[
Aggarwal RK, Allainguillaume J, Bajay MM, Barthwal S, Bertolino P, Chauhan P, Zucchi MI (2011) Permanent Genetic Resources added to Molecular Ecology Resources Database 1 August 2010 – 30 September 2010. Molecular Ecology Resources 11(1): 219-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02944.x21429127
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brachet S, Jubier MF, Richard M, Jung-Muller B, Frascaria-Lacoste N (1999) Rapid identification of microsatellite loci using 5’ anchored PCR in the common ash Fraxinus excelsior. Molecular Ecology 8(1):160-163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Broome A, Mitchell RJ (2017) Ecological impacts of ash dieback and mitigation methods. In: Technical Report. FCRN029. UK Forest Research: 1-16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brownstein MJ, Carpten JD, Smith JR (1996) Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. BioTechniques 20: 1004-1010. https://doi.org/10.2144/96206st018780871
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burger K, Müller M, Gailing O (2018) Characterization of EST-SSRs for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and their transferability to Fagus orientalis Lipsky, Castanea dentata Bork., and Quercus rubra L. Silvae Genetica, 67(1): 127-132. https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2018-0019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dobrowolska D, Hein S, Oosterbaan A, Skovsgaard JP, Wagner SP (2008) Ecology and growth of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). 35 p, Available under: http://www.valbro.uni-freiburg.de/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis J, Burke J (2007) EST-SSRs as a resource for population genetic analyses. Heredity 99:125-132. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.680100117519965
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferrazzini D, Monteleoni I, Belletti P (2007) Genetic variability and divergence among Italian populations of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Annals of Forest Science 64(2):159-168. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006100
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Resources 2(4):618-620. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2002.00305.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hebel I, Haas R, Dounavi A (2006) Genetic variation of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) populations from provenance regions in southern Germany by using nuclear and chloroplast microsatellites. Silvae Genetica 55(1-6):38-44. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2006-0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heuertz M, Hausman JF, Hardy OJ, Vendramin GG, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Veke-mans X (2004) Nuclear microsatellites reveal contrasting patterns of genetic structure between western and south-eastern European populations of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Evolution 58(5):976-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00432.x15212379
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kalia RK, Rai MK, Kalia S, Singh R, Dhawan AK (2011) Microsatellite markers: an overview of the recent progress in plants. Euphytica 177:309-344.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0286-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kramer AT, Havens K (2009) Plant conservation genetics in a changing world. Trends in Plant Science 14(11):599-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.08.00519748300
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kubisiak TL, Nelson CD, Staton ME, Zhebentyayeva T, Smith C, Olukolu BA, Fang GC, Hebard FV, Anagnostakis S, Wheeler N, Sisco PH, Abbott AG, Sederoff RR (2013) A transcriptome-based genetic map of Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima) and identification of regions of segmental homology with peach (Prunus persica). Tree Genetics & Genomes 9: 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-012-0579-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lefort F, Brachet S, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Edwards KJ, Douglas GC (1999) Identification and characterisation of microsatellite loci in ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and their conservation in olive family (Oleaceae). Molecular Ecology8(6):1075-1092. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00655_8.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKinney LV, Nielsen LR, Collinge DB, Thomsen IM, Hansen JK, Kijaer ED (2014) The ash dieback crisis: genetic variation in resistance can prove a long-term solution. Plant Pathology 63(3):485-499. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12196
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mitchell RJ, Bailey S, Beaton JK, Bellamy PE, Brooker RW, Broome A, Chetcuti J, Eaton S, Ellis CJ, Farren J, Gimona A, Goldberg E, Hall J, Iason GR, Kerr G, Littlewood NA, Morgan V, Newey S, Potts JM, Pozsgai G, Ray D, Sim DA, Stock-an JA, Taylor AFS, Woodward S (2014) The potential ecological impact of ash dieback in the UK. JNCC Report No. 483. Peterborough: JNCC, 244 p, ISSN 0963-8091
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pautasso M, Aas G, Queloz V, Holdenrieder O (2013) European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback – A conservation biology challenge. Biological Conservation 158:37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6(1):288-295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research – an update. Bioinformatics 28(19):2537-2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460346324522820204
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18(2):233-234. https://doi.org/10.1038/7270810657137
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sollars ESA, Harper AL, Kelly LJ, Sambles CM, Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Swarbreck D et al. (2017) Genome sequence and genetic diversity of European ash trees. Nature 541:212-234. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature2078628024298
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stocks JJ, Metheringham CL, Plumb WJ, Lee SJ, Kelly LJ, Nichols RA, Buggs RJA (2019) Genomic basis of European ash tree resistance to ash dieback fungus. Nature Ecology & Evolution 3(12):1686-1696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-1036-6688755031740845
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sutherland BG, Belaj A, Nier S, Cottrell JE, P Vaughan S, Hubert J, Russell K (2010) Molecular biodiversity and population structure in common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in Britain: implications for conservation. Molecular Ecology 19(11):2196-2211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04376.x20465580
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley PF (2005) Micro-Checker User Guide. Hull: The University of Hull
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Varshney RK, Graner A, Sorrells ME (2005) Genic microsatellite markers in plants: features and applications. Trends in Biotechnology 23(1):48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.11.00515629858
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wallander E (2013) Systematics and floral evolution in Fraxinus (Oleaceae). Belgische Dendrologie Belge 2012:38-58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38(6):1358-1370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x28563791
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zheng HD, Zhuang WY (2014) Hymenoscyphus albidoides sp. nov. and H. pseudo-albidus from China. Mycological Progress 13:625-638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-013-0945-z
]Search in Google Scholar