Integracija Kvantitativne In Kvalitativne Metodologije V Raziskavah V Zdravstvu: Sistematična Pregledna Študija / Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methodology in Health Science Research: A Systematic Review

1. Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. London: Sage Publications, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

2. Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Major issues and controversies in the use in mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2003: 3-50.Search in Google Scholar

3. Gorard S, Taylor C. Combining methods in educational and social research. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

4. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie A. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 2004; 33: 14-26.10.3102/0013189X033007014Search in Google Scholar

5. Niglas K. The multidimensional model of research methodology: an integrated set of continua. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. Handbook of mixed metods research. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, 2010: 215-236.Search in Google Scholar

6. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res 2007; 1: 112-133.10.1177/1558689806298224Search in Google Scholar

7. Lobe B. Združevanje kvalitativnih kvantitativnih metod - stara praksa v novi preobleki? Družboslovne razprave 2006; 22: 55-73.Search in Google Scholar

8. Koller M, Sinitsa E. Mixed methods in online research. In: Conceptualisation and future research agenda - General Online Research Conference; 2009 Apr 6-8, Vienna, Austria. Vienna: University of Vienna, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

9. Östlund U, Kidd L, Wengström Y, Rowa-Dewar N. Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: a methodological review. Int J Nurs Stud 2011; 48: 369-383.10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.10.005709432221084086Search in Google Scholar

10. Andrew S, Halcomb EJ. Mixed methods research is an effective method of enquiry for community health research. Contemp Nurse 2006; 23: 145-153.10.5172/conu.2006.23.2.145Search in Google Scholar

11. Curtis RS, Rabren K, Reilly A. Post-school outcomes of students with disabilities: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. J Vocat Rehabil 2009; 30: 31-48.10.3233/JVR-2009-0451Search in Google Scholar

12. Hopson LM, Steiker LKH. Methodology for evaluating an adaptation of evidence-based drug abuse prevention in alternative schools. Child Sch 2008; 30: 116-127.10.1093/cs/30.2.116290375720634972Search in Google Scholar

13. Bushy A. Conducting culturally competent rural nursing research. Annu Rev Nurs Res 2008; 26: 221-236.10.1891/0739-6686.26.1.221Search in Google Scholar

14. Bryman A, Becker S, Sempik J. Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: a view from social policy. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2008; 11: 261-276.10.1080/13645570701401644Search in Google Scholar

15. Barnes M, Bigari K, Culler T, Gregory H, Hamilton J, Krawczyk S, Earley D, Herlache E. Healthy lifestyles through an Adaptive Living Program: a pilot study. Occup Ther Int 2008; 15: 269-283.10.1002/oti.26119031478Search in Google Scholar

16. Zurc J. Mixed methods: backgrounds, findings and challenges: a systematic review. In: Minimizing and handling non-response in sample surveys - quantitative methods in the social sciences 2, Seminar; 2011 Dec 8-9, Leuven, Belgija. Leuven: Leuven Biostatistics and statistical Bioinformatics Centre, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

17. McMorris BJ, Petrie RS, Catalano RF, Fleming CB, Haggerty KP, Abbott RD. Use of web and in-person survey modes to gather data from young adults on sex and drug use: an evaluation of cost, time, and survey error based on a randomized mixed-mode design. Eval Rev 2009; 33: 138-158.10.1177/0193841X08326463265251119029360Search in Google Scholar

18. Revilla M. Quality in unimode and mixed-mode designs: a multitrait-multimethod approach. Surv Res Methods 2010; 4: 151-164.Search in Google Scholar

19. Millar MM, Dillman DA. Improving response to web and mixedmode surveys. Public Opin Q 2011; 75: 249-269.10.1093/poq/nfr003Search in Google Scholar

20. Gigliotti LM. Comparison of an internet versus mail survey: a case study. Human Dimensions Wildlife 2011; 16: 55-62.10.1080/10871209.2011.535241Search in Google Scholar

21. Lobe B, Vehovar V. Towards a flexible online mixed method design with a feedback loop. Qual Quant 2009; 43: 585-597.10.1007/s11135-007-9146-7Search in Google Scholar

22. Deutskens E, de Ruyter K, Wetzels M. An assessment of equivalence between online and mail surveys in service research. J Service Res 2006; 8: 346-355.10.1177/1094670506286323Search in Google Scholar

23. Bayart C, Bonnel P. The mixing of survey modes: application to Laon web and face to face household travel survey - WAPOR 62nd Annual Conference; 2009 Sep 11-13, Lausanne, Switzerland.Search in Google Scholar

24. Plano Clark VL, Huddleston-Casas CA, Churchill SL, O›Neil Green D, Garrett AL. Mixed methods approaches in family science research. J Fam Issues 2008; 29: 1543-1566.10.1177/0192513X08318251Search in Google Scholar

25. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Choosing a mixed methods design. In: Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL, eds. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2007: 58-88.Search in Google Scholar

26. Morgan DL. Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: applications to health research. Qual Health Res 1998; 8: 362-376.10.1177/10497323980080030710558337Search in Google Scholar

27. Greene JC, Caracelli VJ, Graham WF. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ Eval Policy Anal 1989; 11: 255-274.10.3102/01623737011003255Search in Google Scholar

28. Greene JC. Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2007.Search in Google Scholar

29. Landsverk J, Brown CH, Rolls Reutz J, Palinkas L, Horwitz SM. Design elements in implementation research: a structured review of child welfare and child mental health studies. Adm Policy Ment Health 2011; 38: 54-63.10.1007/s10488-010-0315-y305057220953974Search in Google Scholar

30. Baker DL, Melnikow J, Ying Ly M, Shoultz J, Niederhauser V, Diaz-Escamilla R. Translation of health surveys using mixed methods. J Nurs Scholarsh 2010; 42: 430-438.10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01368.x21091626Search in Google Scholar

