[
1. World Health Organization. Available at:https://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/breast-cancer/en, Accessed on: January 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Dance D, Skinner C, Carlsson G. Breast dosimetry. Appl Radiat Isot. 1999;50(1):185-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00047-510.1016/S0969-8043(98)00047-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the radiologist. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia:222-50. 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Boone JM. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy x-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. Radiology. 1999;213(1):23-37. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc392310.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc392310540637
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Stanton L, Villafana T, Day J, Lightfoot D. Dosage evaluation in mammography. Radiology. 1984;150(2):577-84. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.150.2.669111910.1148/radiology.150.2.66911196691119
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. European Commission. European protocol on dosimetry in mammography. Report EUR 16263, EC, Bruxelles, Luxembourg. 1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Delis H, Spyrou G, Panayiotakis G, Tzanakos G. DOSIS: A Monte Carlo simulation program for dose related studies in mammography. Eur J Radiol. 2005;54(3):371-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.07.01410.1016/j.ejrad.2004.07.01415899338
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Bushberg JT, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;238-282. 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Sookpeng S, Ketted P. Mean glandular dose from routine mammography. Naresuan University J: Sci Technol. 2006:14(3):19-26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Zankl M, Fill U, Hoeschen C, et al. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):410-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nch51310.1093/rpd/nch51315933148
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Wu X, Barnes GT, Tucker D. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. Radiology. 1991;179(1):143-8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.179.1.200626510.1148/radiology.179.1.20062652006265
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Sutter Health (CPMC). Available at: http://www.cpmc.org/services/women/breast/breast_cyst.html. Accessed on: 12 Nov, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. American Cancer Society. Available at: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/breast-cancer/non-cancerous-breast-conditions/fibrosis-and-simple-cysts-in-the-breast.html. Accessed on: 12 Nov, 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Aznar M, Hemdal B. Absorbed dose measurement in mammography. In: Hayat MA (ed.), Cancer Imaging: Lung and breast carcinomas (Vol. 1), Elsevier; 493-501. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012374212-4.50055-910.1016/B978-012374212-4.50055-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Dance DR. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. Phys Med Biol. 1990;35(9):1211-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/35/9/00210.1088/0031-9155/35/9/0022236205
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Nigapruke K, Puwanich P, Phaisangittisakul N, Youngdee W. Monte Carlo simulation of average glandular dose and an investigation of influencing factors. J Radiat Res. 2010;51(4):441-8. https://doi.org/10.1269/jrr.1000810.1269/jrr.1000820523013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Hernandez AM, Seibert JA, Boone JM. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered. Med Phys. 2015;42(11):6337-48. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.493196610.1118/1.4931966460008526520725
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Payamed Electronic Industries Co. Available at: http://www.payamed.com/pma100f.asp. Accessed on: 12 Jun, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. International Aero Engines. Available at: http://www.iae.it/serie-mammo_23.html. Accessed on: 12 Jun, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Cranley K, Gilmore BJ, Fogarty GWA, Desponds L. Catalogue of diagnostic x-ray spectra and other data. Report No.78, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine - IPEM. 1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available at: https://www.nist.gov/pml/x-ray-mass-attenuation-coefficients. Accessed on: 12 Jun, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Delis H, Spyrou G, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G. The influence of mammographic X-ray spectra on absorbed energy distribution in breast: Monte Carlo simulation studies. Radiat Meas. 2005;39(2):149-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2004.04.00310.1016/j.radmeas.2004.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Rezaei FS. Using Monte Carlo method for evaluation of kVp and mAs variation effect on absorbed dose in mammography. European Congress of Radiology, 3 March 2011; Vienna, Austria.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Fredenberg E, Dance DR, Willsher P, Moa E, von Tiedemann M, Young KC, et al. Measurement of breast-tissue x-ray attenuation by spectral mammography: first results on cyst fluid. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(24):8609. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/24/860910.1088/0031-9155/58/24/860924254377
]Search in Google Scholar
