[
Anderson, R. A., McBrayer, L. D. & Herrel, A. 2008. Bite force in vertebrates: opportunities and caveats for use of a nonpareil whole-animal performance measure. – Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93: 709–720. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00905.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Auersperg, A. M. I., Szabo, B., Von Bayern, A. M. P. & Kacelnik, A. 2012. Spontaneous innovation in tool manufacture and use in a Goffin’s Cockatoo. – Current Biology 22(21): R903–R904. DOI: 10.1016/j. cub.2012.09.002
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Bailey, N. T. J. 1981. Statistical Methods in Biology, 2nd ed. – Hodder and Stoughton, London
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bhattacharyya, B. N. 2013. Avian jaw function: adaptation of the seven-muscle system and a review. – Proceedings of the Zoological Society 66(2): 675–685. DOI: 10.1007/s12595-012-0056-x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Biewener, A. A. & Patek, S. N. 2018. Animal Locomotion. – Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/oso/9780198743156.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bright, J. A., Marugán-Lobón, J., Rayfield, E. J. & Cobb, S. N. 2019. The multifactorial nature of beak and skull shape evolution in parrots and cockatoos (Psittaciformes). – BMC Evolutionary Biology 19: 104. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-019-1432-1652537831101003
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Bright, J. A., Marugán-Lobón, J., Cobb, S. N. & Rayfield, E. J. 2016. The shapes of bird beaks are highly controlled by nondietary factors. – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113(19): 5352–5357. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1602683113486848327125856
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Bühler, P. 1981. Functional anatomy of the avian jaw apparatus. – In: King, A. S. & McClelland, J. (eds.) Form and Function in Birds, Vol. 2. – Academic Press, London, pp. 439–468.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burger, A. E. 1978. Functional anatomy of the feeding apparatus of four South African cormorants. – Zoologica Africana 13(1): 81–102. DOI: 10.1080/00445096.1978.11447608
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Burton, P. J. K. 1974a Feeding and the Feeding Apparatus in Waders. – British Museum, London
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burton, P. J. K. 1974b Jaw and tongue features of the Psittaciformes and other orders with special reference to the anatomy of the Tooth-billed Pigeon copy. – Journal of Zoology London 174(2): 255–276. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1974.tb03156.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Carril, J., Degrange, F. J. & Tambussi, C. P. 2015. Jaw myology and bite force of the Monk Parakeet (Aves, Psittaciformes). – Journal of Anatomy 227(1): 34–44. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12330447535726053435
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Cooney, C. R., Bright, J. A., Capp, E. J. R., Chira, A. M., Hughes, E. C., Moody, C. J. A. & Thomas, G. H. 2017. Mega-evolutionary dynamics of the adaptive radiation of birds. – Nature 542: 344–347. DOI: 10.1038/nature21074532158128146475
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Cost, I. N., Middleton, K. M., Sellers, K. C., Echols, M. S., Witmer, L. M., Davis, J. L. & Holliday, C. M. 2020. Palatal biomechanics and its significance for cranial kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rex. – Anatomical Record 303(4): 999–1017. DOI: 10.1002/ar.2421931260190
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Deeming, D. C. 2022. Inter-relationships among body mass, body dimensions, jaw musculature and bite force in reptiles. – Journal of Zoology 318: 23–33. DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12981
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Deeming, D. C., Harrison, S. L. & Sutton, G. P. 2022. Inter-relationships among body mass, jaw musculature and bite force in birds. – Journal of Zoology 317(2): 129–137. DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12966.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Dunning, Jr., J. B. 2008. CRC handbook of avian body masses, 2nd ed. – CRC, Boca Raton, Florida10.1201/9781420064452
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freckleton, R. P., Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. – American Naturalist 160(6): 712–726. DOI: 10.1086/34387318707460
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Genz, A. & Bretz, F. 2009. Computation of Multivariate Normal and t Probabilities, Series Lecture Notes in Statistics. – Springer-Verlag, Cham, Switzerland10.1007/978-3-642-01689-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodman, D. C. & Fisher, H. I. 1962. Functional Anatomy of the Feeding Apparatus in Waterfowl. – Southern Illinois Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gussekloo, S. W. S. & Bout, R. D. 2005. Cranial kinesis in palaeognathous birds. – Journal of Experimental Biology 208(17): 3409–3419. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.0176816109900
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Herrel, A., Spithoven, L., Van Damme, R. & De Vree, F. 1999. Sexual dimorphism of head size in Gallotia galloti: testing the niche divergence hypothesis by functional analyses. – Functional Ecology 13(3): 289–297. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00305.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Herrel, A., Soons, J., Huber, S. K. & Hendry, A. P. 2005. Evolution of bite force in Darwin’s finches: a key role for head width. – Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18(3): 669–675. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00857.x15842496
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Homberger, D. G. 2003. The comparative biomechanics of a prey-predator relationship: The adaptive morphologies of the feeding apparatus of Australian Black-cockatoos and their foods as a basis for the reconstruction of the evolutionary history of the Psittaciformes. – In: Bels, V. L., Gasc, J-P. & Casinos, A. (eds.) Vertebrate Biomechanics and Evolution. – BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd., Oxford, pp. 203–228.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Homberger, D. G. 2017.The avian lingual and laryngeal apparatus within the context of the head and jaw apparatus, with comparisons to the mammalian condition: functional morphology and biomechanics of evaporative cooling, feeding, drinking, and vocalisation. – In: Maina, J. N. (ed.) The Biology of the Avian Respiratory System. – Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 27–97. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44153-5_2
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hrabar, H. D. K. & Perrin, M. 2002. The effect of bill structure on seed selection by granivorous birds. – African Zoology 37(1): 67–80. DOI: 10.1080/15627020.2002.11657157
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hull, C. 1991. A comparison of the morphology of the feeding apparatus in the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus, and the Brown Falcon, F. berigora (Falconiformes). – Australian Journal of Zoology 39(1): 67–76. DOI: 10.1071/ZO9910067
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hull, C. 1993. Prey dismantling techniques of the Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus and the Brown Falcon F. berigora: their relevance to optimal foraging theory. – In: Olsen, P. (ed.) Australian Raptor Studies. – Australian Raptor Association, R.A.O.U., Sydney, pp. 330–336.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jenkins, K. M. & Shaw, J. O. 2020. Bite force data suggests relationship between acrodont tooth implantation and strong bite force. – PeerJ 8: e9468. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9468733365332656000
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. 2012. The global diversity of birds in space and time. – Nature 491: 444–448. DOI: 10.1038/nature1163123123857
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
King, I. C. C., Freeman, H. & Wokes, J. E. 2015. Managing parrot bite injuries to the hand: not just another animal bite. – Hand 10(1): 128–130. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9644-8434984125762886
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Lieber, R. L. & Ward, S. R. 2011. Skeletal muscle design to meet functional demands. – Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366(1570): 1466–1476. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0316313044321502118
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Maestri, R., Patterson, B. D., Fornel, R., Monteiro, L. R. & de Freitas, T. R. O. 2016. Diet, bite force and skull morphology in the generalist rodent morphotype. – Journal of Evolutionary Biology 29(11): 2191–2204. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.1293727470674
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Martens, J., Hoppe, D. & Woog, F. 2013. Diet and feeding behaviour of naturalised Amazon Parrots in a European city. – Ardea 101(1): 71–76. DOI: 10.5253/078.101.0111
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Navalón, G., Bright, J. A., Marugán-Lobón, J. & Rayfield, E. J. 2019. The evolutionary relationship among beak shape, mechanical advantage, and feeding ecology in modern birds. – Evolution 73(3): 422–435. DOI: 10.1111/evo.1365530537045
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Nogueira, M. R., Peracchi, A. L. & Monteiro, L. R. 2009. Morphological correlates of bite force and diet in the skull and mandible of phyllostomid bats. – Functional Ecology 23(4): 715–723. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01549.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. 2004. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. – Bioinformatics 20(2): 289–290. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg41214734327
