Does CyberKnife improve dose distribution versus IMRT and VMAT on a linear accelerator in low-risk prostate cancer?

1Moon DH, Efstathiou JA, Chen RC. What is the best way to radiate the prostate in 2016? Urol Oncol 2017; 35: 59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.06.002Moon DH Efstathiou JA Chen RC What is the best way to radiate the prostate in 2016? Urol Oncol 2017 35 59 68 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.06.00227395453Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2Wolff D, Stieler F, Welzel G, Lorenz F, Abo-Madyan Y, Mai S, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. serial tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D-conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93: 226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.011Wolff D Stieler F Welzel G Lorenz F Abo-Madyan Y Mai S et al Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs serial tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D-conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2009 93 226 33 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.01119765846Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3Syed YA, Patel-Yadav AK, Rivers C, Singh AK. Stereotactic radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A review and future directions. World J Clin Oncol 2017; 8: 389-97. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i5.389Syed YA Patel-Yadav AK Rivers C Singh AK Stereotactic radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A review and future directions World J Clin Oncol 2017 8 389 97 10.5306/wjco.v8.i5.389563871429067275Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4Avkshtol V, Dong Y, Hayes SB, Hallman M, Price R, Sobczak M, et al. A comparison of robotic arm versus gantry linear accelerator stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Res Rep Urol 2016; 8: 145-58. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S58262Avkshtol V Dong Y Hayes SB Hallman M Price R Sobczak M et al A comparison of robotic arm versus gantry linear accelerator stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer Res Rep Urol 2016 8 145 58 10.2147/RRU.S58262499339727574585Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5Seppälä J, Suilamo S, Tenhunen M, Sailas L, Virsunen H, Kaleva E, et al. Dosimetric comparison and evaluation of 4 stereotactic body radiotherapy techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2017; 16: 238-45. doi: 10.1177/1533034616682156Seppälä J Suilamo S Tenhunen M Sailas L Virsunen H Kaleva E et al Dosimetric comparison and evaluation of 4 stereotactic body radiotherapy techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer Technol Cancer Res Treat 2017 16 238 45 10.1177/1533034616682156561603728279147Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6Chen RC. Radiation therapy for prostate cancer: an evolving treatment modality. Urol Oncol 2019; 37: 579-81. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.05.023Chen RC Radiation therapy for prostate cancer: an evolving treatment modality Urol Oncol 2019 37 579 81 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.05.02331280984Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7Katz A. Stereotactic bodyrRadiotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer: a ten-year analysis. Cureus 2017; 9: e1668. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1668Katz A Stereotactic bodyrRadiotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer: a ten-year analysis Cureus 2017 9 e1668 10.7759/cureus.1668567977329152425Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8McBride SM, Wong DS, Dombrowski JJ, Harkins B, Tapella P, Hanscom H, et al. Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy in low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma: Preliminary results of a multi-institutional phase 1 feasibility trial. Cancer 2012; 118: 3681-90. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26699McBride SM Wong DS Dombrowski JJ Harkins B Tapella P Hanscom H et al Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy in low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma: Preliminary results of a multi-institutional phase 1 feasibility trial Cancer 2012 118 3681 90 10.1002/cncr.2669922170628Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9MacDougall ND, Dean C, Muirhead R. Stereotactic body radiotherapy in prostate cancer: is rapidarc a better solution than cyberknife? Clin Oncol 2014; 26: 4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.08.008MacDougall ND Dean C Muirhead R Stereotactic body radiotherapy in prostate cancer: is rapidarc a better solution than cyberknife? Clin Oncol 2014 26 4 9 10.1016/j.clon.2013.08.00824071450Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10Dong P, Nguyen D, Ruan D, King C, Long T, Romeijn E, et al. Feasibility of prostate robotic radiation therapy on conventional C-arm linacs. Pract Radiat Oncol 2014; 4: 254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.10.009Dong P Nguyen D Ruan D King C Long T Romeijn E et al Feasibility of prostate robotic radiation therapy on conventional C-arm linacs Pract Radiat Oncol 2014 4 254 60 10.1016/j.prro.2013.10.00925012834Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11Lin YW, Lin KH, Ho HW, Lin H, Lin L, Lee S, et al. Treatment plan comparison between stereotactic body radiation therapy techniques for prostate cancer: non-isocentric CyberKnife versus isocentric RapidArc. Phys Med 2014; 30: 654-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.03.008Lin YW Lin KH Ho HW Lin H Lin L Lee S et al Treatment plan comparison between stereotactic body radiation therapy techniques for prostate cancer: non-isocentric CyberKnife versus isocentric RapidArc Phys Med 2014 30 654 61 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.03.00824726212Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12Quan EM, Li X, Li Y, Wang X, Kudchadker R, Johnsosn J, et al. A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 83: 1169-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.015Quan EM Li X Li Y Wang X Kudchadker R Johnsosn J et al A comprehensive comparison of IMRT and VMAT plan quality for prostate cancer treatment Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012 83 1169 78 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.015380583722704703Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13Elith CA, Dempsey SE, Warren-Forward HM. A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer. J Med Radiat Sci 2013; 60: 84-92. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.22Elith CA Dempsey SE Warren-Forward HM A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer J Med Radiat Sci 2013 60 84 92 10.1002/jmrs.22417580926229615Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14McGarry CK, Butterworth KT, Trainor C, O’Sullivan JM, Prise KM, Hounsell AR. Temporal characterization and in vitro comparison of cell survival following the delivery of 3D-conformal, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Phys Med Biol 2011; 56: 2445-57. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/8/008McGarry CK Butterworth KT Trainor C O’Sullivan JM Prise KM Hounsell AR Temporal characterization and in vitro comparison of cell survival following the delivery of 3D-conformal, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) Phys Med Biol 2011 56 2445 57 10.1088/0031-9155/56/8/00821427488Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15Kopp RW, Duff M, Catalfamo F, Shah D, Rajecki M, Ahmad K. VMAT vs. 7-Field-IMRT: assessing the dosimetric parameters of prostate cancer treatment with a 292-patient sample. Med Dosim 2011; 36: 365-72. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.09.004Kopp RW Duff M Catalfamo F Shah D Rajecki M Ahmad K VMAT vs 7-Field-IMRT: assessing the dosimetric parameters of prostate cancer treatment with a 292-patient sample. Med Dosim 2011 36 365 72 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.09.00421377863Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16Davidson MTM, Blake SJ, Batchelar DL, Cheung P, Mah K. Assessing the role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) relative to IMRT and helical tomotherapy in the management of localized, locally advanced, and postoperative prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 80: 1550-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.024Davidson MTM Blake SJ Batchelar DL Cheung P Mah K Assessing the role of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) relative to IMRT and helical tomotherapy in the management of localized, locally advanced, and postoperative prostate cancer Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011 80 1550 8 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.02421543164Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17Salimi M, Shirani K, Abi T, Nedaie H, Hassani H, Gharaati H, et al. Assessment and comparison of homogeneity and conformity indexes in step-and-shoot and compensator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) in prostate cancer. J Med Signals Sens 2017; 7: 102-7. PMID: 28553583Salimi M Shirani K Abi T Nedaie H Hassani H Gharaati H et al Assessment and comparison of homogeneity and conformity indexes in step-and-shoot and compensator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) in prostate cancer J Med Signals Sens 2017 7 102 7 PMID: 2855358310.4103/2228-7477.205502Search in Google Scholar

18Fischer-Valuck BW, Rao YJ, Michalski JM. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7: 297-307. doi: 10.21037/ tau.2017.12.16Fischer-Valuck BW Rao YJ Michalski JM Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer Transl Androl Urol 2018 7 297 307 10.21037/tau.2017.12.16604375030050791Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19Varnava M, Sumida I, Mizuno H, Shiomi H, Suzuki O, Yoshioka Y, et al. A new plan quality objective function for determining optimal collimator combinations in prostate cancer treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy using CyberKnife. PLoS ONE 2018; 13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208086Varnava M Sumida I Mizuno H Shiomi H Suzuki O Yoshioka Y et al A new plan quality objective function for determining optimal collimator combinations in prostate cancer treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy using CyberKnife PLoS ONE 2018 13 10.1371/journal.pone.0208086625855930481228Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20Scobioala S, Kittel C, Elsayad K, Kroeger K, Oertel M, Samhouri L, et al. A treatment planning study comparing IMRT techniques and cyber knife for stereotactic body radiotherapy of low-risk prostate carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1353-6Scobioala S Kittel C Elsayad K Kroeger K Oertel M Samhouri L et al A treatment planning study comparing IMRT techniques and cyber knife for stereotactic body radiotherapy of low-risk prostate carcinoma Radiat Oncol 2019 14 10.1186/s13014-019-1353-6668917031399115Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21Ceylan