[
Ardia, D. R., Pérez, J. H. & Clotfelter, E. D. 2006. Nestbox orientation affects internal temperature and nest site selection by Tree Swallows. – Journal of Field Ornithology 77(3): 339–344. DOI: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2006.00064.x10.1111/j.1557-9263.2006.00064.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Avilés, S. M., Sánchez, J. M. & Parejo, D. 2000. Nest-site selection and breeding success in the Roller (Coracias garrulus) in the Southwest of the Iberian peninsula. – Journal of Ornithology 141(3): 345–350. DOI: 10.1007/BF0246224410.1007/BF02462244
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bellrose, F. C., Johnson, K. L. & Meyers, T. U. 1964. Relative value of natural cavities and nesting houses for Wood Ducks. – Journal of Wildlife Management 28(4): 661–676. DOI: 10.2307/379878110.2307/3798781
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belles-Isles, J. C. & Picman, J. 1986. Nesting losses and nest preferences in House Wrens. – Condor 88(4): 483–486. DOI: 10.2307/136827510.2307/1368275
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bloom, P. H. & Hawks, S. J. 1983. Nest box use and reproductive biology of American Kestrel in Lassen County, California. – Raptor Research 17(1): 9–14.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Briggs, K. B. & Deeming, D. C. 2016. Use of materials in nest construction by Pied Flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca reflects localised habitat and geographical location. – Bird Study 63(4): 516–524. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2016.123886710.1080/00063657.2016.1238867
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Briggs, K. B. & Deeming, D. C. 2021. Localized habitat affects size and materials used in the construction of Common Redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus nests. – Bird Study 68(1): 9–20. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2021.195819710.1080/00063657.2021.1958197
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Briggs, K. B. & Mainwaring, M. C. 2017. Habitat geology influences intraspecific variation in the speckling patterns of Blue Tit Cyanistes caeruleus and Great Tit Parus major eggs. – Acta Ornithologica 52(1): 11–20. DOI: 10.3161/00016454AO2017.52.1.00210.3161/00016454AO2017.52.1.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Briggs, K. B. & Mainwaring, M. C. 2019. Experimental evidence of non-random nest material selection in Pied Flycatchers. – Behavioural Processes 164: 59–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2019.04.00810.1016/j.beproc.2019.04.00831014981
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Browne, S. J. 2006. Effect of nestbox construction and colour on the occupancy and breeding success of nesting tits Parus spp. – Bird Study 53(2): 187–192. DOI: 10.1080/0006365060946143210.1080/00063650609461432
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Butler, M. W., Whitman, B. A. & Dufty, A. M. Jr. 2009. Nest box temperature and hatching success of American Kestrels varies with nest box orientation. – Wilson Journal of Ornithology 121(4): 778–782. DOI: 10.1676/08-124.110.1676/08-124.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Charter, M., Meyrom, K., Leshem, Y., Aviel, S., Izhaki, I. & Motro, Y. 2010. Does nest box location and orientation affect occupation rate and breeding success of Barn Owls in a semi-arid environment? – Acta Ornithologica 45(1): 115–119. DOI: 10.3161/000164510X51616410.3161/000164510X516164
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cramp, S. & Perrins, C. M. 1993. The birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 7: Flycatchers to Shrikes. – Oxford University Press, Oxford
