Argumentation: Reasoning Universalis

1. Bondarenko, A., Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R.A. and Toni, F. An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial. Intelligence 93, 1997, pp. 63–101.10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00015-5 Search in Google Scholar

2. Diakidoy, I.A., Kakas, A.C., Michael, L. and Miller, R. Story comprehension through argumentation. In Simon Parsons, Nir Oren, Chris Reed, and Federico Cerutti, editors, Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2014, Scottish Highlands, UK, volume 266 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2014, pp. 31–42, IOS Press. Search in Google Scholar

3. Diakidoy I.A., Michael, L. and Kakas, A.C. Knowledge activation in story comprehension. The Journal of Cognitive Science, 18, 2017, pp. 439–471.10.17791/jcs.2017.18.4.439 Search in Google Scholar

4. Diakidoy I. A., Michael, L., Kakas, A.C. and Miller, R. Story Comprehension through Argumentation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA), 2014, pp. 31–42, IOS Press. Search in Google Scholar

5. Novaes, C.T. The Dialogical Roots of Deduction: Historical, Cognitive, and Philosophical Perspectives on Reasoning, 2020, Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

6. van Eemeren, F.H. and Grootendorst, R. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach, 2003, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616389 Search in Google Scholar

7. Greco, S. and Rigotti, E. Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes, 2019, Springer Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

8. Hadjisoteriou, E. and Kakas, A. C. Reasoning about actions and change in argumentation. Argument Computation, 6 (3), 2015, pp. 265–291.10.1080/19462166.2015.1123774 Search in Google Scholar

9. Johnson-Laird, P. Mental Models, 1983, Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

10. Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P. and Toni, F. On argumentation logic and propositional logic. Studia Logica, 106 (2), 2018, pp. 237–279.10.1007/s11225-017-9736-x Search in Google Scholar

11. Kakas, A.C., Moraitis, P. and Spanoudakis, N.I. GORGIAS: Applying argumentation. Argument & Computation, 10 (1), 2019, pp.55–81.10.3233/AAC-181006 Search in Google Scholar

12. Kakas, A.C., Toni, F. and Mancarella, P. Argumentation logic. In Simon Parsons, Nir Oren, Chris Reed, and Federico Cerutti, editors, Computational Models of Argument - COMMA 2014, volume 266 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2014, pp. 345–356. IOS Press. Search in Google Scholar

13. Kakas, A.C. Informalizing formal logic. Informal Logic, 39 (2), 2019, pp.169–204.10.22329/il.v39i2.5169 Search in Google Scholar

14. Kakas, A. C. and Mancarella, P. On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation, 23 (5), 2013, pp.991–1015.10.1093/logcom/exs068 Search in Google Scholar

15. McCarthy, J. Programs with common sense. In Proc. of Teddington Conf. on Mechanization of Thought Processes, 1959, pp. 75–91. Search in Google Scholar

16. Mercier, H. and Sperber, D. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34 (2), 2011, pp.57–74.10.1017/S0140525X1000096821447233 Search in Google Scholar

17. Mercier, H. The argumentative theory: Predictions and empirical evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20 (9), 2016, pp.689 – 700.10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.00127450708 Search in Google Scholar

18. Michael, L. and Kakas, A.C. Knowledge qualification through argumentation. In Esra Erdem, Fangzhen Lin, and Torsten Schaub, editors, Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany. Volume 5753 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009, pp. 209–222. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_19 Search in Google Scholar

19. Moschovakis, J. Intuitionistic Logic. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Fall 2021 edition, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

20. Perelman C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. The new rhetoric. A treatise on argumentation, 1969, Notre Dame/London: University of Notre Dame Press. Search in Google Scholar

21. Pollock, J. L. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 1987, pp.81–518.10.1207/s15516709cog1104_4 Search in Google Scholar

22. Priest, G., Tanaka K. and Zalta, E.N. Paraconsistent logic. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 Edition), 2022. Search in Google Scholar

23. Dietz, E. and Kakas, A.C. Cognitive argumentation for human syllogistic reasoning. Künstliche Intell., 33(3), 2019, pp.229–242.10.1007/s13218-019-00608-y Search in Google Scholar

24. Dietz, E. and Kakas, A.C. Cognitive argumentation and the suppression task. CoRR, abs/2002.10149, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

25. Dietz, E. and Kakas, A.C. Cognitive argumentation and the selection task. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 43, 2021, pp. 1588-1594, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4n0867c7, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

26. Toumlin, S.E. The Uses of Argument, 1958, Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

27. Walton, D.N. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, 1995, Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

28. Walton, D.N., Reed C. and Macagno, F. Argumentation Schemes, 2008, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802034 Search in Google Scholar