Cite

Introduction

Formation of the δ-ferrite is possible by solidifying or welding austenitic stainless steel and it is stable on room temperature. Depending on the chemical composition of the contents of the δ-ferrite stabilising elements such as Cr, Si, Ti, Mo, etc., the solidification can start with the crystallisation of austenite or δ-ferrite [1]. Austenitic stainless steel can be solidified in four modes, namely austenite, austenite–ferrite, ferrite–austenite and ferrite. Mode of solidification is very important because it influences the properties of steel, especially mechanical properties and welding ability. Cryogenic toughness and high temperature embrittlement are strongly influenced by the presence of δ-ferrite [2, 3]. δ-Ferrite is ductile at room and high temperatures but brittle at cryogenic temperatures. Presence of the δ-ferrite in austenitic Cr-Ni steel and in welded joints increases its strength properties, since grain growth is slowed by the volume-centred cubic crystal structure, and also by the fact that the interfacial boundaries present stronger barriers to the dislocation than the single-phase grain boundaries. However, the δ-ferrite plays a very important role in welding of austenitic stainless steel because it prevents the formation of hot cracks. So it is recommended that up to 10% of δ-ferrite should be present in weld metal. Also, precipitation of intermetallic phase is increased in the presence of δ-ferrite. Depending on the temperature of the heat treatment, the δ-ferrite can be transformed into σ-phase, carbides (type M23C6) and austenite [3,4,5,6,7]. With regard to austenite, the δ-ferrite remains a chromium-rich area where diffusion of chromium and other alphagenic elements is faster. Therefore, δ-ferrite is a suitable place for σ-phase precipitation. The σ-phase is hard and brittle and it increases the hardness while decreasing the toughness and elongation of the steel. Also, as a result of increasing the content of the s phase, the type of fracture changes from transcrystalline to intercrystalline [8]. During the heat treatment or welding, the occurrence of carbides usually precedes the appearance of intermetallic phases. M23C6 carbides usually form first at grain boundaries and twin boundaries and then into the austenitic matrix. Carbides precipitated on grain boundaries particularly make worst the impact properties similar to the corrosion behaviour of austenitic stainless steel [9, 10]. Due to its very high temperature, it is useful to know the microstructure behaviour of austenitic stainless steel because the mechanical and other properties depend on it. Also, it is possible to have the δ-ferrite in austenitic microstructure, especially during welding, and it is important to study the behaviour of the δ-ferrite at high temperature. The aim of this work is to investigate the influence of temperature and time of annealing on microstructure, especially the δ-ferrite behaviour.

Materials and Methods

The material used in this study is austenitic stainless steel that was delivered in hot rolled state. The chemical composition of steel is given in Table 1.

Chemical composition of tested austenitic stainless steel

Chemical composition, wt./%
CSiMnCrNiPSN
0.083.817.018.08.00.0080.0150.162

Specimens for testing were cut from the same bar with diameter of 15 mm. Before testing, all specimens were solution annealed at 1,020°C for 60 min followed by water quenching that brings precipitated carbides and most other intermetallic phases back into solution [4]. Later, the specimens were annealed at 750°C and 850°C for 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min followed by cooling in the air. The microstructural analysis was carried out using the Olympus optical microscope and the scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS). Murakami's reagent (10 g K3Fe(CN)6, 10 g NaOH and 100 mL H2O) was used for etching. Murakami's reagent at room temperature was used for identification of carbides while heated reagent at 100°C was used for identification of the δ-ferrite and σ-phase. The δ-ferrite content and degree of its decomposition were determined by a Feritscope MP30 (Fisher, Germany). This is the magnetic induction method that takes advantage of fact that the δ-ferrite is magnetic while the austenite, carbides and σ-phase are not nonmagnetic microconstituents. The average value was calculated on the basis of five measurements (ASTM A800/A800M-91). Hardness test, according to standard BAS EN ISO 6507-1:2018, was performed on specimens prepared for microstructure analysis.

Results and Discussion
Microstructure Analysis

The microstructure analysis after solution annealing shows the presence of two-phase microstructure. The microstructure consists of the δ-ferrite in an austenite matrix. The δ-ferrite is elongated in the rolling direction (Figure 1). Etching with Murakami's reagent at high temperature (90°C–100°C) coloured the δ-ferrite in brown. Also, it can be seen that these stringers of the δ-ferrite are homogeneous.

Figure 1

Optical micrographs specimen in solution annealed state: (a) rolling direction and (b) transverse direction, Murakami's reagent (etching at high temperature), 200×.

The results of microstructure analysis of specimens heat treated at 750°C and 850°C for 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min are shown in Figures 2 and 3.

Figure 2

Optical micrographs specimen heat treated at 750°C for (a) 5, (b) 15, (c) 30, (d) 60, (e) 120 and (f) 180 min, Murakami's reagent (etching at high temperature), 500×.

