Establishment of diagnostic reference levels arising from common CT examinations in Semnan County, Iran

[1] Treier R, Aroua A, Verdun F, et al. Patient doses in CT examinations in Switzerland: implementation of national diagnostic reference levels. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;142(2-4):244-254.10.1093/rpd/ncq279Search in Google Scholar

[2] Mulkens T, Salgado R, Bellinck P. Dose Optimization and Reduction in CT of the Brain and Head and Neck Region. In: Tack D, Kalra M, Gevenois P (eds). Radiation Dose from Multidetector CT. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2011. p. 281-306.10.1007/174_2011_451Search in Google Scholar

[3] Tack D, Gevenois P (eds). Radiation Dose from Adult and Pediatric Multidetector Computed Tomography. Springer. 2007. section 6:276.10.1007/978-3-540-68575-3Search in Google Scholar

[4] Karim MKA, Hashim S, Bradley DA, et al. Radiation doses from computed tomography practice in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Radiat Phys Chem. 2016;121:69-74.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.12.020Search in Google Scholar

[5] Reiser MF, Hricak H, Knauth M. Radiation Dose from Multidetector CT. Springer-Verlag. 2012. p. 642.Search in Google Scholar

[6] European Commission. Guidance on diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for medical exposures: Radiation Protection 109. Directorate-General, Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection, European Commission; 1999. p. 26.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Vassileva J, Rehani M. Diagnostic reference levels. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204(1):W1-W3.10.2214/AJR.14.12794Search in Google Scholar

[8] Foley SJ, McEntee MF, Rainford LA. Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland. Br J Radiol. 2012;851018:1390-1397.10.1259/bjr/15839549Search in Google Scholar

[9] Cousins C. Changes Impacting on Radiation Protection in Medicine Since the Malaga Conference. in: Radiation Protection in Medicine: Setting the Scene for the Next Decade. Proceedings of an International Conference 3-7 December 2012, Bonn, Germany. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): IAEA. 2015 p. 31-35.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zhang M, Chu C. Optimization of the radiological protection of patients undergoing digital radiography. J Digit Imaging. 2012;25(1):196-200.10.1007/s10278-011-9395-9Search in Google Scholar

[11] Hart D, Wall B. UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50(3):285-291.10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00178-5Search in Google Scholar

[12] Jurkovic S, Segota D, Posedel D, et al. Radiation Doses on CT Scanner in University Hospital Rijeka and Comparison with European Commision Dose Reference Levels. in: Knezevic Z; Krajcar Bronic I; Majer M. (eds). Proceedings of 9th Symposium of the Croatian Radiation Protection Association. 2013. p.259-264.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging: Review and additional advice. Annals of the ICRP. 2001;31(4):33-52.Search in Google Scholar

[14] McCollough C, Cody D, Edyvean S, et al. AAPM Report No. 96. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. Report of AAPM Task Group 23. 2008.10.37206/97Search in Google Scholar

[15] Khoramian D, Sistani S. Estimation and comparison of the radiation effective dose during coronary computed tomography angiography examinations on single-source 64-MDCT and dual-source 128-MDCT. J Radiol Prot. 2017;37(4):826-836.10.1088/1361-6498/aa823f28910264Search in Google Scholar

[16] Janbabanezhad Toori A, Shabestani-Monfared A, Deevband MR, et al. Dose Assessment in Computed Tomography Examination and Establishment of Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in Mazandaran, Iran. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2015;5(4):177-184.Search in Google Scholar

[17] van der Molen A, Schilham A, Stoop P, et al. A national survey on radiation dose in CT in The Netherlands. Insights Imaging. 2013;4(3):383-890.10.1007/s13244-013-0253-9367525523673455Search in Google Scholar

[18] Hiles P, Brennen S, Scott S, Davies J. A survey of patient dose and image quality for computed tomography scanners in Wales. J Radiol Prot. 2001;21(4):345-354.10.1088/0952-4746/21/4/30211787889Search in Google Scholar