Open Access

Methods to Evaluate Electricity Policy from Climate Perspective

Environmental and Climate Technologies's Cover Image
Environmental and Climate Technologies
Special Issue of Environmental and Climate Technologies Part I: Energy, bioeconomy, climate changes and environment nexus

Cite

[1] European Commission. Making the Internal Energy Market Work. Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions. 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[2] European Commission. 2030 climate & energy framework [Online]. [Accessed 10.01.2019]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2030_enSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Locmelis K., Blumberga A., Bariss U., Blumberga D. Energy policy for energy intensive manufacturing companies and its impact on energy efficiency improvements. System dynamics approach. Energy Procedia 2017:128:10–16. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.00510.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Okpala et al. A review of modelling as a tool for environmental impact assessment. IREJEST 2013:10(1):39–46.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Dagiliute R., Juozapaitiene G. Stakeholders in the EIA Process: What is Important for them? The Case of Road Construction. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2018:22(1):69–82. doi: doi:10.2478/rtuect-2018-000510.2478/rtuect-2018-0005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Pre-consultants. Guide to using ECO-it 1.3., 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Therivel R. Strategic environmental assessment in action, 2nd ed. London: Earthscan, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Bidstrup M., Hansen A. M. The paradox of strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2014:47:29–35. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2014.03.00510.1016/j.eiar.2014.03.005Search in Google Scholar

[9] European Commission. Strategic Environmental Assessment. [Online]. [Accessed 10.01.2019]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/sea-legalcontext.htmSearch in Google Scholar

[10] International Association for Impact Assessment. Strategic Environmental assessment. [Online]. [Accessed 11.01.2019]. Available: http://www.iaia.org/wiki-details.php?ID=24Search in Google Scholar

[11] Carew J., Strategic Environmental Assessment, Process and Methods. Strategic Environmental Assessment Workshop, 24–27 May 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Ward E. J., Dimitriou H. T., Dean M. Theory and background of multi-criteria analysis: Toward a policy-led approach to mega transport infrastructure project appraisal. Research in Transportation Economics 2016:58:21–45. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2016.08.00310.1016/j.retrec.2016.08.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[13] Doukas H., Nikas A. Decision support models in climate policy. European Journal of Operational Research 2019:280(1):1–24. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.01710.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Celli G., et al. Multi-Criteria Analysis for decision making applied to active distribution network planning. Electric Power Systems Research 2018:164:103–111. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2018.07.01710.1016/j.epsr.2018.07.017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[15] Blanco G., Amarilla R., Martinez A., Lilamosas C., Oxilia V. Energy transitions and emerging economies: A multi-criteria analysis of policy options for hydropower surplus utilization in Paraguay. Energy Policy 2017:108:312–321. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.00310.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Ertugrul I., Karakasoglu N. Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications 2009:36(1):702–715. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.01410.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] Seyedmohammadi J., Sarmadian F., Jafarzadeh A. A., Mohammad A. Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops. Geoderma 2018:310:178–190. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.01210.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Pelegrina G. D., Duarte L. T., Romano J. M. T. Application of independent component analysis and TOPSIS to deal with dependent criteria in multicriteria decision problems. Expert Systems with Applications 2019:122:262–280. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.00810.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Ervural B. C., et al. An ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS-based SWOT analysis for Turkey’s energy planning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviewed 2018:82(1):1538–1550. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.09510.1016/j.rser.2017.06.095Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[20] Zihare L., Splavins K., Blumberga D. Multi criteria analysis for products derived from agro-industrial by-products. Energy Procedia 2018:147:452–457. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.04510.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.045Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] European Commission. Clean energy for all European. [Online]. [Accessed 10.01.2019]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-strategy-and-energy-union/clean-energy-all-europeansSearch in Google Scholar

[22] United Nations. Framework Convention on Climate Change. FCCC/INFORMAL/84 GE.05-62220 (E) 200705. 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[23] European Commission. Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. COM/2011/0112.Search in Google Scholar

[24] European Council. Conclusions on 2030 climate and energy policy framework. Brussels: European Commission, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

[25] European Commission. Proposal for a Regulation of The European Parliament and of the Council on the internal market for electricity (recast). COM/2016/0861. Brussels: European Commission, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[26] European Commission. Proposal for a Directive of The European Parliament and Of the Council on Common Rules for The Internal Market in Electricity (Recast) COM/2016/0864. Brussels: European Commission, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

[27] European Commission. Proposal for A Regulation of The European Parliament and of the Council on Risk-Preparedness in The Electricity Sector and repealing Directive 2005/89/EC. COM/2016/0862. Brussels: European Commission, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[28] European Commission. Proposal for A Regulation of The European Parliament and of the Council Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1316/2013 and (EU) No 283/2014. COM/2018/438. Brussels: European Commission, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2255-8837
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, other