Research on Key Process Technology for Profile Electrolytic Finishing of Large Marine Propeller Impeller

1. Wang, S.j., Yuan, P., Li, D., Jiao, Y.H.: An overview of ocean renewable energy in China, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, Vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 91–111, 2011.10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.040Search in Google Scholar

2. Vanyashov A D, Karabanova V V, Vasenko E M.: Influence Analysis of Flow Entry Conditions on the Centrifugal Compressor Impeller Blades to Integral Gasodynamic Characteristics in a Combine Regulation Method. Procedia Engineering. Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 389–394, 2016.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.719Search in Google Scholar

3. Ravi, S., Peltier, S. J., & Petersen, E. L.: Analysis of the impact of impeller geometry on the turbulent statistics inside a fan-stirred, cylindrical flame speed vessel using piv. Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1 16, 2013.10.1007/s00348-012-1424-zSearch in Google Scholar

4. Mongeau L G, Thompson D E, Mclaughlin D K.: Aerodynamic noise generated by a centrifugal pump impeller. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 87:S80 S80, 1990.10.1121/1.2028378Search in Google Scholar

5. Seralathan S, Chowdhury D G R.: Modification of Centrifugal Impeller and Effect of Impeller Extended Shrouds on Centrifugal Compressor Performance. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 1119–1128, 2013.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.09.190Search in Google Scholar

6. Rao, M. A., & Brodkey, R. S.: Continuous flow stirred tank turbulence parameters in the impeller stream.Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 137–156, 1972.10.1016/0009-2509(72)80147-7Search in Google Scholar

7. Kai U Z, Gallus H E, Niehuis R.: A Study on Impeller-Diffuser Interaction — Part I: Influence on the Performance. Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 545–556, 2003.10.1115/1.1516814Search in Google Scholar

8. Gagg C R, Lewis P R, Tsang C.: Premature failure of a vacuum pump impeller rotor recovered from a pitch impregnation plant. Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 606–615, 2008.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.03.007Search in Google Scholar

9. Capus J.: Industry Roadmap, update from MPIF. Metal Powder Report, 67(4):10–11, 2012.10.1016/S0026-0657(12)70110-8Search in Google Scholar

10. Hilton E F, Allaire P E, Baloh M J, et al.: Magnetic suspension controls for a new continuous flow ventricular assist device. Asaio Journal, Vol. 43, no. 5, p. 598.10.1097/00002480-199709000-00054Search in Google Scholar

11. Chatzi E G, Kiparssides C.: Steady-state drop-size distributions in high holup fraction dispersion systems. Aiche Journal, Vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 1640–1652, 2010.10.1002/aic.690410705Search in Google Scholar

12. Radl S, Kalvoda E, Glasser B J.: Mixing characteristics of wet granular matter in a bladed mixer. Powder Technology, Vol. 200, no. 3, pp. 171–189, 2010.10.1016/j.powtec.2010.02.022Search in Google Scholar

13. Botros K K.: Developments in Centrifugal Compressor Surge Control-A Technology Assessment. Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 240–249, 2012.10.1115/1.2928358Search in Google Scholar

14. Abu-Eishah S I, Abu-Jabal N M.: Parametric study on the production of phosphoric acid by the dihydrate process. Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 231–250, 2003.10.1016/S1385-8947(00)00166-2Search in Google Scholar

15. Trebinjac I, Claudin I.: Results and analysis of a L2F flow field investigation within a high-speed high-pressure centrifugal compressor. Journal of Thermal Science, Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 155–163, 1997.10.1007/s11630-997-0031-4Search in Google Scholar

16. Darmana D, Deen N G, Kuipers J A M.: Numerical study of homogeneous bubbly flow: Influence of the inlet conditions to the hydrodynamic behavior. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Vol. 35, no. 12, 1077–1099, 2009.10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.08.003Search in Google Scholar