[Caponigro, Ivano & Jon Sprouse. 2007. Rhetorical questions as questions. In Estella Puig-Waldmüller (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11, 121–133. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chao, Yuen Ren. 2004[1968]. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Vol. 3 of The complete works of Yuen Ren Chao. Beijing: The Commercial Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheung, Yam-Leung. 2009. Negative wh-construction and its semantic properties. Journal of Eastern Asian Linguistics 18. 297–321.10.1007/s10831-009-9051-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A constructional approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003]Search in Google Scholar
[Han, Chung-Hye. 2002. Interpreting interrogatives as rhetorical questions. Lingua 112. 201–229.10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00044-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Ilie, Cornelia. 1999. Question-response argumentation in talk shows. Journal of Pragmatics 31. 975–999.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00056-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Ilie, Cornelia. 2009. Rhetorical questions. In Louise Cummings (ed.), The Routledge pragmatics encyclopedia, 435–438. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiang, Wei & Yuzhi Shi. 2008. Shenme de fouding gongyong [The function of the negative marker of shenme]. Linguistic Sciences 34. 270–277.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kay, Paul. 1997. Constructional modus tollens and the level of conventionality. In Paul Kay (ed), Words and the grammar of context, 175–188. Stanford: CSLI Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelley, David. 1990. The art of reasoning with symbolic logic. New York & London: W.W Norton & Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koshik, Irene. 2003. Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies 5. 51–77.10.1177/14614456030050010301]Search in Google Scholar
[Kurafuji, Takeo. 1996. Unambiguous checking. In Masatoshi Koizumi, Masayuki Oishi, & Uli Sauerland (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 29), 81–96. Cambridge: MIT.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ladusaw, William. 1980. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. New York: Garland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Langacker, Ronald. 1990. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Langacker, Ronald. 2001. Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12: 143–188.10.1515/cogl.12.2.143]Search in Google Scholar
[Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic reader. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Langacker, Ronald. 2016. Working toward a synthesis. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 465–477.10.1515/cog-2016-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee-Goldman, Russell. 2006. Rhetorical questions and scales: Just what do you think constructions are for? Paper presented at the International Conference on Construction Grammar 4, Tokyo University, 1–3 September.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Yuming. 1990. Fanwenju de goucheng jiqi lijie [The formation and understanding of rhetorical questions]. Yindu Journal 3. 91–99.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lü, Shuxiang. 1985. Jindai hanyu zhidaici [Demonstratives and pronouns of modern Mandarin Chinese]. Shanghai: Xuelin Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lü, Shuxiang. 2005[1980]. Xiangdai hanyu babai ci [Eight hundred words of contemporary Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michaelis, Laura & Hanbing Feng. 2015. What is this, Sarcastic Syntax? Constructions and Frames 7. 148–180.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ochi, Masao. 2004. How come and other adjunct Wh-phrases: A cross-linguistic perspective. Language and Linguistics 5. 29–57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Paglieri, Fabio & John Woods. 2011. Enthymemes: From reconstruction to understanding. Argumentation 25. 127–139.10.1007/s10503-011-9203-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Pan, Victor Junnan. 2014. Deriving special questions in Mandarin Chinese: A comparative study. In Jong-Un Park & ll-Jae Lee (eds.), Comparative Syntax: Proceedings of the 16th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, 349–368. Seoul: The Korean Generative Grammar Circle.]Search in Google Scholar
[Progovac, Ljiljana. 1993. Negativity polarity: Entailment and binding. Linguistics and Philosophy 16. 149–180.10.1007/BF00985178]Search in Google Scholar