C, Kucuk N, Bas Ayata H, Guden M, Engin K. Dosimetric and physical comparison of IMRT and CyberKnife plans in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2010; 15: 181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2010.10.003Ceylan C Kucuk N Bas Ayata H Guden M Engin K Dosimetric and physical comparison of IMRT and CyberKnife plans in the treatment of localized prostate cancer Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2010 15 181 9 10.1016/j.rpor.2010.10.003386315424376947Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22McGuinness CM, Gottschalk AR, Lessard E, Nakamura J, Pinnaduwage D, Pouliot J, et al. Investigating the clinical advantages of a robotic linac equipped with a multileaf collimator in the treatment of brain and prostate cancer patients. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015; 16: 284-95. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5502McGuinness CM Gottschalk AR Lessard E Nakamura J Pinnaduwage D Pouliot J et al Investigating the clinical advantages of a robotic linac equipped with a multileaf collimator in the treatment of brain and prostate cancer patients J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015 16 284 95 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5502569018226699309Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23Menzel HG. The international commission on radiation units and measurements. J ICRU 2010; 10: 1-106. doi: 10.1093/jicru/ndq001Menzel HG The international commission on radiation units and measurements J ICRU 2010 10 1 106 10.1093/jicru/ndq001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24Park JI, Park JM, Kim J in, Park SY, Ye SJ. Gamma-index method sensitivity for gauging plan delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy. Phys Med 2015; 31: 1118-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.005Park JI Park JM Kim J in Park SY Ye SJ Gamma-index method sensitivity for gauging plan delivery accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy Phys Med 2015 31 1118 22 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.08.00526422199Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25Hussein M, Rowshanfarzad P, Ebert MA, Nisbet A, Clark CH. A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT/VMAT QA systems. Radiother Oncol 2013; 109: 370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.048Hussein M Rowshanfarzad P Ebert MA Nisbet A Clark CH A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT/VMAT QA systems Radiother Oncol 2013 109 370 6 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.04824100148Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26Miften M, Olch A, Mihailidis D, Moran J, Pawlicki T, Molineu A, et al. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218. Med Phys 2018; 45: e53-83. doi: 10.1002/mp.12810Miften M Olch A Mihailidis D Moran J Pawlicki T Molineu A et al Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No 218. Med Phys 2018 45 e53 83 10.1002/mp.1281029443390Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27R Core Team - European Environment Agency. R software, version 4.0.3. [2020]. Available at https://github.com/tim-lebedkov/packages/releases/download/2020_10/r-4.0.3-R-4.0.3-win.exeR Core Team - European Environment Agency. R software, version 4.0.3. [2020] Available at https://github.com/tim-lebedkov/packages/releases/download/2020_10/r-4.0.3-R-4.0.3-win.exeSearch in Google Scholar

28Hardcastle N, Tomé WA, Foo K, Miller A, Carolan M, Metcalfe P. Comparison of prostate IMRT and VMAT biologically optimised treatment plans. Med Dosimet 2011; 36: 292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.06.001Hardcastle N Tomé WA Foo K Miller A Carolan M Metcalfe P Comparison of prostate IMRT and VMAT biologically optimised treatment plans Med Dosimet 2011 36 292 8 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.06.001299584720801014Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

29Mellon EA, Javedan K, Strom TJ, Moros E, Biagioli M, Fernandez D, et al. A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2015; 5: 11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2014.03.003Mellon EA Javedan K Strom TJ Moros E Biagioli M Fernandez D et al A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer Pract Radiat Oncol 2015 5 11 5 10.1016/j.prro.2014.03.00325413432Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30Gleeson I. A comparison of a moderately hypofractionated IMRT planning technique used in a randomised UK external beam radiotherapy trial with an in-house technique for localised prostate cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25: 360-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.03.010Gleeson I A comparison of a moderately hypofractionated IMRT planning technique used in a randomised UK external beam radiotherapy trial with an in-house technique for localised prostate cancer Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020 25 360 6 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.03.010711827632256220Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31Kishan AU, King CR. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2017; 27: 268-78. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.02.006Kishan AU King CR Stereotactic body radiotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer Semin Radiat Oncol 2017 27 268 78 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.02.00628577834Open DOISearch in Google Scholar