Classification of primary caesarean sections in labor and its usefulness for analysis of Slovenian perinatal data

1EURO-PERISTAT Project. European Perinatal Health Report 2010. Accessed July 15th, 2017 at: http://www.europeristat.comEURO-PERISTAT Project. European Perinatal Health Report2010Accessed July 15th, 2017 athttp://www.europeristat.comSearch in Google Scholar

2Belizan JM, Althabe F, Cafferata ML. Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates. Epidemiol. 2007;18:485-6. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318068646a.BelizanJMAlthabeFCafferataMLHealth consequences of the increasing caesarean section ratesEpidemiol200718485–610.1097/EDE.0b013e318068646a17568221Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1181-93. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182704880.SpongCYBerghellaVWenstromKDMercerBMSaadeGRPreventing the first cesarean deliveryObstet Gynecol20121201181–9310.1097/AOG.0b013e3182704880354844423090537Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012;29:7-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285829.GregoryKDJacksonSKorstLFridmanMCesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits?Am J Perinatol2012297–1810.1055/s-0031-128582921833896Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5Bergant J, Sirc T, Lučovnik M, Verdenik I, Stopar Pintarič T. Perinatal analgesia and labour outcomes in Slovenia: a retrospective analysis of births between 2003 and 2013. Zdrav Vestn. 2016;85:83-91.BergantJSircTLučovnikMVerdenikIStoparPintarič TPerinatal analgesia and labour outcomes in Slovenia: a retrospective analysis of births between 2003 and 2013Zdrav Vestn20168583–9110.6016/ZdravVestn.1518Search in Google Scholar

6Fischer A, LaCoursiere DY, Barnard P, Bloebaum L, Varner M. Differences between hospitals in cesarean rates for term primigravidas with cephalic presentation. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:816-21. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000156299.52668.e2.FischerALaCoursiereDYBarnardPBloebaumLVarnerMDifferences between hospitals in cesarean rates for term primigravidas with cephalic presentationObstet Gynecol2005105816–2110.1097/01.AOG.0000156299.52668.e215802411Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;27:297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004.RobsonMHartiganLMurphyMMethods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rateBest Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol201327297–30810.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.00423127896Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8National Institute of Public Health. National Perinatal Information System: definitions and methodological guidelines. Accessed September 12th, 2017 at: http://www.ivz.si/podatki_metodoloska_gradiva?_5_AutoResize=false&_5_Filename=attName.png&_5_MediaId=6423&pi=5&pl=47-5.3National Institute of Public Health. National Perinatal Information System: definitions and methodological guidelinesAccessed September 12th2017http://www.ivz.si/podatki_metodoloska_gradiva?_5_AutoResize=false&_5_Filename=attName.png&_5_MediaId=6423&pi=5&pl=47-5.3Search in Google Scholar

9Robson MS. Classification of cesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001;12:23-39.RobsonMSClassification of cesarean sectionsFetal Matern Med Rev20011223–3910.1017/S0965539501000122Search in Google Scholar

10Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress: a clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol. 1976;33:696-705.SarnatHBSarnatMSNeonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress: a clinical and electroencephalographic studyArch Neurol197633696–70510.1001/archneur.1976.00500100030012987769Search in Google Scholar

11Verdenik I, Novak Antolič Ž, Zupan J. Perinatologia Slovenica II: slovenski perinatalni rezultati za obdobje 2002–11. Ljubljana: Združenje za perinatalno medicino SZD, Ginekološka klinika, UKC, 2013.VerdenikINovakAntolič ŽZupanJPerinatologia Slovenica II: slovenski perinatalni rezultati za obdobje 2002–11LjubljanaZdruženje za perinatalno medicino SZD, Ginekološka klinika, UKC2013Search in Google Scholar

12Pajntar M. Sprožitev poroda. In: Pajntar M, Novak Antolič Ž, Lučovnik M, et al. Nosečnost in vodenje poroda. Ljubljana: Medicinski Razgledi, 2015:270-3.PajntarMSprožitev porodaPajntarMNovakAntolič ŽLučovnikMet alNosečnost in vodenje porodaLjubljanaMedicinski Razgledi2015270–3Search in Google Scholar

13Patka JH, Lodolce AE, Johnston AK. High- versus low-dose oxytocin for augmentation or induction of labor. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:95-101. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E037.PatkaJHLodolceAEJohnstonAKHigh- versus low-dose oxytocin for augmentation or induction of laborAnn Pharmacother20053995–10110.1345/aph.1E03715572602Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14Wei SQ, Luo ZC, Qi HP, Xu H, Fraser WD. High-dose vs low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.007.WeiSQLuoZCQiHPXuHFraserWDHigh-dose vs low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic reviewAm J Obstet Gynecol2010203296–30410.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.00720451894Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15Budden A, Chen LJ, Henry A. High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(10):CD009701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009701.BuddenAChenLJHenryAHigh-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at termCochrane Database Syst Rev201410CD00970110.1002/14651858.CD009701Open DOISearch in Google Scholar