[
Barsade, S. (2020): The contagion we can control, 17 August 2020, retrieved from Harward Business Review: https://hbr.org/2020/03/the-contagion-we-can-control
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benford, R. D. – Snow, D. A. (2000): Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bertot, J. C. – Jaeger, P. T. – Hansen, D. L. (2012): The impact of polices on government social media usage: issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly 29(1): 30–40. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biersack, J. – O’Lear, S. (2014): The geopolitics of Russia’s annexation of Crimea: narratives, identity, silences, and energy. Eurasian Geography and Economics 55(3): 247–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2014.985241
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bird, S. – Klein, E. – Loper, E. (2009): Natural Language Processing with Python: Analyzing Text with the Natural Language Toolkit. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blei, D. M. – Ng, A. Y. – Jordan, M. I. (2003): Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning, 3: 993–1022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boin, A. – Hart, P. – Stern, E. – Stundelius, B. (2017): The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolsen, T. – Palm, R. – Kingsland, J. T. (2020): Framing the Origins of COVID-19. Science Communication 42(5): 562–585.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonsón, E. – Royo, S. – Ratkai, M. (2014): Facebook Practices in Western European Municipalities. Administration & Society 49(3): 320–347. doi:10.1177/0095399714544945
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borah, P. (2011): Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication 61(2): 246–263.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borah, P. (2016): Political Facebook Use: Campaign Strategies Used in 2008 and 2012 Presidential Elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(4): 326–338.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borucki, I. (2016): Regierungen auf Facebook – distributiv, dialogisch oder reaktiv? Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Digital Communication Research 3: 49–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.17174/dcr.v3.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bossetta, M. (2018): The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US election. Journalism & mass communication quarterly 95(2): 471–496.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bratic, V. (2008): Examining peace-oriented media in areas of violent conflict. International Communication Gazette 70(6): 487–503.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brundidge, J. (2010): Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication 60(4): 680–700.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bucy, E. – Bradley, S. (2004): Presidential Expressions and Viewer Emotion: Counterempathic Responses to Televised Leader Displays. Social Science Information 43(1): 59–94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bukkvoll, T. (1997): Ukraine and European security. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bundesregierung. (2022). The Federal Government. Retrieved from Structure and tasks: https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/chancellor/structure-and-tasks-470508
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2018): Research on political information and social media: Key points and challenges for the future. El profesional de la información 27(5): 964–974.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Castells, M. (2013): Communication power. Oxford University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chong, D. – Druckman, J. N. (2007a): A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication 57: 99–118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chong, D. – Druckman, J. N. (2007b): Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Criado, J. I. – Sandoval-Almazan, R. – Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2013): Government innovation through social media. Government Information Quarterly 30(4): 319–326.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daehnhardt, P. (2018): German foreign policy, the Ukraine crisis and the Euro-Atlantic order: Assessing the dynamics of change. German Politics 27(4): 516–538.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Vreese, C. H. (2005): News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design 13(1): 51–62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deutscher Bundestag (2015): Drucksache 18/6609, 5 November 2015, retrieved from Dokumentationsund Informationssystem (DIP): http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/066/1806609.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ekman, M. (2019): Anti-immigration and racist discourse in social. European Journal of Communication 34(6): 606–618.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Entman, R. M. (1993): Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43: 51–58.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Entman, R. M. (2004): Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farazmand, A. (2012): The future of public administration: Challenges and opportunities – A critical perspective. Administration & Society 44(4): 487–517.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flaxman, S. – Goel, S. – Rao, J. M. (2016): Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly 80: 298–320.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fuchs, C. (2013): Social media: A critical introduction. SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gamson, W. A. – Modigliani, A. (1987): The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braun-gart (ed.), Research in political sociology 3. Greenwich: CT: JAI Press., 137–177).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gamson, W. A. – Modigliani, A. (1989): Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95(1): 1–37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaufman, E. (2015): Memory, media, and securitization: Russian media framing of the Ukrainian crisis. Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society 1(1): 141–175.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gebauer, K.-E. (1998): Regierungskommunikation. In O. Jarren – U. Sarcinelli –U. Saxer (eds.), Politische Kommunikation in der demokratischen Gesellschaft. Opladen: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 464–472.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ghosh, S. – Gunning, D. (2019): Natural Language Processing Fundamentals: Build intelligent applications that can interpret the human language to deliver impactful results. Birmingham: Packt Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Google LLC. (2023): Googletrans web version for documents. Retrieved from https://translate.google.com/?sl=de&tl=en&op=docs
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Graber, D. A. – Dunaway, J. (2017): Mass media and American politics. California: CQ Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamelink, C. (2008). Media between warmongers and peacemakers. Media, War & Conflict 1(1): 77–83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hänggli, R. (2012): Key factors in frame building: How strategic political actors shape news media coverage. American Behavioral Scientist 56(3): 300–317.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Helms, L. (2008): Governing in the Media Age: The Impact of the Mass Media on Executive Leadership in Contemporary Democracies. Government and Opposition 43(1): 26–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hill, H. (1993): Staatskommunikation. Juristenzeitung 48(7): 330–336.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Houston, J. B. – Pfefferbaum, B. – Rosenholtz, C. E. (2012): Disaster news: Framing and frame changing in coverage of major US natural disasters, 2000–2010. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89(4): 606–623.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hutto, C. – Gilbert, E. (2014). VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 8(1): 216–225). Michigan, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jain, N. –Prasad, S. – Bordeniuc, A. –Tanasov, A. – Shirinskaya, A. V. – Béla, B. – Reinis, A. (2022). European Countries Step-up Humanitarian and Medical Assistance to Ukraine as the Conflict Continues. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 2022; 13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jungherr, A. (2016): Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13(1): 72–91.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaur, M. – Verma, R. –Otoo, F. N. (2021): Emotions in leader’s crisis communication: Twitter sentiment analysis during COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 31(1–4): 362–372.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kearney, M. W. –Sancho, L. R. –Wickham, H. –Heiss, A. – Briatte, F. – Sidi, J. (2023: Cran. Retrieved from Package ‘rtweet’: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rtweet/rtweet.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kwok, S. W. – Vadde, S. K. – Wang, G. (2021): Tweet topics and sentiments relating to COVID-19 vaccination among Australian Twitter users: Machine learning analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23(5): e26953.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, J. – Kang, J.-H. – Jun, S. – Lim, H. – Jang, D. – Park, S. (2018): Ensemble modeling for sustainable technology transfer. Sustainability 10(7): 2278.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lev-On, A. (2018): The Anti-Social Network? Framing Social Media in Wartime. Social Media + Society, 4(3).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, K. M. (2000): When leaders display emotion: How followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leaders. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Bevavior 21(2): 221–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200003)21:2%3C221:AID-JOB36%3E3.0.CO;2-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Makhortykh, M. – Lyebyedyev, Y. (2015): #SaveDonbassPeople: Twitter, Propaganda, and Conflict in Eastern Ukraine. The Communication Review 18(4): 239–270. doi:10.1080/10714421.2015.1085776
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Makhortykh, M. – Sydorova, M. (2017): Social media and visual framing of the conflict in Eastern Ukraine. Media, war & conflict 10(3): 359–381.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marples, D. R. (2022): Russia’s war goals in Ukraine. Canadian Slavonic Papers 64(2–3): 207–219.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matthes, J. (2008): Media frames and public opinion: Exploring the boundaries of framing effects in a two-wave panel study. Studies in Communication Sciences 8(2): 101–128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matthes, J. (2011): Framing Politics: An Integrative Approach. American Behavioral Scientist 56(3): 247–259.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McNair, B. (2016): Communication and Political Crisis: Media, Politics and Governance in a Globalized Public Sphere. New York: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Monselise, M. – Chang, C. – Ferreira, G. – Yang, R. – Yang, C. (2021): Topics and Sentiments of Public Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines: Social Media Trend Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 23(10): e30765.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moussa, M. E. – Mohamed, E. H. – Haggag, M. H. (2020): A generic lexicon-based framework for sentiment analysis. International Journal of Computers and Applications 42(5): 463–473.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nahon, K. (2016): Where there is social media there is politics. In A. Bruns et al, Routledge companion to social media and politics. New York: Routledge, 39–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nelson, T. E. – Kinder, D. R. (1996): Issue frames and group centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics 58: 1055–1078.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nelson, T. E. – Clawson, R. A. – Oxley, Z. M. (1997): Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review 91: 567–583.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nikolayenko, O. (2019): Framing and counter-framing a Peace March in Russia: the use of Twitter during a hybrid war. Social Movement Studies 18(5): 602–621.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nisch, S. (2023): Invasion of Ukraine: Frames and Sentiments in Zelensky’s Twitter Communication. Journal of Contemporary European Studies. doi:10.1080/14782804.2023.2198691
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nygren, G. – Glowacki, M. – Hök, J. – Kiria, I. – Orlova, D. – Taradai, D. (2018). Journalism in the crossfire: Media coverage of the war in Ukraine in 2014. Journalism Studies 19(7): 1059–1078.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ojala, M. M. – Pantti, M. K. – Kangas, J. (2017): Whose War, Whose Fault?: Visual Framing of the Ukraine Conflict in Western European Newspapers. International Journal of Communication 11: 474–498.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pantti, M. (2019): The Personalisation of Conflict Reporting. Digital Journalism 7(1): 124–145. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1399807
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papacharissi, Z. (2016): Affective publics and structures of storytelling: sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society 19(3): 307–324.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pasitselska, O. (2017): Ukrainian crisis through the lens of Russian media: Construction of ideological discourse. Discourse & Communication 11(6): 591–609.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paul, N. – Sui, M. (2019): I Can Feel What You Feel: Emotion Exchanges in Twitter Conversations between Candidates and the Public. Journal of Political Marketing 21(2): 175–195.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rehurek, R. – Sojka, P. (n.d.): Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Röder, M. – Both, A. – & Hinneburg, A. (2015): Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. New York: ACM Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roman, N. – Wanta, W. – Buniak, I. (2017): Information wars: Eastern Ukraine military conflict coverage in the Russian, Ukrainian and U.S. newscasts. International Communication Gazette 79(4): 357–378.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ross, A. S. – Rivers, D. J. (2018): Discursive Deflection: Accusation of “Fake News” and the Spread of Mis- and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump. Social Media + Society 4(2), doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118776010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rustam, F. – Khalid, M. – Aslam, W. – Rupapara, V. – Mehmood, A. – Choi, G. S. (2021): A performance comparison of supervised machine learning models for Covid-19 tweets sentiment analysis. PLOS ONE 16(2): e0245909.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scheufele, D. A. (2000): Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society 3(2–3): 297–316.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scholz, O. (2022a): Twitter. Retrieved from Bundeskanzler Olaf Scholz: https://twitter.com/Bundeskanzler/status/1504507509356339204
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scholz, O. (2022b): Twitter. Retrieved from Bundeskanzler Olaf Scholz: https://twitter.com/Bundeskanzler/status/1604133707157323777
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schwarz, A. – Seeger, M. W. – Auer, C. (2017): Significance and structure of international risk and crisis communication research: Toward an integrative approach. In A. Schwarz– M. W. Seeger – C. Auer (eds.), The Handbook of International Crisis Communication Research. Malden: Wiley & Sons, 1–10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shrivastava, K. – Kumar, S. – Jain, D. K. (2019): An effective approach for emotion detection in multimedia text data using sequence based convolutional neural network. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78: 29607–29639.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sievert, C. – Shirley, K. (2014: LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces. Baltimore: Association for Computational Linguistics, 63–70.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sniderman, P. M. – Theriault, S. M. (2004): The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris – P. M. Sniderman (eds.), Studies in public opinion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 133–166.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
STATISTA (2021): Distribution of Twitter users worldwide as of April 2021, by age group. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/283119/age-distribution-of-global-twitter-users/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stewart, P. A. – Waller, B. M. – Schubert, J. N. (2009): Presidential speechmaking style: Emotional response to micro-expressions of facial affect. Motivation and Emotion 33(2): 125–135.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stier, S. –Bleier, A. – Lietz, H. – Strohmaier, M. (2018): Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political communication 35(1): 50–74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stracqualursi, L. – Agati, P. (2022) Covid-19 vaccines in Italian public opinion: Identifying key issues using Twitter and Natural Language Processing. PLoS ONE 17(11): e0277394.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stromer-Galley, J. (2000): On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It. Journal of Communication 50(4): 111–132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suslov, M. D. (2014): “Crimea Is Ours!” Russian popular geopolitics in the new media age. Eurasian Geography and Economics 55(6): 588–609.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Syed, S. – Spruit, M. (2017): Full-text or abstract? Examining topic coherence scores using latent Dirichlet allocation. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA). Tokyo: IEEE, 165–174.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Warnick, B. – Heineman, D. (2012): Rhetoric online: the politics of new Media. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wiggins, B. E. (2016) Crimea River: Directionality in Memes from the Russia-Ukraine Conflict. International Journal of Communication 10: 451–485.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wright, N. (2018): No longer the elephant outside the room: Why the Ukraine crisis reflects a deeper shift towards German leadership of European foreign policy. German Politics 27(4): 479–497.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, J. (2020): Does the medium matter? A Meta-Analysis on Using Social Media vs. Traditional Media in Crisis Communication. Public Relations Review 46(4): 1–7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang, X. – Chen, B. C. – Maity, M. – Ferrara, E. (2016): Social politics: agenda setting and political communication on social media. International conference on social informatics. Bellevue: Springer, 330–344.
]Search in Google Scholar