On the Imaginary Accuracy of the LCA on the Basis of the Houseboat in Hamburg (Holistic Approach)

[1] 7-03-17 Untersuchung zu Primärenergiefaktoren. (7-03-17 Study of primary energy factors). Final report. Berlin: Heilderberg, 2018. (in German)Search in Google Scholar

[2] Grajcar M. Houseboat Swan. Based on the data from: Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung. eLCA v0.9.5 BETA (software program). Available: https://www.bauteileditor.deSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Ökobaudat – Handbuch. Technische Beschreibung von Datensätzen in Ökobaudat inkl. Anleitung für Anlieferung und Nutzung von Datensätzen. Version 1.0. (Ökobaudat – Manual. Technical description of data sets in Ökobaudat including instructions for delivery and use of data records. Version 1.0.) Berlin: Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development, 2018. Available: https://www.oekobaudat.de/fileadmin/downloads/2018-03-18_OEBD-Handbuch_pub_01.pdf (in German)Search in Google Scholar

[4] Rosenbaum R. K., Georgiadis S., Fantke P. Uncertainty Management and Sensitivity Analysis. Chapter 11. Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practise. Springer, 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_1110.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_11Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Pikon K. Abiotic depletion in energy and waste management systems. Polityka Energetyczna 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Pomponi F., D'Amico B., Moncaster A. M. A Method to Facilitate Uncertainty Analysis in LCAs of Buildings. Energies 2017:10(4):524. doi:10.3390/en1004052410.3390/en10040524Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Zhang Y.-R., Wu W.-J., Wang Y.-F. Bridge life cycle assessment with data uncertainty. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2016:21:569–576. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1035-710.1007/s11367-016-1035-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] André J., Lopes D. On the use of possibility theory in uncertainty analysis of life cycle inventory. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2012:17(3):350–361. doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0364-910.1007/s11367-011-0364-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[9] Björklund A. E. Survey of approaches to improve reliability in LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2002:7:64. doi:10.1007/BF0297884910.1007/BF02978849Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Zhang X., Zheng R., Wang F. Uncertainty in the life cycle assessment of building emissions: A comparative case study of stochastic approaches. Building and Environment 2019:147:121–131. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.01610.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.016Search in Google Scholar

[11] Onat N. C., Kucukvar M., Halog A., Cloutier S. Systems thinking for life cycle sustainability assessment: A review of recent developments, applications, and future perspectives. Sustainability 2017:9(5):706. doi:10.3390/su905070610.3390/su9050706Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] Burchart-Korol D., Pustejovska P., Blaut A., Jursova S., Korol J. Comparative life cycle assessment of current and future electricity generation systems in the Czech Republic and Poland. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2018:23:2165–2177. doi:10.1007/s11367-018-1450-z10.1007/s11367-018-1450-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Guldbrandsson F., Malmodin J., Bondesson A. Quantifying the life cycle assessment uncertainty in the information and communication technology sector. Life Cycle Management (LCM), 2011. Available: http://www.lcm2019.org/Search in Google Scholar

[14] Soimakallio S., Kiviluoma J., Saikku L. The complexity and challenges of determining GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions from grid electricity consumption and conservation in LCA (life cycle assessment): A methodological review. Energy 2011:36(12):6705–6713. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.02810.1016/j.energy.2011.10.028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[15] Sovacool B. Valuing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Nuclear Power: A Critical Survey. Energy Policy 2008:36:2940–2953. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.01710.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar