Open Access

Are Industries Open for Renewable Energy?

Environmental and Climate Technologies's Cover Image
Environmental and Climate Technologies
SPECIAL ISSUE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES PART II: The Green Deal Umbrella for Environmental and Climate Technologies

Cite

[1] Data & Statistics – IEA [Online]. [Accessed 09.05.2020]. Available: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics?country=WORLD&fuel=Energy%20supply&indicator=CoalProdByTypeSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of European Union 2009:L 140/16.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Official Journal of European Union 2018:L 328/82.Search in Google Scholar

[4] European Commission. Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions The European Green Deal COM/2019/640 final. Brussels: European Commission, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[5] The Global Risks Report 2020 | World Economic Forum, 2020 [Online]. [Accessed 27.04.2020]. Available: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020Search in Google Scholar

[6] Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. ENG090. Elektriskā jauda un saražotā elektroenerģija no atjaunīgiem energoresursiem (Electric power and electricity produced from renewable energy sources) [Online]. [Accessed 03.09.2020]. Available: http://data1.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/vide/vide__energetika__ikgad/ENG090.px/table/tableViewLayout1/ (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar

[7] European Environmental Agency. Share of renewable energy in gross final energy consumption in Europe — European Environment Agency. 2019 [Online]. [Accessed 13.03.2020]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/renewable-gross-final-energy-consumption-4/assessment-4Search in Google Scholar

[8] Cabinet of Ministers. Par Latvijas Nacionālo enerģētikas un klimata plānu 2021.–2030. gadam. (On the Latvian National Energy and Climate Plan 2021–2030 year). Riga: Cabinet of Ministers, 2020.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Meža platība Latvijā turpina pieaugt – pērn tie bija 52 % (Forest area in Latvia continues to grow - last year they were 52%), 2019. [Online]. [Accessed 13.03.2020]. Available: https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/meza-platiba-latvijaturpina-pieaugt--pern-tie-bija-52.a325062/Search in Google Scholar

[10] Fraunhofer ISE. Photovoltaics Report. Freiburg: Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[11] REN21 - 2019 Global Status Report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Briede A. Klimats Latvijā – Nacionālā Enciklopēdija (Climate in Latvia - National Encyclopedia), 2019. [Online]. [Accessed 12.01.2020]. Available: https://enciklopedija.lv/skirklis/26052-klimats-Latvijā (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar

[13] Blumberga A., et al. Atjaunojamās elektroenerģijas akumulācija (Accumulation of renewable electricity.). Riga: RTU, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Global Solar Atlas 2.0. [Online]. [Accessed 12.01.2020]. Available: https://globalsolaratlas.info/mapSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Letcher T. M. Wind Energy Engineering: A Handbook for Onshore and Offshore Wind Turbines. Elsevier, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809451-8.00001-110.1016/B978-0-12-809451-8.00001-1Search in Google Scholar

[16] Âboltiņš R. Vēja enerģijas izmantošanu ietekmējošo faktoru analīze un iespējamie risinājumi (Analysis of factors influencing wind energy use and possible solutions.). 2019. (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar

[17] IRENA. Geothermal energy [Online]. [Accessed 13.01.2020]. Available: https://irena.org/geothermalSearch in Google Scholar

[18] LVĢMC. Ģeotermālie resursi (Geothermal resources) [Online]. [Accessed 12.05.2020]. Available: https://www.meteo.lv/lapas/geologija/zemes-dzilu-resursi/perspektivie-resursi/geotermalie-resursi/geotermalieresursi?id=1488&nid=496 (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar

[19] Ezici B., Egilmez G., Gedik R. Assessing the eco-efficiency of U.S. manufacturing industries with a focus on renewable vs. non-renewable energy use: An integrated time series MRIO and DEA approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020:253:119630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11963010.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119630Search in Google Scholar

[20] IRENA. Bioenergy [Online]. [Accessed 15.02.2020]. Available: https://www.irena.org/bioenergySearch in Google Scholar

[21] Jaffe A. B., Stavins R. N. The energy-efficiency gap What does it mean? Energy Policy 1994:22(10):804–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)90138-410.1016/0301-4215(94)90138-4Search in Google Scholar

[22] Shmelev S. E., Van Den Bergh J. C. J. M. Optimal diversity of renewable energy alternatives under multiple criteria: An application to the UK. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016:60:679–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.10010.1016/j.rser.2016.01.100Search in Google Scholar

[23] Maletič D., et al. Analytic Hierarchy Process Application in Different Organisational Settings. Applications and Theory of Analytic Hierarchy Process - Decision Making for Strategic Decisions. InTechOpen, 2016. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/applications-and-theory-of-analytic-hierarchy-process-decision-making-for-strategic-decisions/analytic-hierarchy-process-application-in-different-organisational-settings10.5772/64511Search in Google Scholar

[24] Saaty T. L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1977:15(3):234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-510.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5Search in Google Scholar

[25] Cabala P. Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Evaluating Decision Alternatives. Oper. Res. Decis. 2010:20(1):5–23.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Lee H. C., Ter Chang C. Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018:92:883–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.00710.1016/j.rser.2018.05.007Search in Google Scholar

[27] Haddad B., Liazid A., Ferreira P. A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system. Renewable Energy 2017:107:462–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.03510.1016/j.renene.2017.01.035Search in Google Scholar

[28] Wang J. J., et al. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009:13(9):2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.02110.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021Search in Google Scholar

[29] Mulliner E., Malys N., Maliene V. Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability. Omega 2016:59(B):146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.01310.1016/j.omega.2015.05.013Search in Google Scholar

[30] Strantzali E., Aravossis K. Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016:55:885–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.02110.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2255-8837
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, other