Are Design Beliefs Safe?

1. Blackburn, S. An Unbeautiful Mind, UNZ.org 2002, http://www.unz.org/Pub/NewRepublic-2002aug05-00029, Accessed on February 14, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

2. Casler, K., Kelemen, D. Developmental Continuity in Teleo-Functional Explanation: Reasoning About Nature Among Romanian Romani Adults, Journal of Cognition and Development 9, 2008, pp. 340-362.10.1080/15248370802248556Search in Google Scholar

3. Comesana, J. Unsafe Knowledge, Synthese 146 (3), 2005, pp. 395-404.10.1007/s11229-004-6213-7Search in Google Scholar

4. Conee, E., Feldman, R. The Generality Problem for Reliabilism, Philosophical Studies 89, 1998, pp. 1-29.10.1023/A:1004243308503Search in Google Scholar

5. De Ridder, J. Design Discourse and the Cognitive Science of Design, Philosophia Reformata 79, 2014, pp. 37-53.10.1163/22116117-90000561Search in Google Scholar

6. Dembski, W. A. No Free Lunch: Why Specified Complexity Cannot Be Purchased Without Intelligence, Lanham: Rowman and little, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

7. Dembski, W. A. The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance through Small Probabilities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.10.1017/CBO9780511570643Search in Google Scholar

8. Evans, E. M. The Emergence of Beliefs About the Origins of Species in School-Age Children, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 46, 2000, pp. 221-254.Search in Google Scholar

9. Greco, J. How Must Knowledge Be Modally Related to What Is Known? Philosophical Topics 26 (1/2), 1999, pp. 373-384.10.5840/philtopics1999261/229Search in Google Scholar

10. Guthrie, S. E. Religion and Art: A Cognitive and Evolutionary Approach, Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture 9 (3), 2015, pp. 282-311.10.1558/jsrnc.v9i3.23971Search in Google Scholar

11. Rodney Holder, R. D. Fine-Tuning, Multiple Universes and Theism. Noûs 36, 2002, pp. 295-312.10.1111/1468-0068.00372Search in Google Scholar

12. Kelemen, D. Are Children “Intuitive Theists”?: Reasoning About Purpose and Design in Nature, Psychological Science 15, 2004, pp. 295-301.10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00672.xSearch in Google Scholar

13. Kelemen, D. The Scope of Teleological Thinking in Preschool Children, Cognition 70, 1999, pp. 241-272.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00010-4Search in Google Scholar

14. Kelemen, D., Rosset, E. The Human Function Compunction: Teleological Explanation in Adults, Cognition 111, 2009, pp. 138-143.10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.00119200537Search in Google Scholar

15. Lombrozo, T., Kelemen, D., Zaitchik, D. Inferring Design Evidence of a Preference for Teleological Explanations in Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease, Psychological Science 18, 2007, pp. 999-1006.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02015.x17958715Search in Google Scholar

16. Nicholas, R., Yaffe, G. Thomas Reid. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2016 Edition.Search in Google Scholar

17. Oppy, G. Arguing About Gods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.10.1017/CBO9780511498978Search in Google Scholar

18. Paley, W. Natural Theology or Evidence for the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

19. Philipse, H. God in the Age of Science: A Critique of Religious Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697533.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

20. Plantinga, A. Is Belief in God Properly Basic? Noûs 15, 1981, pp. 41-51.10.2307/2215239Search in Google Scholar

21. Plantinga, A. Warrant and Proper Function, New York (N.Y.): Oxford University Press, 1993.10.1093/0195078640.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

22. Plantinga, A. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812097.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

23. Pritchard, D. Anti-luck epistemology, Synthese 158 (3), 2007.10.1007/s11229-006-9039-7Search in Google Scholar

24. Pritchard, D., Safety-Based Epistemology: Whither Now? Journal of Philosophical Research 34, 200910.5840/jpr_2009_2Search in Google Scholar

25. Rabinowitz, D. The Safety Condition for Knowledge, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.iep.utm.edu/safety-c/, Accessed on February 13, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

26. Ratzsch, D. Perceiving Design, In N. A. Manson (ed), God and Design: the Teleological Argument and Modern Science, London and New York: Routledge, 2003, pp. 125-145.Search in Google Scholar

27. Ratzsch, D. Koperski, J. Teleological Arguments for God’s Existence, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2016 Edition.Search in Google Scholar

28. Reid, T. Inquiry Into the Human Mind, 7nd Edition, Edinburgh: Maclachlan & Stewart, 1872.Search in Google Scholar

29. Williamson, T. Knowledge and its limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.10.1093/019925656X.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

30. Williamson, T. Reply to Goldman, In P. Greenough, D. Pritchard (eds), Williamson on Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 305-312.Search in Google Scholar