As a part of a project aiming at patterning nanocomposites in hydrogels by radiation-mediated reduction of Au(III) ions into gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), we are currently investigating the synthesis of well-defined poly(HEMA)-based networks and evaluating the potentialities of radiation treatments for creating well-resolved and stable patterns made of AuNPs embedded in hydrogel matrices.
Since the early reports on the structural features and unique properties of metal nanoparticles (NPs) [1, 2, 3], various synthetic methods and experimental conditions have been reported in the literature to generate metal clusters starting from metal salts as precursors. Among them, chemical [4, 5] and photochemical [6] redox reactions have been successfully employed, while other highly efficient treatments based on sonication [7] or radiolytic reduction [8, 9, 10] have also been developed as greener alternatives. Compared to conventional chemical synthesis, the radiation-induced technique does not require the use of any reducing agents. Moreover, by adjusting the dose rate, the radiation-induced method provides fine control over the growing rate of metal cluster, which enables therefore to tailor the properties of the reduced nanoparticles because of specific applications.
The radiolytic synthesis is particularly suitable for the generation of metal NPs in aqueous media via the generation of solvated electrons (e−aq) and hydrogen atoms (H•), which can easily reduce metal ions such as, for instance, Au(III), down to zero-valent state [11]. The presence of polymeric solutes may induce a more complex reduction mechanism involving shortand long-lived polymeric species [12, 13]. Nevertheless, the nanocomposite materials consisting of polymer hydrogel network and metallic NPs provide a synergetic effect to the complex material by reducing the risk of nanoparticle aggregation and at the same time enhancing the mechanical strength of the hydrogels. Furthermore, similarly to colloid solutions, the hydrogels containing metal NPs can play the role of reactors catalyzing chemical reactions taking place in aqueous solutions.
Several approaches in polymer/metal NPs synthesis are distinguished. Metal NPs, often functionalized to ensure good solubility in organic media and prevent aggregation, can be directly added to a monomer blend and further converted into a nanocomposite [14] or physically incorporated within an already prepared polymer matrix (“breathing in”) [15]. This method, however, is likely to result in an inhomogeneous distribution of NPs.
Among the various metal ions that can be reduced in the form of zero-valent nanoparticles, Ag(I) and Au(III) are of the greatest interest due to their nonlinear optical and catalytic properties [18, 19, 20]. Despite many successful studies on the radiolytic formation of AuNPs in aqueous media with [9, 21] and without [22] stabilizing agents such as, for instance, natural polysaccharide chitosan, there are much fewer reports on radiation-mediated metal nanoparticle formation within a hydrogel matrix available. Zhu
This note reports on preliminary results on the radiolytic synthesis of gold nanocomposites within two types of hydrogels based on HEMA: (i) plain poly(HEMA) networks with various contents in ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) as a cross-linker and (ii) stimuli-responsive (SR) networks prepared from the same monomers copolymerized with [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride (MADQUAT), which is expected to impart a pH-dependent behaviour to the resulting copolymer network. These approaches require an advanced control of chemical modifications at the different stages of the elaboration process.
The synthesis of the host matrices was achieved by photopolymerization using UV radiation, a versatile method that allows for the rapid formation of hydrogel materials in various dimensions and shapes. We have also shown that, besides the gels mentioned above, other poly(HEMA)-based stimuli-sensitive gels can be easily obtained by this approach, including pH-sensitive gels containing acrylic acid (AA) and temperature-sensitive gels containing
The obtained poly(HEMA)-based materials were characterized to assess the properties of the hydrogels, in the as-prepared state, after purification, and after EB-irradiation under various conditions. Attention was particularly paid to isothermal swelling in aqueous media.
2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (97%), EGDMA (98%), 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropiophenone (>96%), 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-1-phenyl-1-propanone (Darocur 1173), hydrogen tetrachloroaurate trihydrate (99.99%), 2-(MADQUAT (75% aqueous solution), and
The polymerization of HEMA monomer with EGDMA as cross-linker and Darocur 1173 as photoinitiator was performed in bulk. Approximately 1.5 g of a precursor mixture based on HEMA, EGDMA, and Darocur 1173 (99.0 wt%, 0.5 wt% and 0.5 wt%, respectively, which correspond to 8.192 M for methacrylate functions and 0.033 M for the photoinitiator) was poured into a poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) mold and exposed in air to the fluorescent tubes emitting at 365 nm for 15 min with an irradiance of 6 mW·cm−2 (UV Biolink, Vilber-Lourmat). The surface of the cured poly(HEMA) disks was washed with isopropanol, the disk samples were dried to constant weight in an oven at 60°C, and finally polished to obtain a uniform thickness of 1.0 ± 0.05 mm.
In this procedure, cross-linking polymerization was performed in concentrated aqueous solutions of monomers containing hydrogen peroxide as a co-initiator. Gels based on pure poly(HEMA) have been synthesized at a constant ratio of HEMA to EGDMA equal 99:1 (v/v); this solution has been mixed with 30% aqueous solutions of H2O2 at volume ratios of 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1. After homogenization, 1 ml of the final solution has been poured into the PTFE mold, resulting in a liquid layer thickness of 2 mm, and exposed to the air to 254 nm photon beam with an irradiance of 2.6 mW·cm−2 (CL-1000 Ultraviolet Crosslinker, UVP) at total exposure doses up to 22 J·cm−2.
Gels containing MADQUAT have been synthesized by UV irradiation (as above, exposure dose kept constant at 8 J·cm−2) of solutions containing 50 vol.% of aqueous 30% H2O2, 45–48.75 vol.% of HEMA/EGDMA (99:1) solution, and 1.25–5 vol.% of aqueous 75% MADQUAT, with no pH adjustment. Gels containing AA or
Gelation dose (
Sample make-up | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 50 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 67 vol.% 30% H2O2: 33 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 75 vol.% 30% H2O2: 25 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 80 vol.% 30% H2O2: 20 vol.% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sample composition | methacrylate functions 4.123 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 5.497 mol·L−1 H2O2 3.263 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 6.184 mol·L−1 H2O2 2.448 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 6.596 mol·L−1 H2O2 1.958 mol·L−1 |
2.33 | 2.55 | 2.92 | 3.55 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 |
Gel fractions for hydrogels based on HEMA/EGDMA/H2O2 (30% aqueous solution) with various amounts of MADQUAT (75% aqueous solution), synthesized by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2, total exposure dose 8 J·cm−2
Sample make-up | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 50 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 48.75 vol.% MADQUAT 1.25 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 47.5 vol.% MADQUAT 2.5.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 45 vol.% MADQUAT 5 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sample composition | methacrylate functions 4.123 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 4.020 mol·L−1 MADQUAT 0.049 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.917 mol·L−1 MADQUAT 0.097 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.710 mol·L−1 MADQUAT 0.194 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 |
Gel fraction (%) | 82.0 | 75.1 | 65.3 | 50.9 |
Gel fractions for hydrogels based on HEMA/EGDMA/H2O2 (30% aqueous solution) with various amounts of AA, synthesized by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2, total exposure dose 8 J·cm−2)
Sample make-up | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 50 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 48.75 vol.% AA: 1.25 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 47.5 vol.% AA: 2.5 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 45 vol.% AA: 5 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sample composition | methacrylate functions 4.123 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 4.020 mol·L−1 AA 0.182 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.917 mol·L−1 AA 0.364 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.710 mol·L−1 AA 0.729 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 |
Gel fraction (%) | 82.0 | 92.2 | 90.9 | 88.3 |
Gel fractions for hydrogels based on HEMA/EGDMA/H2O2 (30% aqueous solution) with various amounts of
Sample make-up | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 50 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 48.75 vol.% NIPAm: 1.25 wt% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 47.5 vol.% NIPAm: 2.5 wt% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 45 vol.% NIPAm: 5 wt% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sample composition | methacrylate functions 4.123 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 4.020 mol·L−1 NIPAm 0.110 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.917 mol·L−1 NIPAm 0.221 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.710 mol·L−1 NIPAm 0.442 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 |
Gel fraction (%) | 82.0 | 75.8 | 70.3 | 65.7 |
For swelling tests of MADQUATor AA-containing gels, pH was adjusted with 1 M solutions of NaOH or HCl, and swelling was performed at room temperature (RT). Swelling tests of NIPAm-containing gels have been performed in water (no pH adjustment), in beakers placed in a temperature-controlled bath.
Irradiation of the poly(HEMA)-based materials was performed with a 10 MeV Linac at an average dose rate of about 3 kGy·s−1 (IONISOS, Chaumesnil, France). The treatment was fractionated in 5 kGy-passes for doses up to 20 kGy, and in 25 kGy-passes for doses from 25 kGy to 100 kGy. Poly(HEMA) samples in water-swollen or dry states were sealed in plastic bags with a minimum amount of air and submitted to EB-irradiation at doses up to 100 kGy. Radiolytic synthesis of poly(HEMA)-AuNPs composites was performed on poly(HEMA) disks swollen with Au(III) aqueous solution. The samples sealed in plastic bags with a minimum amount of air and kept in the dark before being submitted to EB-irradiation at doses from 5 kGy to 25 kGy.
Synthesis of AuNPs in the poly(HEMA-co-MADQUAT) hydrogels has been performed by swelling gel samples (synthesized as described above and pre-swollen in water for two weeks) in freshly made aqueous 1 mM Au(III) solution at pH 2 or pH 7 for 2 h, and subsequent immediate irradiation by 6 MeV electron beam (EB) generated by Elektronika ELU-6e linear accelerator (pulsed beam, 20 Hz, 4 μs pulse duration, the average dose rate of 63 Gy·s−1 as determined by polymer film dosimetry – B3WIN-Dose Dosimeters by GEX Corporation USA) at a total dose of 1 kGy, 2 kGy, and 5 kGy, in closed but not sealed Petri dishes.
Structural changes occurring in poly(HEMA) networks upon exposure to EB were evaluated by swelling measurements. The swollen hydrogels were removed from flasks filled with double distilled water at regular time intervals, blotted with a clean paper towel, weighed, and replaced in the same soaking water bath. The swelling measurements were continued until a constant weight was reached for each sample. All measurements were made in duplicate. The equilibrium degree of swelling (DSeq) was calculated from the difference in weight between the disk’s weight in the equilibrium swollen state
The final weight loss from the extractables after EB irradiation was estimated using Eq. (2),
Alternatively, the degree to which the monomer and cross-linker have been polymerized and incorporated into the covalent network can be expressed as the gel fraction (Eq. (3)).
DMA measurement was performed on non-irradiated and EB-treated 1 mm-thick poly(HEMA) bars to measure the viscoelastic response using a Q800 DMA rheometer (TA Instruments) at 1 Hz frequency and 15 μm amplitude in the temperature interval from 30°C to 180°C.
The spectroscopic properties of polished poly(HEMA) substrates and nanocomposites were recorded in the UV-vis domain (transmission mode, from 200 nm to 800 nm) with an Agilent Cary 50 instrument (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
Free radical polymerization of blends including HEMA as the main monomer (99.5, 99.4, 99.0, 98.5 or 94.5 wt%), EGDMA as a cross-linking agent (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1 or 5 wt%), and Darocur 1173 as the photoinitiator (0.5 wt%) was carried out upon exposure to 365 nm resulting in the formation of cross-linked hydrophilic networks as illustrated in Scheme 1.
Scheme 1
Scheme of the poly(HEMA) xerogel synthesis by photopolymerization.

The choice of the photoinitiator and its concentration in the blend has been made in such a way that the incident beam 365 nm penetrates deeply into the 1.5 mm thick samples, due to the low absorption coefficient of the photoinitiator’s n-π* transition. Simple calculations showed that under these experimental conditions the gradient of energy absorption between the top and bottom surfaces of the sample is very limited [24].
To monitor the progress of HEMA polymerization, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measurements were performed on 2 mm-thick samples of HEMA/EGDMA/Darocur 1173 (99/0.5/0.5 wt%) precursor mixture cured by exposure to the 365 nm source for cumulated time intervals. As seen from Fig. 1, the near IR band at 6168 cm−1, corresponding to the third harmonic wavenumber of the methacrylate C=C double bond stretching mode, is gradually decreasing as the exposure to UV illumination increases from 0 min to 60 min.
Fig. 1
Evolution of the near IR band assigned to methacrylate νCH2=C< groups as a function of UV curing time (0–60 min) for a 2 mm-thick sample based on HEMA/EGDMA/Darocur 1173 (99/0.5/0.5 wt%).

Kinetic profiles representing the progress of methacrylate polymerization in monomer blends containing various amounts of EGDMA (0, 0.1, 1, and 5 wt%) were obtained using this method, monomer conversion being calculated from Eq. (4),
The kinetic profile recorded for HEMA polymerization in absence of any cross-linker has the typical sigmoidal shape observed for the bulk polymerization of methyl methacrylate [31], initially with a slow rate and an auto-acceleration stage, well-documented as the Trommsdorff effect [32, 33], which develops at about 10% of monomer conversion, as a consequence of drastic decrease in bimolecular termination rate constant in the viscous medium, and then levels off to reach a final conversion of 60–65% in the vitrified material (Fig. 2). For monomer blends with EGDMA content as low as 0.1 wt%, polymerization proceeds much faster and exhibits a change to another auto-accelerated regime when the conversion level reaches 30–35%. Several experiments conducted with EGDMA concentrations between 0.5 wt% and 5 wt% showed almost the same profile, with a conversion of 90% reached within 10 min, and a very slow completion of the reaction between 10 min and 60 min of exposure.
Fig. 2
Monomer conversion as a function of curing time for HEMA/EGDMA/Darocur 1173 at various EGDMA content (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 5 wt%) and constant Darocur 1173 concentration of 0.5 wt%.

From a practical perspective, it was found convenient to produce the xerogels with various contents of cross-linking agent cured by photoirradiation for 15 min.
UV irradiation (254 nm) of concentrated aqueous solutions of HEMA/EGDMA containing hydrogen peroxide as a co-initiator resulted in the formation of permanently cross-linked hydrogels. While this procedure requires high hydrogen peroxide content in the reagent mixture, it is an efficient way of synthesizing poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Gel fractions as a function of exposure dose for various monomer/aqueous 30% H2O2 ratios are shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3
Gel fraction as a function of exposure dose in synthesizing poly(HEMA) hydrogels by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2) of concentrated aqueous monomer/cross-linker solution containing hydrogen peroxide. Volume fractions of aqueous 30% H2O2 solutions are given in the graph, the remaining fraction being 99/1 v/v HEMA/EGDMA. Inset: maximum gel fraction as a function of hydrogen peroxide content (as the volume fraction of aqueous 30% H2O2 solution).

It can be seen that, when this procedure is used, exposure doses necessary to reach considerable gel fraction (>80%) are in the range of 10–15 J·cm−2, which is at least 2–3 times higher than in the case of xerogel synthesis described above. Moreover, the maximum gel content was somewhat lower than for the xerogels. It has been found that both the yield of gel formation and the final gel content depend to some extent on the sample composition. More efficient cross-linking and higher gel fractions were obtained for samples of higher H2O2/monomer ratios, albeit these dependencies were not much pronounced (11% increase in gel fraction achieved by more than doubling the peroxide content, see inset in Fig. 3). Another indication of hydrogen peroxide influence on the cross-linking process is the values of gelation doses,
Gelation doses systematically decrease with the increasing H2O2 content, pointing out to more efficient cross-linking. These results indicate that the initiation process, rather than the subsequent cross-linking polymerization, is the decisive step governing the efficiency of hydrogel formation in this system.
Another parameter resulting from these calculations is the probability ratio of chain breakage to cross-linking,
The swelling properties of the poly(HEMA) hydrogels obtained by this method depend on UV exposure dose, as is shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4
Equilibrium degree of swelling of poly(HEMA) hydrogels synthesized by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2) of concentrated aqueous monomer/cross-linker solution containing hydrogen peroxide. Volume fractions of aqueous 30% H2O2 solutions are given in the graph, the remaining fraction being 99/1 v/v HEMA/EGDMA. Swelling tests performed in water at RT.

As expected, the cross-link density increases with exposure dose, leading to a pronounced decrease in the equilibrium degree of swelling. At high doses, while monomer and cross-linker are nearly fully converted into a 3D network, the gels can adsorb ca. 0.8–1.2 g of water per gram of dry gel. While there is no pronounced difference in the swelling properties between the gels synthesized in the presence of 20–33% of hydrogen peroxide solution (and 67–80% of monomer/cross-linker mixture), products based on irradiation of samples containing 50% of H2O2 solution (and 50% of HEMA/EGDMA) have somewhat higher tendency to swell. This indicates that solutions irradiated at relatively low monomer and cross-linker concentrations formed somewhat less densely cross-linked networks.
Based on the above-described synthetic procedure, three kinds of stimuli-sensitive hydrogels have been synthesized, where HEMA/EGDMA has been polymerized and cross-linked in the presence of MADQUAT or AA to render pH-responsive properties or
The influence of MADQUAT content on the gel fraction is shown in Table 2.
Increasing the MADQUAT fraction has a clear negative effect on the efficiency of gel formation. This can be traced down to the positive charge on the monomer, which causes electrostatic repulsion between the growing polymer chains and the monomer, and also to the scavenging of •OH radicals resulting from photolysis of hydrogen peroxide by chloride ions, a very efficient reaction (
Fig. 5
Equilibrium degree of swelling of poly(HEMA-co-MADQUAT) hydrogels synthesized by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2, exposure dose 8 J·cm−2) of solutions composed of 50 vol.% of aqueous 30% hydrogen peroxide, 47.5–48.75 vol.% of HEMA/EGDMA (99/1) and 1.25–2.5 vol.% of aqueous 75% MADQUAT, as a function of pH.

In the whole range of tested pH, the equilibrium degree of swelling is significantly higher for the gel synthesized with higher MADQUAT contents. This can be traced down to two effects – lower cross-link density due to less efficient cross-linking polymerization and also higher hydrophilicity of the network due to the higher content of highly hydrophilic MADQUAT. Both synthesized gels show some response to pH, with the transition located in the pH range of 4–6.
The method can also be applied for synthesizing hydrogels containing AA. The efficiency of gel formation is in this case significantly higher than for MADQUAT. Interestingly, the addition of 1.25% of AA to the HEMA/EGDMA solution in water/H2O2 seems to increase the gel fraction (Table 3), which might be related to hydrogen bond formation between the growing poly(HEMA) chains and protonated AA, an effect potentially facilitating polymerization. Only when higher amounts of AA are added, some decrease in the cross-linking yield is observed. The obtained gels are strongly sensitive to pH (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6
Equilibrium degree of swelling of poly(HEMA-co-AA) hydrogels synthesized by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2, exposure dose 8 J·cm−2) of solutions composed of 50 vol.% of aqueous 30% hydrogen peroxide, 45–48.75 vol.% of HEMA/EGDMA (99/1) and 1.25–5 vol.% of AA, as a function of pH.

At low pH, most of the carboxylic groups are protonated. There is no charge along the chain, thus no repulsive forces act between the segments, and also hydroxyl groups of HEMA may form hydrogen bonds with protonated carboxylic groups. Therefore the swelling ability of the gel is moderate. However, at pH >5, deprotonation of carboxylic groups leads to the formation of ionic groups and an increase of linear charge density along the chains. High hydrophilicity and electrostatic repulsion between the charged chain segments lead to strong expansion and swelling. The equilibrium degree of swelling at neutral and high pH depends on the content of AA in the initial mixture. While for 1.25% of AA it levels off at ca. 9 g·g−1, for higher AA content it reaches over 30 g·g−1 at pH 9. Such pronounced pH effects are known from studies on neat poly(AA) hydrogels [36]. It is expected that the average p
Gel fractions obtained by UV-irradiation of samples containing 1.25–5 vol.% of NIPAm (50 vol.% of 30% aqueous hydrogen peroxide, 45–48.75 vol.% of HEMA/EGDMA (99/1)) are shown in Table 4, while Fig. 7 illustrates equilibrium degree of swelling for NIPAm-containing hydrogels as a function of temperature.
Fig. 7
Weight at equilibrium swelling of poly(HEMA-co-NIPAm) hydrogels synthesized by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2, absorbed dose 8 J·cm−2) of solutions composed of 50 vol.% of aqueous 30% hydrogen peroxide, 45–48.75 vol.% of HEMA/EGDMA (99/1) and 1.25–5 vol.% of NIPAm, as a function of temperature, normalized to the weight at equilibrium swelling at 26.0°C.

While NIPAm content in the studied systems was relatively low, the products do exhibit some responsiveness to temperature. The observed mild but clear changes occur at a transition temperature of ca. 32–34°C, which agrees well with the LCST of poly(NIPAm) in water [39]. Interestingly, the highest amplitude of changes in equilibrium degree of swelling was observed for hydrogels based on samples of 2.5 vol.% of NIPAm, i.e., the medium NIPAm content within the used range.
Polymers exposed to ionizing irradiation generally undergo competing cross-linking and chain scission (degradation) processes, yielding final properties of the material that depend critically on the balance between these two main reaction pathways. Methacrylate polymers, particularly PMMA, are known to be sensitive to the direct effect of ionizing radiation and primarily degrade through main chain scission [40, 41]. However, due to the presence of functional side-groups, particularly when water is present inside the polymer matrix (i.e. hydrogels), one can expect that the products of water radiolysis, namely e−aq and strongly oxidizing hydroxyl radicals •OH, may promote reactions of hydroxyethyl ester lateral chains, which may result in intrachain bridges and intermolecular cross-links.
Therefore, to investigate the radiation-induced changes occurring in the water-swollen poly(HEMA) network, hydrogel disks were exposed to 10 MeV EB irradiation at doses varied between 5 kGy and 100 kGy. Before EB irradiation, the disks were equilibrated in pure water and dried of total three times to eliminate the non-reacted compounds during photopolymerization from the xerogels. After irradiation, the same washing protocol has been applied to leach out the products of polymer radiolysis. All disks have been dried to constant weight before swelling measurements. To assess the radiation-induced changes in our system, the diffusion coefficients were calculated following the formalism of the second Fick’s law, considering an unsteady one-dimensional diffusion under isothermal conditions. For a short-time approximation, a solution of Fick’s second law for a plane sheet of thickness
Figure 8 depicts swelling kinetic profiles of poly(HEMA) hydrogels irradiated at various doses as compared to non-irradiated ones which follow Fickian type diffusion (
Fig. 8
Effect of irradiation dose (0–100 kGy) applied to the water-swollen hydrogels on their swelling kinetic profiles of the corresponding dried xerogels soaked in water at 30°C.

