1. bookVolume 22 (2022): Issue 1 (June 2022)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1804-1663
First Published
19 Feb 2010
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

A theoretical framework to evaluate ICT disparities and digital divides: Challenges and implications for e-government development

Published Online: 17 Mar 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 22 (2022) - Issue 1 (June 2022)
Page range: 25 - 51
Received: 11 May 2021
Accepted: 12 Jan 2022
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1804-1663
First Published
19 Feb 2010
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Understanding and using ICT is critical for increasing effectiveness of the public sector, improving access to public services, enhancing transparency and engagement of various stakeholders in public decision-making processes. At the same time, utilization of new emerging technologies such as cloud computing, big data analytics, open data, social media, or Internet of Things has become more commonplace in recent years. This study aims to understand what determines ICT disparities and digital divides in the context of new technologies and digital world shifts. For this purpose, a theoretical framework of ICT-related indicators elucidating differences between the traditional and new approach is proposed. These ICT indicators were identified through the decomposition of related ICT and e-government indices together with explanatory factors derived from the literature. The European Union Member States were chosen as a sample for the exploratory analysis because of the availability of relevant indicators. More specifically, correlation, factor, regression, and cluster analyses were employed as empirical strategies to carry out this study. The Human Development Index together with research and development expenditure are the most important explanatory factors for the new approach, while the traditional set of indicators is still mostly correlated with the gross domestic product per capita. Finally, five clusters of Member States were identified and their implications for improving the use of ICT in the public sector are described.

Keywords

JEL Classification

ABDEL-FATTAH, M. A. K. (2014). Factors influencing adoption and diffusion of e-government services. In 14th European Conference on e-Government (ECEG 2014) (pp. 1–9). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Ltd., Reading. Search in Google Scholar

AL-MUTAWKKIL, A., HESMATI, A., & HWANG, J. (2009). Development of telecommunication and broadcasting infrastructure indices at the global level. Telecommunications Policy, 33(3-4), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2008.12.00810.1016/j.telpol.2008.12.008 Search in Google Scholar

ARCHIBUGI, D., & COCO, A. (2005). Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice. Research Policy, 34(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.00210.1016/j.respol.2004.12.002 Search in Google Scholar

AYANSO, A., CHATTERJEE, D., & CHO, D. I. (2011). E-Government readiness index: A methodology and analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 522–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.02.00410.1016/j.giq.2011.02.004 Search in Google Scholar

BANNISTER, F. (2007). The curse of the benchmark: an assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/002085230707795910.1177/0020852307077959 Search in Google Scholar

BARRENECHEA, M. J., & JENKINS, T. (2014). e-Government or Out of Government. Waterloo, Ontario: Open Text Corporation. Search in Google Scholar

BARTLETT, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 3(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x Search in Google Scholar

BILLON, M., MARCO, R., & LERA-LOPEZ, F. (2009). Disparities in ICT adoption: A multidimensional approach to study the cross-country digital divide. Telecommunications Policy, 33(10-11), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2009.08.00610.1016/j.telpol.2009.08.006 Search in Google Scholar

BOGDANOSKA-JOVANOVSKA, M. (2016). Demarcation of the field of e-government assessment. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 12(48), 19–36. Search in Google Scholar

CHANG, Y., KIM, H., WONG, S. F., & PARK, M. C. (2015). A comparison of the digital divide across three countries with different development indices. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 23(4), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.201510010310.4018/JGIM.2015100103 Search in Google Scholar

COHEN, J., COHEN, P., WEST, S. G., & AIKEN, L. S. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar

CRUZ-JESUS, F., OLIVEIRA, T., & BACAO, F. (2012). Digital divide across the European Union. Information & Management, 49(6), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.09.00310.1016/j.im.2012.09.003 Search in Google Scholar

CRUZ-JESUS, F., OLIVEIRA, T., BACAO, F., & IRANI, Z. (2017). Assessing the pattern between economic and digital development of countries. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(4), 835–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9634-110.1007/s10796-016-9634-1 Search in Google Scholar

CRUZ-JESUS, F., OLIVEIRA, T., & BACAO, F. (2018). The global digital divide: Evidence and drivers. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 26(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.201804010110.4018/JGIM.2018040101 Search in Google Scholar

CUERVO, M. R. V., & MENENDEZ, A. J. L. (2006). A multivariate framework for the analysis of the digital divide: Evidence for the European Union-15. Information & Management, 43(6), 756–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.00110.1016/j.im.2006.05.001 Search in Google Scholar

DODEL, M., & AGUIRRE, F. (2018). Digital inequalities’ impact on progressive stages of e-government development. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 459–463). ACM, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.320947510.1145/3209415.3209475 Search in Google Scholar

