This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ahmed, M., Qureshi, M. N., Mallick, J., & Ben Kahla, N. (2019). Selection of sustainable supplementary concrete materials using OSM-AHP-TOPSIS approach. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, p. 2850480.AhmedM.QureshiM. N.MallickJ.Ben KahlaN.2019Selection of sustainable supplementary concrete materials using OSM-AHP-TOPSIS approach2019285048010.1155/2019/2850480Search in Google Scholar
Alshamrani, O. S., & Alshibani, A. (2020). Automated decision support system for selecting the envelope and structural systems for educational facilities. Building and Environment, 181, p. 106993.AlshamraniO. S.AlshibaniA.2020Automated decision support system for selecting the envelope and structural systems for educational facilities18110699310.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106993Search in Google Scholar
Ambrose, J. (1993). Building Structures. John Wiley & Sons, USA.AmbroseJ.1993John Wiley & SonsUSASearch in Google Scholar
Balali, V., Zahraie, B., & Roozbahani, A. (2014). A comparison of AHP and PROMETHEE family decision making methods for selection of building structural system. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2(5), pp. 149–159.BalaliV.ZahraieB.RoozbahaniA.2014A comparison of AHP and PROMETHEE family decision making methods for selection of building structural system2514915910.12691/ajcea-2-5-1Search in Google Scholar
Bobylev, N. (2011). Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of selected underground construction technologies using the analytic network process. Automation in Construction, 20, pp. 1030–1040.BobylevN.2011Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of selected underground construction technologies using the analytic network process201030104010.1016/j.autcon.2011.04.004Search in Google Scholar
Caterino, N., Iervolino, I., Manfredi, G., & Cosenza, E. (2009). Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for seismic structural retrofitting. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24(6), pp. 432–445.CaterinoN.IervolinoI.ManfrediG.CosenzaE.2009Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for seismic structural retrofitting24643244510.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00599.xSearch in Google Scholar
Chen, L., & Deng, X. (2018). A modified method for evaluating sustainable transport solutions based on AHP and dempster–shafer evidence theory. Applied Sciences, 8, p. 563.ChenL.DengX.2018A modified method for evaluating sustainable transport solutions based on AHP and dempster–shafer evidence theory856310.3390/app8040563Search in Google Scholar
Dagilgan, S. (2019). Geniş açıklıkların örtülmesinde kullanılan taşıyıcı sistem seçimi için bir model önerisi. Master Thesis, Çukurova University. Institute of Applied Science, Adana.DagilganS.2019Master Thesis, Çukurova UniversityInstitute of Applied ScienceAdanaSearch in Google Scholar
Dan, M. D. B. (2004). Multi-criteria decision model for retrofitting existing buildings. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science. Copernicus Publications on Behalf of the European Geosciences Union, 4(4), pp. 485–499.DanM. D. B.2004Multi-criteria decision model for retrofitting existing buildings. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science4448549910.5194/nhess-4-485-2004Search in Google Scholar
Ding, T., Liang, L., Yang, M., & Wu, H. (2016). Multiple attribute decision making based on cross-evaluation with uncertain decision parameters. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016, p. 4313247.DingT.LiangL.YangM.WuH.2016Multiple attribute decision making based on cross-evaluation with uncertain decision parameters2016431324710.1155/2016/4313247Search in Google Scholar
Evstratova, A. V., Krishtalevich, A. K., Belov, V. V., & Nikitin, S. E. (2021). Design of prefabricated reinforced concrete structures: Comparative analysis of prefabricated reinforced concrete floor slab. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1103(1), p. 012023.EvstratovaA. V.KrishtalevichA. K.BelovV. V.NikitinS. E.2021Design of prefabricated reinforced concrete structures: Comparative analysis of prefabricated reinforced concrete floor slab1103101202310.1088/1757-899X/1103/1/012023Search in Google Scholar
Fernandes, W. S., Greco, M., & Almeida, V. S. (2017). Application of the smooth evolutionary structural optimization method combined with a multi-criteria decision procedure. Engineering Structures, 143, pp. 40–51.FernandesW. S.GrecoM.AlmeidaV. S.2017Application of the smooth evolutionary structural optimization method combined with a multi-criteria decision procedure143405110.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Formisano, A., Castaldo, C., & Chiumiento, G. (2017). Optimal seismic upgrading of a reinforced concrete school building with metal-based devices using an efficient multi-criteria decision-making method. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 13(11), pp. 1373–1389.FormisanoA.CastaldoC.ChiumientoG.2017Optimal seismic upgrading of a reinforced concrete school building with metal-based devices using an efficient multi-criteria decision-making method13111373138910.1080/15732479.2016.1268174Search in Google Scholar
Golestanifar, M., Goshtasbi, K., Jafarian, M., & Adnani, S. (2011). A multi-dimensional approach to the assessment of tunnel excavation methods. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 48(7), pp. 1077–1085.GolestanifarM.GoshtasbiK.JafarianM.AdnaniS.2011A multi-dimensional approach to the assessment of tunnel excavation methods4871077108510.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.07.001Search in Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Libreros, J. H., Bertolazzi, A., Turrini, U., & Pellegrino, C. (2020). Assessment of an existing reinforced-concrete prefabricated building: The case of the procédé camus. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 26(3), p. 04020025.Gonzalez-LibrerosJ. H.BertolazziA.TurriniU.PellegrinoC.2020Assessment of an existing reinforced-concrete prefabricated building: The case of the procédé camus2630402002510.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000421Search in Google Scholar
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York.HwangC. L.YoonK.1981Springer-VerlagNew York10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9Search in Google Scholar
Jiang, D., Hasan, M. M., Faiz, T. I., & Noor-E-Alam, M. (2019). A possibility distribution-based multicriteria decision algorithm for resilient supplier selection problems. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 27, pp. 203–223.JiangD.HasanM. M.FaizT. I.Noor-E-AlamM.2019A possibility distribution-based multicriteria decision algorithm for resilient supplier selection problems2720322310.1002/mcda.1696Search in Google Scholar
Korkmaz, S., Ali, N. B. H., & Smith, I. F. (2012). Configuration of control system for damage tolerance of a tensegrity bridge. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(1), pp. 145–155.KorkmazS.AliN. B. H.SmithI. F.2012Configuration of control system for damage tolerance of a tensegrity bridge26114515510.1016/j.aei.2011.10.002Search in Google Scholar
Kuzman, M. K., & Grošelj, P. (2012). Wood as a construction material: Comparison of different construction types for residential building using the analytic hierarchy process. Wood Research, 57(4), pp. 591–600.KuzmanM. K.GrošeljP.2012Wood as a construction material: Comparison of different construction types for residential building using the analytic hierarchy process574591600Search in Google Scholar
Lombera, J. T. S. J., & Aprea, I. G. (2010). A system approach to the environmental analysis of industrial buildings. Building and Environment, 45(3), pp. 673–683.LomberaJ. T. S. J.ApreaI. G.2010A system approach to the environmental analysis of industrial buildings45367368310.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.012Search in Google Scholar
Malekly, H., Mousavi, S. M., & Hashemi, H. (2010). A fuzzy integrated methodology for evaluating conceptual bridge design. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), pp. 4910–4920.MaleklyH.MousaviS. M.HashemiH.2010A fuzzy integrated methodology for evaluating conceptual bridge design3774910492010.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.024Search in Google Scholar
Masters, L. W., & Brandt, E. (1987). Prediction of service life of building materials and components. Materials and Structures, 20(1), pp. 55–77.MastersL. W.BrandtE.1987Prediction of service life of building materials and components201557710.1007/BF02472728Search in Google Scholar
Nawy, E. G. (1985). Reinforced Concrete – A Fundamental Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.NawyE. G.1985Prentice HallUpper Saddle River, NJ, USASearch in Google Scholar
Pan, N. F. (2008). Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method. Automation in Construction, 17(8), pp. 958–965.PanN. F.2008Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method17895896510.1016/j.autcon.2008.03.005Search in Google Scholar
Park, R., & Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures. John Wiley & Sons, USA.ParkR.PaulayT.1975John Wiley & SonsUSA10.1002/9780470172834Search in Google Scholar
Pons, O., & Aguado, A. (2012). Integrated value model for sustainable assessment applied to technologies used to build schools in Catalonia, Spain. Building and Environment, 53, pp. 49–58.PonsO.AguadoA.2012Integrated value model for sustainable assessment applied to technologies used to build schools in Catalonia, Spain53495810.1016/j.buildenv.2012.01.007Search in Google Scholar
Pun, S. K., Liu, C., & Langston, C. (2006). Case study of demolition costs of residential buildings. Construction Management and Economics, 24(9), pp. 967–976.PunS. K.LiuC.LangstonC.2006Case study of demolition costs of residential buildings24996797610.1080/01446190500512024Search in Google Scholar
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.SaatyT. L.1980McGraw-HillNew York, USASearch in Google Scholar
Saaty, T. L., & Özdemir, M. S. (2003). Why the magic number seven plus or minus two? Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38, pp. 233–244.SaatyT. L.ÖzdemirM. S.2003Why the magic number seven plus or minus two?3823324410.1016/S0895-7177(03)90083-5Search in Google Scholar
Trahair, N. S., Bradford, M. A., Nethercot, D. A., & Gardner, L. (2017). The Behaviour and Design of Steel Structures to EC3. CRC Press, London.TrahairN. S.BradfordM. A.NethercotD. A.GardnerL.2017CRC PressLondonSearch in Google Scholar
Yildirim, M. G. (2003). Taşıyıcı sistem seçimine yönelik çok ölçütlü bir yaklaşım, Master Thesis, Istanbul Technical University. Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul.YildirimM. G.2003Master Thesis, Istanbul Technical University.Faculty of ArchitectureIstanbulSearch in Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., Chan, F. T. S., & Ishizaka, A. (2018). A DEMATEL-based completion method for incomplete pairwise comparison matrix in AHP. Annals of Operations Research, 271, pp. 1045–1066.ZhouX.HuY.DengY.ChanF. T. S.IshizakaA.2018A DEMATEL-based completion method for incomplete pairwise comparison matrix in AHP2711045106610.1007/s10479-018-2769-3Search in Google Scholar