It can be suggested therefore that EB irradiation (<100 kGy) seems to induce cross-linking in hydrogels while xerogels primarily tend to degrade with a higher weight loss supported by larger amounts of extractables. At the same time, it has little effect on the polymer network. It is worth mentioning that as far as bulk photopolymerization is used, network formation under non-equilibrium conditions can also result in uncontrolled defects within the network, hence inducing some variability in the obtained results.
DMA is another sensitive technique for investigating the changes in the dynamics of polymer chains in a network over large temperature ranges. Figure 9 shows the very small evolution of the dissipation factor tan δ recorded by thermomechanical analysis of poly(HEMA) networks irradiated in the equilibrium water-swollen state. The glass transition temperature
Fig. 9
Plots of thermomechanical dissipation factor tan δ against temperature in DMA measured for poly(HEMA) hydrogels EB irradiated at 5–100 kGy. Measurement parameters: 1 Hz frequency and 15 μm amplitude in the temperature interval from 30°C to 180°C.

These results obtained by assessing transport and thermophysical properties of irradiated poly(HEMA) networks neither reveal a strong trend towards chain scission nor a dominant increase in cross-linking density upon EB irradiation of the swollen hydrogels. This suggests that both processes seem to balance each other out. A deeper investigation with quantitative measurements of the effects of radiation on linear poly(HEMA) would allow to ascertain these preliminary conclusions. Concerning our main objective consisting in the formation of AuNPs within the hydrogels, the limited effects on the poly(HEMA) matrix observed at doses below 15–20 kGy provides an interesting processing window for the radiolytic reduction of Au(III) ions with minimal impact on the properties of the host polymer.
To produce nanocomposites, poly(HEMA) disks were equilibrated in 1 mM Au(III) aqueous solutions, sealed in plastic bags (under air), and stored in dark before EB irradiation. No radical scavenger was used at this stage of the study. Preliminary experiments showed that the xerogel samples, when used as prepared by photopolymerization, were able to form AuNPs upon Au(III) sorption, likely due to the presence of occluded reducing species within the vitrified matrix. This undesirable effect was suppressed by pre-swelling the material in water and drying which may result either in relaxation and quenching of trapped reactive species or desorption of reductive compounds.
After pre-washing, Au(III) loaded hydrogel disks were found chemically inert concerning the guest ions and were suitable for studying the effect of an EB treatment at doses varied from 5 kGy to 25 kGy. Upon irradiation, the initially pale yellow-coloured disks turned dark pink, exhibiting an absorption band at ca. 550 nm which is a characteristic feature of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of AuNPs.
First, hydrogels soaked in 1 mM Au(III) were EB irradiated at doses of 0–25 kGy. A slight blue shifting and narrowing of the SPR band by increasing the absorbed dose of radiation (Fig. 10) were observed, indicating a smaller NP size.
Fig. 10
Effect of EB dose on the visible absorption spectrum of poly(HEMA)-AuNPs composite disks (1 mm-thick, soaked in 1 mM Au(III)).

Figure 11 depicts UV-vis spectra of poly(HEMA)-AuNPs hydrogel composites equilibrated in Au(III) aqueous solutions of various concentrations before irradiation. As seen from the inset in Fig. 11, the SPR band is increasing monotonically and almost proportionally with increasing of Au(III) concentration, confirming the fact that a 5 kGy dose might not be sufficient whilst a 10 kGy treatment would completely reduce absorbed gold ions.
Fig. 11
Radiolytic formation of AuNPs within poly(HEMA) matrix upon EB irradiation of 1 mM, 0.5 mM, and 0.1 mM Au(III) loaded hydrogels at 5 kGy. Inset: Absorbance as a function of Au(III) concentration.

Figure 12 illustrates the influence of EGDMA content (0.5, 1, 2, and 5 wt%) on the SPR absorption band of poly(HEMA)-AuNPs composites. The resonance band is shifted from 540 nm to 531 nm as the EGDMA content is increased, suggesting the formation of smaller particles with a narrower size distribution. Assuming that the poly(HEMA) networks have a uniform structure, increasing EGDMA concentration results in a higher cross-linking density, with a decrease in the elastic properties of the poly(HEMA) segments. This would expectedly affect the diffusion of reactive species and limit the growth of the metal nanoparticles.
Fig. 12
Radiolytic formation of AuNPs within poly(HEMA) matrix upon EB irradiation of 1 mM Au(III) loaded hydrogels at 5 kGy with various EGDMA content.

Two different approaches were explored to synthesize AuNPs in a limited area, either by direct Au(III) reduction within the matrix at various doses or by pre-irradiation of dry or water-swollen disks followed by soaking in Au(III) solutions. To test the two approaches, lead masks were used to spatially control the irradiated areas in samples exposed to 10 MeV EB at 5 kGy. The typical colour change to purple-red assigned to the presence of AuNPs was precisely localized in irradiated areas of Au(III)-swollen hydrogels and not around (Fig. 13a). Furthermore, pre-irradiation of water-swollen disks and subsequent soaking in Au(III) solution resulted in a well-defined coloured spot, yet much smaller in intensity (Fig. 13b). To improve the latter approach, one needs to characterize and quantify the long-lived polymeric species responsible for Au(III) reduction. Based on these results, radiolytic post-modification of 2D and 3D poly(HEMA)-based patterns are envisioned as a promising fabrication method to generate nanocomposites with unique optical and sensing properties.
Fig. 13
Formation of AuNPs in a limited area exposed to EB of 5 kGy within poly(HEMA) disks (a) swollen in 1 mM Au(III) before irradiation and (b) post-swollen in 1 mM Au(III).

Radiation-induced formation of gold nanoparticles has also been performed in the poly(HEMA-MADQUAT) gels. Hydrogels obtained by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2, exposure dose 8 J·cm−2) of a solution composed of 50 vol.% of aqueous 30% hydrogen peroxide, 47.5 vol.% of HEMA/EGDMA (99/1) and 2.5 vol.% of aqueous 75% MADQUAT, after careful washing and swelling in water for two weeks, have been soaked in aqueous 1 mM Au(III) solutions of pH 2 and pH 7 for 2 h. Subsequently, they were surface-dried to remove excess liquid, placed in Petri dishes, and irradiated with the access of air by a beam of 6 MeV electrons from a linear accelerator with doses up to 5 kGy. The formation of AuNPs is evidenced by the formation of distinct violet colour, especially in samples irradiated at pH 7 (Fig. 14). Soaking the composite gel in water for 24 h does not lead to any noticeable leaching of AuNPs from the gel matrix.
Fig. 14
Poly(HEMA-co-MADQUAT) hydrogels synthesized by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2, exposure dose 8 J·cm−2) of a solution composed of 50 vol.% of aqueous 30% hydrogen peroxide, 47.5 vol.% of HEMA/EGDMA (99/1) and 2.5 vol.% of aqueous 75% MADQUAT, (a) non-irradiated and (b) irradiated by EB at various doses after having been soaked in 1 mM Au(III) solutions of pH 2 and pH 7.

The apparent lack of AuNPs formation at 2 kGy is most probably caused by the oxygen content within the gels. The reducing species formed upon irradiation, e−aq and H•, had been initially strongly scavenged by oxygen until its concentration dropped to the level where the competing reactions of these transients, i.e., reduction of Au(III), started to dominate, yielding gold nanoparticles. The latter process is expected to be the main reaction channel for nanoparticle formation in our system, while we do not exclude some contribution of the α-hydroxyalkyl radicals formed by •OH attack on the HEMA-based network. Radicals of this structure are known to be of reducing character, but their yield in our system and their reaction rate constant with Au(III) is expected to be much lower than corresponding values for e−aq and H•.
While there can be several reasons for the apparent lower yield of AuNPs at pH 2 when compared to pH 7, one of them is the expected difference in reaction rate constant towards Au(III) between e−aq (dominating at pH 7) and H• (dominating at pH 2). Such differences have been clearly demonstrated in the case of Ag(I) reduction, where the rate constant of e−aq is over threefold higher than that of H• [35]. In the case of chloroaurate,
Well-defined PHEMA-based networks can be synthesized and used as uniform substrates for
pH-responsive gels can be obtained by a similar synthetic procedure, using MADQUAT or AA as an ionic co-monomer. Furthermore, temperature-sensitive hydrogels can be obtained in this way by copolymerizing HEMA with NIPAm.
This study stresses the lack of knowledge on the impact of radiation treatment on PHEMA and PHEMA-based networks, in terms of the relative trend for scission and cross-linking, amount of extractables, nature of intermediates, and long-lived reactive species. The precise effects, as well as the nature of long-lived intermediates with potential reductive power towards Au(III) ions, need to be explored in more detail.
The patterned, stimuli-sensitive nanocomposite hydrogels may become a new class of interesting multifunctional materials for electronics, optics, and medicine.
In that perspective, ongoing studies and future developments are currently in progress to gain better control on the conversion of metal salts present in hydrogels into AuNPs of specific size and spatial distribution. Detailed investigation on the nature and amount of remaining active species in the cured xerogels, as well as on the processing conditions by pre-irradiation or simultaneous treatment on the efficiency of reduction reactions should help to go further.
Detailed characterization of the optical properties resulting from the presence of AuNPs in the hydrogels along with their evolution with time, leaching of AuNPs, study of the temperature and pH responsiveness will be helpful for the design of novel patterned nanocomposites with specific functionalities.
Scheme 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

Gelation dose (Dg) and probability ratio of chain breakage to cross-linking (p0/q0) for hydrogels based on HEMA/EGDMA with the addition of a different amount of H2O2 (30% aqueous solution) synthesized by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2)
Sample make-up | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 50 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 67 vol.% 30% H2O2: 33 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 75 vol.% 30% H2O2: 25 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 80 vol.% 30% H2O2: 20 vol.% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sample composition | methacrylate functions 4.123 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 5.497 mol·L−1 H2O2 3.263 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 6.184 mol·L−1 H2O2 2.448 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 6.596 mol·L−1 H2O2 1.958 mol·L−1 |
2.33 | 2.55 | 2.92 | 3.55 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0.25 |
Gel fractions for hydrogels based on HEMA/EGDMA/H2O2 (30% aqueous solution) with various amounts of N-isopropylacrylamide, synthesized by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2, total exposure dose 8 J·cm−2)
Sample make-up | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 50 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 48.75 vol.% NIPAm: 1.25 wt% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 47.5 vol.% NIPAm: 2.5 wt% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 45 vol.% NIPAm: 5 wt% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sample composition | methacrylate functions 4.123 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 4.020 mol·L−1 NIPAm 0.110 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.917 mol·L−1 NIPAm 0.221 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.710 mol·L−1 NIPAm 0.442 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 |
Gel fraction (%) | 82.0 | 75.8 | 70.3 | 65.7 |
Gel fractions for hydrogels based on HEMA/EGDMA/H2O2 (30% aqueous solution) with various amounts of AA, synthesized by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2, total exposure dose 8 J·cm−2)
Sample make-up | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 50 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 48.75 vol.% AA: 1.25 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 47.5 vol.% AA: 2.5 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 45 vol.% AA: 5 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sample composition | methacrylate functions 4.123 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 4.020 mol·L−1 AA 0.182 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.917 mol·L−1 AA 0.364 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.710 mol·L−1 AA 0.729 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 |
Gel fraction (%) | 82.0 | 92.2 | 90.9 | 88.3 |
Gel fractions for hydrogels based on HEMA/EGDMA/H2O2 (30% aqueous solution) with various amounts of MADQUAT (75% aqueous solution), synthesized by UV irradiation (254 nm, irradiance 2.6 mW·cm−2, total exposure dose 8 J·cm−2
Sample make-up | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 50 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 48.75 vol.% MADQUAT 1.25 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 47.5 vol.% MADQUAT 2.5.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% | HEMA/EGDMA (99/1): 45 vol.% MADQUAT 5 vol.% 30% H2O2: 50 vol.% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sample composition | methacrylate functions 4.123 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 4.020 mol·L−1 MADQUAT 0.049 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.917 mol·L−1 MADQUAT 0.097 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 | methacrylate functions 3.710 mol·L−1 MADQUAT 0.194 mol·L−1 H2O2 4.895 mol·L−1 |
Gel fraction (%) | 82.0 | 75.1 | 65.3 | 50.9 |