[Alleton, Viviane. 1972. Les adverbes en Chinois moderne. Den Haag: Mouton & Co.10.1515/9783111670560]Search in Google Scholar
[Beaver, David I. & Brady Z. Clark. 2008. Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444304176]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree words. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110877786]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, Liping. 2008. Dou: Distributivity and beyond. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. On the typology of Wh-questions. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1995. On dou-quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4. 197–234.10.1007/BF01731509]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 2009. On every type of quantificational expression in Chinese. In Monika Rathert & Anastasia Giannakidou (eds.), Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, 53–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Anastasia Giannakidou. 2013. The non-uniformity of wh-indeterminates with free choice and polarity in Chinese. In George Tsoulas & Kook-Hee Gill (eds.), The nature of quantification and crosslinguistic variation, 123–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692439.003.0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697977.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Constantinescu, Camelia. 2011. Gradability in the nominal domain. Leiden: University of Leiden dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Duffley, Patrick & Pierre Larrivée. 2010. Anyone for non-scalarity. English Language and Linguistics 14(1). 1–17.10.1017/S1360674309990402]Search in Google Scholar
[Eifring, Halvor. 1995. Clause combination in Chinese. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004482739]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975. Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry 6. 353–375.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles. 1978. Implication reversal in a natural language. In Franz Guenthner & Siegfried Johannes Schmidt (eds.), Formal semantics and pragmatics for natural language, 289–301. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-9775-2_10]Search in Google Scholar
[Fintel, Kai von. 2000. ‘Whatever’. In Proceedings of the 10th Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT X). 27–39.10.3765/salt.v10i0.3101]Search in Google Scholar
[Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1997. The landscape of polarity items. Groningen: University of Groningen dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy 24. 659–735.10.1023/A:1012758115458]Search in Google Scholar
[Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2007. The landscape of even. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25. 39–81.10.1007/s11049-006-9006-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Giannakidou, Anastasia & Lisa Cheng. 2006. (In)Definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice. Journal of Semantics 23. 135–183.10.1093/jos/ffl001]Search in Google Scholar
[Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heim, Irene. 1984. A note on negative polarity and downward entailingness. In Charles Jones & Peter Sells (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 14, 98–107. Amherst: GLSA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hole, Daniel. 2004. Focus and background marking in Mandarin Chinese: System and theory behind cái, jiù, dōu and yĕ. London & New York: Routledge Curzon.10.4324/9780203565193]Search in Google Scholar
[Hole, Daniel. 2008. EVEN, ALSO and ONLY in Vietnamese. In Shinichiro Ishihara, Svetlana Petrova & Anne Schwarz (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in information structure 11, 1–54. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hole, Daniel. 2013. Focus particles and related entities in Vietnamese. In Daniel Hole & Elisabeth Löbel (eds.), Linguistics of Vietnamese: An international survey, 265–303. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110289411.265]Search in Google Scholar
[Hole, Daniel. 2017. A crosslinguistic syntax of scalar and non-scalar focus particle sentences: The view from Vietnamese and Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 26(4). 389–409.10.1007/s10831-017-9160-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Horn, Laurence R. 2005. Airport ‘86 revisited: Toward a unified indefinite any. In Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffrey Pelletier (eds.), Reference and quantification: The Partee effect, 179–205. Stanford: CSLI Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hou, Xuechao (ed.). 1998. Xiandai hanyu xuci cidian [Dictionary of function words in contemporary Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe [Peking university press].]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacobs, Joachim. 1983. Fokus und Skalen. Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783111351889]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiang, Jingzhong & Haihua Pan. 2013. “Dōu” de yǔyì fēnhé jí jiěshì guīzé [How many DOUs do we really need?]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language], 1. 38–50.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiang, Yan. 2008. Tījí móxíng yǔ “dōu” de yǔyì kèhuà [Scalar model and the semantic characterization of “dou”]. In Cheng Gong & Liu Danqing (eds.), Hànyǔ de xíngshì yǔ gōngnéng yánjiū [Formal and functional studies in Chinese], 123–132. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [The commercial press].]Search in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, Chris. 1997. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California, Santa Cruz dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, Chris. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1). 1–45.10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0]Search in Google Scholar
[König, Ekkehard. 1991. The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective. London & New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krifka, Manfred. 1995. The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 25. 209–257.]Search in Google Scholar
[Krifka, Manfred. 1999. Additive particles under stress. In Proceedings of the 8th Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT VIII). 111–129.10.3765/salt.v8i0.2799]Search in Google Scholar
[Lassiter, Dan. 2011. Measurement and modality: The scalar basis of modal semantics. New York, NY: New York University dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, Thomas. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, Jo-Wang. 1996. Polarity licensing and wh-phrase quantification in Chinese. Massachusetts, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, Jo-Wang. 1998, On existential polarity wh-phrases in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics7. 219–255.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, Feng-hsi. 1990. Scope dependency in English and Chinese. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, Yuehua (ed.). 2001. Shiyong xiandai hanyu yufa [Practical modern Chinese grammar]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [The commercial press].]Search in Google Scholar
[Lü, Shuxiang (ed.). 1995. Xiandai hanyu babai ci [Eight hundred words in modern Chinese]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [The commercial press].]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakanishi, Kimiko. 2006. Even, only, and negative polarity in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 16th Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT XVI).138–155.10.3765/salt.v16i0.2953]Search in Google Scholar
[Paris, Marie-Claude. 1979. Some aspects of the syntax and semantics of the lian … ye/dou construction in Mandarin. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 5. 47–70.10.1163/19606028-90000206]Search in Google Scholar
[Shyu, Shu-ing. 1995. The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shyu, Shu-ing. 2016. Minimizers and EVEN. Linguistics 54(6). 1355–1395.10.1515/ling-2016-0031]Search in Google Scholar
[Solt, Stephanie. 2015. Measurement scales in natural language. Language and Linguistics Compass 9(1). 14–32.10.1111/lnc3.12101]Search in Google Scholar
[Sybesma, Rint. 1996. Review of “The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese” by Shyu Shu-ing. GLOT International 2. 13–14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501743726]Search in Google Scholar
[Xiang, Ming. 2008. Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin dou. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17. 227–245.10.1007/s10831-008-9025-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, Yiming. 1988. Ye zi yuyi chutan [A study on semantics of ye]. Yuwen Yanjiu [Linguistics research] 29(4). 56–59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Ning. 1997. Syntactic dependencies in Mandarin Chinese. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar