[
Alvarez, R. & Olson, S. L. 1978. A new merganser from the Miocene of Virginia (Aves: Anatidae). – Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barr, J. F. 1996. Aspects of Common Loon (Gavia immer) feeding biology on its breeding ground. – Hydrobiologia 321(1): 119–144. DOI: 10.1007/BF00023169
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bell, A. & Chiappe, L. M. 2016. A species-level phylogeny of the Cretaceous Hesperornithiformes (Aves: Ornithuromorpha): implications for body size evolution amongst the earliest diving birds. – Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 14(3): 239–251. DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2015.1036141
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bell, A. & Chiappe, L. M. 2022. The Hesperornithiformes: a review of the diversity, distribution, and ecology of the earliest diving birds. – Diversity 14(4): 267. DOI: 10.3390/d14040267
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bell, A., Wu, Y. H. & Chiappe, L. M. 2019. Morphometric comparison of the Hesperornithiformes and modern diving birds. – Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 513: 196–207. DOI: 10.1016/j. palaeo.2017.12.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brewer, R., McPeek, G. & Adams, R. 1991. The Atlas of Breeding Birds of Michigan. East Lansing. – MI: Michigan State University Press, Michigan
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braun, E. L. & Kimball, R. T. 2021. Data types and the phylogeny of Neoaves. – Birds 2(1): 1–22. DOI: 10.3390/birds2010001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brusatte, S. L., O’Connor, J. K. & Jarvis, E. D. 2015. The origin and diversification of birds. – Current Biology 25(19): R888-R898. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bühler, P., Martin, L. D. & Witmer, L. M. 1988. Cranial kinesis in the Late Cretaceous birds Hesperornis and Parahesperornis. – The Auk 105(1): 111–122. DOI: 10.1093/auk/105.1.111
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cantlay, J. C., Martin, G. R., McClelland, S. C., Potier, S., O’Brien, M. F., Fernández-Juricic, E., Bond, A. L. & Portugal, S. J. 2023. Binocular vision and foraging in ducks, geese and swans (Anatidae). – Proceedings of the Royal Society B 290(2006): 37670586. DOI: 0.1098/rspb.2023.1213
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cerio, D. G. & Witmer, L. M. 2020. Modeling visual fields using virtual ophthalmoscopy: Incorporating geometrical optics, morphometrics, and 3D visualization to validate an interdisciplinary technique. – Vision Research 167: 70–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.11.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiappe, L. M. & Witmer, L. M. (eds.) 2002. Mesozoic Birds: Above the Heads of Dinosaurs. – University of California Press, Berkeley, California
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clifton, G. T. & Biewener, A. A. 2018. Foot-propelled swimming kinematics and turning strategies in Common Loons. – Journal of Experimental Biology 221(19): jeb.168831. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.168831
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Community, B. O. 2018. Blender – a 3D Modelling and Rendering Package. – Stichting Blender Foundation, Amsterdam
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cracraft, J. 1986. The origin and early diversification of birds. – Paleobiology 12(4): 383–399. DOI: 10.1017/ s0094837300003122
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cramp, S. 1978. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 1. Ostrich to Ducks. – Oxford University Press, Oxford
]Search in Google Scholar
[
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. 1992. Handbook of the Birds of the World Vol. 1. – Lynx Edicions, Barcelona
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dethier, M. N., McDonald, K. & Strathmann, R. R. 2003. Colonization and connectivity of habitat patches for coastal marine species distant from source populations. – Conservation Biology 17(4): 1024–1035. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01606.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dostine, P. L. & Morton, S. R. 1989. Food of the Darter Anhinga melanogaster in the Alligator Rivers region, Northern Territory. – Emu 89(1): 53–54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elzanowski, A. & Galton, P. M. 1991. Braincase of Enaliornis, an early Cretaceous bird from England. – Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 11(1): 90–107. DOI: 10.1080/02724634.1991.10011377
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fish, F. E. 2016. Secondary evolution of aquatic propulsion in higher vertebrates: Validation and prospect. – Integrative and Comparative Biology 56(6): 1285–1297. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icw123
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gingerich, P. D. 1973. Skull of Hesperornis and early evolution of birds. – Nature 243(5402): 70–73. DOI: 10.1038/243070a0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gregory, J. T. 1952. The jaws of the Cretaceous toothed birds, Ichthyornis and Hesperornis. – The Condor 54(2): 73–88. DOI: 10.2307/1364594
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gutarra, S. & Rahman, I. A. 2022. The locomotion of extinct secondarily aquatic tetrapods. – Biological Reviews 97(1): 67–98. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12790
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gwiazda, R. 1997. Foraging ecology of the Great Crested Grebe (Podiceps cristatus L.) at a mesotrophiceutrophic reservoir. – Hydrobiologia 353(1): 39–43. DOI: 10.1023/A:1003057400415
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harrison, J. G. 1957. A review of skull pneumatisation in birds. – Bulletin of the British Ornithologists 77: 70–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hayes, B., Martin, G. R. & Brooke, M. D. L. 1991. Novel area serving binocular vision in the retinae of procellariiform seabirds. – Brain, Behavior and Evolution 37(2): 79–84. DOI: 10.1159/000114348
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Houde, P. 1987. Histological evidence for the systematic position of Hesperornis (Odontornithes: Hesperornithiformes). – The Auk 104(1): 125–129. DOI: 10.2307/4087243
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Houssaye, A. & Fish, F. E. 2016. Functional (secondary) adaptation to an aquatic life in Vertebrates: An introduction to the symposium. – Integrative and Comparative Biology 56(6): 1266–1270. DOI: 10.1093/ icb/icw129
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hustler, K. 1992. Buoyancy and its constraints on the underwater foraging behaviour of Reed Cormorants Phalacrocorax africanus and Darters Anhinga melanogaster. – Ibis 134(3): 229–236. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1992.tb03804.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jepsen, N., Ravn, H. D. & Pedersen, S. 2018. Change of foraging behavior of cormorants and the effect on river fish. – Hydrobiologia 820(1): 189–199. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-018-3656-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jessen, C. 2001. Selective brain cooling in mammals and birds. – The Japanese Journal of Physiology 51(3): 291–301. DOI: 10.2170/jjphysiol.51.291
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnsgard, P. A. 1987. Diving Birds of North America: 1 General Attributes and Evolutionary Relationships. – DigitalCommons & University of Nebraska – Lincoln
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kato, A., Ropert-Coudert, Y., Grémillet, D. & Cannell, B. 2006. Locomotion and foraging strategy in foot-propelled and wing-propelled shallow-diving seabirds. – Marine Ecology Progress Series 308: 293–301. DOI: 10.3354/meps308293
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelley, N. P. & Pyenson, N. D. 2015. Evolutionary innovation and ecology in marine tetrapods from the Triassic to the Anthropocene. – Science 348: aaa3716. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa3716
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kristoffersen, A. V. 2001. Adaptive specialization to life in water through the evolutionary history of birds. – Secondary Adaptation of Tetrapods to Life in Water. – Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, pp. 141–50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kurochkin, E. N. 1976. A survey of the Paleogene birds of Asia. – Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 27(1): 75–86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lehikoinen, A., Heikinheimo, O., Lehtonen, H. & Rusanen, P. 2017. The role of cormorants, fishing effort and temperature on the catches per unit effort of fisheries in Finnish coastal areas. – Fisheries Research 190(1): 175–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.02.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindgren, J., Caldwell, M. W., Konishi, T. & Chiappe, L. M. 2010. Convergent evolution in aquatic tetrapods: Insights from an exceptional fossil mosasaur. – PLoS ONE 5(8): e11998. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011998
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lisney, T. J., Stecyk, K., Kolominsky, J., Schmidt, B. K., Corfield, J. R., Iwaniuk, A. N. & Wylie, D. R. 2013. Ecomorphology of eye shape and retinal topography in waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes: Anatidae) with different foraging modes. – Journal of Comparative Physiology A 199(5): 385–402. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-013-0802-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Livezey, B. C. & Humphrey, P. S. 1982. Escape behaviour of steamer ducks. – Wildfowl 33(33): 12–16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lyach, R., Blabolil, P. & Čech, M. 2018. Great Cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo feed on larger fish in late winter. – Bird Study 65(2): 249–256. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2018.1476459
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lythgoe, J. N. 1979. The Ecology of Vision. – Oxford University Press, Oxford
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacArthur, R. H. & Pianka, E. R. 1966. On optimal use of a patchy environment. – The American Naturalist 100(916): 603–609. DOI: 10.1086/282454
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marsh, O. C. 1880. Odontornithes: a Monograph on the Extinct Toothed Birds of North America: With Thirty-four Plates and Forty Woodcuts, Vol. 18. – US Government Printing Office
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, G. R. 2007. Visual fields and their functions in birds. – Journal of Ornithology 148(2): 547–562. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-007-0213-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, G. R. 2012. Through birds’ eyes: Insights into avian sensory ecology. – Journal of Ornithology 153(1): 23–48. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-011-0771-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, G. R. 2014. The subtlety of simple eyes: The tuning of visual fields to perceptual challenges in birds. – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1636): 20130040. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0040
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, G. R. & Katzir, G. 1999. Visual fields in Short-toed Eagles, Circaetus gallicus (Accipitridae), and the function of binocularity in birds. – Brain Behavior and Evolution 53(2): 55–66. DOI: 10.1159/000006582
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, G. R. & Wanless, S. 2015. The visual fields of Common Guillemots Uria aalge and Atlantic Puffins Fratercula arctica: foraging, vigilance and collision vulnerability. – Ibis 157(4): 798–807. DOI: 10.1111/ ibi.12297
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, G. R., Jarrett, N., Tovey, P. & White, C. R. 2005. Visual fields in Flamingos: chick-feeding versus filter-feeding. – Naturwissenschaften 92: 351–354. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-005-0010-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, G. R., White, C. R. & Butler, P. J. 2008. Vision and the foraging technique of Great Cormorants Phalacrocorax carbo: pursuit or close-quarter foraging? – Ibis 150(3): 485–494. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00808.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marugán-Lobón, J., Nebreda, S. M., Navalón, G. & Benson, R. B. 2022. Beyond the beak: brain size and allometry in avian craniofacial evolution. – Journal of Anatomy 240(2): 197–209. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13555
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayr, G. 2004. A partial skeleton of a new fossil loon (Aves, Gaviiformes) from the early Oligocene of Germany with preserved stomach content. – Journal of Ornithology 145(4): 281–286. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-004-0050-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayr, G. 2015. A new skeleton of the late Oligocene “Enspel Cormorant”-from Oligocorax to Borvocarbo, and back again. – Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments 94(1): 87–101. DOI: 10.1007/s12549-014-0167-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayr, G., De Pietri, V. L., Scofield, R. P. & Worthy, T. H. 2018. On the taxonomic composition and phylogenetic affinities of the recently proposed clade Vegaviidae Agnolín et al., 2017 – neornithine birds from the Upper Cretaceous of the Southern Hemisphere. – Cretaceous Research 86(1): 178–185. DOI: 10.1016/j. cretres.2018.02.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mayr, G., Lechner, T. & Böhme, M. 2020. The large-sized darter Anhinga pannonica (Aves, Anhingidae) from the late Miocene hominid Hammerschmiede locality in Southern Germany. – PLoS One 15(5): e0232179. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232179
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mcintyre, J. W. & Barr, J. F. 1997. Common Loon (Gavia immer). – The Birds of North America (313): 32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moen, D. & Morlon, H. 2014. From dinosaurs to modern bird diversity: extending the time scale of adaptive radiation. – PLoS Biology 12(5): e1001854. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001854
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Motani, R. & Vermeij, G. J. 2021. Ecophysiological steps of marine adaptation in extant and extinct non-avian tetrapods. – Biological Reviews 96(5): 1769–1798. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12724
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Munro, J. A. & Clemens, W. A. 1939. The food and feeding habits of the Red-breasted Merganser in British Columbia. – The Journal of Wildlife Management 3(1): 46–53. DOI: 10.2307/3796394
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newbrey, J. L., Paszkowski, C. A. & Gingras, B. A. 2012. Trophic relationships of two species of grebe on a prairie lake based on stable isotope analysis. – Hydrobiologia 697(1): 73–84. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1171-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Connor, J. K. 2019. The trophic habits of early birds. – Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 513(1): 178–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.03.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Owre, O. T. 1967. Adaptations for locomotion and feeding in the Anhinga and the Double-crested Cormorant. – Ornithological Monographs (6): 1–138.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Padian, K. & Chiappe, L. M. 1998. The origin and early evolution of birds. – Biological Reviews 73(1): 1–42. DOI: 10.1017/s0006323197005100
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Panteleyev, A. V., Popov, E. V. & Averianov, A. O. 2004. New record of Hesperornis rossicus (Aves, Hesperornithiformes) in the campanian of Saratov Province, Russia. – Paleontological Research 8(2): 115–122. DOI: 10.2517/prpsj.8.115
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pecsics, T., Laczi, M., Nagy, G. & Csörgő, T. 2017. The cranial morphometrics of the wildfowl (Anatidae). – Ornis Hungarica 25(1): 44–57. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2017-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pöysä, H. 1983a Morphology-mediated niche organization in a guild of dabbling ducks. – Ornis Scandinavica 14(4): 317–326. DOI: 10.2307/3676325
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pöysä, H. 1983b Resource utilization pattern and guild structure in a waterfowl community. – Oikos 40(2): 295–307. DOI: 10.2307/3544594
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R. & Charnov, E. L. 1977. Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. – The Quarterly Review of Biology 52(2): 137–154. DOI: 10.1086/409852
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reinhart, C. & Breton, P. F. 2009. Experimental validation of Autodesk® 3ds Max® Design 2009 and DAYSIM 3.0. – Leukos 6(1): 7–35. DOI: 10.1582/LEUKOS.2009.06.01001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ritland, S. M. 1982. The allometry of the vertebrate eye. – The University of Chicago, Chicago
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ross, R. K. 1977. A comparison of the feeding and nesting requirements of the Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo L.) and Double-crested Cormorant (P. auritus Lesson) in Nova Scotia. – Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science 27: 1971–1977.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmitz, L. 2009. Quantitative estimates of visual performance features in fossil birds. – Journal of Morphology 270(6): 759–773. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10720
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Segesdi, M. & Pecsics, T. 2022. Trends of avian locomotion in water – an overview of swimming styles. – Ornis Hungarica 30(1): 30–46. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2022-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stevens, K. A. 2006. Binocular vision in theropod dinosaurs. – Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 26(2): 321–330. DOI: 10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[321:bvitd]2.0.co;2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Storer, R. W. 1956. The fossil loon, Colymboides minutus. – The Condor 58(6): 413–426. DOI: 10.2307/1365096
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ulenaers, P., Van Vessem, J. & Dhondt, A. A. 1992. Foraging of the Great Crested Grebe in relation to food supply. – Journal of Animal Ecology 61(3): 659–667. DOI: 10.2307/5621
]Search in Google Scholar
[
White, C. R., Butler, P. J., Gremillet, D. & Martin, G. R. 2008. Behavioural strategies of cormorants (Phalacrocoracidae) foraging under challenging light conditions. – Ibis 150(Suppl.1): 231–239. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00837.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Witmer, L. M. & Martin, L. D. 1987. The primitive features of the avian palate, with special reference to Mesozoic birds. – Works and Documents of the Lyon Geology Laboratories 99(1): 21–40.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wood, C. C. & Hand, C. M. 1985. Food-searching behaviour of the Common Merganser (Mergus merganser) I: functional responses to prey and predator density. – Canadian Journal of Zoology 63(6): 1260–1270. DOI: 10.1139/z85-189
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, Y. H., Chiappe, L. M., Bottjer, D. J., Nava, W. & Martinelli, A. G. 2021. Dental replacement in Mesozoic birds: evidence from newly discovered Brazilian enantiornithines. – Scientific Reports 11(1): 19349. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98335-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zelenkov, N. V. 2015. A primitive grebe (Aves, Podicipedidae) from the Miocene of Eastern Siberia (Lake Baikal, Olkhon Island). – Paleontological Journal 49(5): 521–529.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zelenkov, N. 2020. The oldest diving anseriform bird from the late Eocene of Kazakhstan and the evolution of aquatic adaptations in the intertarsal joint of waterfowl. – Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 65(4): 733–742. DOI: 10.4202/app.00764.2020
]Search in Google Scholar