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crawley, M. J. 1993. GLIM for Ecologist. – Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Culina, A., Adriaensen, F., Bailey, L. D., Burgess, M. D., Charmantier, A., Cole, E. F., Eeva, T., Matthysen, E., Nater, C. R., Sheldon, B. C., Sæther, B-E., Vriend, S. J. G., Adamík, P., Aplin, L. M., Angulo, E., Artemyev, A., Barba, E., Barišić, S., Belda, E., Can Bilgin, C., Bleu, C., Both, C., Bouwhuis, S., Branston, C., Broggi, J., Burke, T., Bushuev, A., Camacho, C., Campobello, D., Canal, D., Cantarero, A., Caro, S. P., Cauchoix, M., Chaine, A., Cichoń, M., Ćiković, D., Cusimano, C. A., Deimel, C., Dhondt, A., Dingemanse, N. J., Doligez, B., Dominoni, D. M., Doutrelant, C., Drobniak, S. M., Dubiec, A., Eens, M., Erikstad, K. E., Espín, S., Farine, D. R., Figuerola, J., Gülbeyaz, P. K., Grégoire, A., Hartley, I. R., Hau, M., Hegyi, G., Hille, S., Hinde, C. A., Holtmann, B., Ilyina, T., Isaksson, C., Iserbyt, A., Ivankina, E., Kania, W., Kempenaers, B., Kerimov, A., Komdeur, J., Korsten, P., Král, M., Krist, M., Lambrechts, M., Lara, C. E., Leivits, A., Liker, A., Lodjak, J., Mägi, M., Mainwaring, M. C., Mänd, R., Massa, B., Massemin, S., Martínez-Padilla, J., Mazgajski, T. D., Mennerat, A., Moreno, J., Mouchet, A., Nakagawa, S., Nilsson, J-Å., Nilsson, J., Norte, A. C., van Oers, K., Orell, M., Potti, J., Quinn, J. L., Réale, D., Reiertsen, T. K., Rosivall, B., Russel, A. F., Rytkönen, S., Sánchez-Virosta, P., Santos, E. S. A., Schroeder, J., Senar, J. C., Seress, G., Slagsvold, T., Szulkin, M., Teplitsky, C., Tilgar, V., Tolstoguzov, A., Török, J., Valcu, M., Vatka, E., Verhulst, S., Watson, H., Yuta, T., Zamora-Marín, J. M. & Visser, M. E. 2021. Connected data landscape of long-term ecological studies: the SPI-Birds data hub. – Journal of Animal Ecology 90(9): 2147–2160. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.1338810.1111/1365-2656.13388851854233205462
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Finch, D. M. 1989. Relationships of surrounding riparian habitat to nest-box use and reproductive outcome in House Wrens. – Condor 91(4): 848–859. DOI: 10.2307/136806910.2307/1368069
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodenough, A. E., Elliot, S. L. & Hart, A. G. 2009. The challenges of conservation for declining migrants: are reserve-based initiatives during the breeding season appropriate for the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca? – Ibis 151(3): 429–439. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00917.x10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00917.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodenough, A. E., Hart, A. G. & Elliot, S. L. 2008a Variation in offspring quality with cavity orientation in the Great Tit. – Ethology Ecology and Evolution 20(4): 375–389. DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2008.952251810.1080/08927014.2008.9522518
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodenough, A. E., Maitland, D. P., Hart, A. G. & Elliot, S. L. 2008b Nestbox orientation: a species-specific influence on occupation and breeding success in woodland passerines. –Bird Study 55(2): 222–232. DOI: 10.1080/0006365080946152610.1080/00063650809461526
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hewson, C. M., Amar, A., Lindsell, J. A., Thewlis, R. M., Butler, S., Smith, K. & Fuller, R. J. 2007. Recent changes in bird populations in British broadleaved woodland. – Ibis 149(s2): 14–28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00745.x10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00745.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lambrechts, M. M., Adriaensen, F., Ardia, D. R., Artemyev, A. V., Atiénzar, F., Bańbura, J., Barba, E., Bouvier, J-C., Camproden, J., Cooper, C. B., Dawson, R. D., Eens, M., Eeva, T., Faivre, B., Garamszegi, L. Z., Goodenough, A. E., Gosler, A. G., Grégoire, A., Griffith, S. C., Gustafsson, L., Johnson, L. S., Kania, W., Keišs, O., Llambias, P. E., Mainwaring, M. C., Mänd, R., Massa, B., Mazgajski, T. D., Møller, A. P., Moreno, J., Naef-Daenzer, B., Nilsson, J-Å., Norte, A. C., Orell, M., Otter, K. A., Park, C. R., Perrins, C. M., Pinowski, J., Porkert, J., Potti, J., Remes, V., Richner, H., Rytkönen, S., Shiao, M-T., Silverin, B., Slagsvold, T., Smith, H. G., Sorace, A., Stenning, M. J., Stewart, I., Thompson, C. F., Tryjanowski, P., Török, J., van Noordwijk, A. J., Winkler, D. W. & Ziane, N. 2010. The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases. – Acta Ornithologica 45(1): 1–26. DOI: 10.3161/000164510X51604710.3161/000164510X516047
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lambrechts, M. M., Caizergues, A. E., Perrier, C., Charmantier, A. & Caro, S. P. 2020. Surface temperatures of non-incubated eggs in Great Tits (Parus major) are strongly associated with ambient temperature. – International Journal of Biometeorology 64(10): 1767–1775. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-020-01958-110.1007/s00484-020-01958-132594247
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Le Roux, D. S., Ikin, K., Lindenmayer, D. B., Bistricer, G., Manning, A. D. & Gibbons, P. 2016. Effects of entrance size, tree size and landscape context on nest box occupancy: Considerations for management and biodiversity offsets. – Forest Ecology and Management 366(1): 135–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.01710.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lumsden, H. G. 1986. Choice of nestboxes by Tree Swallows, Tachycineta bicolor, House Wrens, Troglodytes aedon, Eastern Bluebirds, Sialia sialis, and European Starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. – Canadian Field-Naturalist 100(3): 43–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lundberg, A. & Alatalo, R. V. 1992. The Pied Flycatcher. – T & AD Poyser, London
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mainwaring, M. C. & Hartley, I. R. 2012. Causes and consequences of differential growth in birds: a behavioral perspective. – Advances in the Study of Behavior 44: 22–277. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394288-3.00006-X10.1016/B978-0-12-394288-3.00006-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mainwaring, M. C. & Hartley, I. R. 2016. Local weather conditions have complex effects on the growth of Blue Tit nestlings. – Journal of Thermal Biology 60(1): 12–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.05.00510.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.05.00527503711
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mainwaring, M. C., Reynolds, S. J. & Weidinger, K. 2015. The influence of predation on the location and design of nests. – In: Deeming, D. C. & Reynolds, S. J. (eds.) Nests, eggs, and incubation: new ideas about avian reproduction. – Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 50–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazgajski, T. D. 2007. Nest hole age decreases nest site attractiveness for the European Starling Sturnus vulgaris. – Ornis Fennica 84(1): 32–38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maziarz, M., Broughton, R. K. & Wesołowski, T. 2017. Microclimate in tree cavities and nest-boxes: Implications for hole-nesting birds. – Forest Ecology and Management 389(1): 306–313. DOI: 10.1016/j. foreco.2017.01.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mennill, D. J. & Ratcliffe, L. M. 2004. Nest cavity orientation in Black-capped Chickadees Poecile atricapillus: do the acoustic properties of cavities influence sound reception in the nest and extra-pair matings? – Journal of Avian Biology 35(6): 477–482. DOI: 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03351.x10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03351.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, K. E. 2010. Nest-site limitation of secondary cavity-nesting birds in even-aged southern pine forests. – Wilson Journal of Ornithology 122(1): 126–134. DOI: 10.1676/07-130.110.1676/07-130.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mitchell, A. 1974. A Field Guide to the Trees of Britain and Northern Europe. – Collins, London
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Møller, A. P., Adriaensen, F., Artemyev, A., Bańbura, J., Barba, E., Biard, C., Blondel, J., Bouslama, Z., Bouvier, J-C., Camprodon, J., Cecere, F., Chaine, A., Charmantier, A., Charter, M., Cichoń, M., Cusimano, C., Czeszewik, D., Doligez, B., Doutrelant, C., Dubiec, A., Eens, M., Eeva, T., Faivre, B., Ferns, P. N., Forsman, J. T., García-del-Ray, E., Goldshtein, A., Goodenough, A. E., Gosler, A. G., Góźdź, I., Grégoire, A., Gustafsson, L., Hartley, I. R., Heeb, P., Hinsley, S. A., Isenmann, P., Jacob, S., Järvinen, A., Juškaitis, R., Kania, W., Korpimäki, E., Krams, I., Laaksonen, T., Leclercq, B., Lehikoinen, E., Loukola, O., Lundberg, A., Mainwaring, M. C., Mänd, R., Massa, B., Mazgajski, T. D., Merino, S., Mitrus, C., Mönkkönen, M., Morales-Fernaz, J., Moreno, J., Morin, X., Nager, R. G., Nilsson, J-Å., Nilsson, S. G., Norte, A. C., Orell, M., Perret, P., Perrins, C. M., Pimentel, C. S., Pinxten, R., Priedniece, I., Quidoz, M-C., Remeš, V., Richner, H., Robles Díez, H., Russell, A., Rytkönen, S., Senar, J. C., Seppänen, J. T., Pascoal da Silva, L., Slagsvold, T., Solonen, T., Sorace, A., Stenning, M. J., Török, J., Tryjanowski, P., van Noordwijk, A. J., von Numers, M., Walankiewicz, W. & Lambrechts, M. M. 2014. Clutch size variation in Western Palearctic secondary hole-nesting passerine birds in relation to nestbox design. – Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5(4): 353–362. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.1216010.1111/2041-210X.12160
