1. bookVolume 17 (2021): Issue s1 (October 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1801-3422
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Migration and asylum law of the V4 in the European Union context: between harmonisation and reluctance

Published Online: 22 Oct 2021
Volume & Issue: Volume 17 (2021) - Issue s1 (October 2021)
Page range: 761 - 790
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1801-3422
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Ever since the 2015 migration and asylum crisis, the legal regulation of this field in the European Union has been debated strongly in almost all its aspects. The member countries of the Visegrád Group (V4) have voiced dissent regarding a number of EU measures in this field, leading to political and legal confrontation. After a brief review of the public law context of EU migration and asylum policy and the general attitude of the V4 towards these regulatory fields, this paper elaborates how the EU and the V4 reacted – in legal terms – to the 2015 migration and asylum crisis and to each other’s measures, focusing on three key V4 policy goals. The paper also analyses the reception of the 2020 proposal on the New Pact on Migration and Asylum and discusses whether it can be seen as the way forward in terms of a more consensual policy approach. The paper finds that although the approach of the V4 has had a perceivable effect on that of the EU, elements of disagreement remain; it further argues that the harmonious elements of the approaches of the EU and the V4 could potentially be built upon to reach a compromise, but maintains that policy-based reluctance cannot have an effect on obligations laid down by EU law.

Keywords

Abdou, Leila Hadj: From the Migration Crisis to the New Pact on Migration and Asylum – The Status Quo Problem. BRIDGE Network Working Paper 11, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

Al-Kashef, Muhammad – Martin, Marie: EU ‑Egypt migration cooperation: at the expense of human rights. EuroMed Rights, 2019: available at: https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2019/jul/Report-on-EU-Egypt-cooperation-on-migration%20.pdf(5 th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Bauerová, Helena (2018): Migration Policy of the V4 in the Context of Migration Crisis. Politics in Central Europe 14(2): 99–119.10.2478/pce-2018-0011 Search in Google Scholar

Bauerová, Helena (2018): The V4 and European Integration. Politics in Central Europe 14(2): 121–139.10.2478/pce-2018-0012 Search in Google Scholar

Burnay, Matthieu – Denecker, Matthias – Raube, Kolja – Hauck, Volker: Does the EU have the right instruments to finance assistance in protracted crises and the needs of upper middle income countries? European Parliament, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

Cappelletti, Mauro –Seccombe, Monica – Weiler, Joseph, eds. (1986): Integration Through Law: Europe and the American Federal Experience. Vol. 1: Methods, Tools and Institutions De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110909227 Search in Google Scholar

Cassarino, Jean -Pierre (2010): Readmission Policy in the European Union, European Parliament. Search in Google Scholar

Chmiel, Oskar J. (2018): The engagement of Visegrad countries in EU ‑Africa relations, Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik. Discussion Paper No. 24/2018: available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.23661/dp24.2018 (5th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Circolo, Andrea – Hamuľák, Ondrej – Lysina, Peter (2018): The Principle of Solidarity between Voluntary Commitment and Legal Constraint: Comments on the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Joined Cases C-643/15 and C-647/15. Czech Yearbook of Public & Private International Law 9: 155–173. Search in Google Scholar

Colombeau, Sara Casella (2019): Crisis of Schengen? The effect of two ‘migrant crises’ (2011 and 2015) on the free movement of people at an internal Schengen border. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42(5): 625–641. Search in Google Scholar

De Bruycker, Philippe – De Somer, Marie – De Brouwer, Jean -Louis, eds. (2019): From Tampere 20 to Tampere 2.0: Towards a new European consensus on migration. European Policy Centre. Search in Google Scholar

Drinóczi, Tímea – Mohay, Ágoston (2018): Has the Migration Crisis Challenged the Concept of the Protection of the Human Rights of Migrants? The Case of Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary, in Elżbieta, Kużelewska; Amy, Weatherburn; Dariusz, Kloza, eds., Irregular Migration as a Chal‑ lenge for Democracy, Intersentia, pp. 97–112.10.1017/9781780687025.007 Search in Google Scholar

Duszczyk, Maciej – Podgórska, Karolina – Dominika Pszczółkowska (2019): From mandatory to voluntary. Impact of V4 on the EU relocation scheme. European Politics and Society 21(4): 470–487. Search in Google Scholar

European Council of Refugees and Exiles (2020): Joint Statement: The Pact on Migration and Asylum: to provide a fresh start and avoid past mistakes, risky elements need to be addressed and positive aspects need to be expanded, 6 October 2020: available at: https://www.ecre.org/the-pact-on-migration-and-asylum-to-provide-a-fresh-start-and-avoid-past-mistakes-risky--elements-need-to-be-addressed-and-positive-aspects-need-to-be-expanded/(5 th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Fischl, Vilmos (2019): The Role of the Ecumenical Council of the Churches in Hungary in Aiding Persecuted Christians, in Kaló, József –Petruska, Ferenc – Ujházi, Lóránd, Budapest Report on Christian Persecution, Háttér Kiadó, 259–272. Search in Google Scholar