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Pecsics, T., Laczi, M., Nagy, G., Kondor, T. & Csörgő, T. 2019. Analysis of skull morphometric characters in diurnal raptors (Accipitriformes and Falconiformes). – Ornis Hungarica 27(1): 117–131. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2019-0008
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Pecsics, T., Laczi, M., Nagy, G. & Csörgő, T. 2020. Skull morphometric characters in parrots (Psittaciformes). – Ornis Hungarica 28(1): 104–120. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2020-0008
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Provost, K. L., Joseph, L. & Tilston Smith, B. 2018. Resolving a phylogenetic hypothesis for parrots: implications from systematics to conservation. – Emu – Austral Ornithology 118(1): 7–21. DOI: 10.1080/01584197.2017.1387030
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
R Development Core Team 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. – R Foundation for Statistical Computing
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sakamoto, M. 2021. Assessing bite force estimates in extinct mammals and archosaurs using phylogenetic predictions. – Palaeontology 64(5): 743–753. DOI: 10.1111/pala.12567
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Sims, R. 1955. The morphology of the head of the Hawfinch (Coccothraustes coccothraustes). – Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology 2: 371–393.10.5962/p.314153
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soons, J., Genbrugge, A., Podos, J., Adriaens, D., Aerts, P., Dirckx, J. & Herrel, A. 2015. Is beak morphology in Darwin’s finches tune to loading demands? – PLoS One 10(6): e0129479. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129479446680326068929
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Soons, J., Herrel, A., Genbrugge, A., Adriaens, D., Aerts, P. & Dirckx, J. 2012. Multi-layered bird beaks: a finite-element approach towards the role of keratin in stress dissipation. – Journal of the Royal Society Interface 9(73): 1787–1796. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0910338576322337628
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Sustaita, D. 2008. Musculoskeletal underpinnings to differences in killing behavior between North American accipiters (Falconiformes: Accipitridae) and falcons (Falconidae). – Journal of Morphology 269(3): 283–301. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1057717960801
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Sustaita, D. & Hertel, F. 2010. In vivo bite and grip forces, morphology and prey-killing behavior of North American accipiters (Accipitridae) and falcons (Falconidae). – Journal of Experimental Biology 213(15): 2617–2628. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.04173120639423
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Toft, C. A. & Wright, T. F. 2015. Parrots of the Wild. A Natural History of the World’s Most Captivating Birds. – University of California Press, Oakland10.1525/9780520962644
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tokita, M. 2003. The skull development of parrots with special reference to the emergence of a morphologically unique cranio-facial hinge. – Zoological Science 20(6): 749–758. DOI: 10.2108/zsj.20.74912832827
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
van Der Meij, M. A. A. & Bout, R. G. 2004. Scaling of jaw muscle size and maximal bite force in finches. – Journal of Experimental Biology 207(16): 2745–2753. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.0109115235003
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
van der Meij, M. A. A. & Bout, R. G. 2006. Seed husking time and maximal bite force in finches. – Journal of Experimental Biology 209(17): 3329–3335. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.0237916916969
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed. – Springer, New York10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Verma, T. P., Kumathalli, K. I., Jain, V. & Kumar, R. 2017. Bite force recording devices – A review. – Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 11(9): ZE01–ZE05. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/27379.10450571387029207848
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Wang, H., Yan, J. & Zhang, Z. 2017. Sexual dimorphism in jaw muscles of the Japanese Sparrowhawk (Accipiter gularis). – Anatomy, Histology and Embryology 46(6): 558–562. DOI: 10.1111/ahe.1230928891073
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Warton, D. I. & Hui, F. K. C. 2011. The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. – Ecology 92(1): 3–10. DOI: 10.1890/10-0340.121560670
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Zusi, R. L. 1993. Patterns of diversity in the avian skull. – In: Hanken, J. & Hall, B. K. (eds.) The Skull, Vol. 2.: Patterns of Structural and Systematic Diversity. – The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 391–437.
]Search in Google Scholar