Determining Argumentative Dispute Resolution Reveals Deep Disagreement Over Harassment Issue (A Case-Study of a Discussion in the Russian Parliament)

1. Amgoud, L., Doder, D., Vesic, S. Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: Foundations and semantics, Artificial Intelligence 302, 2022, 103607.10.1016/j.artint.2021.103607 Search in Google Scholar

2. Balabanov, S. S., Saralieva, Z. H. Seksual’nye domogatel’stva na rabote v Rossii [Sexual harassment at work in Russia], Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. N.I. Lobachevsky. Series Social Sciences 1 (17), 2010, pp. 7-12. (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

3. Baroni, P., M. Caminada, M. Giacomin. An introduction to argumentation semantics, Knowledge Engineering Revue 26 (4), 2011, pp 365–410.10.1017/S0269888911000166 Search in Google Scholar

4. Barth, E.M., Krabbe, E.C.W. From Axiom to Dialogue, Berlin - New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1982.10.1515/9783110839807 Search in Google Scholar

5. Bex F., Verheij B. Solving a Murder Case by Asking Critical Questions: An Approach to Fact- Finding in Terms of Argumentation and Story Schemes. Argumentation 26, 2012, pp. 325–353. DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9257-010.1007/s10503-011-9257-0 Search in Google Scholar

6. Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M. C. Graduality in Argumentation, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 23, 2005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.141110.1613/jair.1411 Search in Google Scholar

7. Chernigovskaya, T., Shevardnadze, S. ‘This is how the world works: a young lady must resist, and a man must persevere. Spletnik. 08.03.2018. URL: https://spletnik.ru/buzz/interview1/81128-tatyana-chernigovskaya-interview.html (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

8. Chernyansky, P. Daria Zhuk, a TV Rain producer, openly accused MP Slutsky of harassment. Daria Zhuk filed a complaint with the Ethics Commission of the State Duma. The Village. 02.03.2018. URL: https://www.the-village.ru/city/news/304107-zhuk-vs-slutsky (RUS) Search in Google Scholar

9. Dung, P.M. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77, 1995, pp. 321-357.10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X Search in Google Scholar

10. Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511616389 Search in Google Scholar

11. Feldman, R. Deep Disagreement, Rational Resolutions, and Critical Thinking, Informal Logic 25 (1), 2005, pp. 13-23.10.22329/il.v25i1.1041 Search in Google Scholar

12. Fogelin, R.J. The Logic of Deep Disagreement, Informal Logic 25 (1), 2005, pp. 3–11.10.22329/il.v25i1.1040 Search in Google Scholar

13. Kharitonov, M. M. Ponjatie seksual’nogo domogatel’stva (harassmenta) i mehanizmy protivodejstvija emu v trudovom prave Rossii [The concept of sexual harassment and the mechanisms of countering it in the labor law of Russia], Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics 3, 2019, pp. 52-75. (In Russian)10.17323/2072-8166.2019.3.52.75 Search in Google Scholar

14. Lisanyuk, E. Argumentation and conviction. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka, 2015. (in Russian) Search in Google Scholar

15. Lisanyuk, E. Argumentation, Pavilionis’s meaning continuum and the Kitchen Debate, Problemos 88, 2015, pp. 95-113.10.15388/Problemos.2015.88.8481 Search in Google Scholar

16. Lisanyuk, E., Mazurova, M. Argumentation, peer-disagreement and birth of truth in dispute [Argumentaciya, raznoglasiye ravnyh I rozhdeniye istiny v spore]. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 56 (1), 2019, pp. 81–100. DOI: 10.5840/eps20195619 (in Russian)10.5840/eps20195619 Search in Google Scholar

17. Nelyubin, N. MP Oksana Pushkina: ‘Our men find it easier with ‘fish’”. Fontanka.ru. 02.03.2018. URL: https://www.fontanka.ru/2018/03/02/035/ (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

18. Olsson, E. J. A Bayesian Simulation Model of Group Deliberation and Polarization, in F. Zenker (ed.), Bayesian Argumentation. Springer, 2013.10.1007/978-94-007-5357-0_6 Search in Google Scholar

19. Ostrovskaya, Y., Miryasova, O. Problema harassmenta v vysshej shkole [The problem of harassment in higher education], Friedrich Ebert Foundation. Russia, 2021, URL: https://www.fes-russia.org/meroprijatija/publikacija-problema-kharassmenta-v-vysshei-shkole/?fbclid=IwAR2h7eVFEd4KGIk89_LGjTSnh-gnYXWP4G6NLYzNltBWH-7Pfwyvy (Accessed: 03.05.2021) (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

20. Prakken, H. Formalising debates about law-making proposals as practical reasoning, in Araszkiewicz, M., Pleszka, K. (eds.). Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking, Legisprudence Library Series, Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-19575-9_11 Search in Google Scholar

21. Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G. Logical systems for defeasible argumentation, in: Gabbay, D., Guenther, F. (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Kluwer, 2002, pp. 219–318.10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3 Search in Google Scholar

22. Samokhina, S. ‘For lack of harassment’ // Kommersant. 21.03.2018. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3579606 (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

23. Smolyakova, D.T., Chernigovskaya, T. ‘Humans share half of their genes with yeast’. SPb Sobaka.ru СПб 29.03.2018 URL: https://www.sobaka.ru/city/society/70447 (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

24. Sokolova, K. ‘Harassment is like a virus. And my case is a vaccination against it’. MP Slutsky on accusation of harassment. SNOB. 13.06.2018. URL: https://snob.ru/entry/162002 (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

25. Stuchevskaya, O. Harassment i rossijskie zhenshhiny [Harassment and Russian women], Vestnik obshhestvennogo mnenija [Public Opinion Bulletin] 4 (96), 2008. (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

26. Veller, A. About the sexual scandal around a colleague in parliament. SNOB. 26.03.2018. URL: https://snob.ru/profile/31652/blog/135611 (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

27. Walton, D., Reed, Ch., Macagno, F. Argumentation schemes, Cambridge UP, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511802034 Search in Google Scholar

28. Wells, S., Reed, Ch. Testing formal dialectic, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ed. Parsons S. et el., vol. 4049\2006, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 2006, pp. 74-87.10.1007/11794578_5 Search in Google Scholar

29. Wittgenstein, L. On Certainty, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969. Search in Google Scholar

30. Wittgenstein, L. ‘He always treated women with warmth.’ The head of the State Duma committee stood up for Slutsky. Esquire. 07.03.2018. URL: https://esquire.ru/novosti/45002-warm-slutsky (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

31. Wittgenstein, L. ‘MP Pushkina prepares amendments on sexual harassment amid scandal with MP Slutsky’ Kommersant. 27.02.2018. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3559345 (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

32. Wittgenstein, L. Oksana Pushkina proposed to deprive politicians of their positions for harassment. RBC. 22.03.2018. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/22/03/2018/5ab3eeee9a79477dd47ae462 ; (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

33. Wittgenstein, L. The head of the Union of Journalists of Moscow: ‘The Journalists who complained about the harassment of the MP, have humiliated their profession’. Fontanka.ru. 07.03.2018. URL:https://www.fontanka.ru/2022/02/18/70454591/ (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

34. Wittgenstein, L. We consider [Project My schitaem]. Mikhailov and partners. Analytica. 2019. URL: https://m-p-a.ru/genderinequality.html (Accessed: 16.03.2021) (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar

35. Wittgenstein, L. The Ethics Commission of the State Duma found no violation of code of conduct in Slutsky’s behavior. Interfax 21.03.2018. URL: https://www.interfax.ru/russia/604626 (In Russian) Search in Google Scholar