Global Detention Project (2018): Country Report – Immigration Detention in the Czech Republic: “We Will Not Accept Even One More Refugee”, 2018: available at: https://www.globaldetentionproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Immigration-Detention-in-the-Czech-Republic--December-2018-Web.pdf (5th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Global Detention Project (2019): Country Report – Immigration Detention in Slovakia: Punitive Conditions Paid for by the Detainees. Global Detention Project, 2019: available at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Immigration-Detention-in-Slovakia-Online-.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Goldner Lang, Iris (2020): No Solidarity without Loyalty: Why Do Member States Violate EU Migration and Asylum Law and What Can Be Done? European Journal of Migration and Law 22(1): 39–59.10.1163/15718166-12340068 Search in Google Scholar

Goździak, Elżbieta M. – Main, Izabella (2020): Contesting Flexible Solidarity: Poland and the “Migration Crisis”. Frontiers in Human Dynamics 2: 1–13.10.3389/fhumd.2020.562682 Search in Google Scholar

Hautzinger, Zoltán (2019): Migratory Impacts on Law Enforcement, in Hautzinger, Zoltán, ed., Dynamics and Social Impact of Migration, Dialóg -Campus, pp. 149–172. Search in Google Scholar

Karabegović, Dženeta (2020): Visegrad Countries and Migration Leadership Potential: Contextu‑ alizing Opportunities in light of the New Pact on Migration and Asylum and Beyond. Institute of International Relations Prague – Think Visegrad V4 Think -Tank Platform: available at: https://think.visegradfund.org/wp-content/uploads/Karabegovic_2020.pdf,(5th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Krist, Niels (2020): Protecting the Formal Rule of Law in the EU’s Asylum Policy: The CJEU’s Judgment in C-757/17 (The Asylum Relocation Mechanism). BRIDGE Network Blog, 19 May 2020: availableat:https://bridgenetwork.eu/2020/05/19/protecting-the-formal-rule-of-law-in--the-eus-asylum-policy-the-cjeus-judgment-in-c-757-17-the-asylum-relocation-mechanism (5th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2017): Relocation & Resettlement: Sharing Responsibility within the EU and Opening Legal Pathways to Europe, European Union. Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2016): Cost of non ‑Schengen: the impact of border controls within Schen‑ gen on the Single Market. European Union: available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/578974/IPOL_STU(2016)578974_EN.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2020): MEPs to grill Frontex director on agency’s role inpushbacks of asylum ‑seekers. 30th November 2020: available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdfs/news/expert/2020/11/press_release/20201126IPR92509/20201126IPR92509_en.pdf (5th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (2020): Migration: Fundamental rights issues at land borders. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Search in Google Scholar

Glied, Viktor – Zamęcki, Łukasz (2021): Together, but still separated? Migration policy in the V4 countries. Politics in Central Europe 17(1S), 647–673.10.2478/pce-2021-0027 Search in Google Scholar

Gyeney, Laura – Molnár, Tamás (2016): Asylum Policy of the European Union, in Láncos, Petra Lea – Debisso, Kinga – Gyeney, Laura – Szabó, Marcel, eds., Union Policies, Eleven International Publishing, 183–249. Search in Google Scholar

Karamanidou, Lena – Kasparek, Bernd (2018): Border Management and Migration Control in the European Union, RESPOND Research report D2. 1. Search in Google Scholar

Kováts, András (2016): Migrációs helyzetkép Magyarországon, in Tarrósy, István – Glied, Viktor – Vörös, Zoltán, eds., Migráció a 21. században, Publikon Kiadó, pp. 349–368. Search in Google Scholar

Monar, Jörg (2010): The ‘area of freedom, security and justice’: ‘Schengen’ Europe, opt -outs, opt -ins and associates, in Dyson, Kenneth – Sepros, Angelos, eds., Which Europe? The politics of differentiated integration, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 279–292. Search in Google Scholar

Karageorgiou, Eleni (2020): The New Pact on Migration and Asylum: Why Pragmatism Cannot Engender Solidarity. Nordic Journal of European Law, 3(2): III -VIII.10.36969/njel.v3i2.22396 Search in Google Scholar

Nagy, Boldizsár (2016): Hungarian Asylum Law and Policy in 2015–2016: Securitization Instead of Loyal Cooperation. German Law Journal 17(6): 1033–1082.10.1017/S2071832200021581 Search in Google Scholar

Nagy, Boldizsár (2017): Renegade in the Club – Hungary’s Resistance to EU Efforts in the Asylum Field. Osteuropa Recht 63(4): 413–427.10.5771/0030-6444-2017-4-413 Search in Google Scholar

Nagy, Boldizsár (2020): A pyrrhic? Victory concerning detention in transit zones and procedural rights: FMS & FMZ and the legislation adopted by Hungary in its wake. EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy, 15th June 2020: available at: https://eumigrationlawblog.eu/a--pyrrhic-victory-concerning-detention-in-transit-zones-and-procedural-rights-fms-fmz-and--the-legislation-adopted-by-hungary-in-its-wake/(5 th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Nyzio, Arkadiusz (2017): The Second Revival? The Visegrád Group and the European Migrant Crisis in 2015–2017. Politeja 50(5): 47–98. Search in Google Scholar

Pachocka, Marta (2016): Understanding the Visegrad Group States’ Response to the Migrant and Refugee Crises 2014+ in the European Union. Yearbook of Polish European Studies 19: 101–132. Search in Google Scholar

Pap, Norbert – Glied, Viktor – Reményi, Péter (2018): Two Faces of the Migration Crisis in Hungary, in Maria, Paradiso, ed., Mediterranean Mobilities: Europe’s Changing Relationships, Springer International Publishing, pp. 55–64. Search in Google Scholar

Pollet, Kris (2019) All in vain? The fate of EP positions on asylum reform after the European elections. EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy, 23rd May 2019: available at: http://eumigrationlawblog.eu/all-in-vain-the-faith-of-ep-positions-on-asylum-reform-after-the--european-elections/(5 th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Peers, Steve (2015): Relocation of Asylum ‑Seekers in the EU: Law and Policy. EU Law Analysis, 24th September 2015: available at: https://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2015/09/relocation--of-asylum-seekers-in-eu-law.html(5 th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Profant, Tomáš (2018): The Social Construction of Slovakia as a Donor and its Power Effects. Europe ‑AsiaStudies 70(3): 365–387.10.1080/09668136.2018.1453486 Search in Google Scholar

Remek, Éva (2015): A V4 kül -és biztonságpolitikája, in Rajnai, Zoltán – Beatrix Fregan – Kuna Zsuzsanna Marosné – Judit Ozsváth, eds., Tanulmánykötet a 6. Báthory ‑Brassai Nemzetközi Kon‑ ferencia Előadásaiból, Óbudai Egyetem Biztonságtudományi Doktori iskola, pp. 1–2, 285–293. Search in Google Scholar

Rijpma, Jorrit (2016): The proposal for a European Border and Coast Guard: evolution or revolu‑ tion in external border management? European Union. Search in Google Scholar

Schütze, Robert (2015): EU Competences: Existence and Exercise, in Arnull, Anthony – Chalmers, Damien, eds., The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law, Oxford University Press, pp. 75–102. Search in Google Scholar

Shaw, Malcolm N. (2017): International Law. Eighth Edition, Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Stepper, Péter (2018): A kényszermigráció mint biztonsági kihívás Közép ‑Európában: Eltérő per‑ cepciók, közös álláspont a visegrádi országokban. Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem. Search in Google Scholar

Sundberg Diez, Olivia – Trauner, Florian (2021): EU return sponsorships: High stakes, low gains. European Policy Centre. Search in Google Scholar

Szalai, Máté – Csornai, Zsuzsanna – Garai, Nikolett (2017): V4 Migration Policy: Conflicting Nar‑ ratives and Interpretative Framework. CIDOB Colección Monografías. Search in Google Scholar

Szczerbiak, Aleks (2017): How is the European migration crisis affecting Polish politics. EU‑ROPP: European Politics and Policy. 6th July 2017: available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2017/07/06/european-migration-crisis-affecting-polish-politics/(5 th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Tarrósy, István – Vörös, Zoltán (2020): Hungary’s Pragmatic Foreign Policy in a Post-American World. Politics in Central Europe, 16(1): 113–134.10.2478/pce-2020-0006 Search in Google Scholar

Tóth, Norbert (2020): Tranzitzóna után, újabb jogi kihívások előtt? Horizont 2020/9, Migárciókutató Intézet: available at: https://www.migraciokutato.hu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/20200529_HORIZONT_9_toth_norbert_tranzitzona_ut%C3%A1n_ujabb_jogi_kihivasok_elott_elemzes.pdf (5th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Vékony, Dániel (2021): Country Report Hungary, October 2019. GREASE – Religion, Diversity and Radicalisation: available at: http://grease.eui.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2019/10/WP2-Mapping_Hungary-report_Daniel-Vekony-tcm2.pdf (5th March 2021) Search in Google Scholar

Weber, Bodo (2016): The European Refugee Crisis, the Balkan Route and the EU ‑Turkey Deal. Democratization Policy Council: available at: http://www.democratizationpolicy.org/pdf/DPC_Policy_Paper_Europ_refugee_crisis_EU_Turkey_deal.pdf (5th March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo