Contextual Sources of Euroscepticism in Eastern Central and Western Europe: The Role of Peripheral Regions

Anderson, C. J. (1998): When in Doubt, Use Proxies: Attitudes toward Domestic Politics and Support for European Integration. Comparative Political Studies 31(5): 569–601, available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414098031005002. Search in Google Scholar

ARDECO (2023a): GDP in PPS [dataset]: available at https://urban.jrc.ec.europa.eu/trends?lng=en&ctx=ardeco&ts=ARDECO&pil=indicator-le-vel&is=ARDECO&cl=default&i=92&tl=3&clc=002-economy&db=513&it=download&cwt=line-chart&y=2022&tv=-1. Search in Google Scholar

ARDECO (2023b): GDP per capita in PPS [dataset]: available at https://urban.jrc.ec.europa.eu/trends?lng=en&ctx=ardeco&ts=ARDECO&pil=indicator-le-vel&is=ARDECO&cl=default&i=91&tl=3&clc=002-economy&tv=2016&db=658&it=down-load&y=2008&cwt=line-chart. Search in Google Scholar

ARDECO (2023c). Total Popilation (on 1st January) [dataset]: available at https://urban.jrc.ec.europa.eu/trends?lng=en&ctx=ardeco&ts=ARDECO&pil=indicator-le-vel&is=ARDECO&cl=default&i=66&tl=3&clc=001-population-dynamics&db=509&it=download&tv=-1&cwt=line--chart&y=2022. Search in Google Scholar

Bakker, R. – Hooghe, L. – Jolly, S. – Marks, G. – Polk, J. – Rovny, J. – Steenbergen, M. – Vachudova, M. (2020): Codebook 2019 Chapel Hill Expert Survey: May 2020 Version 2019.3: available at https://www.chesdata.eu/2019-chapel-hill-expert-survey. Search in Google Scholar

Bayerlein, M. (2020): Spatial Inequality and Populist Voting in Germany and the United States: availableathttps://www.aicgs.org/publication/spatial-inequality-and-populist-voting-in--germany-and-the-united-states/. Search in Google Scholar

Boda, Z. – Medve -Bálint, G. (2014): Does Institutional Trust in East Central Europe Differ from Western Europe? European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities 3(2): 1–17. Search in Google Scholar

Bojinović Fenko, A. – Lovec, M. – Požgan, J. – Crnčec, D. (2019): Euroscepticism as a Functional Pretext for Populism in Central and Eastern European States: The Eurozone, Migration and Ukrainian Crises. Teorija in Praksa 56: 391–417. Search in Google Scholar

Boomgaarden, H. G. – Schuck, A. R. T. – Elenbaas, M. – Vreese, C. H. (2011): Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support. European Union Politics 12(2): 241–266, available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116510395411. Search in Google Scholar

Condruz–Băcescu, M. (2014): Euroscepticism Across Europe: Drivers and Challenges. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 6(2): 52–59. Search in Google Scholar

Dijkstra, L. – Poelman, H. – Rodríguez -Pose, A. (2020): The geography of EU discontent. Regional Studies 54(6): 737–753, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603. Search in Google Scholar

Dominicis, L. – Dijkstra, L. – Pontarollo, N. (2020): The Urban-Rural Divide in Anti -EU Vote: Social, demographic and economic factors affecting the vote for parties opposed to European integration 5/2021, Publications Office of the European Union. Search in Google Scholar

Ejrnæs, A. – Jensen, M. D. (2019): Divided but united: Explaining nested public support for European integration. West European Politics 42(7): 1390–1419, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1577632. Search in Google Scholar

ESPON EGTC (2022): PROFECY – Inner Peripheries [dataset]: available at https://database.espon.eu/project-data-package/985/. Search in Google Scholar

Essletzbichler, J. – Disslbacher, F. – Moser, M. (2018): The victims of neoliberal globalisation and the rise of the populist vote: A comparative analysis of three recent electoral decisions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11(1): 73–94, available at https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx025. Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2019): Standard -Eurobarometer 91 Bericht: Die öffentliche Meinung in der Europäischen Union: available at https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2253. Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2020): Territorial Agenda 2030 – A future for all places: Informal meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development and/or Territorial Cohesion: available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/brochures/2021/territorial-agenda-2030-a-future-for-all-places. Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat (2020): Statistical regions in the European Union and partner countries: NUTS and statistical regions 2021: available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-manuals--and-guidelines/-/KS-GQ-20-092. Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat (2023): Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region [dataset]: available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table?lang=de Search in Google Scholar

Heidecke, B. – Hübscher, M. (2017): Planzahlen, Wachstumsraten und der Terminal Value. In Heidecke, B.– Schmidtke, R. – Wilmanns J., eds., Funktionsverlagerung und Verrechnungspreise: Rechtsgrundlagen, Bewertungen, Praxistipps, 255–264, Springer Gabler: available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09026-5_8. Search in Google Scholar

Hobolt, S. B. – de Vries, C. E. (2016): Public Support for European Integration. Annual Review of Political Science 19(1): 413–432, available at https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044157. Search in Google Scholar

Keim -Klärner, S. – Bernard, J. – Bischof, S. – van Dülmen, C. – Klärner, A. – Steinführer, A. (2021): Analyzing social disadvantage in rural peripheries in Czechia and Eastern Germany: Conceptual model and study design, Braunschweig: Johann Heinrich von Thünen -Institut Bundesforschungsinstitut für Ländliche Räume Wald und Fischerei, Thünen Working Paper No. 170/170: available at https://doi.org/10.3220/WP1614067689000. Search in Google Scholar

Kopecký, P. – Mudde, C. (2002): The Two Sides of Euroscepticism: Party Positions on European Integration in East Central Europe. European Union Politics 3(3): 297–326, abailable at https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003003002. Search in Google Scholar

Kühn, M. (2015): Peripheralization: Theoretical Concepts Explaining Socio -Spatial Inequalities. European Planning Studies 23(2): 367–378, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.862518. Search in Google Scholar

Lenzi, C., – Perucca, G. (2021): People or Places that Don’t Matter? Individual and Contextual Determinants of the Geography of Discontent. Economic Geography 97(5): 415–445, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2021.1973419. Search in Google Scholar

Mamonova, N. – Franquesa, J. (2020): Populism, Neoliberalism and Agrarian Movements in Europe. Understanding Rural Support for Right–Wing Politics and Looking for Progressive Solutions. Sociologia Ruralis 60(4): 710–731, available at https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12291. Search in Google Scholar

Meijers, M. J. (2017): Radical Right and Radical Left Euroscepticism: A Dynamic Phenomenon, Berlin: Jacques Delors Institute, Notre Europe Policy Paper No. 191: 18. Search in Google Scholar

Musil, J. – Müller, J. (2008): Inner Peripheries of the Czech Republic as a Form of Social Exclusion. In J. Musil, ed., Space and historical time as dimensions of social change. First edition, 75–92, Matfyzpress. Search in Google Scholar

Noguera, J. – Copus, A. (2016): Inner Peripheries: What are they? What policies do they need? available at https://agriregionieuropa.univpm.it/it/content/article/31/45/inner-peripheries--what-are-they-what-policies-do-they-need. Search in Google Scholar

Noguera, J. – Ortega -Reig, M. – Del Alcázar, H. – Copus, A. – Berlina, A. – Moodie, J. –Mantino, F. – Forcina, B. – Weck, S. – Beißwenger, S. – Hans, N. – Tagai, G. – Koós, B. – Kovács, K. – Uzzoli, A. – Dax, T. – Machold, I. – Schürmann, C. – Tobiasz -Lis, P. –… Wójcik, M. (2017): PROFECY – Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe: Final Report: available at https://www.espon.eu/inner-peripheries. Search in Google Scholar

Platon, A. – ZEIT ONLINE (2019): Data EU Elections 2019 [dataset]: available at https://www.zeit.de/po-litik/ausland/2019-07/europawahl-gemeinden-eu-mitgliedsstaaten-ergebnisse-analyse. Search in Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018): The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11(1): 189–209, available at https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024. Search in Google Scholar

Runciman, W. (1980): Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth -century England. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (2000): The Political Basis of Support for European Integration. European Union Politics 1(2): 147–171, available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001002001. Search in Google Scholar

Santana, A. – Zagórski, P. – Rama, J. (2020): At odds with Europe: Explaining populist radical right voting in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics 36(2), 288–309, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1737523. Search in Google Scholar

Sibbertsen, P. – Lehne, H. (2021): Statistik: Einführung für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62696-2. Search in Google Scholar

Stroppe, A. K. – Jungmann, N. (2022): Welchen Einfluss hat der Wohnort auf die Wahlentschei-dung bei der Bundestagswahl 2021? easy_social_sciences 67: 49–60, available at https://doi.org/10.15464/easy.2022.07. Search in Google Scholar

Taggart, P. (1998): A Touchstone of Dissent: Euroscepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems. European Journal of Political Research 33(3): 363–388, available at https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00387. Search in Google Scholar

Taggart, P. – Szczerbiak, A. (2002): The Party Politics of Euroscepticism in EU Member and Candidate States. Political Research Joint Workshops. Search in Google Scholar

Toni, A. – Di Martino, P. – Dax, T. (2021): Location matters. Are science and policy arenas facing the Inner Peripheries challenges in EU? Land Use Policy 100(105111): available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105111. Search in Google Scholar

Treib, O. (2014): The voter says no, but nobody listens: Causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. Journal of European Public Policy 21(10): 1541–1554, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.941534. Search in Google Scholar

Velthuis, S. – Royer, J. – Le Petit -Guerin, M. – Cauchi-Duval, N. – Franklin, R. S. – Leibert, T. – MacKinnon, D. – Pike, A. (2022): Geographically uneven structural change in EU15 regions from 1980 to 2017: A cluster analysis, Working Paper No. 01/22: available at https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/xsgf9. Search in Google Scholar

Vries, C. E. de – Tillman, E. R. (2011): European Union issue voting in East and West Europe: The role of political context. Comparative European Politics 9(1): 1–17, available at https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2009.7. Search in Google Scholar

Vries, C. E. de (2018): Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Walker, I. – Pettigrew, T. F. (1984): Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology 23(4): 301–310, available at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00645.x. Search in Google Scholar