1. bookVolume 69 (2019): Issue 4 (December 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
16 Apr 2016
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Sensitive Analysis on Selection of Piston Material Using MADM Techniques

Published Online: 05 Dec 2019
Page range: 45 - 56
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
16 Apr 2016
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Decision making in material selection plays important role in selecting appropriate material based on design and manufacturing attributes. Proposing a new material is always a challenging task so the researchers used Decision making assistance tools. In the Present paper the application of Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) methods are applied to the piston material selection for optimal design process. Comparative study of subjective and objective criteria weights on selected MADM methods are done. Sensitivity analysis is conducted to prove the consistency in performance score ranking order as the criteria weights for each alternative varies.

Keywords

[1] Anup, K. S., Abijeet TK, Machado, J. W., Shrivathsa, TV. “Design and Analysis of Piston using Aluminum Alloys”, International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering 4 (4), pp. 1 – 6, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Owsinski, R., Nieslony, A. “Identification of Fatigue Cracks On The Basis Of Measurable Changes in System Dynamics”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 67 (2), pp. 77 – 84, 2017. DOI: 10.1515/scjme-2017-002010.1515/scjme-2017-0020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. “Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications”, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-910.1007/978-3-642-48318-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Xu, L., Yang, J.-B. “Introduction to Multi-Criteria Decision Making and the Evidential Reasoning Approach”,. Manchester School of Management, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, 2001. ISBN: 1 86115 111 XSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Aarushi, S. “Major MCDM Techniques and their application-A Review”, IOSR Journal of Engineering 4 (5), pp. 15 – 25, 2014. DOI: 10.9790/3021-0452152510.9790/3021-04521525Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Zardari, N.H., Ahmed, K., Shirazi, S.M., Yusop, Z.B. “Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management”, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12586-210.1007/978-3-319-12586-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Cavallini, C., Giorgetti, A., Citti, P., Nicolaie, F. “Integral aided method for material selection based on quality function deployment and comprehensive VIKOR algorithm”, Materials & Design 47, pp. 27–34, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Chatterjee, P., Chakraborty, S. “Material selection using preferential ranking methods”, Materials & Design 35, pp. 384–393, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Chauhan, A., Vaish, R. “Magnetic material selection using multiple attribute decision-making approach”, Materials & Design 36, pp. 1 – 5, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Jahan, A., Edwards, K. “VIKOR method for material selection problems with interval numbers and target-based criteria”, Materials & Design 47, pp. 759 – 765, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Jahan, A., Mustapha, F., Ismail, M. Y., Sapuan, S., Bahraminasab, M. “A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection”, Materials & Design 32, pp. 1215 – 1221, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Vanko, B., Stanček, L., Moravčík, R. “En Aw-2024 Wrought Aluminum Alloy Processed By Casting With Crystallization Under Pressure”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 67 (2), pp. 109 – 116, 2017. DOI: 10.1515/scjme-2017-002410.1515/scjme-2017-0024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Dwivedi, D. K., Sharma, A., Rajan, T.V. “Machining of LM13 and LM28 cast aluminium alloys: Part I”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 196, pp. 197 – 204, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[14] “What is the difference among MCDM, MADM, MODM and MAUT?”, https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_the_difference_among_MCDM_MADM_MODM_and_MAUTSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Liu, H.-C., Mao, L.-X., Zhang, Z.-Y., Li, P. “Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection”, Applied Mathematical Modelling 37, pp. 6325 – 6338, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Mayyas, A., Shen, Q., Mayyas, A., abdelhamid, M., Shan, D., Qattawi, A., Omar, M. “Using Quality Function Deployment and Analytical Hierarchy Process for material selection of Body-In-White”, Materials & Design 32, pp. 2771 – 2782, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Shanian, A., Milani, A. S., Carson, C., Abeyaratne, R. C. “A new application of ELECTRE III and revised Simos’ procedure for group material selection underweighting uncertainty”, Knowledge-Based Systems 21, pp. 709 – 720, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Helff, F., Gruenwald, L., d’Orazio, L. “Weighted Sum Model for Multi-Objective Query Optimization for Mobile-Cloud Database Environments” Published in EDBT/ICDT Workshops, 2016, online: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1558/paper39.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C. “A multi-criteria classification approach based on a pairwise comparison”, European Journal of Operational Research 158, pp. 378 – 389, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hajkowicz S., Higgins, A. “A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management”, European Journal of Operational Research 184, pp. 255 – 265, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Sameer Kumar, D., Suman K. N. S. “Selection of Magnesium Alloy by MADM Methods for Automobile Wheels”, IJEM 4 (2), pp. 31 – 41, 2014. DOI: 10.5815/ijem.2014.02.0310.5815/ijem.2014.02.03Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Parnell, G., Trainor, T. “2.3.1 Using the Swing Weight Matrix to Weight Multiple Objectives”, INCOSE International Symposium 19, pp. 283 – 298, 2009. DOI: 10.1002/j.2334-5837.2009.tb00949.x10.1002/j.2334-5837.2009.tb00949.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Li, X., Wang, K., Liu, L., Xin, J., Yang, H., Gao, Ch., “Application of the Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Method in Safety Evaluation of Coal Mines”, Procedia Engineering 26, pp. 2085 – 2091, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.241010.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2410Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[24] Lotfi, F. H., Fallahnejad, R. “Imprecise Shannon’s Entropy and Multi Attribute Decision Making”, Entropy 12, pp. 53 – 62, 2010. DOI: 10.3390/e1201005310.3390/e12010053Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Rao, R. V., Davim, J. P. “A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method”, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35, pp. 751 – 760, 2008. DOI 10.1007/s00170-006-0752-710.1007/s00170-006-0752-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26] Swapna, D., Srinivasa Rao, Ch., Kumar, S., Radhika, S. “AHP and TOPSIS based selection of aluminium alloy for automobile panels”, Journal of Mechanical and Energy Engineering 3 (1), pp. 43 – 50, 2019. DOI: 10.30464/jmee.2019.3.1.43Search in Google Scholar

