman, James J. 2006. Skill Formation and the Economics of Investing in Disadvantaged Children. Science 312(5782): 1900–1902.10.1126/science.1128898]Search in Google Scholar
[Heckman, James J., and Dimitrij V. Masterov. 2007. The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children. Review of Agricultural Economics. American Agricultural Economics Association 29: 446–493.10.1111/j.1467-9353.2007.00359.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Heckman, James J., Lance J. Lochner, and Petra E. Todd. 2008. Earnings Functions and Rates of Return. Journal of Human Capital 2(1): 1–31.10.1086/587037]Search in Google Scholar
[Heckman, James J., Rodrigo Pinto, and Peter Savelyev. 2013. Understanding the Mechanisms Through Which an Influential Early Childhood Program Boosted Adult Outcomes. American Economic Review 103(6): 2052–2086.10.1257/aer.103.6.2052]Search in Google Scholar
[Hedström, Peter, and Petri Ylikoski. 2010. Causal Mechanism in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 49–67.10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632]Search in Google Scholar
[Helbig, Marcel, Tina Baier, and Anna Kroth. 2012. Die Auswirkung von Studiengebühren auf die Studierneigung in Deutschland. Evidenz aus einem natürlichen Experiment auf Basis der HISStudienberechtigtenbefragung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41(3): 227–246.10.1515/zfsoz-2012-0305]Search in Google Scholar
[Howell, William G., and Paul E. Peterson. 2002. The Education Gap. Voucher and Urban Schools. WashingtonD. C.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hübner, Malte. 2012. Do Tuition Fees Affect Enrollment Behavior? Evidence from a “Natural Experiment” in Germany. Economics of Education Review 31(6): 949–960.10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.06.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Humphreys, Macartan, and Alexandra Scacco. 2020. The Aggregation Challenge. World Development 127: 1–3.10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104806]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackson, Michele, and David R. Cox. 2013. The Principles of Experimental Design and their Application in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 19: 27–49.10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145443]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–291.10.2307/1914185]Search in Google Scholar
[Keller, Johannes. 2007. Stereotype Threat in Classroom Settings: The Interactive Effect of Domain Identification, Task Difficulty and Stereotype Threat on Female Students’ Maths Performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 77(2): 323–338.10.1348/000709906X113662]Search in Google Scholar
[Keller, Suzanne, and Marisa Zavalloni. 1964. Ambition and Social Class: A Respecification. Social Forces 43(1): 58–70.10.2307/2575967]Search in Google Scholar
[Liebe, Ulf, Petr Mariel, Heiko Beyer, and Jürgen Meyerhoff. 2018. Uncovering the Nexus Between Attitudes, Preferences, and Behavior in Sociological Applications of Stated Choice Experiments. Sociological Methods & Research 50(1): 310–347.10.1177/0049124118782536]Search in Google Scholar
[Möser, Sara, David Glauser, and Rolf Becker. 2019. Valuation of Labour Market Entrance Positions among (future) Apprentices – Results from two Discrete Choice Experiments. Journal of Choice Modelling 33: 1–14.10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100180]Search in Google Scholar
[Mosteller, Frederik, Richard Light, and Jason Sachs. 1996. Sustained Inquiry in Education: Lessons from Skill Grouping and Class Size. Harvard Educational Review 66(4): 797–842.10.17763/haer.66.4.36m328762x21610x]Search in Google Scholar
[Murnane, Richard., and John B. Willett. 2011. Methods Matter: Improving Causal Inference in Educational and Social Science Research. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nguyen, Hannah-Hanh D., and Ann Marie Ryan. 2008. Does Stereotype Threat Affect Test Performance of Minorities and Women? A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology 93(6): 1314–1334.10.1037/a0012702]Search in Google Scholar
[Pietrzyk, Irena, and Melinda Erdmann. 2020. Investigating the Impact of Interventions on Educational Disparities: Estimating Average Treatment Effects (ATEs) is Not Sufficient. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 65: 1–14.10.1016/j.rssm.2019.100471]Search in Google Scholar
[Quast, Heiko, Heike Spangenberg, Bettina Hannover, and Edith Braun. 2012. Determinanten der Studierbereitschaft unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Studiengebühren. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 15(2): 305–326.10.1007/s11618-012-0276-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Raudenbush, Stephen W. 2021. Scaling Up Experiments to Reduce Educational Inequality. Behavioural Public Policy 5(Special Issue 1): 60–70.10.1017/bpp.2020.19]Search in Google Scholar
[Schulze, Alexander, and Jürgen Schiener. 2011. Lehrerurteile und Bildungsgerechtigkeit: Schullaufbahnempfehlungen angehender Lehrkräfte im Vignettenexperiment. Zeitschrift für Sozialisationsforschung und Erziehungssoziologie 31(2): 186–200.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schweinhart, Lawrence J. 2013. Long-Term Follow-Up of a Preschool Experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology 9: 389–409.10.1007/s11292-013-9190-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Sprietsma, Maresa. 2009. Discrimination in Grading? Experimental Evidence from Primary School. ZEW-Discussion Paper No. 09-074. Mannheim: ZEW.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steele, Claude M. 1997. A Threat in the Air: How Stereotypes Shape Intellectual Identity and Performance. American Psychologist 52(6): 613–62910.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613]Search in Google Scholar
[Wei, Thomas E. 2012. Sticks, Stones, Words, and Broken Bones: New Field and Lab Evidence on Stereotype Threat. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 34(4): 465–488.10.3102/0162373712452629]Search in Google Scholar
[Wenz, Sebastian E., and Kerstin Hoenig. 2020. Ethnic and Social Class Discrimination in Education: Experimental Evidence from Germany. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 65: 1–13.10.1016/j.rssm.2019.100461]Search in Google Scholar
[Willer, David, and Henry A. Walker. 2007. Building Experiments. Testing Social Theory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804767835]Search in Google Scholar
[Zangger, Christoph, and Rolf Becker. 2019. Experiments in the Sociology of Education: Causal Inference and Estimating Causal Effects in Sociological Research on Education. Pp. 153–171 in Research Handbook on the Sociology of Education, edited by Rolf Becker. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781788110426.00017]Search in Google Scholar