Education for Advancing the Implementation of the Bioeconomy Goals: An Analysis of Master Study Programmes in Bioeconomy

[1] European Commission. 2018. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2020]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0673Search in Google Scholar

[2] Levidow L., Birch K., Papaioannou T. Divergent Paradigms of European Agro-Food Innovation: The Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) as an R&D Agenda. Science, Technology & Human Values 2012:38(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224391243814310.1177/0162243912438143Search in Google Scholar

[3] Anghel I., Siminica M., Cristea M., Noja G. G., Sichigea M. Bioeconomy credentials and intellectual capital: a comparative modelling approach for the E.U.-13 and E.U.-15 2019. Economic Research 2019:32(1):2699–2722. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.165321210.1080/1331677X.2019.1653212Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bildirici M., Ozaksoy F. An analysis of biomass consumption and economic growth in transition countries. Economic Research 2018:31(1):386–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.142761010.1080/1331677X.2018.1427610Search in Google Scholar

[5] Braha K., Qineti A., Serences R. Innovation and economic growth: The case of Slovakia. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development 2015:4(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/vjbsd-2015-000210.1515/vjbsd-2015-0002Search in Google Scholar

[6] Zilberman D., Gordon B., Hochman G., Wesseler J. Economics of sustainable development and the bioeconomy. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 2018:40(1):22–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx05110.1093/aepp/ppx051Search in Google Scholar

[7] Fonseca S. C., Pinheiro R., Barbosa C., Araujo A., Vaz-Velho M., Alves R. Food innovation and entrepreneurship in higher education: A case study. International Journal of Food Studies 2015:4(2):141–147. https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/4.2.2015.a310.7455/ijfs/4.2.2015.a3Search in Google Scholar

[8] Urmetzer S., Pyka A. Varieties of knowledge-based bioeconomies. In Dabbert S., Lewandowski I., Weiss J., Pyka A. Knowledge-driven developments in the bioeconomy. Economic complexity and evolution. Springer 2017:57–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58374-710.1007/978-3-319-58374-7Search in Google Scholar

[9] European Commission. 2019. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the European council, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. The European green deal. [Online]. [Accessed 15.03.2020]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/european-green-deal-communication_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Golembiewski B., Sick N., Bröring S. The emerging research landscape on bioeconomy: what has been done so far and what is essential from a technology and innovation management perspective? Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 2015:29:308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2015.03.006.10.1016/j.ifset.2015.03.006Search in Google Scholar

[11] Van Lancker J., Wauters E., Van Huylenbroeck G. Managing innovation in the bioeconomy: An open innovation perspective. Biomass and Bioenergy 2016:90:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.01710.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.017Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lozano R. Carpenter A., Satric V. Fostering green chemistry through a collaborative business model: A Chemical Leasing case study from Serbia. Resource Conservation, Recycling 2013:78:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.07.00710.1016/j.resconrec.2013.07.007Search in Google Scholar

[13] Marcon A., Fleith de Medeiros, J., Duarte Ribeiro J. L. Innovation and environmentally sustainable economy: Identifying the best practices developed by multinationals in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017:160:83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.101.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.101Search in Google Scholar

[14] Montalvo C. Sustainable production and consumption systems - cooperation for change: assessing and simulating the willingness of the firm to adopt/develop cleaner technologies. The case of the In-Bond industry in northern Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production 2003:11(4):411–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00063-X10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00063-XSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Montalvo C. General wisdom concerning the factors affecting the adoption of cleaner technologies: a survey 1990–2007. Journal of Cleaner Production 2008:16(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.00210.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.002Search in Google Scholar

[16] Zailani S., Jeyaraman K., Vengadasan G., Premkumar R. Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: a survey. International Journal of Production Economics 2012:140(1):330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.00810.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.008Search in Google Scholar

[17] Chen Y. S. The driver of green innovation and green image - green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics 2007: 81(3):531–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9522-110.1007/s10551-007-9522-1Search in Google Scholar

[18] Chen Y. S. The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics 2008:77:271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9349-110.1007/s10551-006-9349-1Search in Google Scholar

[19] Chen Y. S., Chang C. H. The determinants of green product development performance: green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of Business Ethics 2013:116(1):107–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1452-x10.1007/s10551-012-1452-xSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Caniglia G., Luederitz C., Groß M., Muhr M., John B., Withycombe Keeler L., Wehrden H., Laubichler M., Wiek A., Lang D. Transnational collaboration for sustainability in higher education: Lessons from a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017:168:764–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.25610.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.256Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ardoin N. M., Bowers A. W., Gaillard E. Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation 2020:241:108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.10822410.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224Search in Google Scholar

[22] Thurer M., Tomasevic I., Stevenson M., Qu T., Huisingh D. A systematic review of the literature on integrating sustainability into engineering curricula. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:181:608–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.13010.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.130Search in Google Scholar

[23] Schutte G. What kind of innovation policy does the bioeconomy need? New Biotechnology 2018:40(A):82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.00310.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.00328458016Search in Google Scholar

[24] Wydra S. Measuring innovation in the bioeconomy – Conceptual discussion and empirical experiences. Technology in Society 2020:61:101242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.00310.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.003Search in Google Scholar

[25] Ribeiro G., Cherobim A. P. Environment and innovation: discrepancy between theory and research practice. RAI Revista de Administracao e Inovacao 2017:14(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.10.00210.1016/j.rai.2016.10.002Search in Google Scholar

[26] Drejerska N. Employment in vs. Education for the bioeconomy. Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2017. November 2017, Kaunas, Lithuania.10.15544/RD.2017.245Search in Google Scholar

[27] Lang D. J., Wiek A., Bergmann M., Stauffacher M., Martens P., Moll P., Swilling M., Thomas C. J. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science 2012:7:25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x10.1007/s11625-011-0149-xSearch in Google Scholar

[28] Segalas J., Ferrer-Balas D., Mulder K. F. What do engineering students learn in sustainability courses? The effect of the pedagogical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 2010:18(3):275–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.01210.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.012Search in Google Scholar

[29] Tejedor G., Segalas J., Rosas-Casals M. Transdisciplinarity in higher education for sustainability: How discourses are approached in engineering education. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018:175:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.08510.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.085Search in Google Scholar

[30] Lambrechts W., Mula I., Ceulemans K., Molderez I. The integration of competences for sustainable development in higher education: an analysis of bachelor programmes in management. Journal of Cleaner Production 2013:48:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.03410.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.034Search in Google Scholar

[31] Wiek A., Withycombe L., Redman C. Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic programme development. Sustainable Science 2011:6:203–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-610.1007/s11625-011-0132-6Search in Google Scholar

[32] Lask J., Maier J., Tchouga B., Vargas-Carpintero R. The bioeconomist. In: Lewandowski I. Bioeconomy. Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy. Springer, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_12Search in Google Scholar

[33] Repko A. F., Szostak R., Buchenberger M. P. Identifying relevant disciplines and gathering information about the problem. In: Introduction to interdisciplinary studies, 2nd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks: CA, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Barth M., Burandt S. Adding the “e-” to learning for sustainable development: challenges and innovation. Sustainability 2013:5:2609–2622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su506260910.3390/su5062609Search in Google Scholar

[35] Biobased materials. Master study programme description. Maastricht University [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/education/master/master-biobased-materialsSearch in Google Scholar

[36] Bio Inspired innovation. Master study programme description. Utrecht University [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.uu.nl/masters/en/bio-inspired-innovation/study-programmeSearch in Google Scholar

[37] Biobased Sciences and Biosystems Engineering (and Biotechnology). Master study programme description. Wageningen University and Research [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.wur.nl/en/Education-Programmes/master/MSc-programmes/MSc-Biobased-Sciences.htm.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Management of Bioeconomy, Innovation and Governance. Master study programme description. University of Edinburgh [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.ed.ac.uk/studying/postgraduate/degrees/index.php?r=site/view&edition=2020&id=769Search in Google Scholar

[39] Industrial Biotechnology. Master study programme description. University of Strathclyde [Online]. [Accessed 01-March 2020]. Available: https://www.strath.ac.uk/courses/postgraduatetaught/industrialbiotechnology/.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Bioeconomy. Master study programme description. The University of Hohenheim [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.uni-hohenheim.de/en/bioeconomy-masters.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Forest Sciences. Master study programme description. University of Helsinki [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://www.helsinki.fi/en/admissions/degree-programmes/forest-sciences-masters-programme.Search in Google Scholar

[42] European Forestry. Joint Master study programme description. University of Eastern Finland, AgroParisTech, University of Freiburg, University of Lleida, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Transilvania University of Braşov. [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/en/content/european-forestry-master-science-forestrySearch in Google Scholar

[43] European Master in Bioeconomy in the Circular economy. Joint Master study programme description. University of Bologna, University of Milano-Bicocca, University of Naples Federico II, University of Turin [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: http://masterbiocirce.com/program-overview/Search in Google Scholar

[44] European Master in Biological and Chemical Engineering for a Sustainable Bioeconomy. Erasmus Mundus Joint Master study programme description. Paris Institute of Technology for Life, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Reims-Champagne-Ardenne, Aalto University, Tallinn University of Technology, University of Liège [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020]. Available: http://www.bioceb.eu/Search in Google Scholar

[45] The MSc in Management of Bioeconomy, Innovation and Governance Programme Aims [Online]. [Accessed 01.03.2020].Available: http://www.sps.ed.ac.uk/gradschool/prospective/taught_masters/h_n/msc_management_bioeconomy_innovation_governance/programme_aimsSearch in Google Scholar