Figure 3

Optical micrographs specimen heat treated at 850°C for (a) 5, (b) 15, (c) 30, (d) 60, (e) 120 and (f) 180 min, Murakami's reagent (etching at high temperature), 500×

Figures 2 and 3 show the austenitic microstructure with precipitation of secondary phases on the δ-ferrite and austenitic grain boundaries. These figures show the presence of the σ-phase because Murakami's reagent colours the σ-phase in blue on high temperature. Presence of the σ-phase is noticed only on the δ-ferrite. SEM analysis of the tested sample annealed at 750°C and 850°C confirmed the transformation of δ-ferrite (Figure 4). Analysis confirmed that with increasing temperature and time the form of the δ-ferrite is changed. The form of the δ-ferrite is not more homogeneous and disintegration of the δ-ferrite could be seen. The nucleation of the σ-phase predominantly occurred at austenite/δ-ferrite grain boundaries (Figure 4) because grain boundaries and interfaces are the high-energy regions.

Figure 4

Micrograph of transformation of the δ-ferrite using scanning electron microscope after annealing at 750°C for 5 min, 3,000×.

The average composition of the σ-phase was determined by EDS analysis and presented in Figure 5 and Table 2. The results show that the σ-phase mostly consists of Cr and Fe.

Figure 5

Micrograph of σ-phase using scanning electron microscope after annealing at 750°C for 30 min, 3,000×.

Energy-dispersive spectrometer analysis

Chemical composition, wt.%
SiCrFeNi
Spectrum 15.0133.2755.654.1
Spectrum 24.5726.2860.736.11
Spectrum 33.5220.0167.047.80
Spectrum 43.5720.3567.928.16

Although the literature considers the existence of other phases like carbides, analysis by SEM and EDS did not show their presence. To investigate the presence of carbides, etching with Murakami's reagent on room temperature was used. Etching at room temperature, carbides can be revealed at the austenite grain boundaries, within the weldment and the δ-ferrite [11]. Figure 6 show the presence of the carbides at austenite/δ-ferrite grain boundaries and in the δ-ferrite. At temperature 850°C, carbides were present at austenite grain boundaries too.

Figure 6

Optical micrographs specimen heat treated: (a) at 750°C for 30 min (cooling in air) and (b) at 850°C for 30 min (cooling in air), Murakami's reagent (etching at room temperature), 500×.

Determination of the δ-ferrite Content

Feritscope MP30 was used for the determination of the δ-ferrite content. Work of this device is based on the principle of magnetic induction, i.e. the δ-ferrite is magnetic and the austenite, σ-phase and carbides are nonmagnetic micro-constituents. The results of testing are present in Figure 7. The average value of the δ-ferrite in initial solution annealed state was 12.42%.

Figure 7

The δ-ferrite content in annealed samples.

Figure 7 shows that with increasing temperature or time the δ-ferrite content decreases compared with an initial state. The time of annealing has strong influence because after 1 h of annealing the δ-ferrite content is the same for both temperatures.

Hardness Testing

The hardness was tested on samples prepared for metallographic analysis according to standard BAS EN ISO 6507-1:2018. The samples were taken in the rolling direction. The results of the hardness testing are presented in Figure 8.

Figure 8

Hardness testing for different temperatures and time.

The testing of hardness showed that with increasing annealing time at 750°C hardness increases to 120 min, and later hardness decreases on the hardness of initial state. Hardness decreases with increasing annealing time at 850°C, but after 1 h hardness increases on the hardness of initial state. Influence of temperature on hardness was the opposite. After 5 min of annealing, the highest decomposition of the δ-ferrite was at 850°C (about 95%, almost two times more than at 750°C) and for those samples the hardness was the highest. However, the hardness decreases with increasing annealing time to 1 h. Then the hardness increases to the initial state hardness. In case of annealing at 750°C, the situation is opposite, i.e. the hardness increases to 2 h of annealing than it decreases to the initial state hardness. After 3 h of annealing, the hardness is the same for both temperatures and it is almost the same as the initial state hardness.

Conclusions

From the results of investigation of influence of temperature and time on microstructure of austenitic stainless steel, i.e. decomposition of the δ-ferrite the following could be concluded:

Initial microstructure of steel after solution annealing is austenitic with average value of 12.42% of the δ-ferrite.

Increase in temperature and time of annealing resulted in decomposition of the δ-ferrite. After 30 min of annealing, content of the δ-ferrite was reduced to less than 2%, i.e. about 90% the δ-ferrite was transformed.

Influence of temperature on decomposition of the δ-ferrite decreases with time because after 1 h annealing the ratio of decomposed δ-ferrite was the same for both temperatures. Temperature and time are very important for a diffusion process. It is possible to get the same results for higher temperature and shorter time or vice versa.

Etching with Murakami's reagent on room temperature showed the presence of the carbides. Precipitation of the carbides was the first on austenite/δ-ferrite grain boundaries and in the δ-ferrite. With increasing temperature and time, the carbides were precipitated on austenitic grain boundaries too.

After 180 min, hardness of annealed samples at 750°C and 850°C is almost the same as the initial state.