[Abels, Klaus. 2011. Don’t repair that island! It ain’t broke. Manuscript, University College London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aoun, Joseph & Y.-H. Audrey Li. 1993. Wh-elements in situ: Syntax or LF? Linguistic Inquiry 24(2). 199–238.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arregi, Karlos. 2007. Syntax and semantics of split questions. In José Camacho, Nydia Flores-Ferran, Liliana Sanchez, Viviane Deprez & María José Cabrera (eds.), Romance linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the 36th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), 15–28. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.287.03arr]Search in Google Scholar
[Arregi, Karlos. 2010. Ellipsis in split questions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theories 28(3). 539–592.10.1007/s11049-010-9097-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barros, Matthew, Patrick Elliott & Gary Thoms. 2014. There is no island repair. Manuscript, Rutgers University, University College London and University of Edinburgh.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bauerle, Rainer. 1979. Questions and answers. In Rainer Bauerle, Urs Egli & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Semantics from different points of view, 61–74. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-67458-7_6]Search in Google Scholar
[Camacho, Jose. 2002. Wh-doubling: Implications for the syntax of Wh-movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 157–164.10.1162/002438902317382206]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, Lisa L.-S. 1991. On the typology of wh-questions. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheung, Chi-Hang, Candice. 2014. Wh-fronting and the left periphery in Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 23. 393–431.10.1007/s10831-013-9112-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Craenenbroeck, Jeroen van. 2004. Ellipsis in Dutch dialects (LOT Dissertation Series 96). Utrecht: LOT.]Search in Google Scholar
[É. Kiss, Katalin. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74. 245–273.10.1353/lan.1998.0211]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, Gareth. 1980. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 337–362.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hankamer, Jorge & Ivan Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 391–428.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hill, Virginia. 2007. Vocatives and the pragmatics-syntax interface. Lingua 117. 2077–2105.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James. 1988. Shuo ‘shi’ he ‘you’ [On ‘be’ and ‘have’ in Chinese]. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 59(1). 43–64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James & Chen-Sheng Luther Liu. 2001. Logophoricity, attitudes and ziji at the interface. In Peter Cole, Gabriella Hermon & C.-T. James Huang (eds.), Long distance reflexives (Syntax and Semantics 33), 141–195. New York: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard. 2015. The silence of heads. Manuscript, New York University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 2017. Chinese Ba. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn, 1–72. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom036]Search in Google Scholar
[Lobeck, Ann. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Merchant, Jason. 2004. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 661–738.10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2012. Agreements that occur mainly in the main clause. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons, 79–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.190.04miy]Search in Google Scholar
[Morgan, Jerry. 1973. Sentence fragments and the notion “sentence”. In Braj B. Kachru, Robert B. Lees, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli & Sol Saporta (eds.), Issues in linguistics, 719–751. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oguro, Takeshi. 2017. Speech act phrase, conjectural questions, and hearer. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 23(1). 190–199.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ota, Tatsuo. 1987. A historical grammar of modern Chinese. Beijing: Peking University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 501–557.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Ross, John Robert. 1969. Guess who? In Robert Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia Green & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 252–286. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. GIVENness, AvoidF, and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7. 141–77.]Search in Google Scholar
[Speas, Peggy & Carole Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar. Vol. 1, Syntax and semantics, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.57.15spe]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2010. Formal Chinese syntax. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2015. A generalized syntactic schema for utterance particles in Chinese. Lingua Sinica 1. 1–24.10.1186/s40655-015-0005-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2016a. Sentence-final particles as conjuncts under the cartographic approach. Bulletin of Linguistic Studies 16. 1–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2016b. Predicative function of utterance particles in Chinese. In Pang-hsin Ting, Samuel Hung-nin Cheung, Sze-Wing Tang & Andy Chin (eds.), New horizons in the study of Chinese: Dialectology, grammar, and philology — Studies in honor of Professor Anne Yue, 15–24. Hong Kong: T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre, Institute of Chinese Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Ting-Chi. 1989. Studies on Chinese morphology and syntax: 2. Taipei: Student Book Co., Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1994. On economizing the theory of A’-Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wei, Ting-Chi. 2016. Fragment answers in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 3(1). 100–131.10.1075/ijchl.3.1.04wei]Search in Google Scholar
[Wei, Ting-Chi. 2018. Fragment questions in Mandarin Chinese: Topic movement and pied-piping. Language and Linguistics 9(3). 266–305.10.1075/lali.00010.wei]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, Edwin S. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 203–238.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods, Rebecca. 2017. Towards a model of the syntax-discourse interface: A syntactic analysis of please. Manuscript, University of Huddersfield.]Search in Google Scholar