[1. Uporaba informacijsko - komunikacijske tehnologije v gospodinjstvih in pri posameznikih Slovenija: končni podatki.Ljubljana: Statistični urad Republike Slovenije, 2012. Pridobljeno5. 12. 2012 s spletne strani: http://www.stat.si/.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Klemenc-Ketiš Z, Kersnik J. Seeking health advice on the Internet in patients with health problems: a cross-sectional population study in Slovenia. Inform Health Soc Care 2013; 3: 280-90.10.3109/17538157.2013.76430623514043]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Demiris G. The diffusion of virtual communities in health care: concepts and challenges. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 62: 178-88.10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.00316406472]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Fox S. Medicine 2.0: peer-to-peer healthcare: report.Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Research Center, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Preece J. Empathic communities: reaching out across the web.Interactions 1998; 2: 32-43.10.1145/274430.274435]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Tanis M. Online social support groups. In Joinson A, McKenna KYA, Postmes T, Reips UD, editors. Oxford handbook of internet psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007: 137-52.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Barak A, Boniel-Nissim M, Suler J. Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Comput Hum Behav 2008; 24: 1867-83.10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.004]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Santana S, Lausen B, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Chronaki CE, Prokosch H-U, Wynn R. Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey. BMC Fam Pract 2011; 12: 20-35.10.1186/1471-2296-12-20310111821496309]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Coulson NS, Malik S. Health-related online support communities.]Search in Google Scholar
[In: Yan Z, editor. Encyclopedia of cyber-behaviour. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2012: 671-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Bartlett K, Coulson NS. An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects doctor/patient communication. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 83: 113-9.10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.02920599338]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Seckin G. Informational and decisional empowerment in online health support communities: initial psychometric validation of the Cyber Info-Decisional Empowerment Scale (CIDES) and preliminary data from administration of the scale. Support Care Cancer 2011; 19: 2057-61.10.1007/s00520-011-1249-y21858718]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Bridges J, Loukanova S, Carrera P. Patient empowerment in health care. In: Heggenhougen K, Quah S, editors. International encyclopedia of public health, Vol. 5. San Diego: Academic Press, 2008: 17-28.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAJF. Self-reported differences in empowerment between lurkers and posters in online patient support groups. J Med Internet Res 2008; 10: e18. doi:10.2196/jmir.992.10.2196/jmir.992248392518653442]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Lemire M, Sicotte C, Paré G. Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health. Health Policy 2008; 88: 130-40.10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.00618436330]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Menon ST. Toward a model of psychological health empowerment: implications for health care in multicultural communities. Nurse Educ Today 2002; 22: 28-39.10.1054/nedt.2001.072111886225]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Sharf BF. Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the internet. Women Health 1997; 26: 65-84.10.1300/J013v26n01_05]Search in Google Scholar
[17. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Shaw BR, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAJF. Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qual Health Res 2008; 18: 405-17.10.1177/1049732307313429]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Speer PW. Intrapersonal and interactional empowerment: implication for theory. J Community Psychol 2000; 28: 51-61.10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(200001)28:1<51::AID-JCOP6>3.0.CO;2-6]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Zimmerman MA. Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. Am J Community Psychol 1995; 23: 581-99.10.1007/BF02506983]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Speer PW, Hughey J. Community organizing: an ecological route to empowerment and power. Am J Community Psychol 1995; 23: 729-48.10.1007/BF02506989]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Boehm A, Staples LH. Empowerment: the point of view of consumers. Fam Soc 2004; 85: 270-80.10.1606/1044-3894.314]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Radin P. ‘‘To me, it’s my life’’: medical communication, trust, and activism in cyberspace. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 591-601.10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.022]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Mlinar S. Perceptions of empowerment among part-time nursing students. Zdrav Var 2012; 51: 69-74.10.2478/v10152-012-0008-x]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Hur MH. Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: exploring a typology of the process and components across disciplines. J Community Psychol 2006; 34: 523-40.10.1002/jcop.20113]Search in Google Scholar