31. Mortenson WB, Oliffe JL. Mixed methods research in occupational therapy: a survey and critique. OTJR 2009; 29: 14-23.Search in Google Scholar

32. Dunning K, LeMasters GK. Optimum survey methods when interviewing employed women. Am J Ind Med 2009; 52: 105-112.10.1002/ajim.2065819016248Search in Google Scholar

33. Nigg CR, Motl RW, Wong KT, Yoda LU, McCurdy DK, Paxton R, et al. Impact of mixed survey modes on physical activity and fruit/vegetable consumption: a longitudinal study. Surv Res Methods 2009; 3: 81-90.Search in Google Scholar

34. Vatne S, Fagermoen MS. Event-oriented data integration: a qualitative strategy in studying professional practice. Res Theory Nurs Pract 2008; 22: 38-55.10.1891/1541-6577.22.1.38Search in Google Scholar

35. Joubert DJ, Lee TP. Empowering your institution through assessment. J Med Libr Assoc 2007; 95: 46-53.Search in Google Scholar

36. McCabe SE, Diez A, Boyd CJ, Nelson TF, Weitzman ER. Comparing web and mail responses in a mixed mode survey in college alcohol use research. Addict Behav 2006; 31: 1619-1627.10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.12.009315649216460882Search in Google Scholar

37. Smyth T, Allen S. Nurses› experiences assessing the spirituality of terminally ill patients in acute clinical practice. Int J Palliat Nurs 2011; 17: 337-343.10.12968/ijpn.2011.17.7.33721841702Search in Google Scholar

38. Ploeg J, Skelly J, Rowan M, Edwards N, Davies B, Grinspun D, Bajnok I, Downey A. The role of nursing best practice champions in diffusing practice guidelines: a mixed methods study. Worldviewa Evid Based Nurs 2010; 7: 238-251.10.1111/j.1741-6787.2010.00202.x20880009Search in Google Scholar

39. Hawkes C, Foxcroft DR, Yerrell P. Clinical guideline for nurse-led early extubation after coronary artery bypass: an evaluation. J Adv Nurs 2010; 66: 2038-2049.10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05337.x20626495Search in Google Scholar

40. Beckwith, Dickinson A, Kendall S. Exploring understanding of the term nursing assessment: a mixed method review of the literature. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2010; 7: 98-110.Search in Google Scholar

41. Rivard LM, Russell DJ, Roxborough L, Ketelaar M, Bartlett DJ, Rosenbaum P. Promoting the use of measurement tools in practice: a mixed-methods study of the activities and experiences of physical therapist knowledge brokers. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 1580-1590.10.2522/ptj.2009040820813819Search in Google Scholar

42. Colarossi L, Breitbart V, Betancourt G. Barriers to screening for intimate partner violence: a mixed-methods study of providers in family planning clinics. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2010; 42: 236-243.10.1363/422361021126299Search in Google Scholar

43. Blakely G, Skirton H, Cooper S, Allum P, Nelmes P. Use of educational games in the health professions: a mixed-methods study of educators› perspectives in the UK. Nurs Health Sci 2010; 12: 27-32.10.1111/j.1442-2018.2009.00479.x20487322Search in Google Scholar

44. Schreiber J, Downey P, Traister J. Academic program support for evidence-based practice: a mixed-methods investigation. J Phys Ther Educ 2009; 23: 36-43.10.1097/00001416-200901000-00006Search in Google Scholar

45. Durham K, Van Vliet PM, Badger F, Sackley C. Use of information feedback and attentional focus of feedback in treating the person with a hemiplegic arm. Physiother Res Int 2009; 14: 77-90.10.1002/pri.43119107706Search in Google Scholar

46. Schaetti C, Hutubessy R, Ali SM, Pach A, Weiss MG, Chaignat CL, Khatib AM. Oral cholera vaccine use in Zanzibar: socioeconomic and behavioural features affecting demand and acceptance. BMC Public Health 2009; 9: 99.10.1186/1471-2458-9-99267150419351401Search in Google Scholar

47. Sverker A, Östlund G, Hallert C, Hensing G. ‹I lose all these hours...›: exploring gender and consequences of dilemmas experienced in everyday life with coeliac disease. Scand J Caring Sci 2009; 23: 342-352.10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00628.x19645808Search in Google Scholar

48. Levett-Jones T, Lathlean J, Higgins I, McMillan M. The duration of clinical placements: a key influence on nursing students› experience of belongingness. Aust J Adv Nurs 2008; 26: 8-16.Search in Google Scholar

49. Small ML. How to conduct a mixed methods study: recent trends in a rapidly growing literature. Annu Rev Sociol 2011; 37: 57-86.10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102657Search in Google Scholar

50. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Chamberlain P, Hurlburt MS, Landsverk J. Mixed-methods designs in mental health services research: a review. Psychiatr Serv 2011; 62: 255-263.10.1176/ps.62.3.pss6203_025521363896Search in Google Scholar

51. Niglas K. How the novice researcher can make sense of mixed methods design. Int J Multiple Res Approach 2009; 3: 34-46.10.5172/mra.455.3.1.34Search in Google Scholar

52. Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qual Res 2006; 6: 97-113.Search in Google Scholar

53. Collins KMT, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Jiao QG. A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. J Mix Methods Res 2007; 1: 267-294.10.1177/1558689807299526Search in Google Scholar

54. Gorecki CA, Brown JM, Briggs M, Nixon J. Evaluation of five search strategies in retrieving qualitative patient-reported electronic data on the impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life. J Adv Nurs 2010; 66: 645-652.10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05192.x20423399Search in Google Scholar