DOONG, S. H., & HO, S. C. (2012). The impact of ICT development on the global digital divide. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(5), 518–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.02.00210.1016/j.elerap.2012.02.002 Search in Google Scholar

DUTTA, S, & LANVIN, B. (Eds.) (2020). The Network Readiness Index 2020: Accelerating Digital Transformation in a post-COVID Global Economy. Washington: Portulans Institute. Search in Google Scholar

ELENA-BUCEA, A., CRUZ-JESUS, F., OLIVEIRA, T., & COELHO, P. S. (2020). Assessing the role of age, education, gender and income on the digital divide: Evidence for the European Union. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10012-910.1007/s10796-020-10012-9 Search in Google Scholar

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2015). Monitoring the Digital Economy & Society 2016 - 2021. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Search in Google Scholar

HANAFIZADEH, M. R., HANAFIZADEH, P., & BOHLIN, E. (2013). Digital divide and e-readiness: Trends and gaps. International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), 5(3), 30–75. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijea.201307010310.4018/ijea.2013070103 Search in Google Scholar

HELBIG, N., DAWES, S. S., MULKI, F. H., HRDINOVA, J. L., COOK, M. E., & EDWARDS, T. (2009a). International Digital Government Research: A Reconnaissance Study (1994-2008). Albany, NY: Center for Technology in Government. Search in Google Scholar

HELBIG, N., GIL-GARCIA, J. R., & FERRO, E. (2009b). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.05.00410.1016/j.giq.2008.05.004 Search in Google Scholar

INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION. (2018). Measuring the Information Society Report 2018 – Volume 1. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union. Search in Google Scholar

JAEGER, P. T., & THOMPSON, K. M. (2003). E-government around the world: Lessons, challenges, and future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2003.08.00110.1016/j.giq.2003.08.001 Search in Google Scholar

JANSSEN, M. (2010). Measuring and benchmarking the back-end of e-government: A participative self-assessment approach. In Proceedings of the 9th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference (EGOV 2010) (pp. 156–167). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_1410.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_14 Search in Google Scholar

KAISER, H. F. (1970). A second-generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0229181710.1007/BF02291817 Search in Google Scholar

KASSEN, M. (2014). Globalization of e-government: open government as a global agenda; benefits, limitations and ways forward. Information Development, 30(1), 51–58. DOI: 10.1177/026666691247362010.1177/0266666912473620 Search in Google Scholar

KRISHNAN, S., TEO, T. S., & LIM, J. (2013). E-Participation and e-government maturity: A global perspective. In Proceedings of the WG 8.6 International Working Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT (TDIT 2013) (pp. 420–435). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_2610.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_26 Search in Google Scholar

LACHANA, Z., ALEXOPOULOS, C., LOUKIS, E., & CHARALABIDIS, Y. (2018). Identifying the different generations of egovernment: An analysis framework. In The 12th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS) (pp. 1–13). Corfu, Greece. Search in Google Scholar

LAKKA, S., STAMATI, T., MICHALAKELIS, C., & ANAGNOSTOPOULOS, D. (2015). Cross-national analysis of the relation of eGovernment maturity and OSS growth. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 99, 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.02410.1016/j.techfore.2015.06.024 Search in Google Scholar

LINDERS, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.00310.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003 Search in Google Scholar

LNĚNIČKA, M. (2015). E-government development index and its comparison in the EU member states. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice - Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 22(34), 75–87. Search in Google Scholar

LNĚNIČKA, M., & KOMÁRKOVÁ, J. (2019). Big and open linked data analytics ecosystem: Theoretical background and essential elements. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.00410.1016/j.giq.2018.11.004 Search in Google Scholar

LNĚNIČKA, M., MÁCHOVÁ, R., & KOMÁRKOVÁ, J. (2015). Cloud e-government index as a new benchmarking framework for the public sector. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research (pp. 29–37). Masaryk University, Brno Search in Google Scholar

LNĚNIČKA, M., & NIKIFOROVA, A. (2021). Transparency-by-design: What is the role of open data portals?. Telematics and Informatics, 61, 101605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.10160510.1016/j.tele.2021.101605 Search in Google Scholar

MÁCHOVÁ, R., & LNĚNIČKA, M. (2015). Reframing E-government development indices with respect to new trends in ICT. Review of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 383–412. https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2015-002710.1515/revecp-2015-0027 Search in Google Scholar

MÁCHOVÁ, R., & LNĚNIČKA, M. (2016). Modelling e-government development through the years using cluster analysis. eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government (JeDEM), 8(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v8i1.41210.29379/jedem.v8i1.412 Search in Google Scholar

