Modelling of Institutional Capacity within Study of Energy Transition Dynamics

[1] Willems S., Baumert K. Institutional Capacity and Climate Actions. OECD Pap. 2003:1–50. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Healey P. Building Institutional Capacity through Collaborative Approaches to Urban Planning. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Sp. 1998:30(9):1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1068/a30153110.1068/a301531 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Fukuda-Parr S., Lopes C., Malik K. Capacity for development: New solutions to old problems. 1^st ed. Fukuda-Parr S., Lopes C. (Eds). Routledge, 2002. https://doi.org/10.4324/978184977065110.4324/9781849770651 Search in Google Scholar

[4] European Commission. The European Green Deal. 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Ferri N. United nations general assembly. Int. J. Mar. Coast. Law. 2010:25(2):271–287. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180910X1266577663874010.1163/157180910X12665776638740 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Erickson L. E., Brase G., Erickson L. E., Brase G. Paris Agreement on Climate Change. Reducing Greenh. Gas Emiss. Improv. Air Qual. 1^st ed. 2019:11–22. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351116589-210.1201/9781351116589-2 Search in Google Scholar

[7] McKenna R. et al. High-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy assessments: A review of potential definitions, methodologies and future research needs. Renew. Energy 2022:182:659–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.02710.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Diógenes J. R. F., Claro J., Rodrigues J. C., Loureiro M. V. Barriers to onshore wind energy implementation: A systematic review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2019:60:101337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.10133710.1016/j.erss.2019.101337 Search in Google Scholar

[9] European Commission. Commission of European Communities. Communication on the 2017 list of Critical Raw Materials for the EU (COM no. 490). 2017:1–8. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Bolwig S. et al. Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018:101:440–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.01910.1016/j.rser.2018.11.019 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Cohen J. J., Reichl J., Schmidthaler M. Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review. Energy 2017:76:4–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.05610.1016/j.energy.2013.12.056 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Seidl R., von Wirth T., Krütli P. Social acceptance of distributed energy systems in Swiss, German, and Austrian energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2019:54:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.00610.1016/j.erss.2019.04.006 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Bolwig S. et al. Climate-friendly but socially rejected energy-transition pathways: The integration of techno-economic and socio-technical approaches in the Nordic-Baltic region. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020:67:101559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.10155910.1016/j.erss.2020.101559 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Vuichard P., Stauch A., Wüstenhagen R. Keep it local and low-key: Social acceptance of alpine solar power projects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020:138:2020:110516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.11051610.1016/j.rser.2020.110516 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Jami A. A., Walsh P. R. From consultation to collaboration: A participatory framework for positive community engagement with wind energy projects in Ontario, Canada. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2017:27:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.00710.1016/j.erss.2017.02.007 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Firestone J., Hoen B., Rand J., Elliott D., Hübner G., Pohl J. Reconsidering barriers to wind power projects: community engagement, developer transparency and place. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2018:20(3):370–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.141865610.1080/1523908X.2017.1418656 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Dwyer J., Bidwell D. Chains of trust: Energy justice, public engagement, and the first offshore wind farm in the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2019:47:166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.08.01910.1016/j.erss.2018.08.019 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Warren C. R., McFadyen M. Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy 2010:27(2):204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.01010.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010 Search in Google Scholar

[19] del C. Torres Sibille A., Cloquell-Ballester V. A., Cloquell-Ballester V. A., Darton R. Development and validation of a multicriteria indicator for the assessment of objective aesthetic impact of wind farms. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009:13(1):40–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.00210.1016/j.rser.2007.05.002 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Sánchez-Pantoja N., Vidal R., Pastor M. C. Aesthetic impact of solar energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier Ltd. 2018:98:227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.02110.1016/j.rser.2018.09.021 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Hille S. L., Curtius H. C., Wüstenhagen R. Red is the new blue – The role of color, building integration and country-of-origin in homeowners’ preferences for residential photovoltaics. Energy Build. 2018:162:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.07010.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.070 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Jolissaint N., Hanbali R., Hadorn J. C., Schüler A. Colored solar façades for buildings. Energy Procedia 2017:122:175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.34010.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.340 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Bao Q., Sinitskaya E., Gomez K. J., MacDonald E. F., Yang M. C. A human-centered design approach to evaluating factors in residential solar PV adoption: A survey of homeowners in California and Massachusetts. Renew. Energy 2020:151:503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.04710.1016/j.renene.2019.11.047 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Nansai K., Wang P., Eggert R. G., Yellishetty M., Kleijn R. Critical Material Management for Sustainable Transition. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019:154:104499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.10449910.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104499 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Watari T., Nansai K., Nakajima K. Review of critical metal dynamics to 2050 for 48 elements. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020:155:104669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.10466910.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104669 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Graedel T. E., Harper E. M., Nassar N. T., Nuss P., Reck B. K., Turner B. L. Criticality of metals and metalloids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2015:112(14):4257–4262. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.150041511210.1073/pnas.1500415112439431525831527 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Koskimaa V., Rapeli L., Hiedanpää J. Governing through strategies: How does Finland sustain a future-oriented environmental policy for the long term? Futures 2020:125:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.10266710.1016/j.futures.2020.102667 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Jacobs A. M. Policy Making for the Long Term in Advanced Democracies. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2016:19:433–454. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-110813-03410310.1146/annurev-polisci-110813-034103 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Jakob M., Flachsland C., Christoph Steckel J., Urpelainen J. Actors, objectives, context: A framework of the political economy of energy and climate policy applied to India, Indonesia, and Vietnam. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2020:70:101775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.10177510.1016/j.erss.2020.101775 Search in Google Scholar

[30] Leipprand A., Flachsland C., Pahle M. Starting low, reaching high? Sequencing in EU climate and energy policies. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 2020:37:140–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.08.00610.1016/j.eist.2020.08.006 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Dioha M. O., Abraham-Dukuma M. C., Bogado N., Okpaleke F. N. Supporting climate policy with effective energy modelling: A perspective on the varying technical capacity of South Africa, China, Germany and the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 2020:69:101759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.10175910.1016/j.erss.2020.101759 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Sovacool B. K., Turnheim B., Hook A., Brock A., Martiskainen M. Dispossessed by decarbonisation: Reducing vulnerability, injustice, and inequality in the lived experience of low-carbon pathways. World Dev. 2021:137:105116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.10511610.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105116 Search in Google Scholar