[Brubaker, Rogers. 1998. “Migrations of Ethnic Unmixing in the New Europe.” International Migration Review 32 (4): 1047-1065.10.1177/019791839803200409]Search in Google Scholar
[Burawoy, Michael. 2016. “The Promise of Sociology: Global Challenges for National Disciplines.” Sociology 50 (5): 949–959.10.1177/0038038516629901]Search in Google Scholar
[Castles, Stephen and Mark J. Miller. 1993. The age of migration. New York: The Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Croitoru, Alin. 2013. “An insight into the nature of the relationship between migration and entrepreneurship.” Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology, 4 (1): 105–125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Czaika, Mathias and Hein de Haas. 2016. “Evaluating Migration Policy Effectiveness.” In Routledge Handbook of Immigration and Refugee Studies, edited by Anna Triandafyllidou, 34-41. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Czaika, Mathias and Hein de Haas. 2013. “The Effectiveness of Immigration Policies.” Population and Development Review 39 (3): 487–508.10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00613.x]Search in Google Scholar
[de Haas, Hein and Simona Vezzoli. 2011. “Leaving matters: the nature, evolution and effects of emigration policies.” IMI Working Papers. Oxford: International Migration Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gamlen, Alan. 2008. “The emigration state and the modern geopolitical imagination.” Political Geography, 8 (27): 840–856.10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.10.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Hollifield, James Frank and Tom K. Wong. 2013. “International Migration: Cause or Consequence of Political Change?” Migration and Citizenship: Newsletter of American Political Science Association Organized Section on Migration and Citizenship, 1 (1): 3–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hollifield, James Frank. 2008. “The politics of international migration.” In Migration theory. Talking across disciplines, edited by Caroline Brettell and James Frank Hollifield, 183-238. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koch, Anne. 2013. “The Politics and Discourse of Migrant Return: The Role of UNHCR and IOM in the Governance of Return.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40 (6): 905-923.10.1080/1369183X.2013.855073]Search in Google Scholar
[Lesińska, Magdalena. 2013. “The dilemmas of policy towards return migration. The case of Poland after the EU Accession.” Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 2 (1): 77–90.]Search in Google Scholar
[Massey, Douglas S. 1999. “International migration at the dawn of the twenty-first century: the role of the state.” Population and development review, 25 (2): 303–322.10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00303.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Østergaard-Nielsen, Eva. 2003. “International migration and sending countries.” International migration and sending countries. Perception, policies and transnational relations, edited by Eva Østergaard-Nielsen, 3–32, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230512429_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Sandu, Dumitru. 2008. Eurobaromenter 69. National report. Executive summary. Romania. European Commission.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sandu, Dumitru. 2010. Lumile sociale ale migraţiei româneşti în străinătate. Iaşi: Polirom.]Search in Google Scholar
[Şerban, Monica and Daria Lăzărescu. 2014. “Romania.” In European Migration: A sourcebook (Second Edition), edited by Anna Triandafyllidou & Ruby Gropas, 301-312. Aldershot: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Şerban, Monica and Melinda Stoica. 2007. Politici şi instituţii în migraţia internaţională: migraţia pentru muncă din România. 1990-2006 (Policies and institutions on international migration: work migration from Romania 1990-2006). Open Society Foundation Romania.]Search in Google Scholar
[Şerban, Monica. 2014. “Defining migration policies from origin country perspective.” Journal of Community Positive Practices, XIV (3): 65-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[Şerban, Monica. 2011. Dinamica migraţiei internaţionale: un exerciţiu asupra migraţiei româneşti în Spania. (Dynamics of international migration: an exercise on Romanian migration to Spain). Iaşi: Lumen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Şerban, Monica. 2015. “Migration policies from origin country perspective in the case of Romania. Testing a definition.” Journal of Community Positive Practices, XV (1) 72-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sinatti, Giulia. 2015. “Return migration as a win-win-win scenario? Visions of return among Senegalese migrants, the state of origin and receiving countries.” Ethnic and racial studies, 38 (2): 275-291.10.1080/01419870.2013.868016]Search in Google Scholar
[Stănculescu, Manuela Sofia and Victoria Stoiciu. 2012. Impactul crizei economice asupra migraţiei forţei de muncă din România. (The impact of economic crisis on labour migration from Romania) Bucureşti: Paideia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tai, Qiuqing and Truex, Rory. 2015. “Public Opinion towards Return Migration: A Survey Experiment of Chinese Netizens.” The China Quarterly, 223: 770 - 78610.1017/S0305741015000879]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinar, Agnieszka. 2014. “Emigration Policies in Contemporary Europe.” International Migration Institute/Migration Policy Centre. CARIM-East Research Report.]Search in Google Scholar
[World Bank. 2016. Migration and Remittances Factbook 2016, 3rd edition. Washington, DC: World Bank.]Search in Google Scholar
[White, Anne. 2014. “Polish Return and Double Return Migration.” Europe-Asia Studies, 66 (1): 25-49.10.1080/09668136.2013.855021]Search in Google Scholar
