This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Laventhal N, Spelke MB, Andrews B, Larkin LK, Meadow W, Janvier A. Ethics of resuscitation at different stages of life: a survey of perinatal physicians. Pediatrics. 2011;127:e1221-2. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1031.LaventhalNSpelkeMBAndrewsBLarkinLKMeadowWJanvierAEthics of resuscitation at different stages of life: a survey of perinatal physicians2011127e1221210.1542/peds.2010-103121502232Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Armstrong K, Rayan CA, Hawkes CP, Janvier A, Dempsey EM. Life and death decisions for incompetent patients: determining best interest-the Irish perspective. Acta Paediatr. 2010;100:519-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.02084.x.ArmstrongKRayanCAHawkesCPJanvierADempseyEMLife and death decisions for incompetent patients: determining best interest-the Irish perspective20101005192310.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.02084.x21070357Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hansen TW, Aasland O, Janiver A, Førde R. Ethics, choices and decisions in acute medicine: a national survey of Norwegian physicians’ attitudes. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14:e63-9. doi: 10.1097/ PCC.0b013e31826e73f1.HansenTWAaslandOJaniverAFørdeREthics, choices and decisions in acute medicine: a national survey of Norwegian physicians’ attitudes201314e63910.1097/PCC.0b013e31826e73f123388577Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Janvier A, Leblanc I, Barrington KJ. Nobody likes premies: the relative value of patients’ lives. J Perinatol. 2008;28:821-6. doi: 10.1038/ jp.2008.103.JanvierALeblancIBarringtonKJNobody likes premies: the relative value of patients’ lives200828821610.1038/jp.2008.10318633422Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hagen EM, Therkelsen ØB, Førde R, Aasland O, Janvier A, Hansen TW. Challenges in reconciling best interest and parental exercise of autonomy in pediatric life-or-death situations. J Pediatr. 2012;161:146-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.01.017.HagenEMTherkelsenØBFørdeRAaslandOJanvierAHansenTWChallenges in reconciling best interest and parental exercise of autonomy in pediatric life-or-death situations20121611465110.1016/j.jpeds.2012.01.01722364819Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sham CO, Cheng YW, Ho KW, Lai PH, Lo LW, Wan HL, et al. Do-not-resuscitate decision: the attitudes of medical and non-medical students. J Med Ethics. 2007;33:261-5.ShamCOChengYWHoKWLaiPHLoLWWanHLDo-not-resuscitate decision: the attitudes of medical and non-medical students200733261510.1136/jme.2005.014423259813017470500Search in Google Scholar
Tyrer F, Williams M, Feathers L, Faull C, Baker I. Factors that influence decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the views of doctors and medical students. Postgrad Med J. 2009;85:564-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.079491.TyrerFWilliamsMFeathersLFaullCBakerIFactors that influence decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the views of doctors and medical students200985564810.1136/pgmj.2009.07949119892889Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Markota M, Svab I, Sarazin Klemencic K, Albreht T. Slovenian experience on health care reform. Croat Med J. 1999;40:190-4.MarkotaMSvabISarazinKlemencic KAlbrehtTSlovenian experience on health care reform1999401904Search in Google Scholar
Gregov L, Kovačević A, Slišković A. Stress among Croatian physicians: comparison between physicians working in emergency medical service and health centers: pilot study. Croat Med J. 2011;52:8-15. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.8.GregovLKovačevićASliškovićAStress among Croatian physicians: comparison between physicians working in emergency medical service and health centers: pilot study20115281510.3325/cmj.2011.52.8305126321328715Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Janvier A, Leblanc I, Barrington KJ. The best-interest standard is not applied for neonatal resuscitation decisions. Pediatrics. 2008;121:963-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1520.JanvierALeblancIBarringtonKJThe best-interest standard is not applied for neonatal resuscitation decisions2008121963910.1542/peds.2007-152018450900Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Beaton DE. Understanding the relevance of measured change though studies of responsiveness. Spine. 2000;25:3192-9.BeatonDEUnderstanding the relevance of measured change though studies of responsiveness2000253192910.1097/00007632-200012150-0001511124736Search in Google Scholar
Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48:175-86.ManeesriwongulWDixonJKInstrument translation process: a methods review2004481758610.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.x15369498Search in Google Scholar
Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:268-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x.SousaVDRojjanasriratWTranslation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guidelines2011172687410.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x20874835Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Richter J, Eisemann M, Zgonnikova E. Doctors’ authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions: a comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany. J Med Ethics. 2001;27:186–91. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.3.186.RichterJEisemannMZgonnikovaEDoctors’ authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions: a comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany2001271869110.1136/jme.27.3.186173338511417027Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Janiver A, Bauer KL, Lantos JD. Are newborns morally different form older children? Theor Med Bioeth. 2007;28:413-25.JaniverABauerKLLantosJDAre newborns morally different form older children?2007284132510.1007/s11017-007-9052-y17985104Search in Google Scholar
Donohue PK, Boss RD, Aucott SW, Keene EA, Teague P. The impact of neonatologists’ religiosity and spirituality on healthcare delivery for high-risk neonates. J Palliat Med. 2010;13:1219-24. doi: 10.1089/ jpm.2010.0049.DonohuePKBossRDAucottSWKeeneEATeaguePThe impact of neonatologists’ religiosity and spirituality on healthcare delivery for high-risk neonates20101312192410.1089/jpm.2010.004920831436Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cook I, Kirkup AL, Langham LJ, Malik MA, Marlow G, Sammy I. End of life care and do not resuscitate orders: how much does age influence decision making? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2017;3:2333721417713422. doi: 10.1177/2333721417713422.CookIKirkupALLanghamLJMalikMAMarlowGSammyIEnd of life care and do not resuscitate orders: how much does age influence decision making? A systematic review and meta-analysis20173233372141771342210.1177/2333721417713422547065528638855Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zweibel NR, Cassel CK, Karisson T. Public attitudes about the use of chronological age as a criterion for allocating health care resources. Gerontologist. 1993;33:74-80.ZweibelNRCasselCKKarissonTPublic attitudes about the use of chronological age as a criterion for allocating health care resources199333748010.1093/geront/33.1.748440504Search in Google Scholar
Diederich A, Winkelhage J, Wirsik N. Age as a criterion for setting priorities in health care? A survey of the German public view. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023930.DiederichAWinkelhageJWirsikNAge as a criterion for setting priorities in health care? A survey of the German public view20116e2393010.1371/journal.pone.0023930316413021904600Open DOISearch in Google Scholar