[Rohde, Hannah. 2006. Rhetorical questions as redundant interrogatives. In Henry Beecher, Shin Fukuda & Hannah Rohde (eds.), San Diego Linguistics Papers 2, 134–168. San Diego, CA: Department of Linguistics, University of California, San Diego.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sadock, Jerrold. 1971. Queclaratives. In Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 223–232. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sadock, Jerrold. 1974. Towards a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shao, Jingmin. 1996. Xiandai hanyu yiwenju yanjiu [A study of modern Chinese rhetorical questions]. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shao, Jingmin. 2013. Yiwenju de jiegou leixing yu fanwenju de zhuanhua guanxi yanjiu [The conversion relationship between the structure types of interrogative sentences and rhetorical questions]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese language learning] 2. 3–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shao, Jingmin & Xiufeng Zhao. 1989. “Shenme” fei yiwen yongfa yanjiu [A study on the non-interroative usages of “what”]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [Language teaching and linguistic studies] 1. 26–40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shou, Yongming. 2002. Yiwen daici de fouding yongfa [The negative usage of the interrogative pronouns]. Journal of Shanghai Teachers University 31. 113–117.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sprouse, Jon. 2007. Rhetorical questions and wh-word movement. Linguistic Inquiry 38. 572–580.10.1162/ling.2007.38.3.572]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsai, Wei-tien Dylan. 2011. Cong “zhe hua cong he shuo qi” [Speaking from “where should I begin?”]. Yuyanxue Luncong [Essays on linguistics] 43. 194–208.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, Douglas. 2001. Enthymeme, common knowledge, and plausible inference. Philosophy and Rhetoric 34. 93–112.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walton, Douglas. 2008. The three bases for the enthymeme: A dialogical theory. Journal of Applied Logic 6. 361–379.10.1016/j.jal.2007.06.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Haifeng. 2003. “A shenme B” jiegoushi chutan [On the construction “A shenme B”]. Journal of Sichuan University 126. 89–92.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Changsong. 2017. A study on noncanonical wh-particles from the prosody-syntax interface: A case study of shenme in “V shenme (V)/(NP)” construction. In Shengli Feng (ed.). Studies in prosodic grammar, vol. 2, 73–100. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu, Danhua. 2011. “X shenme X” de jiegou xingzhi xintan [A new exploration of the structure “X shenme X”]. Journal of Central South University 17. 180–184.]Search in Google Scholar
[Xu, Shenghuan. 1999. Yiwenju tanxun gongneng de qianyi [The transfer of probing functions of interrogative constructions]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 268. 3–11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, Barry Chung-Yu. 2014. Shenme gen shenme ‘what and what’. Paper presented at the 10th Workshop on Formal Syntax & Semantics (FOSS-10), National Quemoy University, Kinmen, November 22–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, Yang & Wei-Tian Dylan Tsai. 2019. Nianli yizhuan de yunlü yufa ji shiyan yanjiu [An experimental study of the prosodic syntax of force shift]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese teaching in the world] 1, 20-30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yin, Shuling. 2009. Xiandai hanyu fanwenju yanjiu [A study of modern Chinese rhetorical questions]. Ha’er’bin: Heilongjiang University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yuan, Ying & Yan Jiang. 2010. Xiuci sanduanlun yu yuyi de yuyong tuidao [Rhetorical syllogism and implicature-drawing in pragmatic inference]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 42. 97–103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yuan, Yulin & Bin Liu. 2016. “Shenme”ju fouding yiyi de xingcheng yu shijie jizhi [On the formation and construal mechanism of the negative meaning of shenme-sentences]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [Chinese teaching in the world] 3. 303–317.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhu, Jun. 2013. Fanwen goushi “you shenme X” de fouding moshi yu fouding dengji: Hudong jiaoji moshi zhong de yuyong fouding ge’an fenxi [The negation model and hierarchy of the rhetorical question “you shenme X”: A case study of pragmatic negation in interactive modes]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 357. 505–517.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhu, Jun. 2014. Fanwen goushi “X shenme X” de lichang biaoda gongneng kaocha [Expressive function of rhetorical question format “X +shenme + X” in negative position]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese language learning] 3. 20–27.]Search in Google Scholar
