1. bookVolume 68 (2019): Issue 1 (January 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Discovery of Geographically Robust Hybrid Poplar Clones

Published Online: 18 Nov 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 68 (2019) - Issue 1 (January 2019)
Page range: 101 - 110
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2509-8934
First Published
22 Feb 2016
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Hybrid poplar clonal growth in the states (regions) of Minnesota (MN), Indiana (IN), Michigan (MI), and New York (NY) USA was analyzed to discover 10 geographically robust (geo-robust) clones, all P. deltoides x P. nigra (D x N) hybrids previously tested and screened in MN, that were broadly adapted across latitudinal and longitudinal ranges of 9 and 20 degrees, respectively. The clonal effect for growth explained 25 to 36 % of the total variance, 2.5–4.1 times the clone x site interaction. Clone explained 24 to 46 % of total variation in canker occurrence on two sites. Genetic gain in growth was calculated relative to commercial check clones. Genetic gain in growth of geo-robust clones exceeded that of random clones by 24 to 44 %. Geo-robust clones and the best clones on each site were not significantly different on the MN sites, but best clones outperformed geo-robust clones on the other sites by 10 to 39 % genetic gain. Geo-robust clones grew faster than commercial check clones on all but the MI site. The reduction in genetic gain for growth due to using broadly adapted clones relative to the best clones has to be compared to the additional costs and benefits of multiple breeding zones.

Keywords

Becker HC and J Leon (1988) Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101:1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bentzer BG, GS Foster, HL Hellberg and AG Podzorski (1988) Geotype x environment interaction in Norway spruce involving three levels of genetic control: seed source, clone mixture, and clone. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18(9):1172-1181. https://doi.org/10.1139/x88-18010.1139/x88-180Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Berguson WE, BG McMahon DE Riemenschneider DE (2017) Additive and non-additive genetic variances for tree growth in several hybrid poplar populations and implications regarding breeding strategy. Silvae Genetica 66:33-39. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2017-000510.1515/sg-2017-0005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Des Marais DL, KM Hernandez and TE Juenger (2013) Genotype-by-environment interaction and plasticity: exploring genomic responses of plants to the abiotic environment. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 44:5-29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-13580610.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135806Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Eldridge KG, AR Rout and JW Turnbull (1972) Provenance variation in the growth pattern of Populus deltoides. Australian Forest Research 5:45-50Search in Google Scholar

Farmer RE Jr (1996) The genecology of Populus. In: Stettler RF, HD Bradshaw Jr, PE Heilman and TM Hinckley (eds) Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. Canada: NRC Research, pp 33-55Search in Google Scholar

Finlay KW and GN Wilkinson (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14:742-754. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR963074210.1071/AR9630742Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ghezehei SB, EG Nichols, CA Maier and DW Hazel (2019) Adaptability of Populus to physiography and growing conditions in the southeastern USA. Forests 10:118. https://doi.org/10.3390/f1002011810.3390/f10020118Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie JH and M Turelli (1989) Genotype-environment interactions and maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics 121:129-13810.1093/genetics/121.1.129120359517246488Search in Google Scholar

Guet J, F Fabbrini, R Fichot, M Sabatti, C Bastien and F Brignolas (2015) Genetic variation for leaf morphology, leaf structure and leaf carbon isotope discrimination in European populations of black poplar (Populus nigra L.) Tree Physiology 35:850-863. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpv05610.1093/treephys/tpv05626224105Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lerner IM (1954) Genetic homeostasis. Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd Ltd, 134 pSearch in Google Scholar

Li B and R Wu (1996) Genetic causes of heterosis in juvenile aspen: a quantitative comparison across intra- and inter-specific hybrids. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 93:380-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0022318010.1007/BF0022318024162295Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Loehle C (1998) Height growth rate tradeoffs determine northern and southern range limits for trees. Journal of Biogeography 25:735-742 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.2540735.x10.1046/j.1365-2699.1998.2540735.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mitton JB and Grant MC (1984) Associations among protein heterozygosity, growth rate, and developmental homeostasis. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 15:479-499. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.00240310.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002403Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nelson ND, WE Berguson, BG McMahon, M Cai and DJ Buchman (2018) Growth performance and stability of hybrid poplar clones in simultaneous tests on six sites. Biomass & Bioenergy 118:115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.08.00710.1016/j.biombioe.2018.08.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nelson ND, R Meilan, WE Berguson, BG McMahon, M Cai and D Buchman (2019) Growth performance of hybrid poplar clones on two agricultural sites with and without early irrigation and fertilization. Silvae Genetica 68:58-66. https://doi.org/10.2478/sg-2019-001110.2478/sg-2019-0011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rae AM, MPC Pinel, C Bastien, M Sabatti, NR Street, J Tucker, C Dixon, N Marron, SY Dillen and G Taylor (2008) QTL for yield in bioenergy Populus: identifying G x E interactions from growth at three contrasting sites. Tree Genetics & Genomes 4:97-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-007-0091-310.1007/s11295-007-0091-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Riemenschneider DE, WE Berguson, DI Dickmann, RB Hall, JG Isebrands, CA Mohn, GR Stanosz, GA Tuskan (2001) Poplar breeding and testing strategies in the north-central U.S.: Demonstration of potential yield and consideration of future research needs. The Forestry Chronicle 77(2):245-253. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc77245-210.5558/tfc77245-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (2019) Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htmSearch in Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE) (2016) 2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy. In: Langholtz MH, BJ Stokes and LM Eaton (Leads) Volume 1: Economic Availability of Feedstocks. Oak Ridge, TN: ORNL/TM-2016/160, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. http://doi.org/10.2172/127165110.2172/1271651Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

U.S. NOAA, National Centers for Environmental Information (2019) Available at https://www.usclimatedata.com/ U.S. Climate Data, three-decade (1981–2010) averages.Search in Google Scholar

Wu R (1998) The detection of plasticity genes in heterogeneous environments. Evolution 52:967-977. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01826.x10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01826.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ying CC and WT Bagley (1976) Genetic variation of eastern cottonwood in an eastern Nebraska provenance study. Silvae Genetica 25(2):67-73Search in Google Scholar

Yu Q and P Pulkkinen (2003) Genotype-environment interaction and stability in growth of aspen hybrid clones. Forest Ecology and Management 173:25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00819-210.1016/S0378-1127(01)00819-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zalesny RS, RB Hall, JA Zalesny, BG McMahon, WE Berguson and GR Stanosz (2009) Biomass and genotype x environment interactions of Populus energy crops in the Midwestern United States. BioEnergy Research 2:106-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9039-910.1007/s12155-009-9039-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zanewich KP, DW Pearce and SB Rood (2018) Heterosis in poplar involves phenotypic stability: cottonwood hybrids outperform their parental species at suboptimal temperatures. Tree Physiology 38:789-800. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpy01910.1093/treephys/tpy01929509939Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo