Determination of the CTV-PTV margin for prostate cancer radiotherapy depending on the prostate gland positioning control method

1. Cuzick J, Thorat M, Andriole G, et al. Prevention and Early Detection of Prostate Cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct; 15(11): e484– e492. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70211-610.1016/S1470-2045(14)70211-6Search in Google Scholar

2. Khullar K, Parikh R. The role of radiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2019; 7(2): 92–97.Search in Google Scholar

3. Byrne T. A Review of Prostate Motion With Considerations for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Med Dosim. Fall 2005; 30(3):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2005.03.005.10.1016/j.meddos.2005.03.00516112467Search in Google Scholar

4. Gawlik – Jakubczak T, Matuszewski M. Fiducial markers in the treatmentof prostate cancer: technique and short term observation. Oncology in Clinical Practice. 2015; Vol. 11, No. 6, 295–299.Search in Google Scholar

5. Piotrowski T. Wybrane zagadnienia dotyczące planowania leczenia w radioterapii. Wielkopolskie Centrum Onkologii.Search in Google Scholar

6. Chen Z, Yang Z, Wang J, Hu W. Dosimetric impact of different bladder and rectum filling during prostate cancer. Radiation Oncology. 2016, Vol 11, Article number: 103.Search in Google Scholar

7. Yartsev S, Bauman G. Target margins in radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Br J Radiol. November 2016; 89(1067): 20160312. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160312.10.1259/bjr.20160312512483827377353Search in Google Scholar

8. Bodusz D, Głowacki G, Miszczyk L. Ocena śródfrakcyjnej ruchomości gruczołu krokowego w trakcie radioterapii chorych na raka stercza. Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology. 2011; 61(5):439.Search in Google Scholar

9. Antico M, et al. Real-time adaptive planning method for radiotherapy treatment delivery for prostate cancer patients, based on a library of plans accounting for possible anatomy configuration changes. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2): e0213002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213002.10.1371/journal.pone.0213002639496030818345Search in Google Scholar

10. Oborska D. Obrazowanie w radioterapii - kryteria jakości obrazów MV vs kV, planarne vs wolumetryczne. II Konferencja z zakresu detekcji promieniowania jonizującego oraz kontroli jakości w rentgenodiagnostyce, radioterapii i medycynie nuklearnej, Klimówka, Poland, Maj 2015.Search in Google Scholar

11. Merriel S, Funston G, Hamilton W. Prostate Cancer in Primary Care. Adv Ther. 2018; 35(9): 1285–1294. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0766-1.10.1007/s12325-018-0766-1613314030097885Search in Google Scholar

12. Rawla P. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J Oncol. 2019 Apr; 10(2): 63–89. doi: 10.14740/wjon1191.10.14740/wjon1191649700931068988Search in Google Scholar

13. Chen F, Zhao X. Prostate Cancer: Current Treatment and Prevention Strategies. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Apr; 15(4): 279–284. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.6499.10.5812/ircmj.6499378589824082997Search in Google Scholar

14. Koukourakis G, Kelekis N, Armonis V, Kouloulias V. Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Adv Urol. 2009; 2009: 327945. doi: 10.1155/2009/327945.10.1155/2009/327945273574819730753Search in Google Scholar

15. Lam Cham Kee D, Peiffert D, J-M Hannoun-Lévi. Brachytherapy Boost for Prostate Cancer: A National Survey From Groupe curiethérapie - Société française De radiothérapie Oncologique. Cancer Radiother. 2019 Dec;23(8):847-852. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.06.003.10.1016/j.canrad.2019.06.00331375324Search in Google Scholar

16. Posiewnik M, Piotrowski T. A review of cone-beam CT applications for adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer. European Journal of Medical Physics. Vol 59, p 13-21, March 2019.10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.02.01430928061Search in Google Scholar

17. Yaver M, Foo A, Larsen T, et. al. Consistency of Organ Geometries During Prostate Radiotherapy With Two Different Bladder and Bowel Regimens. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2015 Dec;46(4):380-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2015.09.001.10.1016/j.jmir.2015.09.001Search in Google Scholar

18. Ren W, Sun Ch, Lu N, et. al, Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Radiotherapy in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Nov 8;17(6):254-262. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6464.10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6464Search in Google Scholar

19. McNair H, Hansen V, Parker Ch, et. al. A Comparison of the Use of Bony Anatomy and Internal Markers for Offline Verification and an Evaluation of the Potential Benefit of Online and Offline Verification Protocols for Prostate Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 May 1;71(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.002.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.002Search in Google Scholar

20. O’Neill A, Jain S, Hounsell A, et. al. Fiducial marker guided prostate radiotherapy: a review. Br J Radiol. December 2016; 89(1068): 20160296. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160296.10.1259/bjr.20160296Search in Google Scholar

21. Pérez-Romasanta L, Lozano-Martín E, Velasco-Jiménez J, et. al. CTV to PTV Margins for Prostate Irradiation. Three-dimensional Quantitative Assessment of Interfraction Uncertainties Using Portal Imaging and Serial CT Scans. Clin Transl Oncol. 2009 Sep;11(9):615-21.doi: 10.1007/s12094-009-0413-z.10.1007/s12094-009-0413-zSearch in Google Scholar

22. Kukołowicz P, Kukołowicz H, Tyburska I. Dependence of the Safe Rectum Dose on the CTV-PTV Margin Size and Treatment Technique. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. May-Jun 2015;20(3):198-203. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.12.004.10.1016/j.rpor.2014.12.004Search in Google Scholar

23. Ziółkowski S, Biedka M, Żmuda E, Ziółkowska E. Trudności w przeprowadzeniu radioterapii u chorych z otyłością. Inżynier i Fizyk Medyczny. 2014, Vol. 3, p 111-116.Search in Google Scholar

24. Lin L, Hertan L, Rengan R, et. al. Effect of Body Mass Index on Magnitude of Setup Errors in Patients Treated With Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Endometrial Cancer With Daily Image Guidance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jun 1;83(2):670-5.doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.026.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.026Search in Google Scholar

25. Bentzen S, Constine L, Deasy J, et. al. Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): An Introduction to the Scientific Issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1; 76(3 Suppl): S3–S9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040Search in Google Scholar

26. NCNN (National Comrehensive Cancer Network) Guidelines Version 2.2017.Search in Google Scholar

27. NCNN (National Comrehensive Cancer Network) Guidelines Version 1.2020.Search in Google Scholar

28. Piziorska M, Kukołowicz P, Zawadzka A, et. al. Adaptive off-line protocol for prostate external radiotherapy with cone beam computer tomography. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. 2012. Vol. 188, p 1003–1009.Search in Google Scholar

29. McKenzie A, Herk M, Mijnheer B. Margins for Geometric Uncertainty Around Organs at Risk in Radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2002 Mar;62(3):299-307. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00015-4.10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00015-4Search in Google Scholar