Knowledge of Results About More Accurate Versus Less Accurate Trials: Differential Effects on Psychological Variables and Motor Learning in Adolescent Females

1Lewthwaite R., Wulf G. (2012). Motor learning through a motivational lens. In A.M. Williams, N.J. Hodges (eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory, and practice (pp. 173-192). New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

2Badami R., VaezMousavi S.M., Wulf G., Namazizadeh M. (2012). Feedback about more accurate versus less accurate trials: Differential effects on self- confidence and activation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 83(2),196-203. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599850Search in Google Scholar

3Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances Learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 78(2), 40-47. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2007.10599402Search in Google Scholar

4Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G., Wally R., Borges T. (2009). KR after good trials enhances learning in older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 80(3), 663-668. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2009.10599606Search in Google Scholar

5Abbas Z.A., North J.S. (2018). Good-vs. poor-trial feedback in motor learning: The role of self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation across levels of task difficulty. Learning and Instruction 55, 105-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.009Search in Google Scholar

6Saemi E., Porter G.M., Ghotbi-Varzaneh A., Zarghami M., Maleki F. (2012). Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 13(4), 378-382. DOI: 10.1016/j.psych-sport.2011.12.008Search in Google Scholar

7Saemi E., Wulf G., Ghotbi-Varzaneh A., Zarghami M. (2011). Feedback after good versus poor trials enhances motor learning in children. Brazilian Journal of Physical Education & Sport 25(4), 673-681. DOI: 10.1590/S1807-55092011000400011Search in Google Scholar

8Badami R., VaezMousavi S.M., Wulf G., Namazizadeh M. (2011). Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 82(2), 360-364. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599765Search in Google Scholar

9Deci E.L., Ryan R.M., Koestner R. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 125(6), 627-668. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627Search in Google Scholar

10McAuley E., Duncan T., Tammen V.V. (1987). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 60(1), 48-58. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413Search in Google Scholar

11Martens R., Burton D., Vealey R.S., Bump L.A., Smith D.E. (1990). Development and validation of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2. In R. Martens, R.S. Vealey, D. Burton (eds), Competitive anxiety in sport (pp. 117-190). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Search in Google Scholar

12AAHPERD (1969). Skills tests manual: volleyball for boys and girls. Washington: AAHPERD.Search in Google Scholar

13Kus S. (2004). Coaching volleyball successfully. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Search in Google Scholar

14Magill R.A, Anderson D.I. (2012). The roles and uses of augmented feedback in motor skill acquisition. In A.M. Williams, N.J. Hodges (eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory, and practice (pp. 3-22). New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

15Allen J.B., Howe B.L. (1998). Player ability, coach feedback, and female adolescent athletes’ perceived competence and satisfaction. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 20, 280-299. DOI: 10.1123/jsep.20.3.280Search in Google Scholar

16Chiviacowsky S., Harter N.M. (2015). Perceptions of competence and motor learning: Performance criterion resulting in low success experience degrades learning. Brazilian Journal of Motor Behavior 9(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.20338/bjmb. v9i1.82Search in Google Scholar

17Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G., Lewthwaite R. (2012). Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 1-8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00458Search in Google Scholar

18Hollembeak J., Amorose A.J. (2005). Perceived coaching behaviors and college athletes’ intrinsic motivation: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 17(1), 1-17. DOI: 10.1080/10413200590907540Search in Google Scholar

19Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. In E.L. Deci, R.M. Ryan (eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.Search in Google Scholar

20Goudas M., Biddle S., Fox K. (1994). Perceived locus of causality, goal orientations, and perceived competence in school physical education classes. British Journal of Educational Psychology 64(3), 453-463. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994. tb01116.xSearch in Google Scholar

21Goudas M., Dermitzaki I., Bagiatis K. (2000). Predictors of students’ intrinsic motivation in school physical education. European Journal of Psychology of Education 15, 271-280. DOI: 10.1007/BF03173179Search in Google Scholar

22Whitehead J., Corbin C. (1991). Youth fitness testing: The effect of percentile-based evaluative feedback on intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 62(2), 225-231. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1991.10608714Search in Google Scholar

23Black S.J., Weiss M.R. (1992). The relationship among perceived coaching behaviors, perceptions of ability, and motivation in competitive age-group swimmers. Journal ofSport & Exercise Psychology 14(3), 309-325. DOI: 10.1123/jsep.14.3.309Search in Google Scholar

24Lee M.A., Carter J.A., Xiang P. (1995). Children’s conceptions of ability in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 14(4), 384-393. DOI: 10.1123/jtpe.14.4.384Search in Google Scholar

25Veal M.L., Compagnone N. (1995). How sixth graders perceive effort and skill. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 14(4), 431-444. DOI: 10.1123/jtpe.14.4.431Search in Google Scholar

26Lewthwaite R., Wulf G. (2010). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63(4), 738-749. DOI: 10.1080/17470210903111839Search in Google Scholar

27Wulf G., Chiviacowsky S., Lewthwaite R. (2010). Normative feedback effects on learning a timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 81(4), 425-431. DOI: DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2010.10599703Search in Google Scholar

28Vealy R.S. (2009) Confidence in sport. In B.W. Brewer (ed.), Sport Psychology (pp. 43-532). UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

29Escarti A., Guzman G.F. (1999). Effects of feedback on self-efficacy, performance, and choice in an athletic task. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 11(1), 83-96. DOI: 10.1080/10413209908402952Search in Google Scholar

30Lucangegi D., Scruggs T.E. (2003). Text anxiety, perceived competence, and academic achievement in secondary school student. Advance in Learning and Behavioural Disabilities 16, 223-230. DOI: 10.1016/S0735-004X(03)16008-9Search in Google Scholar

31Weiss M.R., Horn T.S. (1990). The relation between children’s accuracy estimates of their physical competence and achievement-related characteristics. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 61(3), 250-258. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1990.10608687Search in Google Scholar

32White R.W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review 66(5), 297-333. DOI: 10.1037/h0040934Search in Google Scholar