[
Acar, K. (2022). Covid-19 sürecinde spor bilimleri fakültesi öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitime yönelik algıları: Bir metafor analizi [Perceptions of sports science faculty students towards distance education during the Covid-19 process: A metaphor analysis]. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 1764–1796.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aguilar, O. G., Apaza, F. T., & Huanca, S. C. (2022). Influencing factors in perceived learning mediated by satisfaction in university students in times of Covid-19. 20th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology: “Education, Research and Leadership in Post-Pandemic Engineering: Resilient, Inclusive and Sustainable Actions”, Hybrid Event. Boca Raton, Florida-USA, July 18–22, 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Akgün, F. (2018). Uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin web tabanlı öğretime yönelik tutumları ve çevrim içi teknolojilere yönelik öz-yeterlik algılarının incelenmesi [Investigation of distance education students’ attitudes towards web-based teaching and their self-efficacy perceptions towards online technologies]. In 9th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium-ICITS2015 Full Paper Proceedings.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aktaş, Ö., Büyüktaş, B., Gülle, M., & Yıldız, M. (2020). COVID–19 virüsünden kaynaklanan izolasyon günlerinde spor bilimleri öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitime karşı tutumları [Attitudes of sports science students towards distance education during the days of isolation caused by the COVID-19 virus]. Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 1–9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Albayrak, E. Güngören, Ö. C., & Horzum, M. B. (2014). Algılanan Öğrenme ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlaması [Turkish adaptation of the Perceived Learning Scale]. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(1), 1–14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade Change: Tracking Online Education in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alomyan, H., & Au, W. (2004). Exploration of instructional strategies and individual difference within the context of web-based learning. International Education Journal, 4(4), 86–91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2007). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: SPSS uygulamalı [Research methods in social sciences: SPSS applied]. Sakarya Yayıncılık.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alyoussef, I. Y. (2021). E-Learning Acceptance: The Role of Task–Technology Fit as Sustainability in Higher Education. Sustainability, 13, 6450. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1311645010.3390/su13116450
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aras, E., & ve Karakaya, Y. E. (2020). Spor eğitimi kurumlarında görev yapan akademik personelin uzaktan eğitime yönelik görüşleri: Nitel bir çalışma [Opinions of academic staff working in sports education institutions on distance education: A qualita tive study]. Spormetre The Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 18(2), 1–12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arbaughi, J. B. (2000), Virtual Classroom Characteristics and Student Satisfaction with Internet-Based MBA Courses. Journal of Management Education, 24(1), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629000240010410.1177/105256290002400104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). Amos 5.0 update to the AMOS user’s guide. Chicago: Small Waters Corp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arı, E., Yılmaz, V., & Doğan, M. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinin internet üzerinden alışverişlerine ilişkin tutum ve davranışların önerilen bir yapısal eşitlik modeliyle araştırılması [Investigation of university students’ attitudes and behaviors towards online shopping with a proposed structural equation model]. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 22(2), 385–399.10.18657/yecbu.02638
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and eLearning Research, 7(3), 285–29210.20448/journal.509.2020.73.285.292
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Batista, I. V. C., & Cornachıone, E. B. (2005). Learning styles influences on satisfaction and perceived learning: Analysis of an online business game‖, Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference 32, 22–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Birişçi, S., Metin, M., & Demiryürek, G. (2011). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin bilgisayar ve internet kullanımına yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi: (Artvin ili örneği) [Examination of primary school teachers’ attitudes towards computer and internet use: (Artvin province example)]. Eğitim Teknolojileri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 1–18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı [Manual of data analysis for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bollinger, D. U., & Erichsen, E. A. (2013). Student satisfaction with blended and online courses based on personality type. Canadian Journal of Learning & Technology, 39(1), 1–23. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1007071.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bozavlı, E. (2021). Is foreign language teaching possible without school? Distance learning experiences of foreign language students at Ataturk University during the Covid-19 pandemic. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 12(1), 3–18.10.24093/awej/vol12no1.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Demirel, F., Karadeniz, Ş., & Çakmak, E. K. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. (23. Baskı) [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.10.14527/9789944919289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, basics concepts, applications, and programming. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Can, H. C., Özdemir, H., & Işım-Türksoy, A. (2020). What does e-learning mean for physical education teacher candidates: Mixed method research. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(3), 1374–1386.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caspi, A., & Blau, I. (2008). Social presence in online discussion groups: Testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning. Social Psychology of Education, 11(3), 323–346.10.1007/s11218-008-9054-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duque, L. C. (2014). A framework for analysing higher education performance: Students’ satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and dropout intentions. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(1–2), 1–21.10.1080/14783363.2013.807677
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Durmuş, A., & Bağcı, H. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının web tabanlı öğretime yönelik tutumlarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Examination of pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards web-based teaching in terms of different variables]. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 225–231.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eom, S. B. (2014). Understanding e-learners’ satisfaction with learning management systems. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 16 (2/3), 10–13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw Hill.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gil, H. (2008). The challenge of the transition from online delivery to online teaching and learning. In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen, D. A. Williset. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2589–2594). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gopal, R., Singh, V., & Aggarwal, A. (2021). Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 6923–6947.10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1805912733903795
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gülbahar, Y. (2009). E-öğrenme. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.10.14527/9786054282098
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2016). Research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gray, J. A., & Diloreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), n1. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1103654.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamid, Y., Al-Karaki, J. N., Nseobot, I. R., Effiong, A. I., Dinnoo, V., & Edet, A. U. (2020). A simple and predictive model for COVID-19 evolution in large scale infected countries. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(24), 3961-3971.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hair, J. F, Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hergüner, G., Yaman, Ç., Çağlak-Sarı, S., Yaman S., & Dönmez, A. (2021). The effect of online learning attitudes of sports sciences students on their learning readiness to learn online in the era of the new coronavirus pandemic (Covid–19). TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1); 68–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hsieh, P. A. J., & Cho, V. (2011). Comparing e-Learning tools’ success: The case of instructor–student interactive vs. self-paced tools. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2025–2038.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Isaac, O., Aldholay, A., Abdullah, Z., & Ramayah, T. (2019). Online learning usage within Yemeni higher education: The role of compatibility and task-technology fit as mediating variables in the IS success model. Computers & Education, 136, 113–129.10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
İmhan, M., & ve Çetin, B. (2013). Çevrimiçi öğrenmeye yönelik hazır bulunuşluk ölçeğinin (ÇÖHBÖ) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [The validity and reliability study of the Turkish form of the online learning readiness scale (ÇÖLLÖ)]. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 3(2), 72–101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Islam, A. N. (2013). Investigating e-learning system usage outcomes in the university context. Computers & Education, 69, 387–399.10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kafes, A.Y., & Yıldırım, A. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitim memnuniyeti ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Developing university students’ distance education satisfaction scale: Validity and reliability study]. Turkish Studies, 16(6), 1641–1657.10.7827/TurkishStudies.50766
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1999). Yeni İnsan ve İnsanlar [New Man and People]. İstanbul: Evrim Yayınevi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kara, A. (2010). Öğrenmeye ilişkin tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi [Developing an attitude scale towards learning]. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(32), 49–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karasar, N. (2018). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri: Kavramlar, ilkeler ve teknikler [Scientific research methods: Concepts, principles and techniques]. (32.Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Klein, P., Ivanjek, L., Dahlkemper, M. N., Jeličić, K., Geyer, M.-A., Küchemann, S., & Susac, A. (2021). Studying physics during the COVID-19 pandemic: Student assessments of learning achievement, perceived effectiveness of online recitations, and online laboratories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, 010117, 1–11.10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010117
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuşcu, E., & Sancar, R. (2022). A comparative examination of faculty members’ and students’ meanings regarding emergency remote teaching in the COVID-19 process. Educational Academic Research, 47, 93–107.10.5152/AUJKKEF.2022.1034893
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kurucay, M., & Inan, F. A. (2017). Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Computers & Education, 115, 20–37.10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koutsoyiannis, A. (1989). Ekonometri kuramı. Çeviren: Şenesen Ü. 1. Baskı [Econometric theory. Translated by Şenesen Ü. 1st Edition]. Ankara: Verso Yayıncılık.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, H. Y., Qu, H., & Kim, Y. S. (2007). A study of the impact of personal innovativeness on online travel shopping behavior-A case study of Korean travelers. Tourism Management, 28(3), 886–897.10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iuliano, E., Mazzilli, M., Zambelli, S., Macaluso, F., Raviolo, P., & Picerno P. (2021). Satisfaction levels of sport sciences university students in online workshops for substituting practice-oriented activities during the COVID-19 Lockdown. Education Sciences. 11(10), 600.10.3390/educsci11100600
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, R., Meng, Z. Tian, M., Zhang, Z., & Xiao, W. (2021). Modelling Chinese EFL learners’ flow experiences in digital game-based vocabulary learning: The roles of learner and contextual factors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 483–505.10.1080/09588221.2019.1619585
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Susanti, L., & Fairina, Y. (2019). The Advocacy Model of Indonesian Chinese Students, the Affluent Market. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 625–640. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12140a10.29333/iji.2019.12140a
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M. ve Chen, G. D. (2007). An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners’ factors toward e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1906–1920.10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lo C. C. (2010). How student satisfaction factors affect perceived learning‖, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 47–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Love, E. G, Love, D. W., & Northcraft, G. B. (2010). Is the end in sight? Student regulation of in-class and extra-credit effort in response to performance feedback. Acad Manag Learn Educ, 9, 81–97.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGill, T. J., & Klobas, J. E. (2009). A task–technology fit view of learning management system impact. Computers & Education, 52(2), 496–508.10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martín-Rodríguez, O., Fernández-Molina, J. C., Montero-Alonso, M. A, & González-Gómez, F. (2015). The main components of satisfaction with e-learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.88837010.1080/1475939X.2014.888370
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millan, A., & Esteban, A. (2004). Development of a multiple-item scale for measuring customer satisfaction in travel agencies services. Tourism Management, 25(5), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2003.07.002.10.1016/j.tourman.2003.07.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murad, F. A., & Kamal, A. A. (2021). The impact of e-learning on university students’ learning of sport skill subjects during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences, EJSBS, XXX, (III), 201–216.10.15405/ejsbs.300
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mutlu-Bozkurt, T., & Tamer, K. (2020). Sporda e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutum ölçeği [Scale of attitude towards e-learning in sports]. International Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 6(36), 1761–1771.10.31576/smryj.634
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mutlu-Bozkurt, T., & Erdoğan, R. (2022). Investigation of the relationship between the attitudes of physical education and sports teacher candidates towards e-learning in sports and academic success in the distance education process. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 21(2), 47–53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Özdemir, E., & Aydoğan, H. (2021). Spor eğitimi alan üniversite öğrencilerinin e-öğrenmeye yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi [Examining attitudes of university students taking sport education towards elearning]. Spor Eğitim Dergisi, 5(3), 187–195.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Özgür, H. ve Tosun, N. (2010). İnternet destekli eğitimin e-öğrenme tutumlarına etkisi [The effect of internet assisted education on e-learning attitudes]. XV. Türkiye’de İnternet Konferansı, 2–4. İstanbul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Öztürk-Demir, S. ve Eren E. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinin çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamına ilişkin memnuniyet düzeyleri [Satisfaction levels of university students regarding the online learning environment]. Uluslararası Bilim ve Eğitim Dergisi, 4(2), 67–84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pizan, A., & Ellis, T. (1999). Customer satisfaction and its measurement in hospitality enterprises. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 11(7), 326–339.10.1108/09596119910293231
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pokhrel, S., & Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 133–141.10.1177/2347631120983481
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prabhu, M. N. B., Bolar, K., Mallya, J., Roy, P., Payini, V., & Thirugnanasambantham, K. (2022). Determinants of hospitality students’ perceived learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Role of interactions and self-efficacy. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 30, 100335.10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100335842318834512192
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rahman, L. A., Omar, N., Fatzel, F. H. M., & Isa, N. S. M. (2022). Predictors of student satisfaction and perceived learning in online distance learning: The effects of self-efficacy and interaction. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 785–803.10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i10/14804
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ribeiro, R. (2020). How university faculty embraced the remote learning shift. EdTech Magazine. Retrieved from https://edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2020/04/how-university-faculty-embraced-remote-learning-shift (Erişim Tarihi: 23 Şubat 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richardson, J., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. JALN, 7(1), 68–88.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rovai A. P., Wighting M. J., Baker J. D., & ve Grooms L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual higher education classroom settings. Internet and Higher Education, 121(1), 7–13.10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sadik A, & Reisman S. (2004). Design and implementation of a web-based learning environment: Lessons learned. Q Rev Distance Educ, 5, 157–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sebastianelli, R., Swift, C., & Tamimi, N. (2015). Factors affecting perceived learning, satisfaction, and quality in the online MBA: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Education for Business, 90(6), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2015.103897910.1080/08832323.2015.1038979
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schermelleh-Engel K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online, 8, 23–74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shee, D. Y., & Wang Y. S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers and Education, 50, 894–905.10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics, 6th edn Boston. Ma: Pearson.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tavşancıl, E. (2006). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. (3. Baskı) [Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. (3rd Edition)]. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Topal, M., Akgün, Ö. E., & Aydın, F. (2017). Lisansüstü uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin algılanan öğrenme düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi: Sakarya Üniversitesi örneği [Examining the perceived learning levels of graduate distance education students in terms of various variables: Sakarya University example]. VIII. International Graduate Education Symposium Proceedings Book, 126–140.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turan, S., Yaman, M. S., Genç, H. İ., Ahmet Dönmez, Gülten Hergüner, & Yaman, Ç. (2022), Predictive of perceived learning: academic motivation and attitudes to mobile learning, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 106–113.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Problems in the application of learning management systems: Comparison of research perspectives between Australia and China. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 3789–3810.10.1007/s10639-021-10431-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tüzün, F. ve Yörük-Toraman, N. (2021). Pandemi döneminde uzaktan eğitim memnuniyetini etkileyen faktörler [Factors affecting distance education satisfaction during the pandemic period]. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(3), 822–845.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick, & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using Multivar Stat. 4th ed. (pp. 653–771). Boston, MA: Allyn, & Bacon.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uusiautti, S., Maatta, K., & Leskisenoja, E. (2017). Succeeding alone and together-university students’ perceptions of caring online teaching. Journal of Studies in Education, 7(2), 48–66.10.5296/jse.v7i2.11162
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Usta, İ., Uysal, Ö., & Okur, M. R. (2016). Çevrimiçi öğrenme tutum ölçeği: Geliştirilmesi, geçerliği ve güvenirliği [Online learning attitude scale: Development, validity and reliability]. Journal of International Social Research, 9(43), 2215–2215.10.17719/jisr.20164317786
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ünlü, H., Aktaş, Ö., & Büyüktaş, B. (2021). Spor bilimleri öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitime yönelik tutum ve görüşlerinin incelenmesi [Examining the attitudes and views of sports science students towards distance education]. Spor Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 294–306.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Rooij, S. W., & Zirkle, K. (2016). Balancing pedagogy, student readiness and accessibility: A case study in collaborative online course development. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 1–7.10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walker, P., Whittaker, C., Watson, O., Baguelin, M., Ainslie, K., Bhatia, S., . . . Cattarino, L. (2020). Report 12: The global impact of covid-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression. Science, 369(5602), 413–422. https://doi.org.10.1126/science.abc003510.1126/science.abc0035729250432532802
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wan, Z., Wang, Y., & Haggerty, N. (2008). Why people benefit from e-learning differently: The effects of psychological processes on e-learning outcomes. Information & Management, 45(8), 513–521.10.1016/j.im.2008.08.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended elearning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155–164.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WHO. (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (Erişim Tarihi: 23 Şubat 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yaman, M. (2009), Perceptions of students on the application of distance education in physical education lessons. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 1–10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 65–77.10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
YÖK. (2020). Basın Açıklaması [Press briefing] (18 Mart 2020), Retrieved from https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2020/universitelerde-uygulanacak-uzaktan-egitime-iliskin-aciklama.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 23 Şubat 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
YÖK. (2020a). Basın ve Halkla İlişkiler Müşavirliği, Yükseköğretim kurumlarımızdaki 2020–2021 eğitim ve öğretim dönemine yönelik açıklama [Press and Public Relations Consultancy, Statement for the 2020–2021 academic year in our Higher Education Institutions], 13.08.2020, 1–2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
YÖK. (2021). YÖK Başkanı Erol Özvar, Üniversitelerde Yüz Yüze Eğitimin Detaylarını Açıkladı, 8 Eylül 2021 [YÖK President Erol Özvar Announced the Details of Face-to-face Education at Universities, 8 September 2021.]. Retrieved from https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2021/yok-baskaniozvar-dan-yuz-yuze-egitime-iliskin-aciklamalar.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 23 Şubat 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
