Cite

1. Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd EAM. Clinical and histological manifestations of dental caries. In Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM, editors. Dental Caries. The disease and its clinical management. Copenhagen: Blackwell Munksgaard. 2003; pp. 71–99.Search in Google Scholar

2. Joshua A, Chapman W, Eugene R, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, González-Cabezas C. Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138: 188–94.10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.10.019Search in Google Scholar

3. Tufekci E, Dixon JS, Gunsolley JC, Lindauer SJ. Prevalence of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81: 206–10.10.2319/051710-262.1Search in Google Scholar

4. Mizrahi E. Enamel demineralization following ortho dontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 1982; 82: 62–7.10.1016/0002-9416(82)90548-6Search in Google Scholar

5. Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 94: 68–73.Search in Google Scholar

6. Adebayo OA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Bond strength test: role of operator skill. Aust Dental J. 2008; 53: 145–50.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00024.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Mitchell L. Decalcification during orthodontic treat ment with fixed appliances-an overview. Br J Orthod. 1992; 19: 199–205.10.1179/bjo.19.3.199Search in Google Scholar

8. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnet AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod. 1982; 81: 93–8.10.1016/0002-9416(82)90032-XSearch in Google Scholar

9. Boersma JG, van der Veen MH, Lagerweij MD, Bokhout B. Caries prevalence measured with QLF after treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances: influencing factors. Caries Res. 2005; 39: 41–7.10.1159/00008165515591733Search in Google Scholar

10. Øgaard B, Bishara SE, Duschner H. Enamel effects during bonding-debonding and treatment with fixed appliances. In: Graber TM, Eliades T, Athanasiou AE: Risk Management in Orthodontics: Experts Guide to Malpractice. Hanover Park, IL, Quintessence. 2004; 19–46.Search in Google Scholar

11. Lundstrom F, Krasse B. Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli frequency in orthodontic patients: the effect of chlorhexidine treatments. Eur J Orthod. 1987; 9: 109–16.10.1093/ejo/9.2.1093472888Search in Google Scholar

12. Mattoush TJ, van der Veen MH, Zentner A. Caries lesions after orthodontic treatment followed by quan titative light fluorescence: a 2-year follow-up. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 9: 294–8.10.1093/ejo/cjm00817483494Search in Google Scholar

13. Ardu S, Castioni, Benbachir N, Krejci I. Minimally invasive treatment of white spot enamel lesions. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38: 633–6.Search in Google Scholar

14. Corry A, Millett DT, Creanor SL, Foye RH, Gilmour WH. Effect of fluoride exposure on cariostatic poten tial of orthodontic bonding agents: an in vitro eva luation. J Orthod. 2003; 30: 323–9.10.1093/ortho/30.4.32314634171Search in Google Scholar

15. Harvey WJ, Powell KR. Care of dental enamel for the orthodontic patient. Aust Orthod J. 1981; 7: 70–6.Search in Google Scholar

16. Zabokova-Bilbilova E, Sotirovska-Ivkovska A, Stefanovska E: The Importance of Proper Oral Hygiene in Patients Undergoing Treatment with Fixed Orthodon tic Appliances. Balk J of Stom. 2013; 17(3): 138–43.Search in Google Scholar

17. Øgaard B, Rolla G, Øgaard B. Oral microbiological changes, long-term enamel alterations due to decalci-fication, and caries prophylactic aspects, in Brantley WA, Eliades T, eds: Orthodontic Materials: Scientific and Clinical Aspects. Stuttgart, Thieme. 2001; 123–142.Search in Google Scholar

18. Freeman JE, Shannon IL. Addition of stannous fluo ride to acid etchant in direct bonding procedures. Intern J Orthod. 1981; 19: 13–17.Search in Google Scholar

19. Cehreli Z C, Kecik D, Kocadereli I. Effect of selfetching primer and adhesive formulations on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127: 573–9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.027Search in Google Scholar

20. Garcia-Godoy F. Shear bond strength of a resin composite to enamel treated with an APF gel. Pediatric Dentistry. 1993; 15(4): 272–4.Search in Google Scholar

21. Davidson CL, Bekke-Hoekstra IS. The resistance of superficially sealed enamel to wear and carious attack in vitro. J Oral Rehabilitation. 1980; 7: 299–305.10.1111/j.1365-2842.1980.tb00448.xSearch in Google Scholar

22. Heinig N, Hartmann A. Efficacy of a sealant: study on the efficacy of a sealant (Light Bond) in preve nting decalcification during multibracket therapy. J Orofacial Orthop. 2008; 69: 154–67.10.1007/s00056-008-0741-6Search in Google Scholar

23. Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Tagami J. The influence of storage solution on dentin bond durabi lity of resin cement. J Dentistry. 2000; 16: 1–6.Search in Google Scholar

24. Shungin D, Olsson AI, Persson M. Orthodontic treat ment-related white spot lesions: a 14-year prospective quantitative follow-up, including bonding mate rial assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138: 136–8.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.04.001Search in Google Scholar

25. Benson PE, Pender N, Higham SM. Quantifying ena mel demineralization from teeth with orthodontic brackets – a comparison of two methods. Part 2: vali dity. Eur J Orthod. 2003; 25: 159–65.10.1093/ejo/25.2.159Search in Google Scholar

26. Hirschfield RE. Control of decalcification by use of fluoride mouth rinse. ASDC J Dent Child. 1978; 45: 458–60.Search in Google Scholar

27. Geiger AM, Gorelick L, Gwinnett AJ, Griswold PG. The effect of a fluoride program on white spot for mation during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 93(1): 29–37.10.1016/0889-5406(88)90190-4Search in Google Scholar

28. Chadwick BL, Roy J, Knox J, Treasure ET. The effect of topical fluorides on decalfication in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128: 601–6.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.049Search in Google Scholar

