Evaluation of the effect of Intubation Box Use on Tracheal Intubation Difficulty with King Vision® and Truview Videolaryngoscope in Manikin in a Tertiary Care Hospital
Sep 25, 2022
About this article
Article Category: Original Article
Published Online: Sep 25, 2022
Page range: 25 - 28
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/rjaic-2021-0004
Keywords
© 2021 Nazia Nazir, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Comparison of Coordinates of Tracheal Intubation Difficulty on Manikin Without And With Intubation Box_
| Without I.B. | With I.B. | Without I.B. | With I.B. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to Successful Intubation (sec) | 21.2±1.69 | 31.13±2.15 | <0.001 | 15.80±1.13 | 23.37±1.17 | <0.001 |
| First Pass Intubation Success Rate |
29 | 24 | 0.103 | 30 | 26 | 0.112 |
| Click | 0 | 7 | 0.011 | 0 | 6 | 0.024 |
| Pogo Score |
75–100 | 75–100 | 0.744 | 100 | 100 | 1.00 |
Comparison of Coordinates of Tracheal Intubation Difficulty Among the Two Laryngoscopes With And Without Use of Intubation Box_
| TRUVIEW video-laryngoscope (n=30) | King Vision® video-laryngoscope (n=30) | P value |
TRUVIEW video-laryngoscope (n=30) | King Vision® video-laryngoscope (n=30) | P value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intubation Time (sec) | 31.13±2.15 | 23.37±1.17 | <0.001 | 21.20±1.69 | 15.80±1.13 | <0.001 |
| First Pass Success |
24 | 26 | 0.729 | 29 | 30 | 1.00 |
| Click | 7 | 6 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 |
| POGO Score |
75%(n=6) | 100(N=30) | 0.011 | 75%(n=5) | 100(n=30) | 0.021 |
| 100%(n=24) | 100%(n=25) | |||||