[
1. Alchourrón, C., P. Gärdenfors, D. Makinson, On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions, Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 1985, pp. 510-530.10.2307/2274239
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Almpani, S., Y. Kiouvrekis, P. Stefaneas, P. Frangos, Computational Argumentation for Medical Device Regulatory Classification, International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 31, 2022, DOI: 10.1142/S021821302250005110.1142/S0218213022500051
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Barbashina, E., E. Lisanyuk, Leon Petrażycki on Norms and Their Logical Study, Studia Humana 7: 4, 2018, pp. 30-38.10.2478/sh-2018-0021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Dung, P.M., On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77, 1995, pp. 321-357.10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Eemeren van, F.H., R. Grootendorst, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragmadialectical Approach, Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511616389
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Gabbay, D. M., K. Schlechta, A New Perspective on Nonmonotonic Logics, Springer International Publishing AG, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-46817-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Kirillova, N., E. Lisanyuk, Truth and legal argumentation in Fyodor Dostoevsky’s, The Karamazov Brothers, Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science 48, 2019, pp. 193-204.10.17223/1998863x/48/19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Lisanyuk, E., Argumentation, Pavilionis’s meaning continuum and the Kitchen Debate, Problemos 88, 2015, pp. 95-113.10.15388/Problemos.2015.88.8481
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Lisanyuk E. Logical theories of rational behavior, law and argumentation [Логічні теорії раціональної поведінки, право і аргументація], Philosophy of law and contemporary theory of law [Філософія права і загальна теорія права] 1–2, 2014, pp. 148-159, in Ukrainian.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Pollock, J. L., Defeasible Reasoning and Degrees of Justification, Argument and Computation 1 (1), 2010, pp. 7-22.10.1080/19462161003728921
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Prakken, H., Formalising debates about law-making proposals as practical reasoning, [in:] M. Araszkiewicz, K. Pleszka (eds.), Logic in the Theory and Practice of Lawmaking. Legisprudence Library Series, Springer, 2015.10.1007/978-3-319-19575-9_11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Schumann, A. Did the Neo-Babylonians construct a Symbolic Logic for legal proceedings? Journal of Applied Logics – IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications 6: 1, 2019, pp. 31-82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Schumann, A. Archaeology of Logic, Taylor & Francis Group, 2023.10.1201/9781003316466
]Search in Google Scholar