[25. McMillan DW, Chavis DM. Sense of community: a definition and theory. J Community Psychol 1986; 14: 6-23.10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Peterson NA, Lowe JB, Aquilino ML, Schnider JE. Linking social cohesion and interactional empowerment: support and new implications for theory. J Community Psychol 2005; 33: 233-44.10.1002/jcop.20047]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Blanchard AL, Welbourne JA, Boughton MA. A model of online trust: the mediating role of norms and sense of virtual community.Inform Commun Society 2011; 14: 76-106.10.1080/13691181003739633]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Stavrositu C, Sundar SS. Does blogging empower women? Exploring the role of agency and community. J Comput Mediat Comm 2012; 17: 369-86.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01587.x]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Michinov N, Michinov E, Toczek-Capelle MC. Social identity, group processes, and performance in synchronous computermediated communication. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2004; 8: 27-39.10.1037/1089-2699.8.1.27]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Matzat U. A theory of relational signals in online groups. New Media Soc 2009; 11: 375-94.10.1177/1461444808101617]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Tanis M. Health-related online forums: what’s the big attraction.J Health Commun 2008; 13: 698-714.10.1080/1081073080241531618958781]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Verovšek A, Cimerman P. Predstavitev Med.over.net na prireditvi ob 10. letnici delovanja portala na Med.Over.Net.Ljubljana, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Ip EJ, Barnett MJ, Tenerowicz MJ, Perry PJ. The touro 12-step: a systematic guide to optimizing survey research with online discussion boards. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12: e16.10.2196/jmir.1314295622720507843]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Blanchard AL. Testing a model of sense of virtual community.Comput Hum Behav 2008; 24: 2107-23.10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Kraut RE, Resnick P, Kiesler S, Ren Y, Chen Y, Burke M et al.Building successful online communities: evidence-based social design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012.10.7551/mitpress/8472.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Obst PL, Stafurik J. Online we are all able bodied: online psychological sense of community and social support found through membership of disability-specific websites promotes well-being for people living with a physical disability. J Community Appl Soc 2010; 20: 525-31.10.1002/casp.1067]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Basu A, Dutta MJ. The relationships between health information seeking and community participation: the roles of health information orientation and efficacy. Health Commun 2008; 23: 70-9.10.1080/1041023070180712118443994]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Vehovar V, Sicherl P, Hüsing T, Dolničar V. Methodological challenges of digital divide measurements. Inf Soc; 2006: 279-90.10.1080/01972240600904076]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Dolničar V. Merjenje dinamike digitalnega razkoraka. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Vehovar V, Travar J. RIS 2008: e-Zdravje in e- Farmacija (#84).Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Mo PKH, Coulson NS. Developing a model for online support group use, empowering processes and psychosocial outcomes for individuals living with HIV/AIDS. Psychol Health 2012; 27: 445-59.10.1080/08870446.2011.59298121854088]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Welbourne JL, Blanchard AL, Wadsworth MB. Motivations in virtual health communities and their relationship to community, connectedness and stress. Comput Hum Behav 2013; 29: 129-39.10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.024]Search in Google Scholar
[43. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAFJ. Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients’ empowerment. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 74: 61-910.1016/j.pec.2008.07.04418778909]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Walther JB. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective. Commun Res 1992; 19: 52-90.10.1177/009365092019001003]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013: report. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Research Center, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Černigoj Sadar N. Delovanje neformalnih socialnih omrežij pri zadovoljevanju potreb družin. In: Novak M, Černigoj Sadar N, Dragoš S, Ferligoj A, Hlebec V, Kogovšek T, Nagode M, editors.Omrežja socialne opore Slovencev, Ljubljana: Inštitut Republike Slovenije za socialno varstvo, 2004: 133-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Lozar Manfreda K, Bosnjak M, Berzelak J, Haas I, Vehovar V. Web surveys versus other survey modes: a meta-analysis comparing response rates. Int J Market Res 2008; 50: 79-104.10.1177/147078530805000107]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Ule M, Kamin T. Družbeni dejavniki neenakosti v zdravju. Zdrav Var 2012; 51: 1-4. ]Search in Google Scholar