1. bookVolume 39 (2012): Issue 3 (September 2012)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1897-1695
First Published
04 Jul 2007
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Chemical U-Th-Pb geochronology: A precise explicit approximation of the age equation and associated errors

Published Online: 19 Jun 2012
Volume & Issue: Volume 39 (2012) - Issue 3 (September 2012)
Page range: 167 - 179
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1897-1695
First Published
04 Jul 2007
Publication timeframe
1 time per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In a single decaying system, the age determined from the exponential decay law is directly related to its linear Maclaurin approximation. This relationship can be additively extended to several decaying systems resulting in the same daughter element, by using proportionality functions, thus allowing an explicit formulation of the age as a function of element concentrations. The values of the binary proportionality function for the 238U-235U-Pb system and the ternary proportionality function for the 232Th-238U-235U-Pb system were determined by iterations of the exponential decay formula up to 4 Ga, with a step of 10 Ma, for a set of 24 different U/Th ratios. From the iteration data, the expressions of the two functions and the associated coefficients were determined by polynomial regression and mathematical programing on conveniently separated time and compositional intervals.

Additional time- and composition-dependent age corrections optimized by mathematical programming of the residuals lead to an accuracy of 0.005 Ma of the resulting age. The error propagation can be traced through all the operations defined by explicit formulas according to simple error propagation rules, finally allowing the calculation of the standard error of the result. The formulas and parameters derived can be used in a calculation spreadsheet.

Keywords

[1] Audi G, Wapstra AH and Thibault C, 2003. The AME2003 atomic mass evaluation: (II). Tables, graphs and references. Nuclear Physics A 729(1): 337–676, DOI 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.00310.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bosse V, Boulvais P, Gautier P, Tiepolo M, Ruffet G, Devidal JL, Cherneva Z, Gerdjikov I and Paquette JL, 2009. Fluid-induced disturbance of the monazite Th-Pb chronometer: In situ dating and element mapping in pegmatites from the Rhodope (Greece, Bulgaria). Chemical Geology 261(3–4): 286–302, DOI 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.02510.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.025Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bevington PR and Robinson DK, 2003. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 320 pp. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Cheng H, Edwards RL, Hoff J, Gallup CD, Richards DA, and Asmerom Y, 2000. The half-lives of uranium-234 and thorium-230. Chemical Geology 169(1–2): 17–33, DOI 10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00157-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(99)00157-610.1016/S0009-2541(99)00157-6Search in Google Scholar

[5] Cherniak DJ, Bruce Watson E, Grove M and Harrison TM, 2004. Pb diffusion in monazite: A combined RBS/SIMS study. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 68(4): 829–840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2003.07.01210.1016/j.gca.2003.07.012Search in Google Scholar

[6] Geyh MA and Schleicher H, 1990. Absolute age determination. Physical and chemical dating methods and their application. Springer Verlag, 514 pp. 10.1007/978-3-642-74826-4Search in Google Scholar

[7] Jaffey AH, Fynn KF, Glendenin LE, Bentley WC and Essling AM, 1971. Precision measurement of half-lives and specific activities of 235U and 238U. Physical Review C 4: 1889–1906, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevC.4.1889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.4.188910.1103/PhysRevC.4.1889Search in Google Scholar

[8] Jercinovic MJ and Williams ML, 2005. Analytical perils (and progress) in electron microprobe trace element analysis applied to geochronology: background acquisition interferences, and beam irradiation effects. American Mineralogist 90: 526–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.142210.2138/am.2005.1422Search in Google Scholar

[9] Jercinovic MJ, Williams ML and Lane ED, 2008. In-situ trace element analysis of monazite and other fine-grained accessory minerals by EPMA Chemical Geology 254(3–4), 197–215, DOI 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.05.016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.05.01610.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.05.016Search in Google Scholar

[10] Kato T, Suzuki K and Adachi M, 1999. Computer program for the CHIME age calculation. Journal of Earth and Planetary Sciences Nagoya Univ. 46: 49–56. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Le Roux LJ and Glendenin LE, 1963. Half-life of 232Th. Proceedings of National Meeting on Nuclear Energy, Pretoria, 83–94. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lisowiec N, 2006. Precision estimation in electron microprobe monazite dating: Repeated measurements versus statistical (Poisson) based calculations. Chemical Geology 234(3–4): 223–235, DOI 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.04.010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.04.01010.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.04.010Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ludwig KR, 1991. ISOPLOT: a plotting and regression program for rdiogenic-isotope data. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Rep. 91-445, 39 pp. 10.3133/ofr91445Search in Google Scholar

[14] Montel JM, Veschambre M and Nicollet C, 1994. Datation de la monazite à la microsonde eléctronique. Comptes Rendues, Acadèmie des Sciences Paris 318: 1489–1495. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Montel J, Foret S, Veschambre M, Nicollet C and Provost A, 1996. Electron microprobe dating of monazite. Chemical Geology 131(1–4): 37–53, DOI 10.1016/0009-2541(96)00024-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(96)00024-110.1016/0009-2541(96)00024-1Search in Google Scholar

[16] Parrish RR, 1990. U-Pb dating of monazite and its application to geological problems Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 27(11): 1431–1450, DOI 10.1139/e90-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/e90-15210.1139/e90-152Search in Google Scholar

[17] Pyle JM, Spear FS, Wark DA, Daniel CG and Storm LC, 2005. Contributions to precision and accuracy of monazite microprobe ages. American Mineralogist 90: 547–577. http://dx.doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.134010.2138/am.2005.1340Search in Google Scholar

[18] Rhede D, Wendt I and Förster H-J, 1996. A three-dimensional method for calculating independent chemical U/Pb- and Th/Pb-ages of accessory minerals. Chemical Geology 130(3–4): 247–253, DOI 10.1016/0009-2541(96)00015-0. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(96)00015-010.1016/0009-2541(96)00015-0Search in Google Scholar

[19] Săbău G, 2009. CHIME U-Th-Pb — geochronology: an explicit age formulation as a function of element concentrations. Romanian Journal of Mineralogy 84: 68–71. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Scherrer NC, Engi M, Gnos E, Jakob V and Liecht A, 2000. Monazite analysis: from sample preparation to microprobe age dating and REE quantification, Schweizerische Mineralogische und Petrographische Mitteilungen 80: 93–105 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Shields WR, 1960. Comparison of Belgian Congo and synthetic “nor-mal” samples. Report. 8, National Bureau of Standards, Meeting of the Advisory Committee for Standard Materials and Methods of Measurement, May 17–18, 1960, 37 pp. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Slagstad T, 2006. Chemical (U-Th-Pb) dating of monazite: Analytical protocol for a LEO 1450VP scanning electron microscope and examples from Rogaland and Finnmark, Norway. NGU-Bulletin 443: 11–18 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Steiger RH and Jäger E, 1977. Subcommission on Geochronology: Convention on the use of decay constants in geo- and cosmochronology. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 36(3): 359–362, DOI 10.1016/0012-821X(77)90060-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(77)90060-710.1016/0012-821X(77)90060-7Search in Google Scholar

[24] Suzuki K, Adachi M and Tanaka T, 1991. Middle Precambrian provenance of Jurassic sandstone in the Mino Terrane, central Japan: Th-U-total Pb evidence from an electron microprobe monazite study. Sedimentary Geology 75(1–2): 141–147, DOI 10.1016/0037-0738(91)90055-I. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0037-0738(91)90055-I10.1016/0037-0738(91)90055-ISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Suzuki K, 2009. CHIME dating and age mapping of monazite in granulites and paragneisses from the Hwacheon area, Korea: implications for correlations with Chinese cratons. Geoscience Journal 13(3): 275–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12303-009-0027-z10.1007/s12303-009-0027-zSearch in Google Scholar

[26] Suzuki K and Kato T, 2008. CHIME dating of monazite, xenotime, zircon and polycrase: protocol, pitfalls and chemical criterion of possibly discordant age data. Gondwana Research 14(4): 569–586, DOI 10.1016/j.gr.2008.01.005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2008.01.00510.1016/j.gr.2008.01.005Search in Google Scholar

[27] Vlach SRF, 2010. Th-U-PbT dating by electron probe microanalysis, part I. Monazite: analytical procedures and data treatment. Geologia USP, Série científica 10(1): 61–85. 10.5327/Z1519-874X2010000100006Search in Google Scholar

[28] Williams ML, Jercinovic MJ, Goncalves P and Mahan KH, 2006. Format and philosophy for collecting, compiling, and reporting microprobe monazite ages. Chemical Geology 225(1–2): 1–15, DOI 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.02410.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.07.024Search in Google Scholar

[29] Williams ML, Jercinovic MJ, Harlov DE, Budzyń B and Hetherington CJ, 2011. Resetting Monazite Ages during Fluid-related Alteration. Chemical Geology 283(3–4): 218–225, DOI 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.01.019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.01.01910.1016/j.chemgeo.2011.01.019Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo