GHG Performance Evaluation in Green Deal Context

[1] European Commission. The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[2] European Commission. Clean energy. The European Green Deal. 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Lee H. Climate Change Biology, 1^st ed. Academic Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Lal R. Carbon sequestration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2008:363(1492):815–830. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.218510.1098/rstb.2007.2185261011117761468Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bajcinovci B. Environment quality: Impact from traffic, power plant and land morphology, a case study of Prishtina. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2017:19(1):65–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/rtuect-2017-000610.1515/rtuect-2017-0006Search in Google Scholar

[6] Danila A. M., et al. Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990 – 2016 and inventory report 2018. Copenhagen: EEA, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Luzzati T., Gucciardi G. A non-simplistic approach to composite indicators and rankings: An illustration by comparing the sustainability of the EU Countries. Ecological Economics 2015:113:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.01810.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.018Search in Google Scholar

[8] Antanasijević D., et al. A differential multi-criteria analysis for the assessment of sustainability performance of European countries: Beyond country ranking. Journal of Cleaner Production 2017:165:213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.13110.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.131Search in Google Scholar

[9] Moutinho V., Madaleno M., Robaina M. The economic and environmental efficiency assessment in EU cross-country: Evidence from DEA and quantile regression approach. Ecological Indicators 2017:78:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.04210.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.042Search in Google Scholar

[10] García-Álvarez M. T., Moreno B., Soares I. Analyzing the sustainable energy development in the EU-15 by an aggregated synthetic index. Ecological Indicators 2016:60:96–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.00610.1016/j.ecolind.2015.07.006Search in Google Scholar

[11] Siksnelyte I., Zavadskas E. K., Bausys R., Streimikiene D. Implementation of EU energy policy priorities in the Baltic Sea Region countries: Sustainability assessment based on neutrosophic MULTIMOORA method. Energy Policy 2018:125:90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.01310.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.013Search in Google Scholar

[12] Cucchiella F., et al. A comparison of environmental and energetic performance of European countries: A sustainability index. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017:78:401–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.07710.1016/j.rser.2017.04.077Search in Google Scholar

[13] De Alegría I. M., et al. Spain’s fulfillment of its Kyoto commitments and its fundamental greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction drivers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016:59:858–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.20810.1016/j.rser.2015.12.208Search in Google Scholar

[14] Cruz L., Dias J. Energy and CO₂ intensity changes in the EU-27: Decomposition into explanatory effects. Sustainable Cities and Society 2016:26:486–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.03.00710.1016/j.scs.2016.03.007Search in Google Scholar

[15] Štreimikiene D., Balezentis T. Kaya identity for analysis of the main drivers of GHG emissions and feasibility to implement EU ‘20-20-20’ targets in the Baltic States. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2016:58:1108–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.31110.1016/j.rser.2015.12.311Search in Google Scholar

[16] Su M., et al. Greenhouse gas emission accounting for EU member states from 1991 to 2012. Applied Energy 2016:184:759–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.07410.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.074Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kijewska A., Bluszcz A. Research of varying levels of greenhouse gas emissions in European countries using the k-means method. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 2016:7(5):935–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2016.05.01010.1016/j.apr.2016.05.010Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kijewska A., Bluszcz A. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union member states with the use of an agglomeration algorithm. Journal of Sustainable Mining 2016:15(4):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2017.02.00110.1016/j.jsm.2017.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[19] Randma T. Estonia needs a plan and support to get rid of its dirty oil shale. Energy Post, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Volkova A., Latosov E., Siirde A. Heat Storage Combined with Biomass CHP under the National Support Policy. A Case Study of Estonia. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2020:24(1):171–184. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-001110.2478/rtuect-2020-0011Search in Google Scholar

[21] O’Sullivan K. Ireland has third highest emissions of greenhouse gas in EU. The Irish Times, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Statistics Finland. Greenhouse gas emissions increased, emission allocation exceeded. Environmental and natural Resources 2019. Helsinki, 2019.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Opricovic S., Tzeng G. H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research 2004:156(2):445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-110.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1Search in Google Scholar

[24] Leal J. E. AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method. MethodsX 2020:7:100748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.02110.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021699301332021813Search in Google Scholar