[
1. J. Carlton, “Marine propellers and propulsion, 2nd ed.,” Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2012.10.1016/B978-0-08-097123-0.00010-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. P. Król, “Hydrodynamic State of Art Review: Rotor–Stator Marine Propulsor Systems Design,” Polish Marit. Res. 28 (1) (2021), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2021-000710.2478/pomr-2021-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. L.C. Burrill, “Marine propeller blade vibrations: full scale tests,” Trans. NECIES, 1946, 62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. L.C. Burrill and W. Robson, “Virtual mass and moment of inertia of propellers,” Trans. NECIES, 1962, 78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. M.G. Parsons, W.S. Vorus, and E.M. Richard, “Added mass and damping of vibrating propellers,” Technical Report, University of Michigan, 1980.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. S. Hyloarides and W. Van Gent, “Hydrodynamic reactions to propeller vibrations,” in: Schip en Werf, 1979, 46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. H. Shen, D. Zhao, and Z. Luo, “Solution to eigenvalues of fluid-solid coupling vibration problem,” J. Dalian Univ. Technol. 30 (3) (1990), 369–371. (In Chinese)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Z. Zheng, D. Zhao, and G. Wang, “Fluid-structure coupling kinetic analysis of propellers,” J. Dalian Univ. Technol., 36 (1996), 199–223. (In Chinese)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. J. Xiong, D. Zhao, and J. Ma, “Dynamic analysis of propeller blades,” J. Dalian Univ. Technol. 40 (2000), 737–740. (In Chinese)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. A. Korotkin, “Added masses of ship structures (Vol. 88),” Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.10.1007/978-1-4020-9432-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. H. Ghassemi and E. Yari, “The added mass coefficient computation of sphere, ellipsoid and marine propellers using boundary element method,” Polish Marit. Res. 18 (2011), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10012-011-0003-110.2478/v10012-011-0003-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. P. Castellini and C. Santolini, “Vibration measurements on blades of a naval propeller rotating in water with tracking laser vibrometer,” Measurement 24 (1998), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2241(98)00044-X10.1016/S0263-2241(98)00044-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. [13] S.H. Abbas, J.K. Jang, D.H. Kim, and J.R. Lee, “Underwater vibration analysis method for rotating propeller blades using laser Doppler vibrometer,” Opt. Laser Eng. 132 (2020), 106133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.10613310.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106133
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. L. Guangnian, Q. Chen, and Y. Liu, “Experimental study on dynamic structure of propeller tip vortex,” Polish Marit. Res. 27 (2) (2020), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-002210.2478/pomr-2020-0022
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. G. Vaz, D. Hally, T. Huuva, N. Bulten, P. Muller, P. Becchi, J.L. Herrer, S. Whitworth, R. Macé, and A. Korsström, “Cavitating flow calculations for the E779A propeller in open water and behind conditions: code comparison and solution validation,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors (SMP) 15 (2015), 344–360.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. H. Nouroozi and H. Zeraatgar, “Propeller hydrodynamic characteristics in oblique flow by unsteady RANSE solver,” Polish Marit. Res. 27 (1) (2020), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-000110.2478/pomr-2020-0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. A. Nadery and H. Ghassemi, “Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamic performance of the propeller behind the ship with and without Wed,” Polish Marit. Res. 27 (4) (2020), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-006510.2478/pomr-2020-0065
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Y. Zhang, X.P. Wu, M.Y. Lai, G.P. Zhou, and J. Zhang, “Feasibility study of RANS in predicting propeller cavitation in behind-hull conditions,” Polish Marit. Res. 27 (4) (2020), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-006310.2478/pomr-2020-0063
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. J.F. Sigrist, “Fluid‒structure interaction: an introduction to finite element coupling,” John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, United Kingdom, 2015.10.1002/9781118927762
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Z. Suo and R. Guo, “Hydroelasticity of rotating bodies— theory and application,” Marine Struct. 9 (1996), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8339(95)00010-010.1016/0951-8339(95)00010-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. H. Lin and J. Lin, “Nonlinear hydroelastic behavior of propellers using a finite element method and lifting surface theory,” J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 1 (1996), 114. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0239116710.1007/BF02391167
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. D. Zou, J. Zhang, N. Ta, Z. Rao, “The hydroelastic analysis of marine propellers with consideration of the effect of the shaft,” Ocean Eng. 131 (2017), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.12.03210.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.12.032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. J. Li, Y. Qu, H. Hua, “Hydroelastic analysis of underwater rotating elastic marine propellers by using a coupled BEMFEM algorithm,” Ocean Eng. 146 (2017), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocean eng.2017.09.028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Y. Young, “Time-dependent hydroelastic analysis of cavitating propulsors,” J. Fluid. Struct. 23 (2007), 269–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2006.09.003.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2006.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Y. Young, “Fluid-structure interaction analysis of flexible composite marine propellers,” J. Fluid. Struct. 24 (2008), 799–818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.12.010.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.12.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. X. He, Y. Hong, and R. Wang, “Hydroelastic optimisation of a composite marine propeller in a non-uniform wake,” Ocean Eng. 39 (2012), 14–23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.10.007.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.10.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. H. Lee, M.C. Song, J.C. Suh, B.J. Chang, “Hydro-elastic analysis of marine propellers based on a BEM-FEM coupled FSI algorithm,” Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 6 (2014), 562–577. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0198.10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0198
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. J. Neugebauer, M. Abdel-Maksoud, and M. Braun, “Fluid-structure interaction of propellers,” in IUTAM Symposium on Fluid‒Structure Interaction in Ocean Engineering 2008, (pp. 191‒204). Springer, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-1-4020-8630-4_17
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. S. Kapuria and H. Das, “Improving hydrodynamic efficiency of composite marine propellers in off-design conditions using shape memory alloy composite actuators,” Ocean Eng. 168 (2018), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.09.00110.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.09.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. D.M. MacPherson, V.R. Puleo, and M.B. Packard, “Estimation of entrained water added mass properties for vibration analysis,” SNAME New England Section, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. J. Xing, “Natural vibration of two-dimensional slender structure–water interaction systems subject to Sommerfeld radiation condition,” J. Sound Vib. 308 (2007), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.00910.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. O.C. Zienkiewicz and R.L. Taylor, “The finite element method: solid mechanics,” Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2000.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. X.C. Wang, “Finite element method,” Tsinghua University Press, 2002. (In Chinese)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. E. Kock and L. Olson, “Fluid-structure interaction analysis by finite element method: a variational approach,” Int. J. Num. Mech. Eng. 31 (1991), 463–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162031030510.1002/nme.1620310305
]Search in Google Scholar