29. Gwinnett AJ, Buonocore MG, Sheykoleslam Z. Effect of fluoride on etched human and bovine tooth enamel surfaces as demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biology. 1972; 17: 271–8.10.1016/0003-9969(72)90210-5Search in Google Scholar

30. Adriaens ML, Dermaut LR, Verbeeck MH. The use of “Fluor Protector”, a fluoride varnish, as a caries prevention method under orthodontic molar bands. Eur J Orthod. 1990; 2: 316–19.10.1093/ejo/12.3.3162401340Search in Google Scholar

31. Azarpazhooh A, Limeback H. Clinical efficacy of casein derivatives: a systematic review of the lite rature. J Am Dental Association. 2008; 139: 915–24.10.14219/jada.archive.2008.027818594077Search in Google Scholar

32. Vivaldi-Rodrigues G, Demito CF, Bowman SJ, Ramos AL. The effectiveness of a fluoride varnish in preventing the development of white spot lesions. World J Orthod. 2006; 7: 138–44.Search in Google Scholar

33. Demito CF, Rodrigues GV, Ramos AL, Bowman SJ. Efficacy of a fluoride varnish in preventing whitespot lesions as measured with laser fluorescence. J Clin Orthod. 2011; 45: 25–9.Search in Google Scholar

34. Zabokova-Bilbilova E, Bajraktarova B, Sotirovska-Ivkovska A, Georgiev Z: Dental enamel around fixed orthodontic appliances after fluoride varnish application. Acta morphologica. 2012; Vol. 9(1): 45–9.Search in Google Scholar

35. Reynolds EC. Casein phosphopeptide-amorphous cal cium phosphate: the scientific evidence. Adv Dent Res. 2009; 21: 25–9.10.1177/089593740933561919717407Search in Google Scholar

36. Shen P, Cai F, Nowicki A, Vincent J, Reynolds EC. Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by su gar-free chewing gum containing casein phosphor-peptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. J Dent Res. 2001; 80(12): 2066–70.10.1177/0022034501080012080111808763Search in Google Scholar

37. Cross KJ, Huq NL, Stanton DP, Sum M, Reynolds EC. NMR studies of a novel calcium, phosphate and fluoride delivery vehicle – (S1) – casein (59–79) sta bilized amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate nano-complexes. Biomaterials. 2004; 25: 5061–9.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.04515109869Search in Google Scholar

38. Iijima Y, Cai F, Shen P, Walker G, Reynolds C, Rey nolds EC. Acid resistance of enamel subsurface lesi ons remineralized by a sugar-free chewing gum con taining casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. Caries Res. 2004; 38: 551–6.10.1159/00008058515528910Search in Google Scholar

39. Kecik D, Cehreli SB, Sar C, Unver B. Effect of aci dulated phosphate fluoride and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate application on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78: 129–33.10.2319/122506-529.118193975Search in Google Scholar

40. Uysal T, Amasyali M, Ozcan S, Koyuturk AE, Akyol M, Sagdic D. In vivo effects of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic composite on ena mel demineralization around orthodontic brackets. Aust Dent J. 2010; 55: 285–91.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01236.x20887516Search in Google Scholar

41. Ellwood R, Fejerskov O, Cury JA, Clarkson J. Fluo rides in caries control. In Fejerskov O, Kidd E. Den tal caries. The disease and its clinical management. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard. 2008; 287–327.Search in Google Scholar

42. Andersson A, Skold-Larsson K, Hallgren A, Petersson LG, Twetman S. Effect of a dental cream con taining amorphous cream phosphate complexes on white spot lesion regression assessed by laser fluores cence. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2007; 5: 229–33.Search in Google Scholar

43. Featherstone JD. The science and practice of caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000; 131: 887–99.10.14219/jada.archive.2000.030710916327Search in Google Scholar

44. Mota SM, Enoki C, Ito IY, Elias AM, Matsumoto MA. Streptococcus mutans counts in plaque adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement or resin-based composite. Braz Oral Res. 2008; 22: 55–60.10.1590/S1806-83242008000100010Search in Google Scholar

45. Willmot DR. White spot lesions after orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod. 2008; 14: 209–19.10.1053/j.sodo.2008.03.006Search in Google Scholar

46. Bailey DL, Adams GG, Tsao CE. Regression of postorthodontic lesions by a remineralizing cream. J Dent Res. 2009; 88(12): 1148–53.10.1177/002203450934716819887683Search in Google Scholar

47. Beerens MW, van der Veen MH, van Beek H, ten Cate JM. Effects of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium fluoride phosphate paste on white spot lesi ons and dental plaque after orthodontic treatment: a 3-month follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010; 118: 610–17.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00780.x21083623Search in Google Scholar

48. Br¨chner A, Christensen C, Kristensen B. Treatment of post-orthodontic white spot lesions with casein phosphopeptide-stabilised amorphous calcium pho sphate. Clin Oral Investig. 2011; 15: 369–73.10.1007/s00784-010-0401-220383545Search in Google Scholar

49. Kumar VLN, Itthagarun A, King NM. The effect of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on remineralization of artificial caries-like lesions: an in vitro study. Aust Dental J. 2008; 53: 34–40.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00006.x18304239Search in Google Scholar

50. Nyvad B. The role of oral hygiene. In Fejerskov O, Kidd E. Dental caries. The disease and its clinical mana gement. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard. 2008; 257–64.Search in Google Scholar

51. Sudjalim TR, Woods MG, Manton DJ. Prevention of white spot lesions in orthodontic practice: a contem porary review. Aust Dent J. 2006; 51: 284–9.10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00445.x17256301Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
0350-1914
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Basic Medical Science, History and Ethics of Medicine, Clinical Medicine, other, Social Sciences, Education