MÁCHOVÁ, R., KOMÁRKOVÁ, J., KOPÁČKOVÁ, H., & LNĚNIČKA, M. (2018). Benchmarking smart e-government development: Insights from a national perspective. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice - Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 25(42), 152–164. Search in Google Scholar

MISHRA, D., AKMAN, I., AND MISHRA, A. (2014). Theory of reasoned action application for green information technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.03010.1016/j.chb.2014.03.030 Search in Google Scholar

MOHAMMED, F., & IBRAHIM, O. (2013). Refining e-government readiness index by cloud computing. Jurnal Teknologi, 65(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.175910.11113/jt.v65.1759 Search in Google Scholar

NAM, T. (2014). Determining the type of e-government use. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.09.00610.1016/j.giq.2013.09.006 Search in Google Scholar

NARDO, M. et al. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

OJO, A., JANOWSKI, T., & ESTEVEZ, E. (2011). Building theoretical foundations for electronic governance benchmarking. In Proceedings of the 10th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference (EGOV 2011) (pp. 13–25). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_210.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_2 Search in Google Scholar

OSBORNE, J. W., & COSTELLO, A. B. (2009). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pan-Pacific Management Review, 12(2), 131–146. Search in Google Scholar

OXFORD INSIGHTS. (2020). Government AI Readiness Index 2020. Ottawa: IDRC. Search in Google Scholar

RORISSA, A., DEMISSIE, D., & PARDO, T. (2011). Benchmarking e-government: A comparison of frameworks for computing e-government index and ranking. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.09.00610.1016/j.giq.2010.09.006 Search in Google Scholar

SISKOS, E., ASKOUNIS, D., & PSARRAS, J. (2014). Multicriteria decision support for global e-government evaluation. Omega, 46, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.02.00110.1016/j.omega.2014.02.001 Search in Google Scholar

STOLTZFUS, K. (2005). Motivations for implementing e-government: An investigation of the global phenomenon. In Proceedings of the 2005 national conference on Digital government research (pp. 333–338). Digital Government Society of North America. Search in Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS. (2014). United Nations e-Government Survey 2014: E-Government for the Future We Want. New York: UN Publishing Section.10.18356/73688f37-en Search in Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS. (2016). United Nations e-Government Survey 2016: E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development. New York: UN Publishing Section. Search in Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS. (2018). United Nations e-Government Survey 2018: Gearing E-Government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies. New York: UN Publishing Section.10.18356/d54b9179-en Search in Google Scholar

UNITED NATIONS. (2020). United Nations e-Government Survey 2020: Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development. New York: UN Publishing Section.10.18356/8bdf045f-en Search in Google Scholar

VENTURA, E., & SATORRA, A. (2015). A multiple indicator model for panel data: An application to ICT area-level variation. Telecommunications Policy, 39(10), 830–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.00210.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.002 Search in Google Scholar

VICENTE, M. R., & LOPEZ, A. J. (2011). Assessing the regional digital divide across the European union-27. Telecommunications Policy, 35(3), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.12.01310.1016/j.telpol.2010.12.013 Search in Google Scholar

WASEDA UNIVERSITY. (2020). The 15th WASEDA International Digital Government Rankings Report. Tokyo: The Institute of D-Government at Waseda University. Search in Google Scholar

WIMMER, M. A., PEREIRA, G. V., RONZHYN, A., & SPITZER, V. (2020). Transforming government by leveraging disruptive technologies: Identification of research and training needs. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 12(1), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v12i1.59410.29379/jedem.v12i1.594 Search in Google Scholar

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. (2016). The Global Information Technology Report 2016: Innovating in the Digital Economy. Geneva: SRO-Kundig. Search in Google Scholar

YERA, A., ARBELAITZ, O., JAUREGUI, O., & MUGUERZA, J. (2020). Characterization of e-Government adoption in Europe. PLoS ONE, 15(4), e0231585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.023158510.1371/journal.pone.0231585 Search in Google Scholar

ZAHRAN, D. I., AL-NUAIM, H. A., RUTTER, M. J., & BENYON, D. (2015). A critical analysis of e-government evaluation models at national and local municipal levels. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 13(1), 28–42. Search in Google Scholar

ZHANG, H., XU, X., & XIAO, J. (2014). Diffusion of e-government: A literature review and directions for future directions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 631-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.01310.1016/j.giq.2013.10.013 Search in Google Scholar

ZHAO, F., COLLIER, A., & DENG, H. (2014). A multidimensional and integrative approach to study global digital divide and e-government development. Information Technology & People, 27(1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2013-002210.1108/ITP-01-2013-0022 Search in Google Scholar

ZISSIS, D., & LEKKAS, D. (2011). Securing e-government and e-voting with an open cloud computing architecture. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.01010.1016/j.giq.2010.05.010 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo