Ambiguity in Argumentation: The Impact of Contextual Factors on Semantic Interpretation

1. Aristotle. Topics. In the complete works of Aristotle, vol. I, ed. Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991. Search in Google Scholar

2. Atlas, J. Philosophy Without Ambiguity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989. Search in Google Scholar

3. Chang, C.-H., & Krulee, G. Resolution of ambiguity in Chinese and its application to machine translation. Machine Translation, 6(4), 1991, pp. 279–315.10.1007/BF00417653 Search in Google Scholar

4. Chapman, S., & Routledge, C. (Eds.). Key Ideas in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh University Press, 2009.10.1515/9780748631421 Search in Google Scholar

5. Crivelli, P. Aristotle on Truth, Cambridge, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511482496 Search in Google Scholar

6. Degano, C. Corpus linguistics and argumentation: Retrieving argumentative patterns in UK prime ministerial debates. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5(2), 2016, pp.113-138.10.1075/jaic.5.2.01deg Search in Google Scholar

7. Golitsis, P. “Aristotle on Ambiguity”. Strategies of Ambiguity in Ancient Literature, edited by Martin Vöhler, Therese Fuhrer and Stavros Frangoulidis, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2021, pp. 11-28.10.1515/9783110715811-002 Search in Google Scholar

8. Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan. Language, context and text: a social semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press, 1985. Search in Google Scholar

9. Halliday, M.A.K. An introduction to functional grammar.2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold, 1994. Search in Google Scholar

10. Halliday, M. A. K. The notion of context in language education. Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Language and education. Volume 7 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 250–264. London & New York: Continuum, 2007. Search in Google Scholar

11. Hamblin, C. L. Fallacies. London: Methuen, 1970. Search in Google Scholar

12. Hinton, M. Corpus Linguistics Methods in the Study of (Meta)Argumentation. Argumentation 35, 2021, pp. 435–455.10.1007/s10503-020-09533-z Search in Google Scholar

13. Horn, L.R.A pragmatic approach to certain ambiguities. Linguist Philos 4, 1981, pp. 321–358.10.1007/BF00304400 Search in Google Scholar

14. Hutchby, I. Oh’, Irony and Sequential Ambiguity in Arguments. Discourse & Society 12 (2), 2001, pp. 123–41.10.1177/0957926501012002001 Search in Google Scholar

15. Jackson, S. Frans H. van Eemeren and Wu Peng (ed.). Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics: John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Volume 12 of the Argumentation in Context Series. Argumentation 32 (2), 2017, pp. 293-299.10.1007/s10503-018-9459-9 Search in Google Scholar

16. Jaszczolt, K. Discourse, beliefs and intentions. Oxford: Elsevier, 1999. Search in Google Scholar

17. Koniak, P. and Cwalina, W. Does it pay to avoid speaking straight about controversial issues? Impact of argumentative ambiguity on the perception of the speaker, Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 26 No. 1, 2022, pp. 84-9710.1108/JCOM-11-2020-0154 Search in Google Scholar

18. Larina, T., Ozyumenko V. and Ponton D. Persuasion strategies in media discourse about Russia: Linguistic ambiguity and uncertainty. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics Levinson, S. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized Conversational 22 implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2019.10.1515/lpp-2019-0002 Search in Google Scholar

19. Levinson, S. C. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. The MIT Press, 2000.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

20. Malinowski, B. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. Charles K. Ogden & Ian A. Richards (eds.), The meaning of meaning, London: Routledge, 1935, pp. 146–152. Search in Google Scholar

21. Postal, P. On Certain Ambiguities. In Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 3, 1974. Search in Google Scholar

22. Schiaparelli, A. Aristotle on the fallacies of combination and division in Sophistici Elenchi 4. History and Philosophy of Logic, 2003.10.1080/0144534031000096145 Search in Google Scholar

23. Smith, L. W. John-Steiner, V., Panofsky, C. P., Smith, L. W (eds.). “Context.” Sociocultural Approaches to Language and Literacy: An Interactionist Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 1994.10.1017/CBO9780511897047 Search in Google Scholar

24. van Eemeren, F. H. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma- dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2010.10.1075/aic.2 Search in Google Scholar

25. van Eemeren, F. H. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse in political deliberation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1), 2013, pp. 10-31.10.1075/jaic.2.1.01eem Search in Google Scholar

26. Walton, D. N. Informal logic: A pragmatic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

27. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/seal_2 Search in Google Scholar

28. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/make_1?q=make Search in Google Scholar