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Monti, F., Nelli, L., Catoni, C. & Dell’Omo, G. 2019. Nest box selection and reproduction of European Rollers in Central Italy: a 7-year study. – Avian Research 10(1): 13. DOI: 10.1186/s40657-019-0150-010.1186/s40657-019-0150-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mueller, A. J., Twedt, D. J. & Bowers, E. K. 2019. Rapid adoption of nest boxes by Prothonotary Warblers (Protonotaria citrea) in mesic deciduous forest. – Canadian Journal of Zoology 97(12): 1109–1115. DOI: 10.1139/cjz-2019-005910.1139/cjz-2019-0059
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Navara, K. J. & Anderson, E. M. 2011. Eastern Bluebirds choose nestboxes based on box orientation. – Southeast Naturalist 10(4): 713–720. DOI: 10.1656/058.010.041010.1656/058.010.0410
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Connor, R. J. 1984. The Growth and Development of Birds. – John Wiley and Sons, London
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodwell, J. S. 1991. British Plant Communities, Volume 1: Woodlands and Scrub. – Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rohrbaugh, R. W. Jr. & Yahner, R. H. 1997. Effects of macrohabitat and microhabitat on nest box use and nesting success of American Kestrels. – Wilson Bulletin 109(1): 410–423.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sacilotto, K. A. & Anderson, J. T. 2005. Avian nest box use on islands in the Ohio River. – Northeastern Naturalist 12(4): 403–410. DOI: 10.1656/1092-6194(2005)012[0403:ANBUOI]2.0.CO;2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salaberria, C., Celis, P., López-Rull, I. & Gill, D. 2014. Effects of temperature and nest heat exposure on nestling growth, dehydration and survival in a Mediterranean hole-nesting passerine. – Ibis 156(2): 265–275. DOI: 10.1111/ibi.1212110.1111/ibi.12121
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Samplonius, J. M. & Both, C. 2019. Climate change may affect fatal competition between two bird species. – Current Biology 29(2): 327–331. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.06310.1016/j.cub.2018.11.06330639109
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, K. W., Smith, L., Charman, E., Briggs, K., Burgess, M., Dennis, C., Harding, M., Isherwood, C., Isherwood, I. & Mallord, J. 2011. Large-scale variation in the temporal patterns of the frass fall of defoliating caterpillars in oak woodlands in Britain: implications for nesting woodland birds. – Bird Study 58(4): 506–511. DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2011.61618610.1080/00063657.2011.616186
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stanback, M. T., Niemasik, E., Millican, D. & McGovern, P. 2019. Pairing nest boxes does not promote coexistence of Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis) and subordinate cavity nesters. – Wilson Journal of Ornithology 131(2): 422–427. DOI: 10.1676/18-9310.1676/18-93
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wachob, D. G. 1996. A microclimate analysis of nest-site selection by Mountain Chickadees. – Journal of Field Ornithology 67(4): 525–533.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilkin, T. A., King, L. E. & Sheldon, B. C. 2009. Habitat quality, nestling diet, and provisioning behaviour in Great Tits Parus major. – Journal of Avian Biology 40(2): 135–145. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04362.x10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04362.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, J. 2015. A nest-box and colour-ringing study of Bearded Tits Panurus biarmicus at Leighton Moss, Lancashire. – Ringing and Migration 30(2): 75–80. DOI: 10.1080/03078698.2015.112824710.1080/03078698.2015.1128247
]Search in Google Scholar