[27] Gomes, L. F. A. M., Rangel A. D., Leal, M. da R. Jr.. “Treatment of uncertainty through the interval smart/swing weighting method: a case study”, Pesquisa Operational, 31 (3), pp. 467 – 485, 2011. DOI: 10.1590/S0101-7438201100030000410.1590/S0101-74382011000300004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[28] Kumar D. S., Radhika, S., Suman, K. N. S. “MADM methods for finding the right personnel in academic institutions”, International Journal of u-and e-Service, Science and Technology 6 (5), pp. 133 – 144, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Baragetti, S. “Analytic Hierarchy Process Application for the Selection of a Metal Matrix Composite”, The Open Materials Science Journal 8 (1), pp. 63 – 70, 2014. DOI: 10.2174/1874088X0140801006310.2174/1874088X01408010063Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Žmindák, M. “Dynamic and Sensitivity Analysis General Non-Conservative Asymmetric Mechanical Systems”, Strojnícky časopis – Journal of Mechanical Engineering 68 (2), pp. 105 – 124, 2018. DOI: 10.2478/scjme-2018-002110.2478/scjme-2018-0021Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[31] Memariania, A., Aminib, A., Alinezhadc, A. “Sensitivity Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW): The Results of Change in the Weight of One Attribute on the Final Ranking of Alternatives”, Journal of Industrial Engineering 4, pp. 13 – 18, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Alinezhada, A., Esfandiari, N. “Sensitivity Analysis in the QUALIFLEX and VIKOR Methods”, Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering 10, pp. 29 – 34, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Yazdani, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Ignatius, J., Abad, M. D. “Sensitivity Analysis in MADM Methods: Application of Material Selection”, Engineering Economics Decisions 27 (4), 2016. DOI: 10.5755/j01.ee.27.4.1400510.5755/j01.ee.27.4.14005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo