When Ideology Matters More – Science and Vaccine Scepticism in Light of Political Ideologies and Partisanship during the Third COVID-19 Wave in Hungary¹

Bauer, M. W. – Petkova, K. – Boyadjieva, P. (2000) Public knowledge of and attitudes to science: Alternative measures that may end the “science war”. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(1), 30–51.10.1177/016224390002500102Search in Google Scholar

Bajomi-Lázár, P. (2013): The party colonisation of the media – the case of Hungary. East European Politics and Societies, 27(1), 69–89.10.1177/0888325412465085Search in Google Scholar

Bayerlein, M. – Boese, V. A. – Gates, S. – Kamin, K. – Murshed, S. M. (2021): Populism and COVID-19: How Populist Governments (Mis)Handle the Pandemic. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Working Paper, No. 2192.Search in Google Scholar

Cakanlar, A. – Trudel, R. – White, K. (2020): Political Ideology and the Perceived Impact of Coronavirus Prevention Behaviors for the Self and Others.Search in Google Scholar

Calvillo, D. P. – Ross, B. J. – Garcia, R. J. – Smelter, T. J. – Rutchick, A. M. (2020): Political ideology predicts perceptions of the threat of COVID-19 (and susceptibility to fake news about it). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1119–1128.10.1177/1948550620940539Search in Google Scholar

Clinton, J. – Cohen, J. – Lapinski, J. – Trussler, M. (2021): Partisan pandemic: How partisanship and public health concerns affect individuals’ social mobility during COVID-19. Science advances, 7(2), available at https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.abd7204, (6. 10. 2021).10.1126/sciadv.abd7204Search in Google Scholar

Conway Iii, L. G. – Woodard, S. R. – Zubrod, A. – Chan, L. (2021): Why are conservatives less concerned about the coronavirus (COVID-19) than liberals? Comparing political, experiential, and partisan messaging explanations. Personality and individual differences, 183, 111124.10.1016/j.paid.2021.111124Search in Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N. – Klar, S. – Krupnikov, Y. – Levendusky, M. – Ryan, J. B. (2021): How affective polarization shapes Americans’ political beliefs: A study of response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 8(3), 223–234.10.1017/XPS.2020.28Search in Google Scholar

Dunlap, R. E. – McCright, A. M. – Yarosh, J. H. (2016): The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the US. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58(5), 4–23.Search in Google Scholar

de Figueiredo, A. – Larson, H. J. (2021): Exploratory study of the global intent to accept COVID-19 vaccinations. Communications Medicine, 1(1), 1–10.10.1038/s43856-021-00027-xSearch in Google Scholar

Gauchat, G. (2012): Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American sociological review, 77(2), 167–187.10.1177/0003122412438225Search in Google Scholar

Gramacho, W. – Turgeon, M. – Kennedy, J. – Stabile, M. – Mundim, P. S. (2021): Political Preferences, Knowledge, and Misinformation About COVID-19: The Case of Brazil. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 36.10.3389/fpos.2021.646430Search in Google Scholar

Havey, N. F. (2020): Partisan public health: how does political ideology influence support for COVID-19 related misinformation? Journal of Computational Social Science, 3(2), 319–342.10.1007/s42001-020-00089-2Search in Google Scholar

IDEA Institute (2020a): The majority of the Hungarian people think that the health care system does not get enough funding to control the pandemic. (In Hungarian: A magyarok többsége szerint az egészségügy nem kap elég támogatást a járvány megfékezésére. Euronews, (26 March 2021), available at: https://hu.euronews.com/2020/03/26/idea-a-magyarok-tobbsege-szerint-az-egeszsegugy-nem-kap-eleg-tamogatast-a-jarvany-megfekez, (6. 10. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

IDEA Institute (2020b): People who are willing to vaccinate trust sciences and the EU (In Hungarian: A tudományban és az EU-ban bíznak azok, akik beoltatnák magukat koronavírus ellen.) Azonnali, 22 December 2020, available at: https://azonnali.hu/cikk/20201222_a-tudomanyban-es-az-eu-ban-biznak-azok-akik-beoltatnak-magukat-koronavirus-ellen, (6. 10. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Jacques, P. J. – Dunlap, R. E. – Freeman, M. (2008): The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental politics, 17(3), 349–385.10.1080/09644010802055576Search in Google Scholar

Kates, J. – Tolbert, J. – Orgera, K. (2021): The Red/Blue Divide in COVID-19 Vaccination Rates. Policy Watch, 14 September, 2021, available at: https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/the-red-blue-divide-in-covid-19-vaccination-rates/, (6. 10. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Kennedy, J. (2019): Populist politics and vaccine hesitancy in Western Europe: an analysis of national-leveldata.European journal of public health, 29(3), 512–516.10.1093/eurpub/ckz004Search in Google Scholar

Körösényi, A. (2012): Political polarisation and its consequences for democratic accountability. Hungarian Politics, 1990–2010 (In Hungarian: A politikai polarizáció és következményei a demokratikus elszámoltathatóságra. Magyar politika, 1990–2010). Working Papers in Political Science, 1. MTA TK PTI, (6. 10. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Körösényi, A. – Illés, G. – Metz, R. (2017): The role of political leaders in crisis situations: theoretical framework and research questions. (In Hungarian: A politikai vezetők szerepe válsághelyzetekben: fogalmi-elméleti keret és kutatási kérdések). In Körösényi András (Ed): Governing in storm: political leaders in crisis situations. (In Hungarian: Viharban kormányozni. Politikai vezetők válsághelyzetekben.) MTA TK PTI, 9–45.Search in Google Scholar

Kreko, P. (2020): Countering conspiracy theories and misinformation. Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories, 242–256.10.4324/9780429452734-2_8Search in Google Scholar

Latkin, C. A. – Dayton, L. – Yi, G. – Colon, B. – Kong, X. (2021): Mask usage, social distancing, racial, and gender correlates of COVID-19 vaccine intentions among adults in the US. PloS one, 16(2), e0246970. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246970.Search in Google Scholar

Lewandowsky, S –, Gignac, G. E. – Oberauer, K. (2015): Correction: The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PloS One, 10(8), 1–11.10.1371/journal.pone.0134773Search in Google Scholar

Lieberoth, A. et al. (2021): Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey, Royal Society Open Science 8(2), available at: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.200589, (2. 12. 2021).10.31234/osf.io/f7ghwSearch in Google Scholar

Mathieu, E. – Ritchie, H. – Ortiz-Ospina (2021): A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations. Natural Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01122-8.Search in Google Scholar

McCright, A. M. – Dunlap, R. E. (2011): The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194.10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.xSearch in Google Scholar

McCright, A. M. – Dentzman, K. – Charters, M. – Dietz, T. (2013): The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environmental Research Letters, 8(4), 044029. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044029.10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044029Search in Google Scholar

Miller, B. L. (2020): Science Denial and COVID Conspiracy Theories: Potential Neurological Mechanisms and Possible Responses. JAMA, 324 (22), 2255–2256.10.1001/jama.2020.21332Search in Google Scholar

Mooney, C. (2012): The republican brain: the science of why they deny science and reality. John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Myers, C. D. (2021): No effect of partisan framing on opinions about the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 132–144.10.1080/17457289.2021.1924747Search in Google Scholar

Palonen, E. (2009): Political Polarisation and Populism in Contemporary Hungary. Parliamentary Affairs, 62 (2), 318–334.10.1093/pa/gsn048Search in Google Scholar

Patkós V. (2015): Political polarisation and economic failure in European democracies. (In Hungarian: Politikai polarizáció és gazdasági sikertelenség az európai demokráciákban.). Political Science Review (In Hungarian Politikatudományi Szemle), 26 (4), 29–52.Search in Google Scholar

Patkós, V. (2019): Results about the reasons and consequences of political polarization. (In Hungarian: Szekértáborharc – Eredmények a politikai megosztottság okairól és következményeiről.) TKPTI-Napvilág.Search in Google Scholar

Peng, C. Y. J. – Lee, K. L. – Ingersoll, G. M. (2002): An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. The journal of educational research, 96(1), 3–14.10.1080/00220670209598786Search in Google Scholar

Plohl, N. – Musil, B. (2021): Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: The critical role of trust in science. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(1), 1–12.10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988Search in Google Scholar

Political Capital (2018): Conspiracy theories, fake news, superstitions in Hungarian public opinions, available at: https://www.politicalcapital.hu/pc-admin/source/documents/pc-boll-konteo-20181107.pdf, (6. 10. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Nardi, A. – Troiano, G., (2021): Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19. Public Health. 194, 245–251.10.1016/j.puhe.2021.02.025Search in Google Scholar

Wellcome Global Monitor (2018): How does the world feel about science and health? available at: https://wellcome.org/reports/wellcome-global-monitor/2018. (6. 10. 2021).Search in Google Scholar